Should Burris be seated as Senator for IL? Our Government is out of control! - GoFuckYourself.com

RayVega · 01-06-2009, 01:03 PM

Anyone following this?

I see no reason he should not. Although Governor Blagojevich is currently under criminal investigation, he has not been fired as Gov. And therefore has legal right to appoint Burris.

However, Burris needs his appointment letter to be co-signed by the Secretary of State who refuses to sign it because of the criminal charges pending against the Gov.

This just goes to show that the system only works when it is a benefit of the government. In a move to say "fuck you" the Gov. appointed someone who is not approved by the "empire", and it is a clear example that although duly appointed by a representative duly elected by the poeple, the Goverment can do what they want...

Scary stuff!

uno · 01-06-2009, 01:09 PM

Governor seems like a scumbag but the guy he appointed seems ok so far.

baddog · 01-06-2009, 01:09 PM

It is their fault. They left it up to the gov. Make your bed and all that.

JFK · 01-06-2009, 01:11 PM

I think innocent till proven guilty should apply,although Burris will be tainted in the public mind, no matter what happens

spacedog · 01-06-2009, 01:16 PM

Didn't he pay for/buy the appointment?

What they should do is hold an election for the position

RayVega · 01-06-2009, 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFK

I think innocent till proven guilty should apply,although Burris will be tainted in the public mind, no matter what happens

Burris is in a bad situation no matter what...but the law is the law, and he should have been let into the senate.

BradM · 01-06-2009, 01:26 PM

He has a legal right, according to the LAW to be let into the Senate. What is happening is illegal, and he will win whatever suit is brought forward.

spunky99 · 01-06-2009, 01:41 PM

how much did it cost him?

uno · 01-06-2009, 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spunky99

how much did it cost him?

He's contributed $4k I believe. Something like that.

mynameisjim · 01-06-2009, 01:56 PM

I live here in Chicago so it's on all the news.

I can't believe they didn't allow him on the Senate floor. The secretary of state has no authority to overrule a legal appointment by the Governor.

But the basis of the Governer's problem is that he was trying to sell a political appointment. Do people really think this doesn't happen. When Hillary met with Obama after she lost the nomination and a day after started campaigning for him, obviously a deal was made to offer her a cabinet appointment. What's the difference? It's called politics. Blago just was too outspoken about it.

Also, Blago never committed any crime. He was a desperate man who was rambling ideas during a phone call. That's not illegal, at least not yet in America. That's not even conspiracy to commit a crime if you are just talking about it.

The guy is a total crook and piece of shit, but he never broke the law or even came close. That's why the prosecutor asked for an extension to bring an indictment. Not because the case is so complex, but because they don't have enough yet.

uno · 01-06-2009, 02:28 PM

He got close to breaking the law. You can't accept money or gifts for an appointment like that.

Hillary being offered a position was a completely different situation.

01-06-2009, 01:03 PM	#1
RayVega Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: New York ICQ#348007554 Posts: 4,212	Should Burris be seated as Senator for IL? Our Government is out of control! Anyone following this? I see no reason he should not. Although Governor Blagojevich is currently under criminal investigation, he has not been fired as Gov. And therefore has legal right to appoint Burris. However, Burris needs his appointment letter to be co-signed by the Secretary of State who refuses to sign it because of the criminal charges pending against the Gov. This just goes to show that the system only works when it is a benefit of the government. In a move to say "fuck you" the Gov. appointed someone who is not approved by the "empire", and it is a clear example that although duly appointed by a representative duly elected by the poeple, the Goverment can do what they want... Scary stuff! __________________ Ray "The Don" Vega Managing Director Private Equity Fund [email protected]

01-06-2009, 01:09 PM	#2
uno RIP Dodger. BEST.CAT.EVER Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: NYC Area Posts: 18,450	Governor seems like a scumbag but the guy he appointed seems ok so far. __________________ -uno icq: 111-914 CrazyBabe.com - porn art MojoHost - For all your hosting needs, present and future. Tell them I sent ya!

01-06-2009, 01:11 PM	#4
JFK FUBAR the ORIGINATOR Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: FUBARLAND Posts: 67,382	I think innocent till proven guilty should apply,although Burris will be tainted in the public mind, no matter what happens __________________ FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com

01-06-2009, 01:41 PM	#8
spunky99 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Vancouver Posts: 3,462	how much did it cost him? __________________ Spunky Cash - GND Bank - Good Girls Bank - Bliss Bucks - Nuts For Mobile - Daddy I Get Paid To Be A Whore Click Here To Make Money With Spunky - Domains For Sale - ICQ 281841678

01-06-2009, 01:56 PM	#10
mynameisjim Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 2,985	I live here in Chicago so it's on all the news. I can't believe they didn't allow him on the Senate floor. The secretary of state has no authority to overrule a legal appointment by the Governor. But the basis of the Governer's problem is that he was trying to sell a political appointment. Do people really think this doesn't happen. When Hillary met with Obama after she lost the nomination and a day after started campaigning for him, obviously a deal was made to offer her a cabinet appointment. What's the difference? It's called politics. Blago just was too outspoken about it. Also, Blago never committed any crime. He was a desperate man who was rambling ideas during a phone call. That's not illegal, at least not yet in America. That's not even conspiracy to commit a crime if you are just talking about it. The guy is a total crook and piece of shit, but he never broke the law or even came close. That's why the prosecutor asked for an extension to bring an indictment. Not because the case is so complex, but because they don't have enough yet. __________________ jim (at) amateursconvert . com Amateurs Convert

01-06-2009, 01:09 PM	#3
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,090	It is their fault. They left it up to the gov. Make your bed and all that.

01-06-2009, 01:16 PM	#5
spacedog Yes that IS me. Bitch. Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Posts: 14,149	Didn't he pay for/buy the appointment? What they should do is hold an election for the position

01-06-2009, 01:26 PM	#7
BradM Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: 1123,6536,5231 Posts: 3,397	He has a legal right, according to the LAW to be let into the Senate. What is happening is illegal, and he will win whatever suit is brought forward.

01-06-2009, 02:28 PM	#11
uno RIP Dodger. BEST.CAT.EVER Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: NYC Area Posts: 18,450	He got close to breaking the law. You can't accept money or gifts for an appointment like that. Hillary being offered a position was a completely different situation. __________________ -uno icq: 111-914 CrazyBabe.com - porn art MojoHost - For all your hosting needs, present and future. Tell them I sent ya!