So should I be amazed by Wal-Mart or pissed at their competitors? - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

tranza · 03-09-2009, 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ

transportation costs. Wal-Mart is much cheaper due to having more of their own trucks and depot centers. I was there just the other day to get dog and cat in bulk and notice they closed down their seafood department. Also, the place was empty, but see they're still posting profits.odd

Wow! They took a little time to grow up... hehe

count of monte cristo · 03-09-2009, 09:25 AM

walmart is the tube sites of retail

dav3 · 03-09-2009, 09:27 AM

Seriously Walmart... Dole peaches from fucking China?

Mssimpson · 03-09-2009, 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

that frozen food stuff is killing your organs for sure

in moderation it doesn't do anything..

ADL Colin · 03-09-2009, 10:47 AM

WalMart = low cost competitor. They are geniuses at it

Puremeds-J · 03-09-2009, 11:02 AM

I shop here..

Jade509 · 03-09-2009, 11:03 AM

Who compares the prices on groceries? To much time on your hands!

Reak AGV · 03-09-2009, 11:04 AM

Walmart sells more products -> prices go down.

Deesnuts · 03-09-2009, 11:06 AM

fuck walmart and mcdonalds

Tom_PM · 03-09-2009, 11:13 AM

If you knew that some employees making the clothes make 2 cents an hour and worked mandatory overtime daily, 7 days a week (but with a free snack at midnight) and slept in the factory in a 3 by 5 foot rental unit that comes out of their pay, does it matter?
http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/chinablue/

baddog · 03-09-2009, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snake Doctor

Retail businesses don't create new jobs. If all you're doing is setting up shop in a town to sell things to people who live in that town, then it's not a net plus for the local economy.

All you're doing is taking away from other businesses that were already in the area, so it's a job transfer, not a job creation.
In cases like Wal-Mart they actually destroy jobs because they use far fewer man hours in labor to generate the same amount of sales than the stores they usually replace when they come to town.

Therefore, giving tax breaks to a Wal Mart store to come to town is a pretty stupid thing for a public official to do. Giving tax breaks to a manufacturing plant or a business like that may make sense, because that does create jobs, but not retail.

If a Wlmart comes in and hires 100 people and it results in 2 or 3 mom and pop places with a combined payroll of 15, then they have created 85 new jobs by my math.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

wrong.

if you are doing it cheaper... in terms of total disposable income, there is a net gain in the community... which then leads to more spending elsewhere on other goods and services.

That too.

Pleasurepays · 03-09-2009, 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snake Doctor

Yes but if you're doing it cheaper then that inevitably means that you're employing fewer people to do it, which more than offsets any gain made by the money other consumers save.

Wallmart selling a shirt for 4.00 vs mom and pops 15.00 doesn't mean it requires a different number of people to sell the shirt. that's quite a gap in logic... that "cheaper products" require "fewer employees"

i can understand what you are saying and understand the general arguments... however, we are supposed to be living in the USA, not Communist North Korea. People vote by the millions everyday on this issue. They vote with their wallets and their hard earned money. If they vote YES for Wallmart and NO for mom and pop, then that's life. If you truly believe in capitalism, you shouldn't be telling people how they should spend their money. supply and demand is exactly that.

The economy is not a zero sum system. Economies grow. Wealth is created. You can't treat it is a static idea and a simple zero sum system where if someone wins, someone must lose. It doesn't work like that. People save money at Wallmart and spend it elsewhere in their community. Perhaps to start their own companies and even grow jobs/consumption. That all has nothing to do with what Wallmart does with its tiny profit from a small town.

I am not for Wallmart
I am not for small business

I am for the consumers right to choose how they want to spend their own hard earned money. You can't be a true believer in democracy and only support it when your side wins.... anymore than you can believe in capitalism so long as everything is fair, even and you agree with the outcomes. We became the worlds largest economy by adhering to certain ideals. End of story. No one has surpassed us, because they are too busy trying to figure out how to guarantee equality of outcome rather than ensuring equality of opportunity.

03-09-2009, 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uno

I love Trader Joe's and Whole Foods, but they are both way expensive.

I've actually been shopping ONLY at Trader Joes and I have realized that I spend less, and I can go a lot longer between shopping trips. I've shopped at Walmart a few times, and each time I do, I end up buying $50 worth of DVD's, PS3 games, etc. On top of $150 in food, a simple midnight shopping trip turns into a fiasco.

As for the food, I usually buy a lot more crap, so Trader Joes is the best option for me. The food is much more fresh, the people are nicer and I only spend $200 a month for groceries (and I eat 6 times a day). TJ all the way!

Phil21 · 03-09-2009, 12:06 PM

While Wal-Mart definitely can be cheaper for a lot of things, it is not always the case. You are also in many cases NOT comparing the same product, even if it is in the same packaging and with the same SKU.

For example, many companies will have say a box of 12 "something" that is sent to normal retail distribution. They also have a wal-mart product that uses the *same box* (so it looks identical) but actually has 10 of the "somethings" inside it. The wal-mart version is cheaper, but actually the same/slightly higher cost per unit to the consumer.

While I absolutely admire wal-mart for many things they have done awesomely, I don't agree overall with their business practices. Having been on the supplier side of wal-mart, they play very dirty. Many times this IS a benefit to their customer, but in my opinion a detriment to the way of life I would like to see in this country.

Say you make widgets.. Wal-mart wants your widgets in their store. You usually sell widgets for $2.00/ea. Wal-mart comes to you (or you come to them) and they say "well, we'll buy your widgets for $1.75 but increase your volume 10fold". This is usually a win for you! Yay! 10 times the volume! Everything is going good, you just massively expanded your business to be able to handle your new huge customer. Then... a year later wal-mart says "sorry.. we calculate you can make said widget for $1.60. You will give us this price or we will no longer carry your product". Now you're stuck. It costs you $1.59 to make said widgets, but you cannot stop distribution to wal-mart since now you're beholden to the volume plus the huge capital you invested in being able to handle them to begin with. So you do it.

Fast forward a couple years, and wal-mart will "suggest" you move production to a cheaper locale than the US - because then you can sell them widgets at $.99/ea. This is after you've cut out every last ounce of 'waste' you could have in making said widgets. Some good, some bad. Some of this waste were things like making your widget less reliable.

While buying household goods at wal-mart is generally good, you would be *amazed* at some of the things that are different there. In many cases, wal-mart picks up an established brand and sells it as-is the first year or two and establishes themselves as the retail channel of choice for said brand. But 5 years later, what you buy at wal-mart with the same label as somewhere else - are completely different items. Many large brands maintain a "wal-mart" distribution channel (less quality, lower price), and a "standard" distribution channel.

I know we did for what we sold. Wal-mart got the worst product we had, since we had the worst terms with them. Wal-mart also will slowly impose onerous things like you being responsible for shrinkage (how?!? we have no control over it!), product returns, etc. Basically a vendor gets paid when the sale is rung up - if the item is stolen or whatever, well tough shit.

Now.. Wal-mart has absolutely done amazing things in the automation of stock levels, streamlined distribution systems, etc. For this, I do admire them. I also have to admire in a pervase way the means they can manhandle vendors so freely. They truly do think it is best for their customers I believe.

Snake Doctor · 03-09-2009, 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

If a Wlmart comes in and hires 100 people and it results in 2 or 3 mom and pop places with a combined payroll of 15, then they have created 85 new jobs by my math..

If you can show me an example of where a Wal-Mart store came to a community and the result of that was a net plus of 85 jobs, then I'll agree with you.

Otherwise you're just making up a hypothetical that doesn't ever happen.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

Wallmart selling a shirt for 4.00 vs mom and pops 15.00 doesn't mean it requires a different number of people to sell the shirt. that's quite a gap in logic... that "cheaper products" require "fewer employees"

i can understand what you are saying and understand the general arguments... however, we are supposed to be living in the USA, not Communist North Korea. People vote by the millions everyday on this issue. They vote with their wallets and their hard earned money.

Actually one of the reasons Wal-Mart can sell a shirt for $4 is because they keep labor costs low. Both in terms of cost per hour worked, and hours worked per dollar of goods sold, so there is no gap in my logic.
I'm not saying that's a bad thing, I'm just saying that retailers don't "create jobs".

Also, chill the fuck out. Who the fuck said anything about America vs communist north korea?

I said that Wal-Mart is good for the overall economy several times in this thread. The only problem I have with them is getting tax breaks to bring a store into town and the politicians using the "they're bringing jobs here" argument, because that's bullshit.

They should pay the same taxes as every other retail business in town.

Snake Doctor · 03-09-2009, 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

We became the worlds largest economy by adhering to certain ideals. End of story. No one has surpassed us, because they are too busy trying to figure out how to guarantee equality of outcome rather than ensuring equality of opportunity.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAH

Yeah, our becoming the world's largest economy is only because of a set of ideals. It had nothing to do with Europe and Asia's infrastructure being decimated during World War II while ours was left almost 100% intact, giving us a 15-20 year head start on the post war industrial age.
It has nothing to do with the amount of natural resources we have or the amount of arable land available on our continent.

It's all because of these ideals that you cling to like a religion.

Jesus Christ dude, I can agree that there are good things about capitalism and the free enterprise system, but you worship at the altar like capitalism is Jehovah and you're a witness.
Quit drinking the kool-aid for a minute and realize that there are other possible reasons for our proseperity besides capitalism and that in some cases there are better ways to do things than leave them to the free market.

If you're not willing to do that then you've obviously detached yourself from all logic in order to cling to an ideology, and it's pointless to discuss things with a person who won't respond to reason or logic.

Snake Doctor · 03-09-2009, 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phil21

While Wal-Mart definitely can be cheaper for a lot of things, it is not always the case. You are also in many cases NOT comparing the same product, even if it is in the same packaging and with the same SKU.
.

I'm with you on this. I know when I buy something like a T-shirt at walmart it's going to fall apart alot quicker than one from somewhere else, even if they both say fruit of the loom or hanes on them.

With food though, a gallon of milk is a gallon of milk and a loaf of bread is a loaf of bread....which is why I'm shocked by the drastic price difference, because I don't see how the difference is anything other than how much the store chooses to mark things up, or how good of a deal they can negotiate with the supplier.

And with food, that's one area where Wal-Mart isn't the #1 seller in the country. Not all Wal-Mart's sell groceries, and there are other grocery chains that do more volume than they do....but they still just kill them on the retail price.
It's crazy.

Elli · 03-09-2009, 01:13 PM

The CNBC special on WalMart was highly interesting, all about the company's culture and methods. Very well done, imo.

There's no Walmart near my house, but I do admit to shopping at Costco for my bulk needs like toilet paper, paper towel, olive oil, razor blades, etc. Everything fresh I get from the local farmer's market store and everything else from Thrifty Foods. I'm glad there's no WalMart around here. They just kill all the local business for miles around.

uno · 03-09-2009, 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sherm

I've actually been shopping ONLY at Trader Joes and I have realized that I spend less, and I can go a lot longer between shopping trips. I've shopped at Walmart a few times, and each time I do, I end up buying $50 worth of DVD's, PS3 games, etc. On top of $150 in food, a simple midnight shopping trip turns into a fiasco.

As for the food, I usually buy a lot more crap, so Trader Joes is the best option for me. The food is much more fresh, the people are nicer and I only spend $200 a month for groceries (and I eat 6 times a day). TJ all the way!

When we shop at Costco we almost always wind up spending $300 or more dollars for things like whole beef tenderloins, king crab legs, huge crates of stuff we probably won't use in a year, etc.

Even shopping at the 3 local supermarkets our bill runs 2-300 every week or 2, but I like to cook and a lot of times I need exotic or expensive spices, weird ingredients, things like that. It all adds up.

Trader Joe's, looking back, I do think we spend less, but Whole Foods is definitely crazy expensive, but very high quality and/or organic products.

03-09-2009, 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uno

When we shop at Costco we almost always wind up spending $300 or more dollars for things like whole beef tenderloins, king crab legs, huge crates of stuff we probably won't use in a year, etc.

Even shopping at the 3 local supermarkets our bill runs 2-300 every week or 2, but I like to cook and a lot of times I need exotic or expensive spices, weird ingredients, things like that. It all adds up.

Trader Joe's, looking back, I do think we spend less, but Whole Foods is definitely crazy expensive, but very high quality and/or organic products.

Costco is nuts. I am for the most part a vegetarian though (I do eat fish occasionally though), so spending money on fresh meat isn't much of an issue. We do cook a lot around here as my wife is a "foodie", so I hear you about the spices, oils, etc. The best part of Trader Joes is the flash frozen fish. It's not as fresh as something fresh from the butcher, but it's a hell of a lot better than something from a grocer freezer.

Try a comparison though...SHop TJ's once a month, and another retailer the next, and you'd be surprised at the financial comparison! And yes, Whole Foods is ridiculous. I only go there if I need a quick bite, and I grab a veggie wrap from the to go area. Their beers are great as well.

Snake Doctor · 03-09-2009, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uno

When we shop at Costco we almost always wind up spending $300 or more dollars for things like whole beef tenderloins, king crab legs, huge crates of stuff we probably won't use in a year, etc.

Even shopping at the 3 local supermarkets our bill runs 2-300 every week or 2, but I like to cook and a lot of times I need exotic or expensive spices, weird ingredients, things like that. It all adds up.

Trader Joe's, looking back, I do think we spend less, but Whole Foods is definitely crazy expensive, but very high quality and/or organic products.

I do the same thing at Sam's. I end up spending more than I otherwise would because I buy things I would never buy if they didn't look like such a "deal".

And they have all these "new products" that I want to try, but you have to buy such a large quantity, and if I don't like it, then it ends up going to waste. (Like the tub of bruschetta I bought last month)

I've definitely become a "shop with a list" guy lately. I won't deviate from the list no matter what, saves alot of $$.

Pleasurepays · 03-09-2009, 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snake Doctor

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAH

Yeah, our becoming the world's largest economy is only because of a set of ideals. It had nothing to do with Europe and Asia's infrastructure being decimated during World War II while ours was left almost 100% intact, giving us a 15-20 year head start on the post war industrial age. It has nothing to do with the amount of natural resources we have or the amount of arable land available on our continent.

It's all because of these ideals that you cling to like a religion.

Jesus Christ dude, I can agree that there are good things about capitalism and the free enterprise system, but you worship at the altar like capitalism is Jehovah and you're a witness. Quit drinking the kool-aid for a minute and realize that there are other possible reasons for our proseperity besides capitalism and that in some cases there are better ways to do things than leave them to the free market.

If you're not willing to do that then you've obviously detached yourself from all logic in order to cling to an ideology, and it's pointless to discuss things with a person who won't respond to reason or logic.

i don't worship anything. i think there is good and bad in all economic and political systems. in our case, i simply believe that hands off, on the whole,.. produces more good than bad. i can't say its free from "bad" and certainly don't believe that.

california... a single US State is the worlds 5th largest economy.. that has nothing to do with asia, hitler or anything else. it has to do with the creation of wealth. the fact 98% of countries in the world lag behind a single state has nothing to do with "head starts" anymore than Africas failure as a continent has anything to do with not being impacted by the war at all.

the only people that are so dismissive of these notions are those who have never created any amount of wealth themselves.

Pleasurepays · 03-09-2009, 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snake Doctor

I do the same thing at Sam's. I end up spending more than I otherwise would because I buy things I would never buy if they didn't look like such a "deal".

And they have all these "new products" that I want to try, but you have to buy such a large quantity, and if I don't like it, then it ends up going to waste. (Like the tub of bruschetta I bought last month)

I've definitely become a "shop with a list" guy lately. I won't deviate from the list no matter what, saves alot of $$.

you're not supposed to be shopping at chain stores remember? you're all about the small businessman and against the big chains.

03-09-2009, 01:58 PM

I shop at Safeway and Smart and Final. The times I have went to WalMart the stores are always packed with people. The lines were long too.

Tom_PM · 03-09-2009, 02:00 PM

I've heard Whole Foods is good. They're also on Fortunes best places to work 2008 I think. My grocery store is Wegmans, made #3 on Fortunes list.
Wal mart? Didnt make top 50.

smax · 03-09-2009, 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phil21

While Wal-Mart definitely can be cheaper for a lot of things, it is not always the case. You are also in many cases NOT comparing the same product, even if it is in the same packaging and with the same SKU.

For example, many companies will have say a box of 12 "something" that is sent to normal retail distribution. They also have a wal-mart product that uses the *same box* (so it looks identical) but actually has 10 of the "somethings" inside it. The wal-mart version is cheaper, but actually the same/slightly higher cost per unit to the consumer.

While I absolutely admire wal-mart for many things they have done awesomely, I don't agree overall with their business practices. Having been on the supplier side of wal-mart, they play very dirty. Many times this IS a benefit to their customer, but in my opinion a detriment to the way of life I would like to see in this country.

Say you make widgets.. Wal-mart wants your widgets in their store. You usually sell widgets for $2.00/ea. Wal-mart comes to you (or you come to them) and they say "well, we'll buy your widgets for $1.75 but increase your volume 10fold". This is usually a win for you! Yay! 10 times the volume! Everything is going good, you just massively expanded your business to be able to handle your new huge customer. Then... a year later wal-mart says "sorry.. we calculate you can make said widget for $1.60. You will give us this price or we will no longer carry your product". Now you're stuck. It costs you $1.59 to make said widgets, but you cannot stop distribution to wal-mart since now you're beholden to the volume plus the huge capital you invested in being able to handle them to begin with. So you do it.

Fast forward a couple years, and wal-mart will "suggest" you move production to a cheaper locale than the US - because then you can sell them widgets at $.99/ea. This is after you've cut out every last ounce of 'waste' you could have in making said widgets. Some good, some bad. Some of this waste were things like making your widget less reliable.

While buying household goods at wal-mart is generally good, you would be *amazed* at some of the things that are different there. In many cases, wal-mart picks up an established brand and sells it as-is the first year or two and establishes themselves as the retail channel of choice for said brand. But 5 years later, what you buy at wal-mart with the same label as somewhere else - are completely different items. Many large brands maintain a "wal-mart" distribution channel (less quality, lower price), and a "standard" distribution channel.

I know we did for what we sold. Wal-mart got the worst product we had, since we had the worst terms with them. Wal-mart also will slowly impose onerous things like you being responsible for shrinkage (how?!? we have no control over it!), product returns, etc. Basically a vendor gets paid when the sale is rung up - if the item is stolen or whatever, well tough shit.

Now.. Wal-mart has absolutely done amazing things in the automation of stock levels, streamlined distribution systems, etc. For this, I do admire them. I also have to admire in a pervase way the means they can manhandle vendors so freely. They truly do think it is best for their customers I believe.

Great PBS documentary about Walmart that talks about the above scenario
China really needs to thank Walmart

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/walmart/

Snake Doctor · 03-09-2009, 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

i don't worship anything. i think there is good and bad in all economic and political systems. in our case, i simply believe that hands off, on the whole,.. produces more good than bad. i can't say its free from "bad" and certainly don't believe that.

california... a single US State is the worlds 5th largest economy.. that has nothing to do with asia, hitler or anything else. it has to do with the creation of wealth. the fact 98% of countries in the world lag behind a single state has nothing to do with "head starts" anymore than Africas failure as a continent has anything to do with not being impacted by the war at all.

the only people that are so dismissive of these notions are those who have never created any amount of wealth themselves.

Just an FYI....that one state with the world's 5th largest economy has the country's 6th largest tax burden on individuals, and some of the most onerous regulations on business.

To throw a wrench in your "hands off is best" theory.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

you're not supposed to be shopping at chain stores remember? you're all about the small businessman and against the big chains.

I never once fucking said that asshole. Quit putting goddamn words in my mother fucking mouth.
You must be confusing me with someone else so would you please learn to read and fucking stop it?

I put in big fucking bold letters in my last post that WAL MART IS GOOD FOR THE ECONOMY and yet you still have this delusion that I'm against big chains.

I don't know what you're fucking problem is, but I've made the exact opposite case throughout this entire thread.

Learn to fucking read dipshit.

NicAngel · 03-09-2009, 02:19 PM

i'd rather pay more $ for fresh organic good. in the long run i spend less on doctor visits.

GregE · 03-09-2009, 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

people who resent Wallmart typically resent authority... and that is the root of the issue. it obviously isn't the consumer and what they want that is the concern.

Huh?

What the hell does "authority" have to do with it?

Pleasurepays · 03-09-2009, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snake Doctor

Just an FYI....that one state with the world's 5th largest economy has the country's 6th largest tax burden on individuals, and some of the most onerous regulations on business.

To throw a wrench in your "hands off is best" theory.

its bankrupt... has been forever. it succeeds in spite of idiotic government policies, taxes and regulations, not because of them.

and as i said.. no path is perfect. i simply said "i believe that" less interference with entrepreneurship does greater good and trying to fix any and all social inequalities at the expense of entrepreneurs.

you're kind of a lunatic.

what made you so angry anyway? you're the one saying Wallmart destroys jobs and communities.... then you are saying Wallmart is good for the economy... then your saying i'm confused and putting words in your mouth.

it can't destroy local communities and be good for the economy as a whole. that doesn't even make sense. you cant have a net good come from what you yourself claim is nothing but bad.

C-Luv · 03-09-2009, 02:39 PM

I do all my shopping at Walmart, You really do save $$$$$

Phil21 · 03-09-2009, 02:46 PM

Personally, I feel Wal-Mart is bad for the economy. However, I understand enough to realize I have absolutely no clue when it comes to economic theory.

All I can see are the results of how they treat people. I am not a fan.

Part of me feels I was born about 2 generations late

I am much more of a small town, main street sort of guy.. I'd much rather pay more to buy from someone I know in the community, who helps support a lifestyle I enjoy. I still try to do this here, but not nearly as much as I'd like.

I also feel that many smaller companies, while certainly less efficient in most cases, are orders of magnitude more resilient than huge monolithic corporations. See the banking crisis for this - you don't see too many small credit unions who didn't farm out loans going bankrupt or asking for money - they made responsible financial decisions and while hurting, are still fairly healthy today. When the people selling the product (in this case, loans) don't have to stand by it - then you get into the scenario we have today of effectively scam artists running things.

Sorry.. went off topic

I think you will find, that Wal-Mart takes a loss on the staple foods that grab headlines/attention such as Milk, Bread, etc. This gets people into the store because it is "so cheap!!!" and then they can charge higher amounts for other products when you don't notice.

It would be interesting to take a standard shopping list containing a nice mix of milk, cheese, meat, fruits/veggies, prepared foods, etc. and buying the exact same quantity/brand (when possible) from both Wal-mart, and your local discount grocer (here it would be Cub Foods - not something fancy like Wegmans or other "higher end" grocery stores). Also of course be careful a "box of pop tarts" or whatever is the same from both stores - e.g. verify quantities

I think you will find the totals are pretty close, far closer than you may think.

Snake Doctor · 03-09-2009, 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

its bankrupt... has been forever. it succeeds in spite of idiotic government policies, taxes and regulations, not because of them.

and as i said.. no path is perfect. i simply said "i believe that" less interference with entrepreneurship does greater good and trying to fix any and all social inequalities at the expense of entrepreneurs.

you're kind of a lunatic.

what made you so angry anyway? you're the one saying Wallmart destroys jobs and communities.... then you are saying Wallmart is good for the economy... then your saying i'm confused and putting words in your mouth.

it can't destroy local communities and be good for the economy as a whole. that doesn't even make sense. you cant have a net good come from what you yourself claim is nothing but bad.

You have some severe reading comprehension problems.

I didn't write half of what you think I did. You must have misread or not understood the subtlety of some of the points I was making.

Your lack of comprehension doesn't = me not making sense.

I said that Wal-Mart was good, but does not deserve special tax considerations from municipalities. Those two statements are not inconsistent with each other.

You are the one who chose to use California as an example. Then you say they succeed "despite" the government policies, not because of them.
Then why don't other states with lower tax burdens and less regulations grow even more than California? You use California as your example of why free markets rule, and then dismiss the fact that the market there is less free than it is in most other places in the country.....but I'm the one who is confused?

Maybe free market capitalism has very little to do with California being a large economy. Perhaps the climate and proximity to the ocean are the reason people move there and bring their capital with them, and that grows the economy?

DAMNMAN · 03-09-2009, 05:02 PM

I bought an Acai drink from Publix market 2 weeks ago and it was $4.99 I bought the same exact brand and size drink for Walmart Neighborhood Market (Their food only store here in Florida) for $3.39 yesterday. All other prices are similarly disproportionate. I'd much rather give my money to Publix but I find myself saving so much money at the Walmart store it doesn't make sense to shop elsewhere.

And I do know the ramifications of shopping at Walmart.

SouthPark nailed this along time ago BTW.

03-09-2009, 09:25 AM	#52
count of monte cristo Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: monte cristo Posts: 473	walmart is the tube sites of retail __________________ premier payment sending company

03-09-2009, 09:27 AM	#53
dav3 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 7,348	Seriously Walmart... Dole peaches from fucking China? __________________ Webmasters :: Juicy Ads :: ACWM :: Crak Revenue :: Money Tree

03-09-2009, 10:47 AM	#55
ADL Colin Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Tube Titans, USA Posts: 11,929	WalMart = low cost competitor. They are geniuses at it __________________ Adult Date Link - $50 PPS starting NOW! -- good and JUICY! skype = "adultdatelink"

03-09-2009, 11:02 AM	#56
Puremeds-J Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: The Mountains of Washington State Posts: 939	I shop here.. __________________ BiWeekly Payouts with no delay! - Now on NATS - $30 Per Trial - Check, Wire, Paxum! WE GOT AFRICAN MANGO! - Check out our New Reality Tour for CXPILL!

03-09-2009, 11:04 AM	#58
Reak AGV Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Unknown Posts: 4,283	Walmart sells more products -> prices go down. __________________ Need Mainstream Content and SEO? SEO * Website Copy * Blogs Blogging - PR Work - Forum Marketing - Social Marketing - Link building - Articles 100% Guaranteed Content!

03-09-2009, 11:03 AM	#57
Jade509 Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 1,166	Who compares the prices on groceries? To much time on your hands!

03-09-2009, 11:06 AM	#59
Deesnuts Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 2,792	fuck walmart and mcdonalds

03-09-2009, 11:13 AM	#60
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	If you knew that some employees making the clothes make 2 cents an hour and worked mandatory overtime daily, 7 days a week (but with a free snack at midnight) and slept in the factory in a 3 by 5 foot rental unit that comes out of their pay, does it matter? http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/chinablue/ __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

03-09-2009, 12:06 PM	#64
Phil21 Confirmed User Join Date: May 2001 Location: ICQ: 25285313 Posts: 993	While Wal-Mart definitely can be cheaper for a lot of things, it is not always the case. You are also in many cases NOT comparing the same product, even if it is in the same packaging and with the same SKU. For example, many companies will have say a box of 12 "something" that is sent to normal retail distribution. They also have a wal-mart product that uses the same box (so it looks identical) but actually has 10 of the "somethings" inside it. The wal-mart version is cheaper, but actually the same/slightly higher cost per unit to the consumer. While I absolutely admire wal-mart for many things they have done awesomely, I don't agree overall with their business practices. Having been on the supplier side of wal-mart, they play very dirty. Many times this IS a benefit to their customer, but in my opinion a detriment to the way of life I would like to see in this country. Say you make widgets.. Wal-mart wants your widgets in their store. You usually sell widgets for $2.00/ea. Wal-mart comes to you (or you come to them) and they say "well, we'll buy your widgets for $1.75 but increase your volume 10fold". This is usually a win for you! Yay! 10 times the volume! Everything is going good, you just massively expanded your business to be able to handle your new huge customer. Then... a year later wal-mart says "sorry.. we calculate you can make said widget for $1.60. You will give us this price or we will no longer carry your product". Now you're stuck. It costs you $1.59 to make said widgets, but you cannot stop distribution to wal-mart since now you're beholden to the volume plus the huge capital you invested in being able to handle them to begin with. So you do it. Fast forward a couple years, and wal-mart will "suggest" you move production to a cheaper locale than the US - because then you can sell them widgets at $.99/ea. This is after you've cut out every last ounce of 'waste' you could have in making said widgets. Some good, some bad. Some of this waste were things like making your widget less reliable. While buying household goods at wal-mart is generally good, you would be amazed at some of the things that are different there. In many cases, wal-mart picks up an established brand and sells it as-is the first year or two and establishes themselves as the retail channel of choice for said brand. But 5 years later, what you buy at wal-mart with the same label as somewhere else - are completely different items. Many large brands maintain a "wal-mart" distribution channel (less quality, lower price), and a "standard" distribution channel. I know we did for what we sold. Wal-mart got the worst product we had, since we had the worst terms with them. Wal-mart also will slowly impose onerous things like you being responsible for shrinkage (how?!? we have no control over it!), product returns, etc. Basically a vendor gets paid when the sale is rung up - if the item is stolen or whatever, well tough shit. Now.. Wal-mart has absolutely done amazing things in the automation of stock levels, streamlined distribution systems, etc. For this, I do admire them. I also have to admire in a pervase way the means they can manhandle vendors so freely. They truly do think it is best for their customers I believe. __________________ Quality affordable hosting.

03-09-2009, 01:13 PM	#68
Elli Reach for those stars! Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Vancouver, BC Posts: 17,991	The CNBC special on WalMart was highly interesting, all about the company's culture and methods. Very well done, imo. There's no Walmart near my house, but I do admit to shopping at Costco for my bulk needs like toilet paper, paper towel, olive oil, razor blades, etc. Everything fresh I get from the local farmer's market store and everything else from Thrifty Foods. I'm glad there's no WalMart around here. They just kill all the local business for miles around. __________________ Make More Money with Cams and Dating at FFN.com! email: [email protected]

03-09-2009, 01:58 PM	#74
JaneB Guest Posts: n/a	I shop at Safeway and Smart and Final. The times I have went to WalMart the stores are always packed with people. The lines were long too.

03-09-2009, 02:00 PM	#75
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	I've heard Whole Foods is good. They're also on Fortunes best places to work 2008 I think. My grocery store is Wegmans, made #3 on Fortunes list. Wal mart? Didnt make top 50. __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

03-09-2009, 02:19 PM	#78
NicAngel Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: san diego, ca Posts: 817	i'd rather pay more $ for fresh organic good. in the long run i spend less on doctor visits. __________________ ICQ# 400925426

03-09-2009, 02:39 PM	#81
C-Luv Confirmed User Join Date: May 2008 Location: Phoenix, AZ Posts: 3,025	I do all my shopping at Walmart, You really do save $$$$$ __________________ C-Luv [email protected] ICQ- 461280620 - Skype- C-luvi

03-09-2009, 02:46 PM	#82
Phil21 Confirmed User Join Date: May 2001 Location: ICQ: 25285313 Posts: 993	Personally, I feel Wal-Mart is bad for the economy. However, I understand enough to realize I have absolutely no clue when it comes to economic theory. All I can see are the results of how they treat people. I am not a fan. Part of me feels I was born about 2 generations late I am much more of a small town, main street sort of guy.. I'd much rather pay more to buy from someone I know in the community, who helps support a lifestyle I enjoy. I still try to do this here, but not nearly as much as I'd like. I also feel that many smaller companies, while certainly less efficient in most cases, are orders of magnitude more resilient than huge monolithic corporations. See the banking crisis for this - you don't see too many small credit unions who didn't farm out loans going bankrupt or asking for money - they made responsible financial decisions and while hurting, are still fairly healthy today. When the people selling the product (in this case, loans) don't have to stand by it - then you get into the scenario we have today of effectively scam artists running things. Sorry.. went off topic I think you will find, that Wal-Mart takes a loss on the staple foods that grab headlines/attention such as Milk, Bread, etc. This gets people into the store because it is "so cheap!!!" and then they can charge higher amounts for other products when you don't notice. It would be interesting to take a standard shopping list containing a nice mix of milk, cheese, meat, fruits/veggies, prepared foods, etc. and buying the exact same quantity/brand (when possible) from both Wal-mart, and your local discount grocer (here it would be Cub Foods - not something fancy like Wegmans or other "higher end" grocery stores). Also of course be careful a "box of pop tarts" or whatever is the same from both stores - e.g. verify quantities I think you will find the totals are pretty close, far closer than you may think. __________________ Quality affordable hosting. Last edited by Phil21; 03-09-2009 at 02:47 PM..

03-09-2009, 05:02 PM	#84
DAMNMAN Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 1,440	I bought an Acai drink from Publix market 2 weeks ago and it was $4.99 I bought the same exact brand and size drink for Walmart Neighborhood Market (Their food only store here in Florida) for $3.39 yesterday. All other prices are similarly disproportionate. I'd much rather give my money to Publix but I find myself saving so much money at the Walmart store it doesn't make sense to shop elsewhere. And I do know the ramifications of shopping at Walmart. SouthPark nailed this along time ago BTW. __________________ email: zmaster (at) earthlink.net ICQ: 196678616 ZMASTER One less god!!! I contend that we are both an atheist. I just belive in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.