the new Terminator flick - GoFuckYourself.com

Loch · 05-25-2009, 04:22 PM

CRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP
The writers and directors should only be allowed to write for 12 year olds from now on or do find Nemo movies

I know it sounds funny from someone in porn saying that seeing that we are not exactly known for our writing....well other then "hello mr pizza man, ohh whats that you have a big cock?) bla bla LOL

But fuck me what a let down!

mikesinner · 05-25-2009, 04:42 PM

I thought it was pretty good but it wasn't meant to be a serious movie. The storyline had already been overdone by the third movie.

BFT3K · 05-25-2009, 04:51 PM

The overall theme for all of the previous Terminator flicks is "Man vs Machines" with lots of special effects.

In the latest Terminator movie, the premise is "Man vs Machines" with lots of special effects.

How were you let down?

_Richard_ · 05-25-2009, 04:53 PM

i heard the boy in white armour rewrote most of the movie?

»Rob Content« · 05-25-2009, 04:54 PM

I heard you must be homo sexual if you saw this movie and you are over 16

mikesinner · 05-25-2009, 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by »Rob Content«

I heard you must be homo sexual if you saw this movie and you are over 16

There were a couple of hot chicks in it but I don't think I even saw one cleavage shot.

mynameisjim · 05-25-2009, 05:07 PM

The director is just like the guy who did the latest Star Trek, they are action directors but not really story tellers. Not that it's a bad thing, but the Terminator movies and Star Trek got popular because of the premise and the characters, not because they were action packed. In fact, they all had horrible special effects and action for their times. The first terminator was low budget and expected to fail, just like Star Trek, and even Star Wars.

Loch · 05-25-2009, 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mynameisjim

The director is just like the guy who did the latest Star Trek, they are action directors but not really story tellers. Not that it's a bad thing, but the Terminator movies and Star Trek got popular because of the premise and the characters, not because they were action packed. In fact, they all had horrible special effects and action for their times. The first terminator was low budget and expected to fail, just like Star Trek, and even Star Wars.

If the haters cant see it dont bother explaining.

Terminator much like star trek actually does have a rather complicated storyline,

GatorB · 05-25-2009, 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loch

CRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP
The writers and directors should only be allowed to write for 12 year olds from now on or do find Nemo movies

I know it sounds funny from someone in porn saying that seeing that we are not exactly known for our writing....well other then "hello mr pizza man, ohh whats that you have a big cock?) bla bla LOL

But fuck me what a let down!

You do understand this is meant as part 1 of a 3 part series right? You did realize that Marcus Wright was the main character in the movie and it's really about him. If you saw the first movie and liked it and you are now quibbling about plot lines and "un-believable" things happening in this one, well then there's no helping you. I mean if you bought into the original plot of machines taking over the world and sending a robot with human flesh on it back into the past to kill the mother of a yet un-born leader of the future human resistance then you really shouldn't be bitching about much.

SomeCreep · 05-25-2009, 05:20 PM

I thought it was pretty good, except for the ending, which was weak sauce.

mikesinner · 05-25-2009, 05:32 PM

I liked the part where they computer generated a young Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Loch · 05-25-2009, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

You do understand this is meant as part 1 of a 3 part series right? You did realize that Marcus Wright was the main character in the movie and it's really about him. If you saw the first movie and liked it and you are now quibbling about plot lines and "un-believable" things happening in this one, well then there's no helping you. I mean if you bought into the original plot of machines taking over the world and sending a robot with human flesh on it back into the past to kill the mother of a yet un-born leader of the future human resistance then you really shouldn't be bitching about much.

They are missing several elements in the movie, a lot actually....it was just overall very very weak.
Not to mention that they should have started this whole damn thing before the actual war, im sure they decided to NOT do that to be able to do a Prequel later, which is just too bad.

James Cameron come back and take care of the rest please lol

TiltMaster · 05-25-2009, 05:44 PM

LOL terminator salvation was by FAR the best movie so far this year ... It was written well and special effects were excellent

Iron Fist · 05-25-2009, 06:08 PM

It's because the ending was SUPPOSED to be the new terminator killing John Connor, but that got leaked so they had to rewrite the ending to what it was now, and also, they wanted Christian Bale to play the part of the New Terminator, but he didn't want any of that and said, if he was going to be in the movie at all then he plays John Connor or nothing. So they ended up rewriting him back into the movie, since the role of John Connor was actually pretty small until the rewrite.

The movie in it's current state sucks... but what can do you when you got a whiny bitch for a lead actor.

BFT3K · 05-25-2009, 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sharphead

It's because the ending was SUPPOSED to be the new terminator killing John Connor, but that got leaked so they had to rewrite the ending to what it was now, and also, they wanted Christian Bale to play the part of the New Terminator, but he didn't want any of that and said, if he was going to be in the movie at all then he plays John Connor or nothing. So they ended up rewriting him back into the movie, since the role of John Connor was actually pretty small until the rewrite.

The movie in it's current state sucks... but what can do you when you got a whiny bitch for a lead actor.

Yeah, Christian Bale sucks it. The movie would have been better if they killed him off in the end, and spun off the 1/2 human 1/2 machine guy's character off as the star for future Terminator movies. He was a much better character.

GatorB · 05-25-2009, 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K

Yeah, Christian Bale sucks it. The movie would have been better if they killed him off in the end, and spun off the 1/2 human 1/2 machine guy's character off as the star for future Terminator movies. He was a much better character.

Then how would John Connor send Kyle Reese back in time 11 years later to save Sarah Connor and impregante her if he's dead you dumbass? Besides Connor doesn't die until July 4, 2032

Iron Fist · 05-25-2009, 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K

Yeah, Christian Bale sucks it. The movie would have been better if they killed him off in the end, and spun off the 1/2 human 1/2 machine guy's character off as the star for future Terminator movies. He was a much better character.

Well yeah! Just think... the plot was supposed to be, that the new Terminator admires John Connor so much so that he grafts his likeness over his own and essentially "becomes" John Connor, with no one the wiser...

That would of been the best and could of spun off a decent TV series and multiple more Terminator movies.. but oh well.

Diomed · 05-25-2009, 09:54 PM

I am disappointed it's rated PG-13,

and I haven't even seen it yet.

Regardless,

going to be some nice eye candy

Rick Diculous · 05-25-2009, 10:10 PM

Can't wait to see it despite the critics

Shey · 05-25-2009, 10:25 PM

I can't wait to see it because I think it's going to be fun and action packed. But I'm not expecting greatness, it's ONE MORE Terminator flick for fuck's sake! As if the previous ones were Oscar winning writing/acting performances LOL!

GatorB · 05-25-2009, 10:29 PM

Just a question. Would anyone here be just a bit put off about sending some guy back in time to fuck your mom?

Loch · 05-26-2009, 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

Just a question. Would anyone here be just a bit put off about sending some guy back in time to fuck your mom?

LMFAO

Good point there

05-25-2009, 04:22 PM	#1
Loch Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Canada Posts: 7,674	the new Terminator flick CRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP The writers and directors should only be allowed to write for 12 year olds from now on or do find Nemo movies I know it sounds funny from someone in porn saying that seeing that we are not exactly known for our writing....well other then "hello mr pizza man, ohh whats that you have a big cock?) bla bla LOL But fuck me what a let down! __________________ Contact us for Beta store access (4000 HD/SD productions) - Editing - Encoding/Post production ICQ - 277 862 930 E-mail casper /@/ cool-content.com

05-25-2009, 04:42 PM	#2
mikesinner Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 5,646	I thought it was pretty good but it wasn't meant to be a serious movie. The storyline had already been overdone by the third movie. __________________ My Best Sponsors MPl l Camsl CUMSHOTSl LESBIANSl FETISHl BJ RACESl TEEN BJl BSDMl VODl USE YOUR PC TO CURE CANCER

05-25-2009, 04:54 PM	#5
»Rob Content« Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 4,348	I heard you must be homo sexual if you saw this movie and you are over 16 __________________ 80% Revshare or 30$ PPS on $1 trials: 200 Niches = Vidz.com Galleries / FLVs / Embeds 3 & 5mins FLVs \| RSS & Tube Feeds \| Matching Thumbs \| FLV Browser & Exporter \| No Prechecked Xsales >> Mobile Redirection Script: mobile.vidz.com also paying 80% net Lifetime << ICQ: 198-394-557 ICQ - 436 795 438 E-mail rob /@/ cool-content dotcom

05-25-2009, 05:07 PM	#7
mynameisjim Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 2,985	The director is just like the guy who did the latest Star Trek, they are action directors but not really story tellers. Not that it's a bad thing, but the Terminator movies and Star Trek got popular because of the premise and the characters, not because they were action packed. In fact, they all had horrible special effects and action for their times. The first terminator was low budget and expected to fail, just like Star Trek, and even Star Wars. __________________ jim (at) amateursconvert . com Amateurs Convert

05-25-2009, 05:20 PM	#10
SomeCreep :glugglug Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Where the Wild Things Are Posts: 26,118	I thought it was pretty good, except for the ending, which was weak sauce. __________________ Webair Hosting I use and recommend Webair for hosting.

05-25-2009, 04:51 PM	#3
BFT3K Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Narnia Posts: 10,764	The overall theme for all of the previous Terminator flicks is "Man vs Machines" with lots of special effects. In the latest Terminator movie, the premise is "Man vs Machines" with lots of special effects. How were you let down?

05-25-2009, 04:53 PM	#4
_Richard_ Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Vancouver Posts: 30,986	i heard the boy in white armour rewrote most of the movie?

05-25-2009, 05:32 PM	#11
mikesinner Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 5,646	I liked the part where they computer generated a young Arnold Schwarzenegger. __________________ My Best Sponsors MPl l Camsl CUMSHOTSl LESBIANSl FETISHl BJ RACESl TEEN BJl BSDMl VODl USE YOUR PC TO CURE CANCER

05-25-2009, 05:44 PM	#13
TiltMaster Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 271	LOL terminator salvation was by FAR the best movie so far this year ... It was written well and special effects were excellent

05-25-2009, 06:08 PM	#14
Iron Fist Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 23,400	It's because the ending was SUPPOSED to be the new terminator killing John Connor, but that got leaked so they had to rewrite the ending to what it was now, and also, they wanted Christian Bale to play the part of the New Terminator, but he didn't want any of that and said, if he was going to be in the movie at all then he plays John Connor or nothing. So they ended up rewriting him back into the movie, since the role of John Connor was actually pretty small until the rewrite. The movie in it's current state sucks... but what can do you when you got a whiny bitch for a lead actor. __________________ i like waffles

05-25-2009, 09:54 PM	#18
Diomed Converting like it's 1999 Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: The South Posts: 6,165	I am disappointed it's rated PG-13, and I haven't even seen it yet. Regardless, going to be some nice eye candy __________________ 10 years of experience in: CHAT SALES - PAID TRAFFIC - CONVERSION - CREATIVES - CONSULTATION

05-25-2009, 10:10 PM	#19
Rick Diculous Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 2,370	Can't wait to see it despite the critics __________________ 100+ adult blogs looking for hardlink trades ICQ: 383 631 174 jason @ pornblogempire . com

05-25-2009, 10:25 PM	#20
Shey Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 1,654	I can't wait to see it because I think it's going to be fun and action packed. But I'm not expecting greatness, it's ONE MORE Terminator flick for fuck's sake! As if the previous ones were Oscar winning writing/acting performances LOL! __________________ Regards, Shey <at> datePROFITS.com\| ICQ: 279858568 \| Skype: sheysworld \| Y!M: sheyla702 datePROFITS: Every Niche of ExGF Dating Sites!

05-25-2009, 10:29 PM	#21
GatorB The Demon & 12clicks Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT Posts: 18,208	Just a question. Would anyone here be just a bit put off about sending some guy back in time to fuck your mom?