Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 07-17-2009, 04:39 AM   #51
JFK
FUBAR the ORIGINATOR
 
JFK's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: FUBARLAND
Posts: 67,374
Fitty Tubes down the tubes
__________________

FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX
For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com
JFK is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 05:43 AM   #52
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
There is no shortage of great porn content, just a shortage of people who can afford it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barefootsies View Post
So true nig.

So true....
Great shooters decided may years that the best way to make money in this market was to open their own site. Suze Randall, DD Francesco, Viv Thomas and others. I don't include myself in that company. All of them were shooting for hire. Then there's a list of similar shooters who are in that league who could be hired. Pierre Woodman, Gabi Pontello, Jack Harrison, Steve Colby, Steve Hicks and again many many more. Steve has a site but to my knowledge the rest don't.

They are or were all available for hire. So why didn't those big and great sponsors employ or commission them? Is it that they could not afford them or they thought they could buy a cheap camera, get a few local girls and shoot content to fill a site. Or get someone else without the wealth of experience these people have and cheaper?

IMO some of the shooters ignored the Net at their peril and now suffering. We made the move and never looked back.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 12:17 PM   #53
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by harvey View Post
hmmm.... regarding to this post I'd simply say "welcome to capitalism, it started around 1780" and that would be enough.

But let's be more specific. What you're saying was been told 1 zillion times in internet's adult business (as well as mainstream). Some history to put things in context:

I started a site in 1997 (sex-o-pedia) which was the direct antecedent of Freeones. Back in that time, they were a few of us, mostly what you could call "link lists". (a side note: in the "6 pages never ending tube yadda yadda" thread someone shown Freeones is one of the sites that didn't lose to tubes, or at least not much. That's because that concept is still great, however it takes a lot of work to do it. But there's another hint for you all)

Then top lists faced and everybody started crying and tearing their hairs (while a few ones started their own top lists). Top lists didn't make any harm, but then came TGP.

With TGPs, everybody starting crying again, this time much louder. At that time, a few of us created the TGP2 concept, for which I run the webmaster's central point (tgp2.net). The idea was that by listing only galleries with 5 clickable thumbs people would want to buy memberships. Everything fine in theory, however, once surfers saw TGPs listing no content they simply went to regular TGPs, and TGP2 failed miserably.

By the same time appeared the "Circle Jerks". No content at all, just "circle jerking" surfers betwee sites until they eventually would get tired and hopefully sign up with a pay site. They got LOADS of traffic. Of course, crap traffic, but still loads. And they disappeared. Some turned into CJ/TGP hybrids and disappeared or turned into full TGP.

Then file sharing... and the same story.

Now, it's tubes... and the same story.

It has been EXACTLY THE SAME SINCE THE BEGINNING. AND IT WILL ALWAYS BE LIKE THAT.

The common thing about this is... TRAFFIC. If you have the traffic, you make the rules.

With tubes, there are some scenarios that could happen. For sure, they'll get increasingly more traffic and kill most paysites in the meanwhile. That's why you see mostly webcams and dating sponsors in tube sites: because that's something they can't offer. Paysites as they're now, with the same business model than in 1997 (believe me, they didn't change a damn thing with a few honorable exceptions), are meant to disappear in its majority. One of the reasons is there are too many paysites for the market (wow....) and those that will survive are those willing to offer something different. I made a post explaining some things on content some time ago based on research. Some people heard, some people disbelief, some people laughed. The same that happened in the 6 pages tube thread: if you show evidence, most people will try to fool around evidence and deny it even if it's biting their own asses. However, although the key is in content, there are many many MANY ways to offer value added services tubes can't offer... for now.

So we get to another tube scenario: the "premium" access. Most tube sites are doing it right now for a small fee (around 10 bucks). Now, with tube sites getting 2 million uniques a day, if they convert 0.1% of that traffic that means $600,000 a month. OK, since most of the traffic is regular visitors, make it only 100,000. I think they'll be able to pay 10, 20 or 30 servers if they want. And form there, everything is gravy.

However, when a new technology shows up, most people gets used to it. So, why pay for the great image quality of the "premium access" when you can see videos with lower quality for free and still wank to those? This is the failure scenario for tubes, they're creating the same technology adequation for surfers that in turn will kill them. Those sites will get increasingly more traffic and they source venues will decrease in an exponential curve (when not directly disappear). So, at some point, they'll have shitloads of traffic and nowhere to direct it, at least places that will pay for it. Then the real "Tube Wars" will start and they will try to kill each other.

I don't have a crystal ball, I'm just telling what always happened and applying a tiny bit of logic.

So, they'll get to a point where they have lots of traffic and a few of them are surviving at this point... and then comes the next scenario: create their own networks of paysites, cam sites, dating sites, whatever. They've all the traffic for free already, and they'll be in a position where they could simply "pull the plug" and start selling like they never did.

Who is going to compete with that? Believe me, none of you, unless you change. Not now, you must change.... yesterday. A week ago. A month ago. You're already late and all your crying and whining didn't help at all, otherwise... you wouldn't be crying!!!!

So, what I said in the first post: WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO?
i suggest you look at streaming torrent technology before you make your prediction
currently there is a java fx version
a silverlight version
and RIA version all in development under open source

in a world where every person watching the video/buffering the video is a source as well as target for the bandwidth, the cost of distributing content to 1 person is the same as to 10,000

They will not be hitting a wall any time soon if ever, so your tube war senerio is not likely to happen.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 01:07 PM   #54
Barefootsies
Choice is an Illusion
 
Barefootsies's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of Obama
Posts: 42,635

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
IMO some of the shooters ignored the Net at their peril and now suffering.
True dat nig.
__________________
Should You Email Your Members?

Link1 | Link2 | Link3

Enough Said.

"Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"
Barefootsies is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.