kids watching porn on the internet - GoFuckYourself.com

bigalownz · 08-23-2009, 09:36 PM

just wondering what do you think about stopping kids seeing porn on the internet

who do you think should stop kids seeeing porn?

1, the website owners
2, the isp
3, the parents etc
4, the goverment

Barefootsies · 08-23-2009, 09:42 PM

Is this a real question? It is the parents responsibility.

Book store owners do not card people for looking at nudey mags at any store I have been do. It is right there next to Maxim.

Cable companies do not card their users before you order up a porn on tv.

It is not the government's job to teach us morals, values, or responsibility. That is the role of your parents first and foremost.

Frankly, I get tired of these punk ass parents who can't seem to do anything their fucking selves.

Parents own the house, pay the bills, bought the computer, signed up for the internet, subscribed to cable, whatever. You have the power to pass code block, or put software on your computer to stop this shit. Same as a lot of public libraries do.

It is not rocket science, nor should be a question for any serious debate.

tony286 · 08-23-2009, 09:44 PM

The parents should but we will always be the ones blamed.

bronco67 · 08-23-2009, 09:44 PM

I saw some stat recently that said like 80% of kids from 10 -14 have seen hardcore pornography. I was thinking I didn't see a smut film until I was about 17.

Porn wasn't at my fingertips in 0.2 seconds, like it is today. Kids get exposed to some crazy shit at a young age.

Oh, and its the parent's responsibility.

PornMD · 08-23-2009, 09:52 PM

Definitely the parents' responsibility, though unfortunately in this day and age, with so many parents NOT taking responsibility, your kid is likely to get access to this stuff through their peers whose parents don't have tight leashes/controls on them.

Barefootsies · 08-23-2009, 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404

The parents should but we will always be the ones blamed.

You have to chuckle at 't he masses'.

They want the government to.....

1. Defend them from every threat in the world. Real and imagined. *chuckle*

2. Teach their kids about history, a vocation, morals, values, team work, evolution, God, duty to country, science, math, among other things. But not about sex (i.e. sex in the schools). *shudders*

3. You want them to bail out your banks, insurance companies, airlines, auto companies, investment firms, but you do not want socialism? *rolls eyes*

4. Regulate who can marry who, what you can smoke, drugs you can or cannot take. Then the government is to 'warehouse' (i.e. put in prison and hold forever) those who do not follow our rules. Whether about smoking reefer, or killing dogs all while preaching forgiveness every Sunday. *smirk*

5. The government is to pay for top notch schools, build brand new roads and infrastructure, pay for every social program under the sun, give tax breaks and bail out to new business, extend foreign aid to every country and cause you support internationally, and some how do all this without raising taxes?

Nigga please.

DonovanTrent · 08-23-2009, 09:59 PM

BF, you expect people to behave with logic? Puhleeze.

L-Pink · 08-23-2009, 10:01 PM

The government should outlaw all porn except paysites charging $29.95 a month and customers should get a tax credit for all recurring charges.

.

Riffhard · 08-23-2009, 10:44 PM

I once read that the majority of people watching porn online are kids aged 12 to 17. But I read a lot of things.

PornMD · 08-23-2009, 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Riffhard

I once read that the majority of people watching porn online are kids aged 12 to 17. But I read a lot of things.

If you read it, it's true. Cardinal rule of the internets.

Major (Tom) · 08-24-2009, 01:13 AM

The parents!
any parent who gives a child their own computer is ill advised on how the world works.
any parent who lets a child use a computer behind closed doors is an idiot too.
The thing should stay right in the kitchen so mom or dad can keep an eye on whats happening.
parents have to wake up.
duke

qxm · 08-24-2009, 01:22 AM

these are crazy times for "teens" ... back in the days there were only a pic or two to jack off to (of decent quality.. if u didn't get trapped in a CJ that is).... yeap I remember .... jacking off to thumbnails ...lol ... now them lucky unsupervised bastards r jacking of to free full length videos....(thank u tubes)

Oh well... parents are as inept as ever, while its their responsibility to keep their children away from porn (which is something they have never been good at) .... I can see some sort of regulation being introduced somewhere down the line... Ceteris Paribus.....

John-ACWM · 08-24-2009, 01:31 AM

A short answer should be the parents but like any other activity one does,it's too hard to monitor absolutely everything.

AdultHardcore · 08-24-2009, 01:43 AM

Their parents for sure.

anarchy · 08-24-2009, 04:40 AM

I have to say that I see the strange occurence of girls 18-20 that want to be 'fake raped' or choke on your dick. It is nothing which excites me.. and it's a new trend. I can only point the finger to all the porn that's been lingering around teaching this stuff. I really don't see the excitement of a chick choking/almost puking on your dick or wanting to be raped. For me sex has to be loving to be deep and intense. But I guess this is not the right place to make such a statement

BlackCrayon · 08-24-2009, 04:53 AM

of course the parents. porn that parents have around the house is usually a kids first exposure to it long before the net was even around.

The Duck · 08-24-2009, 05:15 AM

The parents of course. But in reality there is no damn way to stop a kid who really wants to see some naked women / men on the internet.

Dirty Dane · 08-24-2009, 05:49 AM

There is a difference between kid and the term minor. There is a difference between explore and exploit. No minor should be exploited, forced or tricked into to watching porn, but for those denying a 15-16 year old "kid" exploring sexuality (they are already old enough to practice it!), is a fucking hypocrat or lier - or selfdenier

Government or ISPs should not interfere in general. That would be censorship. But it is cool enough to make laws that forbid exploiting. For instance, it should not be allowed to trick kids into your sites with domain names like free-disney.com or something like that, and then place bukkake movie clips on main page.

For paysites, it's quite obvious that credit card stop kids from entering. Mostly. But for free sites...I label my free sites with ICRA. Thats all I can do. Then it is parents, web admins at schools and so on, their responsibility to take advantage of that filter.

I think every webmaster should do this. You might get some less traffic, but that traffic is obviously not converting anyway.

Still have some sites missing the label, so thanks for the reminder.

Vicious_B · 08-24-2009, 05:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Duck

The parents of course. But in reality there is no damn way to stop a kid who really wants to see some naked women / men on the internet.

I have a 16 year old boy and a 14 year old girl. It's my responsibility to keep an eye on what my kids are doing. They know there isn't anything they can do on our computer that I won't know what they are up to whether or not they erase history.
It is also true that unless you want to lock your kids up and never let them go to a friends house they are going to be exposed. Not all parents are going to look out for what their kids are doing either out of laziness or denial. In many cases the kids know way more than the parents on how to operate a computer.
All you can do is have a good relationship with your children. You have to acknowledge that they are going to see things that you don't want them too but be able to talk to them about it.

Iron Fist · 08-24-2009, 06:06 AM

I at least try to label all my sites with RTA and ICRA... but it is the parents responsibility to stop giving their kids laptops and private computer time in their bedrooms.

tranza · 08-24-2009, 06:12 AM

Kids these days are smart and break any kind of "block" when necessary.

Cyber Fucker · 08-24-2009, 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

Is this a real question? It is the parents responsibility.

Book store owners do not card people for looking at nudey mags at any store I have been do. It is right there next to Maxim.

Cable companies do not card their users before you order up a porn on tv.

It is not the government's job to teach us morals, values, or responsibility. That is the role of your parents first and foremost.

Frankly, I get tired of these punk ass parents who can't seem to do anything their fucking selves.

Parents own the house, pay the bills, bought the computer, signed up for the internet, subscribed to cable, whatever. You have the power to pass code block, or put software on your computer to stop this shit. Same as a lot of public libraries do.

It is not rocket science, nor should be a question for any serious debate.

08-23-2009, 09:36 PM	#1
bigalownz Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: NEW ZEALAND Posts: 1,654	kids watching porn on the internet just wondering what do you think about stopping kids seeing porn on the internet who do you think should stop kids seeeing porn? 1, the website owners 2, the isp 3, the parents etc 4, the goverment __________________ $100 free credit for all hosting needs

08-23-2009, 09:42 PM	#2
Barefootsies Choice is an Illusion Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Land of Obama Posts: 42,635	Is this a real question? It is the parents responsibility. Book store owners do not card people for looking at nudey mags at any store I have been do. It is right there next to Maxim. Cable companies do not card their users before you order up a porn on tv. It is not the government's job to teach us morals, values, or responsibility. That is the role of your parents first and foremost. Frankly, I get tired of these punk ass parents who can't seem to do anything their fucking selves. Parents own the house, pay the bills, bought the computer, signed up for the internet, subscribed to cable, whatever. You have the power to pass code block, or put software on your computer to stop this shit. Same as a lot of public libraries do. It is not rocket science, nor should be a question for any serious debate. __________________ Should You Email Your Members? Link1 \| Link2 \| Link3 Enough Said. "Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"

08-23-2009, 09:44 PM	#4
bronco67 Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 29,035	I saw some stat recently that said like 80% of kids from 10 -14 have seen hardcore pornography. I was thinking I didn't see a smut film until I was about 17. Porn wasn't at my fingertips in 0.2 seconds, like it is today. Kids get exposed to some crazy shit at a young age. Oh, and its the parent's responsibility. __________________

08-23-2009, 09:52 PM	#5
PornMD Mainstream Businessman Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: San Diego Posts: 9,291	Definitely the parents' responsibility, though unfortunately in this day and age, with so many parents NOT taking responsibility, your kid is likely to get access to this stuff through their peers whose parents don't have tight leashes/controls on them. __________________ Want to crush it in mainstream with Facebook ads? Hit me up.

08-23-2009, 09:59 PM	#7
DonovanTrent Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Las Vegas, NV Posts: 968	BF, you expect people to behave with logic? Puhleeze. __________________ Donovan Trent

08-23-2009, 09:44 PM	#3
tony286 lurker Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: atlanta Posts: 57,021	The parents should but we will always be the ones blamed.

08-23-2009, 10:01 PM	#8
L-Pink working on my tan Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Florida/Kentucky Posts: 39,152	The government should outlaw all porn except paysites charging $29.95 a month and customers should get a tax credit for all recurring charges. .

08-23-2009, 10:44 PM	#9
Riffhard Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Tampa Bay, FL Posts: 659	I once read that the majority of people watching porn online are kids aged 12 to 17. But I read a lot of things. __________________ Glad to be here. Glad to be anywhere.

08-24-2009, 01:13 AM	#11
Major (Tom) Anti Communist Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Null Posts: 29,763	The parents! any parent who gives a child their own computer is ill advised on how the world works. any parent who lets a child use a computer behind closed doors is an idiot too. The thing should stay right in the kitchen so mom or dad can keep an eye on whats happening. parents have to wake up. duke __________________ My mother said, to get things done You'd better not mess with Major Tom

08-24-2009, 01:22 AM	#12
qxm Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: NoHo Posts: 5,970	these are crazy times for "teens" ... back in the days there were only a pic or two to jack off to (of decent quality.. if u didn't get trapped in a CJ that is).... yeap I remember .... jacking off to thumbnails ...lol ... now them lucky unsupervised bastards r jacking of to free full length videos....(thank u tubes) Oh well... parents are as inept as ever, while its their responsibility to keep their children away from porn (which is something they have never been good at) .... I can see some sort of regulation being introduced somewhere down the line... Ceteris Paribus..... __________________ ICQ: 266990876

08-24-2009, 01:31 AM	#13
John-ACWM Work Work Work Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: EU Posts: 20,060	A short answer should be the parents but like any other activity one does,it's too hard to monitor absolutely everything. __________________ Video Chat Forum

08-24-2009, 01:43 AM	#14
AdultHardcore Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Maine Posts: 338	Their parents for sure. __________________ Webmasters, get your own phone sex number.

08-24-2009, 04:40 AM	#15
anarchy Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Anarcho-capitalist libertarian Posts: 378	I have to say that I see the strange occurence of girls 18-20 that want to be 'fake raped' or choke on your dick. It is nothing which excites me.. and it's a new trend. I can only point the finger to all the porn that's been lingering around teaching this stuff. I really don't see the excitement of a chick choking/almost puking on your dick or wanting to be raped. For me sex has to be loving to be deep and intense. But I guess this is not the right place to make such a statement __________________ http://www.lewrockwell.com

08-24-2009, 04:53 AM	#16
BlackCrayon Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Ottawa Posts: 19,631	of course the parents. porn that parents have around the house is usually a kids first exposure to it long before the net was even around. __________________ you don't know you're wearing a leash if you sit by the peg all day..

08-24-2009, 05:15 AM	#17
The Duck Adult Content Provider Industry Role: Join Date: May 2005 Location: Europe Posts: 18,243	The parents of course. But in reality there is no damn way to stop a kid who really wants to see some naked women / men on the internet. __________________ Skype Horusmaia ICQ 41555245 Email [email protected]

08-24-2009, 05:49 AM	#18
Dirty Dane Sick Fuck Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: www Posts: 9,491	There is a difference between kid and the term minor. There is a difference between explore and exploit. No minor should be exploited, forced or tricked into to watching porn, but for those denying a 15-16 year old "kid" exploring sexuality (they are already old enough to practice it!), is a fucking hypocrat or lier - or selfdenier Government or ISPs should not interfere in general. That would be censorship. But it is cool enough to make laws that forbid exploiting. For instance, it should not be allowed to trick kids into your sites with domain names like free-disney.com or something like that, and then place bukkake movie clips on main page. For paysites, it's quite obvious that credit card stop kids from entering. Mostly. But for free sites...I label my free sites with ICRA. Thats all I can do. Then it is parents, web admins at schools and so on, their responsibility to take advantage of that filter. I think every webmaster should do this. You might get some less traffic, but that traffic is obviously not converting anyway. Still have some sites missing the label, so thanks for the reminder.

08-24-2009, 06:06 AM	#20
Iron Fist Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 23,400	I at least try to label all my sites with RTA and ICRA... but it is the parents responsibility to stop giving their kids laptops and private computer time in their bedrooms. __________________ i like waffles

08-24-2009, 06:12 AM	#21
tranza ICQ: 197-556-237 Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: BRASIL !!! Posts: 57,559	Kids these days are smart and break any kind of "block" when necessary. __________________ I'm just a newbie.