![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
I help you SUCCEED
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas
Posts: 32,195
|
![]() I'm not sure if it already exists, so I ask
![]() Why not build an adult version of one way link exchange platforms like this: iblbuilder.com Value proposition: adult blog / tube owners join the site for SE value Heavy niche segmentation increases link quality monetize via program ads and special offers/sponsorships |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 22,511
|
has the air of a google penalty about it.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
I help you SUCCEED
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas
Posts: 32,195
|
That would definitely apply to TLA and other schemes but this seems to work differently. Besides, showing your url in a directory for such a scheme (same with very obvious behavior of some link sellers at forums) would be a bad move.
It can even be an "invisible" broker ![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
I help you SUCCEED
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas
Posts: 32,195
|
Another approach would be a completely DOUBLE BLIND system. This MIGHT prevent search engines from knowing the identities of the participants. Of course, there's several verification/marketing psychology issues with that approach. However, there's technical workarounds, I'm sure.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |