Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 09-22-2009, 11:02 AM   #51
lagcam
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,892
I am happy with my position on this thread and have nothing more to add, but feel free to continue to miss the point until a different bee flies into your bonnet...
lagcam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2009, 11:04 AM   #52
stickyfingerz
Doin fine
 
stickyfingerz's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 24,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by lagcam View Post
You are missing the point completely.

The main "mistake" here is that the parents acted irresponsibly in taking such photos of their children, and a FEMALE photo technician thought the photos were inappropriate and took the CORRECT action in reporting it upwards through many people who also agreed.

Even though IN THIS CASE after investigation, the family were not believed to have had any bad intent, there are many cases where intent IS found, and if people are scared to do their jobs and report questionable material, then who will win then?

Whatever your anti-police, anti wall-mart, or pro let people do what they want ideals, the parents DID make a very serious mis-judgement in taking those photos, and if not checked who knows where this would have ended up? If you read the report in full, it also says not only that there were many such photos and videos on their pc but also

"ABC News was able to obtain access to four of the photos. There are still nine other photographs which were not released because the Demarees' lawyer said that the photos were intended for private home use and showing them to outside parties would violate the law for distribution of child pornography."

That is THEIR OWN LAWYER'S opinion on the photos.....

You are far too blinkered in this matter, and comparing this case to a guy IN ITALY who hugged and kissed his child in a park is totally irrelevant.

Also, far from everybody "admitting they acted too swiftly", I saw:

"The Police and prosecutors insist they did what they thought was appropriate."

and

"The city of Peoria also states that it stands behind the appropriate actions of their officers."

which is a bit different.

No doubt there is more to this story than EITHER of us know, but all I have ever been commenting is that I believe that the lady in wall-mart acted correctly when finding what she considered inappropriate material and I hope that she and other people working in that line of work will continue to do so as if doing so stops even one paedophile it is worth it...

and before the inevitable response of "what if it was you and your children?", I have already stated that I wouldn't take naked pictures of my cildren.
You are 100% wrong. Something that has always been an innocent thing to those that believe it is innocent is not made un innocent by those that believe its uninnocent due to world influence.

There was a show on last night I watched that was nearly identical to this except the father posted a pic on his family website and a pedo porn site stole the pic and used it, and they went after the father for taking it. Was on that show with the mother from Malcolm in the middle, and Zac Morris on it, can't recall the name. But I thought immediately of this case.

The sick ones are the ones that see perversion in a playful photo of a child. This whole world has gone to shit in the last 20 years. lol
stickyfingerz is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2009, 11:08 AM   #53
Tom_PM
Porn Meister
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 16,443
Better call walmart photo department and report google images for publishing all those bathtime photos.
__________________
43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.
Tom_PM is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2009, 11:16 AM   #54
PornMD
Mainstream Businessman
 
PornMD's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 9,291
Quote:
Originally Posted by PR_Tom View Post
Better call walmart photo department and report google images for publishing all those bathtime photos.
Even Google is distributing child porn! Call the FBI!
__________________
Want to crush it in mainstream with Facebook ads? Hit me up.
PornMD is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.