Youtube going to allow full HD 1080P. - GoFuckYourself.com

After Shock Media · 11-13-2009, 07:31 AM

Still will have the 10 minute length but they will start allowing full 1080P HD video starting next week I think. Current videos that were uploaded and were HD and stuck at their current standard of 720p are being re-encoded to 1080p. They do admit the videos will be slower to load for most people, but the videos are larger (duh!).

If they are bleeding money damn, wouldnt that about double their costs on new video uploads and sharing?

ArsewithClass · 11-13-2009, 07:34 AM

Shit, thats going to be a whack on there servers... Obviously they can afford it, but...

Nicky · 11-13-2009, 07:38 AM

Hmmm, yea that's not a good sign TBH

After Shock Media · 11-13-2009, 07:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nicky

Hmmm, yea that's not a good sign TBH

That is what I was thinking. I just did not want to leave yet another long post.

gleem · 11-13-2009, 07:48 AM

I was just reading an article talking about how youtube has yet to figure out how to make money, and now they are doing this? Need to dump my google stock... oh wait, I did already.

Scott McD · 11-13-2009, 08:06 AM

Crazy!!

What next ? YouTube Blu-Ray vids ???

EscortBiz · 11-13-2009, 08:11 AM

youtube will regret all these things including allowing the user to make the video bigger, its destroying every chance they had of making money off this thing

After Shock Media · 11-13-2009, 01:15 PM

Escortbiz, I am not sure profit is their goal. I think they do want to provide free services to collect data.

TidalWave · 11-13-2009, 01:20 PM

their videos already load so fucking slow

WiredGuy · 11-13-2009, 01:28 PM

Won't be long before adult tube sites will be offering full HD.
WG

$5 submissions · 11-13-2009, 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media

Still will have the 10 minute length but they will start allowing full 1080P HD video starting next week I think. Current videos that were uploaded and were HD and stuck at their current standard of 720p are being re-encoded to 1080p. They do admit the videos will be slower to load for most people, but the videos are larger (duh!).

If they are bleeding money damn, wouldnt that about double their costs on new video uploads and sharing?

According to a link I posted recently, Youtube's hosting cost is close to ZERO. This is due to the fact they are layered on Google's existing immense hardware architecture.

biskoppen · 11-13-2009, 02:03 PM

They have go to a multiple server solution now, there's no way that there current one server can handle this upgrade

aroy3719 · 11-13-2009, 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scott McD

Crazy!!

What next ? YouTube Blu-Ray vids ???

HD is the same shit as Blue-ray

wargames · 11-13-2009, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by $5 submissions

According to a link I posted recently, Youtube's hosting cost is close to ZERO. This is due to the fact they are layered on Google's existing immense hardware architecture.

sandman! · 11-13-2009, 04:41 PM

bullshit their costs might be low but nowhere near 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by $5 submissions

According to a link I posted recently, Youtube's hosting cost is close to ZERO. This is due to the fact they are layered on Google's existing immense hardware architecture.

Houdini · 11-13-2009, 05:36 PM

Google does not breakdown or disclose revenue by departments, so only they know how much Youtube makes or doesn't make. Given that Youtube uses more bandwidth than any site on the net, I would imagine the site is being used as a tool for technologies of scale that even google.com cannot achieve. Google is making a huge profit, it's irrelevant at this point if youtube is losing money. Data is what they are after.

rowan · 11-13-2009, 07:38 PM

Shitloads of outbound content = peer muscle. Some ISPs may even pay google to carry their content.

LoveSandra · 11-13-2009, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nicky

Hmmm, yea that's not a good sign TBH

:thumbsu p

blogman9 · 11-14-2009, 01:41 AM

I think bandwidth is not a problem, because Full HD require only 10mbits.
But question is that: What CPU we need to watch FULL HD using flash ?

StariaDaniel · 11-14-2009, 01:55 AM

Didn't they burn enough money already? Even if they only use youtube to collect data it's hard to believe blowing out even more money will help them in any way ...

Farang · 11-14-2009, 02:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WiredGuy

Won't be long before adult tube sites will be offering full HD.
WG

My thoughts exactly

Odin · 11-14-2009, 02:14 AM

Google is going to surprise everyone when they announce Youtube hits profitability. Everyone overestimates their costs, and underestimates their revenues. I can't go to youtube now days without seeing multiple ads all over the place, and I don't even mind, because I view it in widescreen and the quality is improving.

Manowar · 11-14-2009, 02:16 AM

that will be purdy

Arnox · 11-14-2009, 03:13 AM

Barely any videos are true 1080P, lucky if 1% of videos uploaded are actually the full quality.

burntfilm · 11-14-2009, 03:29 AM

That's pretty killer -

After Shock Media · 11-14-2009, 03:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arnox

Barely any videos are true 1080P, lucky if 1% of videos uploaded are actually the full quality.

We shall see in a week.

EscortBiz · 11-14-2009, 03:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief

Google is going to surprise everyone when they announce Youtube hits profitability. Everyone overestimates their costs, and underestimates their revenues. I can't go to youtube now days without seeing multiple ads all over the place, and I don't even mind, because I view it in widescreen and the quality is improving.

"and I don't even mind, because I view it in widescreen"

the advertisers do mind and at the end of the day they decide whats worth it for them or not, thats why noone uses youtube to advertise long term, they come and go and sooner or later no more suckers,

the CTR is terrible

quiet · 11-14-2009, 03:52 AM

you know, i have not clicked through on a paid ad on facebook, gmail, youtube, (or gfy for that matter), in YEARS. am i the only one? i'm so desensitized i haven't really noticed any ads for many years now.

Marshal · 11-14-2009, 04:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by After Shock Media

If they are bleeding money damn, wouldnt that about double their costs on new video uploads and sharing?

google doesn't have bandwidth bill. i'm serious. check this out: http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/...ube-bandwidth/

Nautilus · 11-14-2009, 04:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quiet

you know, i have not clicked through on a paid ad on facebook, gmail, youtube, (or gfy for that matter), in YEARS. am i the only one? i'm so desensitized i haven't really noticed any ads for many years now.

Same here.

Emma · 11-14-2009, 04:35 AM

full 1080p is really rocks

bronco67 · 11-14-2009, 10:12 AM

That's great. Now I can see someone get kicked in the nuts in HD.

That's right. It's a waste of bandwidth.

EscortBiz · 11-14-2009, 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quiet

you know, i have not clicked through on a paid ad on facebook, gmail, youtube, (or gfy for that matter), in YEARS. am i the only one? i'm so desensitized i haven't really noticed any ads for many years now.

yup, avg surfer who surfs 3 hours a day after 7 days id say at least 200 ads flashed by his face, I doubt they can recall 1

Dirty D · 11-14-2009, 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by biskoppen

They have go to a multiple server solution now, there's no way that there current one server can handle this upgrade

lol....

seeandsee · 11-14-2009, 11:29 AM

they will ruin $$$

LeCoq · 11-14-2009, 01:09 PM

Trust GG to know what they're doing...

Trax · 11-14-2009, 03:56 PM

dont act so smart.
google isnt stupid.
criticizing something you have no insight into just makes you look like a clueless idiot.

sobaka · 11-14-2009, 03:57 PM

I think YouTube is going to partially replace tv in the future. Bandwidth costs are irrelevent to Google. HD video on the new 10-inch led apple tablet and similar setups coupled with Netflix streaming, YouTube, buying shows through Itunes, etc will allow many people to dump cable. That will free up $50+/month per person to spend on Youtube and other providers of video. I will happily dump cable myself once I can buy HD streamed sporting events for a buck or two each.

After Shock Media · 11-14-2009, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nettrust

google doesn't have bandwidth bill. i'm serious. check this out: http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/...ube-bandwidth/

I personally am not sure either way. That is why I said IF.

Maybe all or one of you can explain to me what allowing this, including encoding the past 720d movies to 1020 has to do with net neutrality.

Plus for some more info on why:

The news signifies an even deeper commitment by Google, the search giant, to provide video content that rivals what the most sophisticated cable and over-the-air broadcast networks offer.
The company is also pushing into new types of video-recommendation techniques that will not only suggest directly related videos to users but also use sophisticated algorithms to ascertain what a user will like based on previous viewing history and other indirect factors. This could turn YouTube into a video-discovery engine, similar to Internet radio company Pandora.com.

...

could prove to be a far more lucrative format. Recommendation engines, when properly done, can significantly increase user engagement and can make ad spots more valuable on recommended streams.

...

On the net neutrality issue I could just find this in info.

The introduction of more high-quality video will increase the friction between Google, and particularly YouTube, and various internet service providers in the US, where "net neutrality" has become a sore point. Some ISPs and telephone companies argue that companies which send large amounts of data - particularly video - over their networks should pay to ensure that it does not block others from sending their data. Google and other companies contend that it is the telephone companies' and ISPs' responsibility to maintain the standards of their networks to meet growing demand for high-volume data transmission.

Guess they are saying if you do not like how much we use now, here fuck you!

CyberHustler · 11-14-2009, 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by biskoppen

They have go to a multiple server solution now, there's no way that there current one server can handle this upgrade

DanielS · 11-14-2009, 05:41 PM

At least their system won't reduce quality when you upload a vid ;)

Semi-Retired-Dave · 11-14-2009, 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TidalWave

their videos already load so fucking slow

Get rid of your dial up. They actually load super fast.

EscortBiz · 11-14-2009, 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trax

dont act so smart.
google isnt stupid.
criticizing something you have no insight into just makes you look like a clueless idiot.

again if they are trying to have youtube be something that generates clicks for advertisers this will not help

if they simply want user traffic then yes this will work

EscortBiz · 11-14-2009, 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberAge-Dave

Get rid of your dial up. They actually load super fast.

there are times when youtube does load very slow and in the past months several times where they where down for 30+ minutes

I wish i had that problem of having 500 million daily hits and being down 30 minutes a month but the point is sometimes even with high speed connection it is slow

Elli · 11-14-2009, 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sobaka

I think YouTube is going to partially replace tv in the future. Bandwidth costs are irrelevent to Google. HD video on the new 10-inch led apple tablet and similar setups coupled with Netflix streaming, YouTube, buying shows through Itunes, etc will allow many people to dump cable. That will free up $50+/month per person to spend on Youtube and other providers of video. I will happily dump cable myself once I can buy HD streamed sporting events for a buck or two each.

I have to agree at least partially with this.

NetHorse · 11-14-2009, 10:53 PM

Cool, but honestly, I don't really notice a difference between 720 & 1080..

Quote:

Originally Posted by WiredGuy

Won't be long before adult tube sites will be offering full HD.
WG

I highly doubt that will happen..

11-13-2009, 07:31 AM	#1
After Shock Media It's coming look busy Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn". Posts: 35,299	Youtube going to allow full HD 1080P. Still will have the 10 minute length but they will start allowing full 1080P HD video starting next week I think. Current videos that were uploaded and were HD and stuck at their current standard of 720p are being re-encoded to 1080p. They do admit the videos will be slower to load for most people, but the videos are larger (duh!). If they are bleeding money damn, wouldnt that about double their costs on new video uploads and sharing? __________________ [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

11-13-2009, 07:38 AM	#3
Nicky Judge Jury and Executioner Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Sweden Posts: 30,069	Hmmm, yea that's not a good sign TBH __________________ gfynicky @ gmail.com

11-13-2009, 07:48 AM	#5
gleem Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Sunny Land Posts: 5,593	I was just reading an article talking about how youtube has yet to figure out how to make money, and now they are doing this? Need to dump my google stock... oh wait, I did already. __________________ Contact me: \\// E: webmaster /at/ unprofessional.com

11-13-2009, 08:06 AM	#6
Scott McD Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Glasgow, Scotland Posts: 67,795	Crazy!! What next ? YouTube Blu-Ray vids ??? __________________ I Buy My High Quality Traffic Here, You Should Too!

11-13-2009, 08:11 AM	#7
EscortBiz Fuck Checks, CASH only! Join Date: May 2002 Location: New York City Posts: 19,422	youtube will regret all these things including allowing the user to make the video bigger, its destroying every chance they had of making money off this thing __________________ Spanking, Medical Fetish, Sleeping, Strap-on Anal Lesbians, Girls Fucking Guys, Handjob site REAL HOT, Shemales, Anal and Ass Licking sites 100% Real EXCLUSIVE with amazing retention, ccbill payouts, lots of content FREE FTP HOSTING Promote the largest and oldest member paid escort site, Converts 10 times better then any dating site, CCBill payouts ICQ# 158802076

11-13-2009, 07:34 AM	#2
ArsewithClass So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: UK Posts: 7,957	Shit, thats going to be a whack on there servers... Obviously they can afford it, but...

11-13-2009, 01:15 PM	#8
After Shock Media It's coming look busy Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn". Posts: 35,299	Escortbiz, I am not sure profit is their goal. I think they do want to provide free services to collect data. __________________ [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

11-13-2009, 01:20 PM	#9
TidalWave Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 2,706	their videos already load so fucking slow __________________ www.SwiftNode.com

11-13-2009, 01:28 PM	#10
WiredGuy Pounding Googlebot Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Canada Posts: 34,451	Won't be long before adult tube sites will be offering full HD. WG __________________ I play with Google.

11-13-2009, 02:03 PM	#12
biskoppen Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Very small penis Posts: 5,809	They have go to a multiple server solution now, there's no way that there current one server can handle this upgrade __________________ Submit my videos to make bank, tons of 5 minute videos offered right here

11-13-2009, 05:36 PM	#16
Houdini Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: SoCal Posts: 1,651	Google does not breakdown or disclose revenue by departments, so only they know how much Youtube makes or doesn't make. Given that Youtube uses more bandwidth than any site on the net, I would imagine the site is being used as a tool for technologies of scale that even google.com cannot achieve. Google is making a huge profit, it's irrelevant at this point if youtube is losing money. Data is what they are after.

11-13-2009, 07:38 PM	#17
rowan Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Australia Posts: 17,393	Shitloads of outbound content = peer muscle. Some ISPs may even pay google to carry their content.

11-14-2009, 01:41 AM	#19
blogman9 Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 1,261	I think bandwidth is not a problem, because Full HD require only 10mbits. But question is that: What CPU we need to watch FULL HD using flash ? __________________ Adult industry news

11-14-2009, 01:55 AM	#20
StariaDaniel Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Netherlands Posts: 415	Didn't they burn enough money already? Even if they only use youtube to collect data it's hard to believe blowing out even more money will help them in any way ... __________________ YezzClips.com - Sell your clips and photosets - Promote YezzClips Clipstores and get 20% revshare for life YooGirls.com - Sell your non-nude content - Promote Yoogirls Clipstores and get 20% revshare for life [email protected] • ICQ #464114379

11-14-2009, 02:14 AM	#22
Odin Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: au Posts: 2,545	Google is going to surprise everyone when they announce Youtube hits profitability. Everyone overestimates their costs, and underestimates their revenues. I can't go to youtube now days without seeing multiple ads all over the place, and I don't even mind, because I view it in widescreen and the quality is improving.

11-14-2009, 02:16 AM	#23
Manowar jellyfish Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 71,528	that will be purdy

11-14-2009, 03:13 AM	#24
Arnox Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Radelaide Posts: 2,160	Barely any videos are true 1080P, lucky if 1% of videos uploaded are actually the full quality. __________________ Need Text? X Copywriters \| Adult Writing Service - [email protected]

11-14-2009, 03:29 AM	#25
burntfilm Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Brooklyn NY, Providence, RI Posts: 972	That's pretty killer - __________________ Sorta...

11-14-2009, 03:52 AM	#28
quiet we'll miss you our friend. RIP Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Fernie, BC Posts: 25,115	you know, i have not clicked through on a paid ad on facebook, gmail, youtube, (or gfy for that matter), in YEARS. am i the only one? i'm so desensitized i haven't really noticed any ads for many years now.

11-14-2009, 04:35 AM	#31
Emma Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: England Posts: 2,288	full 1080p is really rocks

11-14-2009, 10:12 AM	#32
bronco67 Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 29,035	That's great. Now I can see someone get kicked in the nuts in HD. That's right. It's a waste of bandwidth. __________________

11-14-2009, 11:29 AM	#35
seeandsee Check SIG! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Europe (Skype: gojkoas) Posts: 50,945	they will ruin $$$ __________________ BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year Contact here

11-14-2009, 01:09 PM	#36
LeCoq Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Hen house Posts: 245	Trust GG to know what they're doing... __________________ The best sig is no sig

11-14-2009, 03:56 PM	#37
Trax [----------------------] Join Date: Aug 2001 Posts: 14,486	dont act so smart. google isnt stupid. criticizing something you have no insight into just makes you look like a clueless idiot.

11-14-2009, 03:57 PM	#38
sobaka Registered User Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 29	I think YouTube is going to partially replace tv in the future. Bandwidth costs are irrelevent to Google. HD video on the new 10-inch led apple tablet and similar setups coupled with Netflix streaming, YouTube, buying shows through Itunes, etc will allow many people to dump cable. That will free up $50+/month per person to spend on Youtube and other providers of video. I will happily dump cable myself once I can buy HD streamed sporting events for a buck or two each.

11-14-2009, 05:41 PM	#41
DanielS Registered User Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 569	At least their system won't reduce quality when you upload a vid ;)