![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Totally Borked
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,284
|
video watermarking without vhooks?
OK, I'm looking to watermark some flvs during transcoding and have found out that the regular ffmpeg way using -vhook is no longer supported (since 0.5) in favour of libavfilter. However, afaik none of the ffmpeg developers have yet been able to bring watermarking using libavfilter to the ffmpeg board, even after this being a major request in ggogle's summer of code.
So... reverting to ffmpeg 0.5 not being an option due to the all the up-to-date x.264 libraries not being backward compatible, what are the other OSS options for watermarking videos? If ffmpeg without vhooks can do this, please shoot me down in a blaze of unglory... current ffmpeg config: Code:
FFmpeg version git-f85e04c, Copyright (c) 2000-2009 Fabrice Bellard, et al. configuration: --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib --mandir=/usr/share/man --incdir=/usr/include/ffmpeg --enable-libmp3lame --enable-libvorbis --enable-libfaad --enable-libfaac --enable-libxvid --enable-libx264 --enable-shared --enable-pthreads --enable-gpl --disable-stripping --enable-nonfree libavutil 50. 3. 0 / 50. 3. 0 libavcodec 52.35. 0 / 52.35. 0 libavformat 52.38. 0 / 52.38. 0 libavdevice 52. 2. 0 / 52. 2. 0 libswscale 0. 7. 1 / 0. 7. 1
__________________
![]() For coding work - hit me up on andy // borkedcoder // com (consider figuring out the email as test #1) All models are wrong, but some are useful. George E.P. Box. p202 |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 8,067
|
If you own the content, you should be watermarking during the editing process. Makes life a million times easier.
And if you don't own the content... why are you watermarking it? |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Totally Borked
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,284
|
Quote:
![]() #1 I own the content, or at least the person I am doing this for does. #2 We only want some of the content watermarked, not all #3 Maybe we purchased the content, not created it, so there is no "editing process" It's better to keep your gob closed and be thought of as an idiot than to open it and remove all doubt.
__________________
![]() For coding work - hit me up on andy // borkedcoder // com (consider figuring out the email as test #1) All models are wrong, but some are useful. George E.P. Box. p202 |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Totally Borked
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,284
|
yeah, and the ffmpeg developers say it's removed in favour of libavfilter as that's superior, but as yet there's still no support for videomarking in libavfilter
![]() I really can't retrograde, cos otherwise I'd have to retrograde all the libraries. I've tried creating a static binary of 0.5 just for the vhooks but it keeps saying there's a problem with libxvid for some reason. Anyone have a static ffmpeg binary for centos supporting vhooks they could email me?
__________________
![]() For coding work - hit me up on andy // borkedcoder // com (consider figuring out the email as test #1) All models are wrong, but some are useful. George E.P. Box. p202 |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
..I Heart Cannibal Corpse
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: California
Posts: 4,328
|
Quote:
__________________
... |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 7,674
|
Quote:
![]() Ill just leave this one alone lol |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 8,067
|
Quote:
But since you want to be an aggressive asshole about it, I think my best suggestion would be to tell you to go fuck yourself. Since when does purchased content mean it's pre-edited? I've only ever bought and sold raw unedited content. And most content transactions from photographers to media companies are done with raw unedited content. In most cases that would include an editing process. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
You're a content guy, he's a programmer, you'll have NO idea what he's talking about or how to answer his question, so it's probably best you drop it and move on. Snoochies. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 55,359
|
i would try going on irc.freenode.net #ffmpeg they might be able to recommend something
__________________
Since 1999: 69 Adult Industry awards for Best Hosting Company and professional excellence. ![]() WP Stuff |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Totally Borked
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,284
|
Quote:
Purchased doesn't mean pre-edited, but then I was trying to understand what you were going on about with your "advice". Since when does content *have* to be always watermarked? Your advise is watermark everything from the outset, yet you have no idea wtf I'm trying to do. fwiw, client only wants watermarking the content that is used for promotion by affiliates, so they can't use the content for promoting others. I've coded it so affiliates can overlay their own watermark to pass the content off as theirs if they want, but the click always goes to us. Members get watermark-free content as that is how it works around here, leached and uploaded to tubes or not. So screw you if you take offence to me riling up against your pathetic post because your post did not in any way shape or form address my question and yet expended as much space suggesting stolen content as it did offering "advice".
__________________
![]() For coding work - hit me up on andy // borkedcoder // com (consider figuring out the email as test #1) All models are wrong, but some are useful. George E.P. Box. p202 |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Totally Borked
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,284
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
![]() For coding work - hit me up on andy // borkedcoder // com (consider figuring out the email as test #1) All models are wrong, but some are useful. George E.P. Box. p202 |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |