Should Rich be banned? - GoFuckYourself.com

ADL Colin · 06-24-2004, 03:26 AM

Do you think a webmaster like Rich should be banned for turning in webmasters to the Dept of Justice on the grounds of obscenity because he disagrees with their political views?

http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...pagen umber=2

StuartD · 06-24-2004, 03:27 AM

Internet God · 06-24-2004, 03:29 AM

ADL Colin · 06-24-2004, 03:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MaskedMan
no

I disagree.

StuartD · 06-24-2004, 03:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
I disagree.

OH! in that case, I'll change my mind.

Internet God · 06-24-2004, 03:31 AM

Maybe we should ban people like Colin who support Bush since the Bush administration is so against porn.

I vote to BAN COLIN!

ADL Colin · 06-24-2004, 03:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Internet God
Maybe we should ban people like Colin who support Bush since the Bush administration is so against porn.

I vote to BAN COLIN!

If you follow the threads I post in you'll see that I am voting for Kerry

Internet God · 06-24-2004, 03:35 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
If you follow the threads I post in you'll see that I am voting for Kerry

Ah, then I'll shut up now.

ADL Colin · 06-24-2004, 03:37 AM

There are many political discussions here.
People who make their living from porn should be free to post their views without feeling that someone is willing to threaten their livelihood. It's a form of forced censorship of the worst kind.

ADL Colin · 06-24-2004, 03:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Internet God
Ah, then I'll shut up now.

Nahh, don't. I am interested in why you think what you do. Maybe I am wrong.

StuartD · 06-24-2004, 03:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
There are many political discussions here.
People who make their living from porn should be free to post their views without feeling that someone is willing to threaten their livelihood. It's a form of forced censorship of the worst kind.

Uhm... yeah, but if we were sitting at a bar talking politics, and someone said somthing and he got up and called the Dept of Justice on the guy, I don't think the bar would kick him out and never let him back in again.

ADL Colin · 06-24-2004, 03:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MaskedMan
Uhm... yeah, but if we were sitting at a bar talking politics, and someone said somthing and he got up and called the Dept of Justice on the guy, I don't think the bar would kick him out and never let him back in again.

That's because a bar is not a place for people in the adult industry to meet - business owners who expect their livelihood to be improved by their meeting here and not hurt by it.

StuartD · 06-24-2004, 03:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
That's because a bar is not a place for people in the adult industry to meet - business owners who expect their livelihood to be improved by their meeting here and not hurt by it.

I challenge you to find a business owner who expects to have their livelihood improved here and not hurt by it.

And if you've ever been to a convention, then you know that a bar is just as likely a place for adult webmasters to do business as GFY is.

Buff · 06-24-2004, 03:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
That's because a bar is not a place for people in the adult industry to meet - business owners who expect their livelihood to be improved by their meeting here and not hurt by it.

Colin, again, why are you trying to teach this special needs class? Obviously Rich is a hypocrite in addition to being a complete retard. He opposes the tyrrany of Bush-Hitler but then narcs on people to the Bush-Hitler regime.

If Rich were any stupider, he'd be "Internet God."

ADL Colin · 06-24-2004, 03:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MaskedMan
I challenge you to find a business owner who expects to have their livelihood improved here and not hurt by it.

And if you've ever been to a convention, then you know that a bar is just as likely a place for adult webmasters to do business as GFY is.

Why would someone "hang out" here if they expected to make less money as a result?

As far as conventions, I've been in the business since 1996. I've been to nearly every major convention since the Orlando conference in 1997. I expect my livelihood to be improved by GFY and not hurt by it. It has been. Much business comes from this board.

StuartD · 06-24-2004, 03:53 AM

I will be fair, I do know what you mean by the whole bar to GFY comparison... and to a point I agree... however...

this is a public forum. Sure, it's contained within a given industry, but it's still very much public. Just as much as a public place is... conversations as such are in any public venue should be completely free, under the rule of freedom of speech.

However, just as what you could say can be used against you in a park or a restaurant or a bar.... it can be here as well.

Freedom of speech is also freedom of foot in mouth.... which is also freedom to do what ever to the person who just made the speech.

If you ban him from GFY for doing this, then every other public place of conversation would have to do the same.

It has nothing to do with my opinions of anyone here or anywhere, even if it was me that someone called the DOJ on... I'd definitely hate that person, but I wouldn't expect the board to ban him.

ADL Colin · 06-24-2004, 03:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MaskedMan

If you ban him from GFY for doing this, then every other public place of conversation would have to do the same.

I respect your opinion. I don't care what he posts at the evolution vs. creation board. This is an adult webmaster board for people in the industry.

Buff · 06-24-2004, 03:59 AM

By the way, in answer to your query, I vote "no" because

1. I hate boards that ban people -- that's fucking gay. It's easy enough to textually sodomize gerbil stuffers like Rich.

2. It's good to have morons like Rich around to share their Bush-Hitler conspiracy theories like "Berg was beheaded by Americans not by Al Qaeda." This keeps all the moderates in check, because as soon as they start getting a left-leaning idea, they realize Rich probably has the same opinion as they do and it dawns on them that they ought to rethink their positions.

3. It's always good to know what the fringe nut position is not only for the entertainment value, but also because eventually it will pop up in a Michael Moore movie and we will already have our refutations handy.

4. The devil you know... if Rich gets banned, an even less mentally sound fucktard like perhaps "Internet God" might take over his position as dipshit-in-chief and as unlikely as you might think, he could be even less coherent than his dementor.

In summation, absolutely do not ban the retard.

evl4fun · 06-24-2004, 04:18 AM

Not that my opinion counts for two shits and a duck.......but I'm with Buff, very valid points.

should he be banned-no should he be punched in the eye-probably should he be verbally aasualted-definatly

arial · 06-24-2004, 04:24 AM

Let the man speak his mind, nothing wrong with that. If he wants to make an idiot of himself then so be it. He's not hurting anyone except himself.

I gotta crash nite all.

ADL Colin · 06-24-2004, 04:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by arial
Let the man speak his mind, nothing wrong with that. If he wants to make an idiot of himself then so be it. He's not hurting anyone except himself.

I gotta crash nite all.

How about we make him wear an Ashc roft armband since he is his stooge?

Joe Citizen · 06-24-2004, 04:32 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
Do you think a webmaster like Rich should be banned for turning in webmasters to the Dept of Justice on the grounds of obscenity because he disagrees with their political views?

http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...pagen umber=2

Banning doesn't achieve anything Colin.

I've been banned twice. The funny thing is it's never been because of my political views.

I'd say more but I'm packing my bags. I'm going to the airport in the morning.

Don't have the time.

ADL Colin · 06-24-2004, 04:40 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joe Citizen
Banning doesn't achieve anything Colin.

I've been banned twice. The funny thing is it's never been because of my political views.

You must not have read the thread.

Rich's political views are fine. I'm saying people who are stooges for Ashhahahahaha and threatening to turn people into the DOJ for disagreeing with their political views have no business on an adult webmaster board.

Rich has become what he most despises, a collaborator of Mr. John A. If he were to really follow through it would mean that anyone who holds a certain viewpoint would then have to consider not posting on certain topics because of his threats. Even as only an empty threat, it is far less than amusing.

Joe Citizen · 06-24-2004, 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
You must not have read the thread.

Rich's political views are fine. I'm saying people who are stooges for Ashhahahahaha and threatening to turn people into the DOJ for disagreeing with their political views have no business on an adult webmaster board.

Rich has become what he most despises, a collaborator of Mr. John A.

People who support Ashhahahahaha and work in this industry are hypocrites.

ADL Colin · 06-24-2004, 04:48 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joe Citizen
People who support Ashhahahahaha and work in this industry are hypocrites.

No one said they supported Ashhahahahaha. Someone posted an opinion that "Bush will win easily." Rich made his usual off the deep end assumptions, put 2 and 2 together got 5 and then decided that he will threaten to turn them into the DOJ. Because he lacks the wit to argue the point he instead decides to threaten people. Probably in another drunken stupor.

Joe Citizen · 06-24-2004, 04:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
No one said they supported Ashhahahahaha. Someone posted an opinion that "Bush will win easily." Rich made his usual off the deep end assumptions, put 2 and 2 together got 5 and then decided that he will threaten to turn them into the DOJ. Because he lacks the wit to argue the point he instead decides to threaten people. Probably in another drunken stupor.

Okay, well it was probably an overreaction on his part.

Rich should smoke a bong and chill out.

That's what I'm doing.

ADL Colin · 06-24-2004, 04:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joe Citizen
Okay, well it was probably an overreaction on his part.

Rich should smoke a bong and chill out.

That's what I'm doing.

When I challenged him on it, he stood by it.

Joe Citizen · 06-24-2004, 05:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
When I challenged him on it, he stood by it.

Yeah he's probably just pissed off.

Theo · 06-24-2004, 05:02 AM

Banned no. A board is nothing more than a mean of communication, but I agree on what you said. If he reported a site, this action is no different than what he despites. That's what Rich should realise.

ADL Colin · 06-24-2004, 05:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Soul_Rebel
Banned no. A board is nothing more than a mean of communication, but I agree on what you said. If he reported a site, this action is no different than what he despites. That's what Rich should realise.

I think you're right, Soul Rebel.

Buff · 06-24-2004, 05:50 AM

Now Joe on the other hand... he should be banned, because he smells like shit.

Joe Citizen · 06-24-2004, 05:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Buff
Now Joe on the other hand... he should be banned, because he smells like shit.

Buff likes Star Wars
Buff cries when people at porn conventions smoke near his booth.

Buff = Gay

12clicks · 06-24-2004, 06:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MaskedMan
I will be fair, I do know what you mean by the whole bar to GFY comparison... and to a point I agree... however...

this is a public forum. Sure, it's contained within a given industry, but it's still very much public. Just as much as a public place is... conversations as such are in any public venue should be completely free, under the rule of freedom of speech.

However, just as what you could say can be used against you in a park or a restaurant or a bar.... it can be here as well.

Freedom of speech is also freedom of foot in mouth.... which is also freedom to do what ever to the person who just made the speech.

If you ban him from GFY for doing this, then every other public place of conversation would have to do the same.

It has nothing to do with my opinions of anyone here or anywhere, even if it was me that someone called the DOJ on... I'd definitely hate that person, but I wouldn't expect the board to ban him.

you couldn't be more wrong.
If a surfer came in here and started threatening to file complaints, he'd be banned.
Bich is nothing more than a surfer pretending to be in this industry. Threatening someone else's business on a business board, should be grounds for banning.
While I enjoy this stooge's posts and enjoy watching him drown in his own hate and stupidity, this board is still about business and making the childish threats Bich made, should cause his ouster.

chodadog · 06-24-2004, 06:45 AM

Rich is childish. That really is fucking pathetic.

Shok · 06-24-2004, 06:46 AM

Rich has proved time and time again that he has a dynamite suit in his closet and is waiting for his orders.

StuartD · 06-24-2004, 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks
you couldn't be more wrong.
If a surfer came in here and started threatening to file complaints, he'd be banned.
Bich is nothing more than a surfer pretending to be in this industry. Threatening someone else's business on a business board, should be grounds for banning.
While I enjoy this stooge's posts and enjoy watching him drown in his own hate and stupidity, this board is still about business and making the childish threats Bich made, should cause his ouster.

The surfer would then be banned for being a surfer, not for his actions against someone practicing free speech.

If Rich truly is nothing but a surfer, then sure... ban him. If he did call the DOJ on account of what someone said, then no, don't ban him.

You said I was wrong and then gave a totally different reason for the banning. Shame on you, making yourself sound right by changing the topic completely again

Sly_RJ · 06-24-2004, 10:15 AM

Doesn't Rich run casino sites? I don't think he has any adult sites, I could be wrong.

12clicks · 06-24-2004, 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MaskedMan
The surfer would then be banned for being a surfer, not for his actions against someone practicing free speech.

If Rich truly is nothing but a surfer, then sure... ban him. If he did call the DOJ on account of what someone said, then no, don't ban him.

You said I was wrong and then gave a totally different reason for the banning. Shame on you, making yourself sound right by changing the topic completely again

sorry asshat. if he called the DOJ to complain about someone here (or even threatened to) he should be gone. There is no changing the topic, I just tried to elemetary school it for you so you'd understand.
(if you owned a business, you would understand the problem better. it has nothing to do with free speach)

sexxxychat69 · 06-24-2004, 10:30 AM

No, it seems to me that people like Rich won't learn a dam thing until it up and bites them in the ass.

Holly · 06-24-2004, 10:34 AM

I'd say this is pretty much a non-issue. "I'm turning your site in to the DOJ" is right up there with:

"I'm seeing my lawyer about this tomorrow. Expect to see the papers in the mail soon."

"That's it motherfucker, I've had enough of your shit. I'm kicking your ass at Internext/Webmaster Access/Mardi Gras/the Winn Dixie parking lot."

"I'm shutting you down. When I'm through with you, you will NEVER do business in the adult industry again."

"Okay, listen up! A group of us are getting together and filing a class action lawsuit against (insert cheating sponsor here)."

If we're gonna start banning people for message board threats, it's going to get awfully lonely around here.

Tom_PMs · 06-24-2004, 10:36 AM

"You are what you eat."

xxxdesign-net · 06-24-2004, 10:36 AM

Ah good one.. I love those porn peddlers defending the conservatives' ideology... and when someone threaten them with a reality check, they scream "low blow"!

So here's a guy, hardcore fan of Bush and an administration trying to pass all kind of obsenity laws... he's running an Interracial site.. and sweating bullets when Rich threaten to report him..? Thats beautiful...

Sly_RJ · 06-24-2004, 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net
So here's a guy, hardcore fan of Bush and an administration trying to pass all kind of obsenity laws... he's running an Interracial site.. and sweating bullets when Rich threaten to report him..? Thats beautiful...

Alex is a hardcore fan of Bush? I must have missed that post.

xxxdesign-net · 06-24-2004, 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sly_RJ
Alex is a hardcore fan of Bush? I must have missed that post.

I didnt.. he stated at numerous occasions, with passion, that he was a republican ... now interpretate that how you want... fan of Bush.. passionate republican...

xxxdesign-net · 06-24-2004, 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
Do you think a webmaster like Rich should be banned for turning in webmasters to the Dept of Justice on the grounds of obscenity because he disagrees with their political views?

http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...pagen umber=2

and btw.. honest question.. do you really think that Ashahahahaha is trying have interracial sites pass for obsene..? If so... do you understand the conseqences for the adult industry to keep a guy like that in power... ? Whats next? Anal?

12clicks · 06-24-2004, 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net
Ah good one.. I love those porn peddlers defending the conservatives' ideology... and when someone threaten them with a reality check, they scream "low blow"!

So here's a guy, hardcore fan of Bush and an administration trying to pass all kind of obsenity laws... he's running an Interracial site.. and sweating bullets when Rich threaten to report him..? Thats beautiful...

ahhh, another idiot joins the fray.
son, there were people who ran into trouble with the law under clinton just because someone ratted them out to the authorities. You have no understanding of the issue.

StuartD · 06-24-2004, 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks
sorry asshat. if he called the DOJ to complain about someone here (or even threatened to) he should be gone. There is no changing the topic, I just tried to elemetary school it for you so you'd understand.
(if you owned a business, you would understand the problem better. it has nothing to do with free speach)

Ooh, name calling now... and bad spelling, you were right about making it at an elementary school level

If I owned a business huh? So now you're assuming things about me, truth is... you really have no idea if I do or not.

Anyway, it still wouldn't make any difference. A person can call a lawyer, or the DOJ, or his mommy all he wants.... that's no cause for being banned. Everyone will see it, and know to avoid that person from then on... but that's about it.

If a surfer comes here, that surfer will be banned on account of this being an adult board and surfers aren't welcome. That's an admin decision... nothing to do with the DOJ or freedom of speech.

As I said, if I talked politics with you in a bar, and you called the DOJ, then I'd hardly assume the bar would kick you out and ban you from the place.

Same goes for a message board.

Gabriel · 06-24-2004, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Internet God
[SIZE=1]Maybe we should ban people like Colin who support Bush since the Bush administration is so against porn.

I vote to BAn COliN

Please quit using subliminal messages. Its after 11am here and its almost impossible to find breakfast still being served.

Rich · 06-24-2004, 11:20 AM

It's fine for people to support the lunatics making the laws that are putting our brothers in jail, but God forbid someone POINT OUT how easy it would be to put ONE OF US in jail for it under these Jesus freaks.

http://www.obscenitycrimes.org/

I make a hell of a point, as I did in that thread._These fools are hypocrites, and if they're going to vote for the type of fundamentalist government shown in the site above, then they should get what they wished for. I didn't seriously file a report against him because I'm not a rat, but it wouldn't break my heart if someone did and these "Bush pornographers" were the first ones hunted down by Asskroft's team of lawyers. Better them then someone on our side who's doing something to help, like Flint or Rick from CJ Bucks.

Being a conservative is one thing. Support the regime that's trying to end our business is another, and it makes you my enemy and the enemy of everything in this business.

Quote:

Originally posted by Sly_RJ
Doesn't Rich run casino sites? I don't think he has any adult sites, I could be wrong.

My main business is gaming but I've been testing the waters in adult for the past year and a half.

Rich · 06-24-2004, 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
No one said they supported Ashhahahahaha. Someone posted an opinion that "Bush will win easily." Rich made his usual off the deep end assumptions, put 2 and 2 together got 5 and then decided that he will threaten to turn them into the DOJ. Because he lacks the wit to argue the point he instead decides to threaten people. Probably in another drunken stupor.

That's bullshit, it wasn't his one comment it was his repeated support and defense of the Bush administration. Just because you fail to see my argument, doesn't make a bit of fucking difference to me. It seems you actually missed the thread where I first asked Alex if he minded my reporting him to Asskroft.

Americans can't have it both ways, either you want Bush or you want to keep your business.

Thank you Colin, for helping me bring this website to more people's attention.

Oh, and for proving that you and 12dicks are the ones ones who want me banned.

06-24-2004, 03:26 AM	#1
ADL Colin Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Tube Titans, USA Posts: 11,929	Should Rich be banned? Do you think a webmaster like Rich should be banned for turning in webmasters to the Dept of Justice on the grounds of obscenity because he disagrees with their political views? http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...pagen umber=2 __________________ Adult Date Link - $50 PPS starting NOW! -- good and JUICY! skype = "adultdatelink"

06-24-2004, 03:27 AM	#2
StuartD Sofa King Band Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Outside the box Posts: 29,903	no __________________ This is me on facebook This is me on twitter

06-24-2004, 03:37 AM	#9
ADL Colin Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Tube Titans, USA Posts: 11,929	There are many political discussions here. People who make their living from porn should be free to post their views without feeling that someone is willing to threaten their livelihood. It's a form of forced censorship of the worst kind. __________________ Adult Date Link - $50 PPS starting NOW! -- good and JUICY! skype = "adultdatelink"

06-24-2004, 03:53 AM	#16
StuartD Sofa King Band Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Outside the box Posts: 29,903	I will be fair, I do know what you mean by the whole bar to GFY comparison... and to a point I agree... however... this is a public forum. Sure, it's contained within a given industry, but it's still very much public. Just as much as a public place is... conversations as such are in any public venue should be completely free, under the rule of freedom of speech. However, just as what you could say can be used against you in a park or a restaurant or a bar.... it can be here as well. Freedom of speech is also freedom of foot in mouth.... which is also freedom to do what ever to the person who just made the speech. If you ban him from GFY for doing this, then every other public place of conversation would have to do the same. It has nothing to do with my opinions of anyone here or anywhere, even if it was me that someone called the DOJ on... I'd definitely hate that person, but I wouldn't expect the board to ban him. __________________ This is me on facebook This is me on twitter

06-24-2004, 03:59 AM	#18
Buff GFY Assassin Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 2,993	By the way, in answer to your query, I vote "no" because 1. I hate boards that ban people -- that's fucking gay. It's easy enough to textually sodomize gerbil stuffers like Rich. 2. It's good to have morons like Rich around to share their Bush-Hitler conspiracy theories like "Berg was beheaded by Americans not by Al Qaeda." This keeps all the moderates in check, because as soon as they start getting a left-leaning idea, they realize Rich probably has the same opinion as they do and it dawns on them that they ought to rethink their positions. 3. It's always good to know what the fringe nut position is not only for the entertainment value, but also because eventually it will pop up in a Michael Moore movie and we will already have our refutations handy. 4. The devil you know... if Rich gets banned, an even less mentally sound fucktard like perhaps "Internet God" might take over his position as dipshit-in-chief and as unlikely as you might think, he could be even less coherent than his dementor. In summation, absolutely do not ban the retard. Last edited by Buff; 06-24-2004 at 04:00 AM..

06-24-2004, 03:29 AM	#3
Internet God So Fucking Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: RockStar Land, US Posts: 182	No

06-24-2004, 03:31 AM	#6
Internet God So Fucking Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: RockStar Land, US Posts: 182	Maybe we should ban people like Colin who support Bush since the Bush administration is so against porn. I vote to BAN COLIN!

06-24-2004, 04:18 AM	#19
evl4fun Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: hell,uhhh errr nebraska Posts: 372	Not that my opinion counts for two shits and a duck.......but I'm with Buff, very valid points. should he be banned-no should he be punched in the eye-probably should he be verbally aasualted-definatly __________________ If you spend all day worrying about what happened yesterday.....then tommorow will suck too.

06-24-2004, 04:24 AM	#20
arial Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Bay Area Posts: 4,012	Let the man speak his mind, nothing wrong with that. If he wants to make an idiot of himself then so be it. He's not hurting anyone except himself. I gotta crash nite all.

06-24-2004, 05:02 AM	#29
Theo HAL 9000 Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Posts: 34,515	Banned no. A board is nothing more than a mean of communication, but I agree on what you said. If he reported a site, this action is no different than what he despites. That's what Rich should realise.

06-24-2004, 05:50 AM	#31
Buff GFY Assassin Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 2,993	Now Joe on the other hand... he should be banned, because he smells like shit.

06-24-2004, 06:45 AM	#34
chodadog Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 9,736	Rich is childish. That really is fucking pathetic. __________________ 26 + 6 = 1

06-24-2004, 06:46 AM	#35
Shok Confirmed User Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: LIVE EVIL Posts: 5,611	Rich has proved time and time again that he has a dynamite suit in his closet and is waiting for his orders.

06-24-2004, 10:15 AM	#37
Sly_RJ Live Hard - Die Hard Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Ready to leave... Posts: 17,042	Doesn't Rich run casino sites? I don't think he has any adult sites, I could be wrong. __________________ PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price! sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144

06-24-2004, 10:30 AM	#39
sexxxychat69 I will make you galleries for a reciprocal link Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 394	No, it seems to me that people like Rich won't learn a dam thing until it up and bites them in the ass.

06-24-2004, 10:34 AM	#40
Holly Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Jesusland Posts: 10,017	I'd say this is pretty much a non-issue. "I'm turning your site in to the DOJ" is right up there with: "I'm seeing my lawyer about this tomorrow. Expect to see the papers in the mail soon." "That's it motherfucker, I've had enough of your shit. I'm kicking your ass at Internext/Webmaster Access/Mardi Gras/the Winn Dixie parking lot." "I'm shutting you down. When I'm through with you, you will NEVER do business in the adult industry again." "Okay, listen up! A group of us are getting together and filing a class action lawsuit against (insert cheating sponsor here)." If we're gonna start banning people for message board threats, it's going to get awfully lonely around here. __________________ War National Damn Champions Eagle

06-24-2004, 10:36 AM	#41
Tom_PMs Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 2,049	"You are what you eat."

06-24-2004, 10:36 AM	#42
xxxdesign-net My hips don't lie Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 10,129	Ah good one.. I love those porn peddlers defending the conservatives' ideology... and when someone threaten them with a reality check, they scream "low blow"! So here's a guy, hardcore fan of Bush and an administration trying to pass all kind of obsenity laws... he's running an Interracial site.. and sweating bullets when Rich threaten to report him..? Thats beautiful...