gimme samples of your favorite Web 2.0 designs/sites - GoFuckYourself.com

Mutt · 05-06-2010, 03:26 AM

I want to get a fresh clean web 2.0 looking site designed - i need some samples so at least the designer has an idea of what I want. don't need to be adult sites, can be mainstream or adult.

post some links please

Zuzana Designs · 05-06-2010, 03:37 AM

I have realized that every person has a different idea of what Web 2.0 is. Do you have a sample of what you feel is Web 2.0 in your eyes. Some clients think this is Web 2.0
Sample 01

while others think these are Web 2.0.
Sample 2
Sample 3

Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life · 05-06-2010, 04:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zuzana Designs

I have realized that every person has a different idea of what Web 2.0 is. Do you have a sample of what you feel is Web 2.0 in your eyes. Some clients think this is Web 2.0
Sample 01

while others think these are Web 2.0.
Sample 2
Sample 3

None of which really look super "web 2.0" in my eyes.

Zuzana Designs · 05-06-2010, 04:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angry Jew Cat

None of which really look super "web 2.0" in my eyes.

What is web 2.0 in "your eyes" ?

Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life · 05-06-2010, 04:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zuzana Designs

What is web 2.0 in "your eyes" ?

I'd lean more towards your first example if I had to choose. I just think the entire concept of "web 2.0" as a design style is stupid, but if I had to I'd say it's more minimal. Tabs, gradients, softer color contrasts.

If I had to pick out a site of the top of my head as having a really slick clean web 2.0 look. I think the first I'd go for would be DocStoc.

But again, I think "Web 2.0" is a stupid fucking term. It's all "Web 2.0" really, WTF is your other option? "Web 1.0"? "Web 3.0"? What are those? I really don't think "Web 2.0" is a term which is applicable to design itself. Though I'm sure the designers will gladly argue that.

calvinawe · 05-06-2010, 04:22 AM

soundcloud.com

Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life · 05-06-2010, 04:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvinawe

soundcloud.com

<3 soundcloud... but not for the design.

now playing, pretty sweet breaks set
http://soundcloud.com/dj-subcyde/dj-...avin-it-breaks

SayWhut · 05-06-2010, 04:27 AM

http://www.degt.cl/
http://www.weberica.in/
http://ftdesigner.net/
http://www.serialcut.com/
http://jackherbert.com/
http://www.members.slam.nhs.uk/
http://modxcms.com/
http://www.richmondwindows.co.uk/
http://www.arvorecer.com.br/

Web 3.0

Zuzana Designs · 05-06-2010, 05:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SayWhut

http://www.degt.cl/
http://www.weberica.in/
http://ftdesigner.net/
http://www.serialcut.com/
http://jackherbert.com/
http://www.members.slam.nhs.uk/
http://modxcms.com/
http://www.richmondwindows.co.uk/
http://www.arvorecer.com.br/

Web 3.0

That's some really nice work. Very clean

LoveSandra · 05-06-2010, 05:43 AM

bump 4 more

daniel_webcams · 05-06-2010, 06:37 AM

yep we need to see more...

Mutt · 05-06-2010, 06:47 AM

web 2.0 is a graphic design style to many even if that's not what the original coiners of the term meant it to be, zuzana's samples have elements of that style but being porn sites they are a bit busy. rounded rectangles, soft gradients, large heading text, blank/negative space, tabs, buttons, jquery sliders - web 2.0 is also function/features which let the surfer interact with the site and its content. i'm just looking for nice samples of the design part for now for reference/inspiration.

The Truth Hurts · 05-06-2010, 06:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zuzana Designs

Sample 3

i usually don't mess with other designers or their work, but you've really gotta make the fixed background image on that page a lot bigger...

otherwise ya get this..

Mutt · 05-06-2010, 06:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SayWhut

http://www.degt.cl/
http://www.weberica.in/
http://ftdesigner.net/
http://www.serialcut.com/
http://jackherbert.com/
http://www.members.slam.nhs.uk/
http://modxcms.com/
http://www.richmondwindows.co.uk/
http://www.arvorecer.com.br/

Web 3.0

most of these are definitely that style - modxcms is a pretty typical good example of 'web 2.0' style design and layout. SerialCut is gorgeous but I'm looking at a social network type site design and that one is really only applicable for a portfolio/showcase type site.

Zuzana Designs · 05-06-2010, 07:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Truth Hurts

i usually don't mess with other designers or their work, but you've really gotta make the fixed background image on that page a lot bigger...

otherwise ya get this..

The site is still just a concept so it will be fixed before going live. I should have fixed that before I posted it. Thanks though for the heads up.

BestXXXPorn · 05-06-2010, 07:01 AM

Web 2.0 Design Style is normally characterized by:

Simplicity
Central Layout
Solid areas of screen real-estate
Simple Navigations
Bold Logos
Bigger Text
Rich Surfaces
Gradients
Reflections
Rounded Corners

And they basically follow better design principals than older sites. With more available options, sites are starting to look more and more like print work (which they should). A stronger focus on good typography is also a staple "Web 2.0" thing...

It's also a move to more application like functionality... AJAX has made a lot of things possible and so as a byproduct it has also changed designs... The popularity of some major players during the rise of "Web 2.0" (Digg, Twitter, etc...) heavily influenced what is considered a "Web 2.0" style... A lot of these design principals considered "Web 2.0" as also based in the tech itself like CSS3... Allowing for rounded corners, gradients, etc... to be created without using images allows for faster page load times and more robust options for designing using (X)HTML/CSS only. I believe this is a major part of "Web 2.0" designs...

Mutt · 05-06-2010, 07:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Truth Hurts

i usually don't mess with other designers or their work, but you've really gotta make the fixed background image on that page a lot bigger...

otherwise ya get this..

yeah i noticed that too. that design isn't in use when u go to Savanah Swings' paysite though.

when this design style came out i was still on a 17" monitor at 1024x768 resolution - a big % of surfers still are - the wide screen look and big design elements looked great to me. now i'm on a 25" monitor at 1920x1080 and websites look so small. I hate it, problem with an LCD monitor is that my display only really looks good at 1920x1080.

Mutt · 05-06-2010, 07:05 AM

oh that Savannah Swings site design is going live? what CMS is it running on that powers the tour?

BestXXXPorn · 05-06-2010, 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt

yeah i noticed that too. that design isn't in use when u go to Savanah Swings' paysite though.

when this design style came out i was still on a 17" monitor at 1024x768 resolution - a big % of surfers still are - the wide screen look and big design elements looked great to me. now i'm on a 25" monitor at 1920x1080 and websites look so small. I hate it, problem with an LCD monitor is that my display only really looks good at 1920x1080.

LOL you bring up another good point...

One of the main reasons font is getting larger on sites...

Because more and more people are moving to better monitors... I'm on a 2560 x 1600... It's not that they look small now it's that they looked WAY too large before... ;)

Zuzana Designs · 05-06-2010, 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt

oh that Savannah Swings site design is going live? what CMS is it running on that powers the tour?

We are going live on the 10th

The tour that's live now is using MAS to power it. We have a flash tour that will be tour #2 that will use MAS. When we get the jQuery on the top of this third tour done and the background fixed it will use Konrads CMS to power it. Going to focus on making it a social network for swingers.

BestXXXPorn · 05-06-2010, 07:15 AM

Also an AWESOME reference for CSS3 styles in all browsers (IE specifically because it sucks):

http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2010...rnet-explorer/

Mutt · 05-06-2010, 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zuzana Designs

We are going live on the 10th

The tour that's live now is using MAS to power it. We have a flash tour that will be tour #2 that will use MAS. When we get the jQuery on the top of this third tour done and the background fixed it will use Konrads CMS to power it. Going to focus on making it a social network for swingers.

what CMS of Konrad's? he's never mentioned a paysite CMS to me other than his tube script.

NaughtyRob · 05-06-2010, 09:01 AM

http://www.socalgirls.com/main.php

fris · 05-06-2010, 09:07 AM

90% of you dont even know what web20 looks like, if you think paysites are any sign of that you are sadly mistaken

Serge Litehead · 05-06-2010, 09:25 AM

agree with AJC & Fris and not really digging the term Web2.0 for design

here's my perspective on what the term means regarding design:
- clean minimalistic style design,
- larger fonts,
- larger space margins between elements,
- fresh and hi contrast color scheme - this one debatable
- some glossy (glass like) effects can apply on buttons and small containers.* this one cute but is not necessary.

Most people see glossy effect and think is web2.0

Mutt, you should give us a shot sometime again ;)

Zuzana Designs · 05-06-2010, 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt

what CMS of Konrad's? he's never mentioned a paysite CMS to me other than his tube script.

We are modifying his tube script to work as the cms with all the social networking features. It will work with CCbill as well. We are using it on this site as too.
Lebron James Tube
If and when I get the design all done of course. Never enough hours in the day it seems.

Serge Litehead · 05-06-2010, 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BestXXXPorn

Web 2.0 Design Style is normally characterized by:

Simplicity
Central Layout
Solid areas of screen real-estate
Simple Navigations
Bold Logos
Bigger Text
Rich Surfaces
Gradients
Reflections
Rounded Corners

And they basically follow better design principals than older sites. With more available options, sites are starting to look more and more like print work (which they should). A stronger focus on good typography is also a staple "Web 2.0" thing...

It's also a move to more application like functionality... AJAX has made a lot of things possible and so as a byproduct it has also changed designs... The popularity of some major players during the rise of "Web 2.0" (Digg, Twitter, etc...) heavily influenced what is considered a "Web 2.0" style... A lot of these design principals considered "Web 2.0" as also based in the tech itself like CSS3... Allowing for rounded corners, gradients, etc... to be created without using images allows for faster page load times and more robust options for designing using (X)HTML/CSS only. I believe this is a major part of "Web 2.0" designs...

Spot on - typography and marginal rules is what makes web2.0 - very similar approach with publishing (print).
fancy stuff is just that.

_Richard_ · 05-06-2010, 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvinawe

soundcloud.com

soundcloud rocks

Sid70 · 05-06-2010, 11:42 AM

porn will be resurrected in web 2.0.

madawgz · 05-06-2010, 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SayWhut

http://www.degt.cl/
http://www.weberica.in/
http://ftdesigner.net/
http://www.serialcut.com/
http://jackherbert.com/
http://www.members.slam.nhs.uk/
http://modxcms.com/
http://www.richmondwindows.co.uk/
http://www.arvorecer.com.br/

Web 3.0

except the second the last one lol

Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life · 05-06-2010, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by madawgz

except the second the last one lol

who the fuck slipped that in there? lol

Deej · 05-06-2010, 02:08 PM

For anyone confused on what Web 2.0 'is' watch this...

Mutt i do believe is just asking for the Look and feel of the new versions of webpages. Saywhut provided some damn nice modern looking sites.

A lot of people confuse web2.0 mechanics for glossy shiny looking reflective design.

MetaMan · 05-06-2010, 02:09 PM

Most of you idiots have 0 concept of web 2.0.

MetaMan · 05-06-2010, 02:12 PM

web 2.0 has nothing to do with rounded corners or larger fonts omfg or gradients or any of that bullshit.

Serge Litehead · 05-06-2010, 02:14 PM

are you talking "web2.0" design style, Meta or functional definition of what is Web2.0 really about?

anyway, enlighten us please

MetaMan · 05-06-2010, 02:16 PM

the fact that you people think web 2.0 has a look shows how much you are tripping, and this is why adult is being demolished.

web 2.0 has no singular look its the exact opposite.

MetaMan · 05-06-2010, 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by holograph

are you talking "web2.0" design style, Meta or functional definition of what is Web2.0 really about?

anyway, enlighten us please

keyword FUNCTIONALITY. i dont want to go into details because i am not free

there is no key style that makes web 2.0 the point of web 2.0 is having your site its own style where it compares to no other. but that is maybe 5% of it.

ill think about how much i want to give away over a movie.

Serge Litehead · 05-06-2010, 02:20 PM

Meta, yea but there some people who like web2.0 look and feel in their designs ;) do you tell them to fuck off when being approached? that is if you're really a designer

MetaMan · 05-06-2010, 02:22 PM

ya but web 2.0 is not about a "look" think of MAC OSX compared to WINDOWS, yes they are both OS's but what makes them different?

here is the key when designing your websites. think of them comparitively but realize how different they are and what makes one better then the other, or appear to be better when in all likelyhood they are the exact same.

ill drop you a msg when i get time i havent forgotten you sound like you are interested in a real convo holograph.

Serge Litehead · 05-06-2010, 02:24 PM

for me personally Web2.0 means interactivity - a possibility to make full blown applications right on a site.. say you make something like Photoshop to load in a browser - that is one single example of pure Web2.0, then instant interactivity with others also Web2.0

that's why i said I don't like term web2.0 for a design in my first post in this thread.

MetaMan · 05-06-2010, 02:24 PM

Of course load speeds font sizes etc etc have to do with the design but you should of been doing those things before "web 2.0" so in all reality they have nothing to do with it.

MetaMan · 05-06-2010, 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by holograph

for me personally Web2.0 means interactivity - a possibility to make full blown applications right on a site.. say you make something like Photoshop to load in a browser - that is one single example of pure Web2.0, then instant interactivity with others also Web2.0

that's why i said I don't like term web2.0 for a design in my first post in this thread.

now you are onto it you bad boy.

Serge Litehead · 05-06-2010, 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetaMan

Of course load speeds font sizes etc etc have to do with the design but you should of been doing those things before "web 2.0" so in all reality they have nothing to do with it.

very true

MetaMan · 05-06-2010, 02:27 PM

web 2.0 is about functionality bringing the website into a users life. they should be able to eat sleep shit and contact their friends all in one streamlined process. not literally but you get the idea.

web 2.0 is about functionality and accessibility.

Deej · 05-06-2010, 02:31 PM

Hey, dont be taking my glory...

MetaMan · 05-06-2010, 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deej

Hey, dont be taking my glory...

12345678

Serge Litehead · 05-06-2010, 02:33 PM

almighty glorious Deej ;) didn't watch the vid, but what you said holds much truth in it))

Deej · 05-06-2010, 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by holograph

almighty glorious Deej ;) didn't watch the vid, but what you said holds much truth in it))

Watch the fucking video!!!!!!!!!!

3xTom · 05-06-2010, 02:48 PM

This entire thread made me chuckle just a little bit...

Deej · 05-06-2010, 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3xTom

This entire thread made me chuckle just a little bit...

Good Times

05-06-2010, 03:26 AM	#1
Mutt Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 34,431	gimme samples of your favorite Web 2.0 designs/sites I want to get a fresh clean web 2.0 looking site designed - i need some samples so at least the designer has an idea of what I want. don't need to be adult sites, can be mainstream or adult. post some links please __________________ I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!

05-06-2010, 06:37 AM	#11
daniel_webcams Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 2,491	yep we need to see more... __________________ Daniel, Skype: [email protected] ICQ: 354-220-339 Email: daniel@adultforce[dot]com

05-06-2010, 06:47 AM	#12
Mutt Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 34,431	web 2.0 is a graphic design style to many even if that's not what the original coiners of the term meant it to be, zuzana's samples have elements of that style but being porn sites they are a bit busy. rounded rectangles, soft gradients, large heading text, blank/negative space, tabs, buttons, jquery sliders - web 2.0 is also function/features which let the surfer interact with the site and its content. i'm just looking for nice samples of the design part for now for reference/inspiration. __________________ I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!

05-06-2010, 07:01 AM	#16
BestXXXPorn Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Asheville, NC Posts: 2,277	Web 2.0 Design Style is normally characterized by: Simplicity Central Layout Solid areas of screen real-estate Simple Navigations Bold Logos Bigger Text Rich Surfaces Gradients Reflections Rounded Corners And they basically follow better design principals than older sites. With more available options, sites are starting to look more and more like print work (which they should). A stronger focus on good typography is also a staple "Web 2.0" thing... It's also a move to more application like functionality... AJAX has made a lot of things possible and so as a byproduct it has also changed designs... The popularity of some major players during the rise of "Web 2.0" (Digg, Twitter, etc...) heavily influenced what is considered a "Web 2.0" style... A lot of these design principals considered "Web 2.0" as also based in the tech itself like CSS3... Allowing for rounded corners, gradients, etc... to be created without using images allows for faster page load times and more robust options for designing using (X)HTML/CSS only. I believe this is a major part of "Web 2.0" designs... __________________ ICQ: 258-202-811 \| Email: eric{at}bestxxxporn.com

05-06-2010, 07:05 AM	#18
Mutt Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 34,431	oh that Savannah Swings site design is going live? what CMS is it running on that powers the tour? __________________ I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!

05-06-2010, 03:37 AM	#2
Zuzana Designs All Your Design Needs Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: [email protected] Posts: 20,788	I have realized that every person has a different idea of what Web 2.0 is. Do you have a sample of what you feel is Web 2.0 in your eyes. Some clients think this is Web 2.0 Sample 01 while others think these are Web 2.0. Sample 2 Sample 3 __________________ Website Design - Consulting - Development sarah [at] zuzanadesigns.com - See Our Work Need a SFW landing page or tour for age verification?

05-06-2010, 04:22 AM	#6
calvinawe Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: AWE hq Posts: 786	soundcloud.com

05-06-2010, 04:27 AM	#8
SayWhut Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: United Blingdom Posts: 962	http://www.degt.cl/ http://www.weberica.in/ http://ftdesigner.net/ http://www.serialcut.com/ http://jackherbert.com/ http://www.members.slam.nhs.uk/ http://modxcms.com/ http://www.richmondwindows.co.uk/ http://www.arvorecer.com.br/ Web 3.0

05-06-2010, 05:43 AM	#10
LoveSandra So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Just Blow Me Posts: 10,551	bump 4 more

05-06-2010, 07:15 AM	#21
BestXXXPorn Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Asheville, NC Posts: 2,277	Also an AWESOME reference for CSS3 styles in all browsers (IE specifically because it sucks): http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2010...rnet-explorer/ __________________ ICQ: 258-202-811 \| Email: eric{at}bestxxxporn.com

05-06-2010, 09:01 AM	#23
NaughtyRob Two fresh affiliate progs Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Inside teen pussy Posts: 29,602	http://www.socalgirls.com/main.php __________________ [email protected] Skype: 17026955414 Vacares Web Hosting - Protect Your Ass with Included Daily Backups

05-06-2010, 09:07 AM	#24
fris Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 55,239	90% of you dont even know what web20 looks like, if you think paysites are any sign of that you are sadly mistaken __________________ Since 1999: 69 Adult Industry awards for Best Hosting Company and professional excellence. WP Stuff

05-06-2010, 09:25 AM	#25
Serge Litehead Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Behind the scenes Posts: 5,190	agree with AJC & Fris and not really digging the term Web2.0 for design here's my perspective on what the term means regarding design: - clean minimalistic style design, - larger fonts, - larger space margins between elements, - fresh and hi contrast color scheme - this one debatable - some glossy (glass like) effects can apply on buttons and small containers.* this one cute but is not necessary. Most people see glossy effect and think is web2.0 Mutt, you should give us a shot sometime again ;) __________________ SilverCrocodile.com Adult web design since '05 Last edited by Serge Litehead; 05-06-2010 at 09:31 AM..

05-06-2010, 11:42 AM	#29
Sid70 Downshifter Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Road trip Posts: 16,413	porn will be resurrected in web 2.0. __________________ Русня, идите нахуй!

05-06-2010, 02:08 PM	#32
Deej I make pixels work Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: I live here... Posts: 24,386	For anyone confused on what Web 2.0 'is' watch this... Mutt i do believe is just asking for the Look and feel of the new versions of webpages. Saywhut provided some damn nice modern looking sites. A lot of people confuse web2.0 mechanics for glossy shiny looking reflective design. __________________ Deej's Designs n' What Not Hit me up for Design, CSS & Photo Retouching Icq#30096880

05-06-2010, 02:09 PM	#33
MetaMan I AM WEB 2.0 Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 28,682	Most of you idiots have 0 concept of web 2.0.

05-06-2010, 02:12 PM	#34
MetaMan I AM WEB 2.0 Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 28,682	web 2.0 has nothing to do with rounded corners or larger fonts omfg or gradients or any of that bullshit.

05-06-2010, 02:14 PM	#35
Serge Litehead Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Behind the scenes Posts: 5,190	are you talking "web2.0" design style, Meta or functional definition of what is Web2.0 really about? anyway, enlighten us please __________________ SilverCrocodile.com Adult web design since '05

05-06-2010, 02:16 PM	#36
MetaMan I AM WEB 2.0 Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 28,682	the fact that you people think web 2.0 has a look shows how much you are tripping, and this is why adult is being demolished. web 2.0 has no singular look its the exact opposite.

05-06-2010, 02:20 PM	#38
Serge Litehead Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Behind the scenes Posts: 5,190	Meta, yea but there some people who like web2.0 look and feel in their designs ;) do you tell them to fuck off when being approached? that is if you're really a designer __________________ SilverCrocodile.com Adult web design since '05

05-06-2010, 02:22 PM	#39
MetaMan I AM WEB 2.0 Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 28,682	ya but web 2.0 is not about a "look" think of MAC OSX compared to WINDOWS, yes they are both OS's but what makes them different? here is the key when designing your websites. think of them comparitively but realize how different they are and what makes one better then the other, or appear to be better when in all likelyhood they are the exact same. ill drop you a msg when i get time i havent forgotten you sound like you are interested in a real convo holograph.

05-06-2010, 02:24 PM	#40
Serge Litehead Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Behind the scenes Posts: 5,190	for me personally Web2.0 means interactivity - a possibility to make full blown applications right on a site.. say you make something like Photoshop to load in a browser - that is one single example of pure Web2.0, then instant interactivity with others also Web2.0 that's why i said I don't like term web2.0 for a design in my first post in this thread. __________________ SilverCrocodile.com Adult web design since '05

05-06-2010, 02:27 PM	#44
MetaMan I AM WEB 2.0 Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 28,682	web 2.0 is about functionality bringing the website into a users life. they should be able to eat sleep shit and contact their friends all in one streamlined process. not literally but you get the idea. web 2.0 is about functionality and accessibility.

05-06-2010, 02:31 PM	#45
Deej I make pixels work Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: I live here... Posts: 24,386	Hey, dont be taking my glory... __________________ Deej's Designs n' What Not Hit me up for Design, CSS & Photo Retouching Icq#30096880

05-06-2010, 02:33 PM	#47
Serge Litehead Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Behind the scenes Posts: 5,190	almighty glorious Deej ;) didn't watch the vid, but what you said holds much truth in it)) __________________ SilverCrocodile.com Adult web design since '05

05-06-2010, 02:48 PM	#49
3xTom Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 1,610	This entire thread made me chuckle just a little bit...