Would you want a Nuclear Bomb IF........... - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

BIGTYMER · 05-08-2010, 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mayabong

Yeah George Stephanopolis does look pretty bad.

No, he looks great. Its your bud Ahmadinejad who looks like shit. Just take one look at him. Could be stress or maybe the CIA has been adding some good stuff to his diet.

mayabong · 05-08-2010, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIGTYMER

No, he looks great. Its your bud Ahmadinejad who looks like shit. Just take one look at him. Could be stress or maybe the CIA has been adding some good stuff to his diet.

I'd be stressed too.

BIGTYMER · 05-08-2010, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mayabong

I'd be stressed too.

Yeah, I would be to if I were him. But he did it to himself. I'm not for or against attacking them but messing with the US is just plain stupid.

mayabong · 05-08-2010, 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIGTYMER

Yeah, I would be to if I were him. But he did it to himself. I'm not for or against attacking them but messing with the US is just plain stupid.

How is he messing with the US? This whole thing has nothing to do with Nuclear weapons BTW. Pakistan has nukes, just test fired missles today, hates israel, supposedly has terrorists here, (they have a dictator too?), and they are our ally? hahaha. This has been planned for a long time. This is just one excuse.

Black Ops · 05-08-2010, 02:56 PM

The USA has created this threat from Iran to go to war with them. This is no different than any other fabricated threat created by the USA.

mayabong · 05-08-2010, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Black Ops

The USA has created this threat from Iran to go to war with them. This is no different than any other fabricated threat created by the USA.

Simple as that. I can't believe people fall for this shit over and over.

L-Pink · 05-08-2010, 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB

Jews are allowed to not follow the rules because Hitler did bad things to them 65 years ago. And if you question that then you're anti-Semitic.

Gotta go with the Gator on this one.

.

mayabong · 05-08-2010, 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

Gotta go with the Gator on this one.

.

smutnut · 05-08-2010, 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVTimes

Ali G should be president!

DateDoc · 05-08-2010, 07:03 PM

I would have no problem with Iran having nuclear capability if they had sane leadership. I do not see the latter happening so the first should not happen either.

Konkan · 05-08-2010, 07:07 PM

Why USA looking after every country that has a nuclear bomb? Are they scared or what? Otherwise who will judge USA for their nuclear bomb btw?

smutnut · 05-08-2010, 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Konkan

Why USA looking after every country that has a nuclear bomb? Are they scared or what? Otherwise who will judge USA for their nuclear bomb btw?

I agree. We should stop watching your goat herding ass and just nuke you, you peasant motherfucker!

mayabong · 05-08-2010, 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caligari

He never said that- another convenient mis-interpretation by the right wing media. He said the state of israel should not exist and orthodox jews agree because according to judaism the state of israel should not exist now.

From a practical and humanitarian standpoint what the fuck did people expect after WW2? They needed to form their own state. Although I do not agree with fanatical zionism or any other religious "isms" for that matter.

Its funny cause the "Homeland" was planned out during WW1 with the Balfour Declaration and this had nothing to do with the "holocaust". The Germans saw this as a stab in the back cause it brought America into the war and eventually their defeat. The jews were not innocent by any means. Of course they'll all play like they are the victims... its quite quite the opposite. (zionists that is) The Jews against zionism speak the truth.

dyna mo · 05-08-2010, 08:03 PM

nation building: worst idea ever. to push a diplomatic notion that things are dramatically different on either side of a dotted line put there for wtfever reason is beyond complete stupidity.

L-Pink · 05-08-2010, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smutnut

I agree. We should stop watching your goat herding ass and just nuke you, you peasant motherfucker!

... oh fuck!

.

nico-t · 05-09-2010, 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Black Ops

The USA has created this threat from Iran to go to war with them. This is no different than any other fabricated threat created by the USA.

exactly.

05-08-2010, 02:56 PM	#55
Black Ops Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 292	The USA has created this threat from Iran to go to war with them. This is no different than any other fabricated threat created by the USA. __________________ If you can read this sig, you're already dead.

05-08-2010, 07:03 PM	#60
DateDoc Outside looking in. Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: To Hell You Ride Posts: 14,243	I would have no problem with Iran having nuclear capability if they had sane leadership. I do not see the latter happening so the first should not happen either. __________________

05-08-2010, 07:07 PM	#61
Konkan Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 3,537	Why USA looking after every country that has a nuclear bomb? Are they scared or what? Otherwise who will judge USA for their nuclear bomb btw? __________________ Only one affiliate program for Pussy and Cash

05-08-2010, 08:03 PM	#64
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 64,779	nation building: worst idea ever. to push a diplomatic notion that things are dramatically different on either side of a dotted line put there for wtfever reason is beyond complete stupidity.