Important court decision: Organized indexing of infringements is also infringement - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

kristin · 06-04-2010, 08:51 AM

Dang, seems like the Euros aren't putting up with this shit anymore.

ottopottomouse · 06-04-2010, 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

Define "porn" sire.

My cousin calls the magazine Country Life 'property porn'

Agent 488 · 06-04-2010, 09:02 AM

Fletch XXX · 06-04-2010, 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caligari

Really? show proof that these celeb sites have stolen content, with evidence that these sites have done what you are charging. You have made a serious statement which you need to back up with proof.

lol i wont even get into this

One need only look at header graphics to find images that infringe copyright, this is precisely what I am referring to when I say pot meet kettle, you guys act like you are above copyright infringement then turn around and do it yourself LOL Im sure Lady Gaga and britney licensed their images for a porn site LOL

Look i dont care what you guys steal, link, opr share, but everytime these threads come up its the same shit, a bunch of guys playing holier than thou meanwhile flying celeb sites in sigs LOL

laaaaame.

Fletch XXX · 06-04-2010, 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head

Just to help balance this a bit.... not all youtube vids fall into this category of course. Many are created for the public, many are created privately by individuals. For example, the video I linked in here yesterday of the forecast model of the ocean currents and oil travel. They have use conditions posted right along side all of the forecast model videos. They want that video to get out to the world.

But yeah, for the most part I agree. I don't post movie clips or music videos for this very reason.

i dont care if you linked every single illegal music vid on youtube bro, i just like poking these puritans.

Amputate Your Head · 06-04-2010, 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX

i dont care if you linked every single illegal music vid on youtube bro, i just like poking these puritans.

Oh, I wasn't trying to defend myself... was trying to suggest that people take a minute to check if a vid has third-party use guidelines, rather than just grabbing whatever they feel like. I didn't do a very good job of suggesting though... lol

dyna mo · 06-04-2010, 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head

Oh, I wasn't trying to defend myself... was trying to suggest that people take a minute to check if a vid has third-party use guidelines, rather than just grabbing whatever they feel like. I didn't do a very good job of suggesting though... lol

he's just fucking with you, he's posted youtube music videos here prior and as recent as a month or so ago, was giving the thumbs up to use youtube "vid to mp3" encoder as long as you don't get caught.

too funnay!

ottopottomouse · 06-04-2010, 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head

Oh, I wasn't trying to defend myself... was trying to suggest that people take a minute to check if a vid has third-party use guidelines, rather than just grabbing whatever they feel like. I didn't do a very good job of suggesting though... lol

I'm now going to sound like a broken record with a similar post to another one I just made

I've had quite a lot of music videos appear on a forum but when you click it there is a link that says you must go and watch it on youtube.

Fletch XXX · 06-04-2010, 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head

Oh, I wasn't trying to defend myself... was trying to suggest that people take a minute to check if a vid has third-party use guidelines, rather than just grabbing whatever they feel like. I didn't do a very good job of suggesting though... lol

hehe just stirring debate man i link vids every day on gfy which is why i dont pick up the torch with the witch burners. I am no crusader, I can see the hypocrisy a mile away and just like poking the bees nest.

dyna mo · 06-04-2010, 09:21 AM

told ya!

Dirty Dane · 06-04-2010, 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spazlabz

The only real impact that I see this ruling having long term is to force those that use stolen/unlicensed copyrighted content to move their stuff to countries that do not give two squirts of piss about the legality of them

I'm not sure about ACTA and all the details but I imagine something similar like the three-strikes = out model will be introduced on domains/IP delegation as well.

06-04-2010, 08:51 AM	#51
kristin GOO! Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Back Home : ) Posts: 9,768	Dang, seems like the Euros aren't putting up with this shit anymore. __________________ Vacares rules. "Usually only fat guys have the kind of knowledge and ability that Kristin has."

06-04-2010, 09:02 AM	#53
Agent 488 Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 22,511

06-04-2010, 09:21 AM	#60
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 64,162	told ya!