Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 06-29-2010, 12:34 PM   #51
Sly
Let's do some business!
 
Sly's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 31,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by BFT3K View Post
Everyone loves a good War Thread!

Do you believe we will live through WWIII?
I envision World War III to be more like the Cold War than a war like World War II.
__________________
Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted

Windows VPS now available.

Wanted: CCBill pay sites for sale
Sly is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 12:44 PM   #52
Quagmire
Confirmed User
 
Quagmire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Stinkin' up your bathroom
Posts: 6,490
There's going to be a war with Iran? when did this happen? why wasn't i informed?
__________________
Quagmire is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 12:48 PM   #53
BFT3K
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
BFT3K's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Narnia
Posts: 10,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quagmire View Post
There's going to be a war with Iran? when did this happen? why wasn't i informed?
I think they just sent the letters out today.
BFT3K is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 12:54 PM   #54
theking
Nice Kitty
 
theking's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The good old USA!!!
Posts: 21,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
if you want to boil troop deployment statistics down to # of troop deployed compared to total troops, you begin by oversimplifying the statistics. dwell ratios, european deployments, homeland security deployments, deployment time used, cooks, supply chain resources, adminstrative staff,etc are all MAJOR factors. i won't sit here and claim i understand it, but to say it's as simple as you describe is way off.

It can be done...but instead of a tour of 12-15 months...it would probably have to be for duration...like it was during the Second World War...or they could reinstitue the draft in short order as the draft boards are still active and all eighteen year olds have to still register for the draft.

I doubt that a land war is necessary as we have tremendous air power capability as well as Naval power. Air strikes and a Naval blockade of the Gulf would bring Iran to its knees in a reasonably short period of time. When all is said and done Iran's military capabilities compared to ours is insignificant.
__________________
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
theking is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 12:55 PM   #55
Quagmire
Confirmed User
 
Quagmire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Stinkin' up your bathroom
Posts: 6,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by BFT3K View Post
I think they just sent the letters out today.
Do you really think its going to be a full blown war, or just another Iraq and then decade+ of mess?
__________________
Quagmire is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 01:00 PM   #56
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 63,914
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregE View Post
Fear of potential Iranian nuclear blackmail in the region methinks.

Of course, this might well be a more compelling reason.

As I recall, Shrub didn't take too kindly to Saddam pulling the same stunt back in '03.
i wonder what part that does play.
dyna mo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 01:00 PM   #57
BFT3K
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
BFT3K's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Narnia
Posts: 10,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quagmire View Post
Do you really think its going to be a full blown war, or just another Iraq and then decade+ of mess?
I just posted the article, but IF we REALLY DID go to war with Iran, then I think all bets are off.

I do not believe it will be "like" any other war to date, and I have no idea why we would allow ourselves to be dragged into it.

In my opinion, it would be the dumbest war we could ever get involved in.
BFT3K is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 01:08 PM   #58
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 63,914
Quote:
Originally Posted by theking View Post
It can be done...but instead of a tour of 12-15 months...it would probably have to be for duration...like it was during the Second World War...or they could reinstitue the draft in short order as the draft boards are still active and all eighteen year olds have to still register for the draft.

I doubt that a land war is necessary as we have tremendous air power capability as well as Naval power. Air strikes and a Naval blockade of the Gulf would bring Iran to its knees in a reasonably short period of time. When all is said and done Iran's military capabilities compared to ours is insignificant.
i'm not sure what the # is but there is a large % of troops who've been re-re-re-deployed, right? the military has even recently considered lowering deployment to 8 months.

but i hear what you are saying and agree, if shit hit the fan and we needed to we could increase troop #s etc. but seriously, i can't discount how much these guys weigh history, 2 long protracted wars + 1 is truly against the odds of history. maybe i'm giving too much credit to the top brass but usually those guys are the smartest guys in the room and they look for winnable outcomes/goals.

Last edited by dyna mo; 06-29-2010 at 01:10 PM..
dyna mo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 01:28 PM   #59
theking
Nice Kitty
 
theking's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The good old USA!!!
Posts: 21,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
i'm not sure what the # is but there is a large % of troops who've been re-re-re-deployed, right? the military has even recently considered lowering deployment to 8 months.

but i hear what you are saying and agree, if shit hit the fan and we needed to we could increase troop #s etc. but seriously, i can't discount how much these guys weigh history, 2 long protracted wars + 1 is truly against the odds of history. maybe i'm giving too much credit to the top brass but usually those guys are the smartest guys in the room and they look for winnable outcomes/goals.
Yes...I know people that are on their fifth deployment and most have been deployed to both Iraq and Afghanistan. One...a helicopter pilot...was just redeployed this month for his third tour in Iraq...and has served two tours in Afghanistan. His 20 years will be in before he finishes the current tour in Iraq and he as yet to decide if he is going to retire at 20 or go for 30.

Iraq and Afganistan did not need to be prolonged...our politicians for whatever their reasons decided to occupy the two countries and do nation building In both countries the military and governments were defeated in a matter of weeks...and victory should have been declared and our forces withdrawn.

There would be no need to engage in a land war in Iran...or to occupy the country...or to nation build. With air strikes and a Naval blockade they can be brought to thier knees in short thrift. That is not to say that our politicians...for whatever their reasons...would not once again engage in a prolonged affair.
__________________
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
theking is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 01:48 PM   #60
DavieVegas
Confirmed User
 
DavieVegas's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 6,116
After they bomb Iran in November we are looking at WW 3 unfortunately.
__________________
SKYPE#: davievegas - email: ddmedia702[at]mail[.]com
DavieVegas is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 01:51 PM   #61
mayabong
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,952
Quote:
When all is said and done Iran's military capabilities compared to ours is insignificant.
LOL the taliban control 70% of Afganistan after 9 years. Our military capabilities are AWESOME!
__________________
Bitcoin Gambling Sites
mayabong is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 02:01 PM   #62
theking
Nice Kitty
 
theking's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The good old USA!!!
Posts: 21,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayabong View Post
LOL the taliban control 70% of Afganistan after 9 years. Our military capabilities are AWESOME!
Whatever percentage they do...or do not control...is the fault of politicians micro managing the military...not the fault of the military.
__________________
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
theking is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 02:04 PM   #63
BFT3K
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
BFT3K's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Narnia
Posts: 10,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by theking View Post
Whatever percentage they do...or do not control...is the fault of politicians micro managing the military...not the fault of the military.
Was Rumsfeld a politician, or part of the military, when he said Iraq would cost no more than $2 billion, and last maybe around 6 days?
BFT3K is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 02:05 PM   #64
Don Pueblo
Confirmed User
 
Don Pueblo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 656
just let me know when i can start tearing up ohio.
__________________
Don Pueblo
Worlds Best Latin Lover
Don Pueblo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 02:11 PM   #65
theking
Nice Kitty
 
theking's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The good old USA!!!
Posts: 21,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by BFT3K View Post
Was Rumsfeld a politician, or part of the military, when he said Iraq would cost no more than $2 billion, and last maybe around 6 days?
Rumsfeld was a civilian/politician...and part of the civilian micro management of the military...in addition to not being the sharpest knive in the drawer.

BTW...we defeated the Iraqi military and overthrew the government in 24 days...mission accomplished by our military...but for whatever the reasons the politicians decided to occupy the country and do nation building.
__________________
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

Last edited by theking; 06-29-2010 at 02:16 PM..
theking is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 02:18 PM   #66
marketsmart
HOMICIDAL TROLL KILLER
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sunnybrook Institution for the Criminally Insane
Posts: 20,419
Quote:
Originally Posted by BFT3K View Post
I just posted the article, but IF we REALLY DID go to war with Iran, then I think all bets are off.

I do not believe it will be "like" any other war to date, and I have no idea why we would allow ourselves to be dragged into it.

In my opinion, it would be the dumbest war we could ever get involved in.

iran and iraq war lasted 10-11 years with a stalemate and you see what we did to iraq in short order...

our technology is far superior to any nation out there, but i dont think we would want a quick war..


.
marketsmart is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 02:18 PM   #67
cykoe6
Confirmed User
 
cykoe6's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vegas
Posts: 4,499
Quote:
Originally Posted by BFT3K View Post
Today we learn that the Israeli Air Force have set up base at a Saudi airfield near Tabuk in north-west Saudi Arabia despite earlier denials from the Saudi government that it had given the Israelis permission to use its airspace to attack Iran.

It is an interesting development if true. If true it shows just how serious the Saudis are about stopping Iran from going nuclear...... as allowing Israel to stage an attack form their soil would be unprecedented...... to say the least.
__________________
бабки, шлюхи, сила
cykoe6 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 02:20 PM   #68
mayabong
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,952
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ View Post
Don't kid yourself it's a military contractors and developers wet dream. It's like Vietnam all over again because the government does not want to leave. We are developing weapons systems and strategies that's pushing us far ahead then the rest of the world.

If we truly wanted to win we would have done what the Russians did. Kill them all.
The russians lost.
__________________
Bitcoin Gambling Sites
mayabong is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 02:21 PM   #69
Sly
Let's do some business!
 
Sly's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 31,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavieVegas View Post
After they bomb Iran in November we are looking at WW 3 unfortunately.
November? For the mid-terms? LOL, I'll give them a little more credit than that.
__________________
Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted

Windows VPS now available.

Wanted: CCBill pay sites for sale
Sly is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 02:21 PM   #70
mayabong
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,952
Quote:
Originally Posted by marketsmart View Post
iran and iraq war lasted 10-11 years with a stalemate and you see what we did to iraq in short order...

our technology is far superior to any nation out there, but i dont think we would want a quick war..


.
Don't know how that makes much sense. Iraq was fighting iran with our weapons.
__________________
Bitcoin Gambling Sites

Last edited by mayabong; 06-29-2010 at 02:23 PM..
mayabong is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 02:24 PM   #71
2012
So Fucking What
 
2012's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 17,189
can't wait, let's get everyone trained on how to use an automatic weapon ASAP ... mom too !
__________________
best host: Webair | best sponsor: Kink | best coder: 688218966 | Go Fuck Yourself
2012 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 02:25 PM   #72
theking
Nice Kitty
 
theking's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The good old USA!!!
Posts: 21,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayabong View Post
Don't know how that makes much sense. Iraq was fighting iran with our weapons.
They were primarily fighting with soviet weapons...some French and...I think...some German weapons. With any military one has to have training/discipline/the will to fight...or the weapons are basically useless.
__________________
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

Last edited by theking; 06-29-2010 at 02:29 PM..
theking is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 02:37 PM   #73
BFT3K
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
BFT3K's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Narnia
Posts: 10,764
What do you believe? What is true, what is propaganda?

How can anyone believe ANYTHING anymore?

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/
BFT3K is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 05:30 PM   #74
marketsmart
HOMICIDAL TROLL KILLER
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sunnybrook Institution for the Criminally Insane
Posts: 20,419
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayabong View Post
Don't know how that makes much sense. Iraq was fighting iran with our weapons.
i dont think they were given any kind of our latest technology..

also, that was a long time ago and our weaponry has grown leaps and bounds...

the US would decimate iran in a war just like we did in iraq...

and just like iraq, we will be stuck there playing police force for the next hundred years..





.
marketsmart is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 05:42 PM   #75
PenisFace
Confirmed User
 
PenisFace's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,774
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sly View Post
Iraqananistan.
I would take a vacation at this place.
__________________
Need custom blog posts or articles? Hit me up: Blog And Article Writer

Yes, I can do any kind of custom orders, too!

ICQ: 641204000
PenisFace is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 11:43 PM   #76
crazytrini85
Confirmed User
 
crazytrini85's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Over there.
Posts: 817
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayabong View Post
LOL the taliban control 70% of Afganistan after 9 years. Our military capabilities are AWESOME!
This is greatly offensive.

You have to understand two things about the American military.

1) ALL rules of engagement, policies and movement are determined by their civilian leaders. The military is only as good as the politicians allow them to be. Right now their hands are tied and unable to complete the task at hand. This has NOTHING to do with the ability of these brave men and women soldiers.

2) The US military is capable of handling any job. They are brave, well trained, willing and able. Any short comings come from politicians, not those in uniform.

You must understand the system. You can not point fingers at soldiers who's job is to OBEY ORDERS. However if you give them an order or a task, they will complete it with success so long as their hands are not tied, as they are now.
crazytrini85 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 11:57 PM   #77
MetaMan
I AM WEB 2.0
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ View Post
If we truly wanted to win we would have done what the Russians did. Kill them all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ View Post
Because we supplied the Afgans weapons... if not, they were well on their way to winning.
nice backtrack.

how do you plan on killing guys who bunker in some of the most treacherous land on the planet? make a giant bulldozer and run over mountains?

you can drop 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000x bombs and it wont make a dent in the landscape of these mountains.

Last edited by MetaMan; 06-29-2010 at 11:58 PM..
MetaMan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 12:00 AM   #78
MetaMan
I AM WEB 2.0
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazytrini85 View Post
This is greatly offensive.

You have to understand two things about the American military.

1) ALL rules of engagement, policies and movement are determined by their civilian leaders. The military is only as good as the politicians allow them to be. Right now their hands are tied and unable to complete the task at hand. This has NOTHING to do with the ability of these brave men and women soldiers.

2) The US military is capable of handling any job. They are brave, well trained, willing and able. Any short comings come from politicians, not those in uniform.

You must understand the system. You can not point fingers at soldiers who's job is to OBEY ORDERS. However if you give them an order or a task, they will complete it with success so long as their hands are not tied, as they are now.
the military is funded BY CIVILIANS, thus why you have civilian leaders directing it. without tax payer dollars you have no military. YOU must understand the system.

what if the job is not meant to be completed? how do you have a successful task that is not meant to be finished in the first place?

Last edited by MetaMan; 06-30-2010 at 12:01 AM..
MetaMan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 12:07 AM   #79
theking
Nice Kitty
 
theking's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The good old USA!!!
Posts: 21,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazytrini85 View Post
This is greatly offensive.

You have to understand two things about the American military.

1) ALL rules of engagement, policies and movement are determined by their civilian leaders. The military is only as good as the politicians allow them to be. Right now their hands are tied and unable to complete the task at hand. This has NOTHING to do with the ability of these brave men and women soldiers.

2) The US military is capable of handling any job. They are brave, well trained, willing and able. Any short comings come from politicians, not those in uniform.

You must understand the system. You can not point fingers at soldiers who's job is to OBEY ORDERS. However if you give them an order or a task, they will complete it with success so long as their hands are not tied, as they are now.
Excellent critique.
__________________
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
theking is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 12:12 AM   #80
MetaMan
I AM WEB 2.0
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by theking View Post
Excellent critique.
ya great critique!

military should have power over itself.

we all know how great military dictatorship turns out.

MetaMan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 12:22 AM   #81
theking
Nice Kitty
 
theking's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The good old USA!!!
Posts: 21,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetaMan View Post
ya great critique!

military should have power over itself.

we all know how great military dictatorship turns out.

He did not say that and niether did I. His post was was in response to mayabong insinuating that our military is incompetent...and it is not. It is micro management by civilans that prolongs conflict...and is not the fault of the military.
__________________
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
theking is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 12:31 AM   #82
MetaMan
I AM WEB 2.0
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by theking View Post
He did not say that and niether did I. His post was was in response to MayaBong insinuating that our military is incompetent...and it is not. It is micro management by civilans that prolongs conflict...and is not the fault of the military.
the military is incompetent and that is why it needs to be controlled.

ok so who do you 2 suggest controls the military?

he was blaming its faults on the civilian leaders.

ok so who is going to do a better job of controlling them?

the military is a bunch of brainwashed kids. i feel really bad for them being used in their prime. god bless their souls i know they mean well. it is really sad though. they just do not know any better.

there is a reason why the military spends so much money going into small towns and poor areas. they make these kids feel incompetent in their own lives and convince them to fight for lies in the act of blind patriotism.

infact the military targets mostly what society would deem as incompetent people and convinces them they are somehow doing good.
MetaMan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 12:41 AM   #83
theking
Nice Kitty
 
theking's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The good old USA!!!
Posts: 21,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetaMan View Post
the military is incompetent and that is why it needs to be controlled.

ok so who do you 2 suggest controls the military?

he was blaming its faults on the civilian leaders.

ok so who is going to do a better job of controlling them?

the military is a bunch of brainwashed kids. i feel really bad for them being used in their prime. god bless their souls i know they mean well. it is really sad though. they just do not know any better.

there is a reason why the military spends so much money going into small towns and poor areas. they make these kids feel incompetent in their own lives and convince them to fight for lies in the act of blind patriotism.

infact the military targets mostly what society would deem as incompetent people and convinces them they are somehow doing good.
Our politicians should decide where and when to engage our military...once they make the decision to engage our military...as General MacArthur said "their is no substitute for victory" and the military should be allowed to conduct the war as they see fit. Micro management by civilians and the political games they play increases the loss of life on all sides including collalteral lives. Left to their own devices the military will fight a brutal but short war...which ultimately saves lives...all around.

The rest of your post is pigshit.
__________________
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

Last edited by theking; 06-30-2010 at 12:44 AM..
theking is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 12:47 AM   #84
MetaMan
I AM WEB 2.0
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by theking View Post
Our politicians should decide where and when to engage our military...once they make the decision to engage our military...as General MacArthur said "their is no substitute for victory" and the military should be allowed to conduct the war as they see fit. Micro management by civilians and the political games they play increases the loss of life on all sides including collalteral lives. Left to their own devices the military will fight a brutal but short war...which ultimately saves lives...all around.

The rest of your post is pigshit.
no it is not.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...110302528.html

"More than 44 percent of U.S. military recruits come from rural areas, Pentagon figures show. In contrast, 14 percent come from major cities."

there is a reason why the military targets these places figure it out. i dont make it up it is fact. they prefer under educated poor people who are easily controlled.

maybe with your post you will realize the military is just a political pawn and nothing else.

Last edited by MetaMan; 06-30-2010 at 12:48 AM..
MetaMan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 01:05 AM   #85
theking
Nice Kitty
 
theking's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The good old USA!!!
Posts: 21,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetaMan View Post
no it is not.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...110302528.html

"More than 44 percent of U.S. military recruits come from rural areas, Pentagon figures show. In contrast, 14 percent come from major cities."

there is a reason why the military targets these places figure it out. i dont make it up it is fact. they prefer under educated poor people who are easily controlled.

maybe with your post you will realize the military is just a political pawn and nothing else.
When I was in the military...every enlistee had a highschool diploma (GED's) were not allowed...every Senior NCO had to have an associate degree or the equivalent of an associate degree and many had full degrees. Every officer had to have a full degree and many had master's and PHD's. No one was allowed in that had any kind of a misdeameanor conviction let alone a felony conviction.

Because the politicians micro manage the military...and prolongs conflicts the military begins losing their cream and to fill the loss they have to reduce standards to get warm bodies in to fill the ranks. This happens in every prolonged conflict.

As a result of two...unecessarily prolonged conflicts the military...not only now accepts people with certain criminal convictions...and medical conditions...as well as people that do not even have a GED...and the age limit for enlistees has risen from 26 years of age to 42 and maybe even 46 years of age...and Senior NCO's are not required to have associate degrees or the equilency. Officers are still required to have a full degree...to the best of my knowledge.

So no it is not what the military prefers...it is what they have to do because of micro management by civilians.
__________________
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

Last edited by theking; 06-30-2010 at 01:07 AM..
theking is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 01:17 AM   #86
MetaMan
I AM WEB 2.0
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by theking View Post
When I was in the military...every enlistee had a highschool diploma (GED's) were not allowed...every Senior NCO had to have an associate degree or the equivalent of an associate degree and many had full degrees. Every officer had to have a full degree and many had master's and PHD's. No one was allowed in that had any kind of a misdeameanor conviction let alone a felony conviction.

Because the politicians micro manage the military...and prolongs conflicts the military begins losing their cream and to fill the loss they have to reduce standards to get warm bodies in to fill the ranks. This happens in every prolonged conflict.

As a result of two...unecessarily prolonged conflicts the military...not only now accepts people with certain criminal convictions...and medical conditions...as well as people that do not even have a GED...and the age limit for enlistees has risen from 26 years of age to 42 and maybe even 46 years of age...and Senior NCO's are not required to have associate degrees or the equilency. Officers are still required to have a full degree...to the best of my knowledge.

So no it is not what the military prefers...it is what they have to do because of micro management by civilians.
we are not talking about when you were in the military. i live in the now.

ok so whether or not is has to do with politicians or civilians is not the point.

the point is currently the military is indeed incompetent. whether from their own actions or not does not change the fact that it indeed is. and the politicians want it this way.

again i will state they want poor undereducated people who are easily controlled. thus why they do the majority of recruiting in poor rural areas. this is indeed fact. now i put my own slight spin on it. but you did indeed agree with it as its current state NOW (education level needed to enlist) and the fact of where the recruiting is done.

they do indeed prefer it. because the military only prefers what the government prefers. they do not nor should not have a say. to make their own decisions is not their job. they serve the "will" of the politicians who were in turn elected to serve the "will" of the people. what they "prefer" does not exist. what they prefer is only what the politicians direct them to prefer as they see fit.

Last edited by MetaMan; 06-30-2010 at 01:19 AM..
MetaMan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 01:17 AM   #87
theking
Nice Kitty
 
theking's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The good old USA!!!
Posts: 21,053
By the way I am speaking about the Army and Marine Corp having lower standards now...I am not aware if the Airforce or the Navy has had to lower their standards...I doubt it.
__________________
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
theking is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 01:19 AM   #88
theking
Nice Kitty
 
theking's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The good old USA!!!
Posts: 21,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetaMan View Post
we are not talking about when you were in the military. i live in the now.

ok so whether or not is has to do with politicians or civilians is not the point.

the point is currently the military is indeed incompetent. whether from their own actions or not does not change the fact that it indeed is. and the politicians want it this way.

again i will state they want poor undereducated people who are easily controlled. thus why they do the majority of recruiting in poor rural areas.

they do indeed prefer it. because the military only prefers what the government prefers. they do not nor should not have a say. to make their own decisions is not their job. they serve the "will" of the politicians who were in turn elected to serve the "will" of the people. what they "prefer" does not exist. what they prefer is only what the politicians direct them to prefer as they see fit.
Once again your post is pigshit...you are now dismissed.
__________________
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
theking is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 01:21 AM   #89
MetaMan
I AM WEB 2.0
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by theking View Post
Once again your post is pigshit...you are now dismissed.
i can keep owning you if you want.

you cannot dismiss facts. well you can dismiss them from your own psyche but that would make you disillusional. which you clearly are.
MetaMan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 01:29 AM   #90
VikingMan
Exploiting human weakness
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: next to a salmon stream
Posts: 6,473
Before we go to war there needs to be another false flag attack. Look for a dirty bomb to be set off in the USA and/or a USA ship that is off the coast of Iran to be "sunk" by Iran. I am thinking the sparks will begin to fly within the next few months.

Last edited by VikingMan; 06-30-2010 at 01:31 AM..
VikingMan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 01:45 AM   #91
theking
Nice Kitty
 
theking's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The good old USA!!!
Posts: 21,053
In Fiscal Year 2008, only 83 percent of new Army recruits had a high school diploma (or at least 15 college credits), comparted with the Department of Defense (DOD) average of 92 percent.

This is 2010 so I suspect the 83 percent that have high school diplomas is a few points less.
__________________
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

Last edited by theking; 06-30-2010 at 01:50 AM..
theking is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 07:21 AM   #92
Rochard
Jägermeister Test Pilot
 
Rochard's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 72,915
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
if you want to boil troop deployment statistics down to # of troop deployed compared to total troops, you begin by oversimplifying the statistics. dwell ratios, european deployments, homeland security deployments, deployment time used, cooks, supply chain resources, adminstrative staff,etc are all MAJOR factors. i won't sit here and claim i understand it, but to say it's as simple as you describe is way off.

No, not really. What the fuck do we need European deployments for? To stop the Russians? They are trying to join NATO, not attack it. The administrative stuff, the cooks - well, most of that is outsourced these days, even in a war zone such as Iraq and Afghanistan.

I understand that a large percentage of troops are dedicated to supply and logistics. However, we have two hundred thousand troops in a combat zone and that's only a fraction of the troops we have.
__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.”
- Sarah Huckabee Sanders

YNOT MAIL | THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION
Rochard is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 07:31 AM   #93
Rochard
Jägermeister Test Pilot
 
Rochard's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 72,915
Quote:
Originally Posted by theking View Post
When I was in the military...every enlistee had a highschool diploma (GED's) were not allowed...every Senior NCO had to have an associate degree or the equivalent of an associate degree and many had full degrees. Every officer had to have a full degree and many had master's and PHD's. No one was allowed in that had any kind of a misdeameanor conviction let alone a felony conviction.

Because the politicians micro manage the military...and prolongs conflicts the military begins losing their cream and to fill the loss they have to reduce standards to get warm bodies in to fill the ranks. This happens in every prolonged conflict.

As a result of two...unecessarily prolonged conflicts the military...not only now accepts people with certain criminal convictions...and medical conditions...as well as people that do not even have a GED...and the age limit for enlistees has risen from 26 years of age to 42 and maybe even 46 years of age...and Senior NCO's are not required to have associate degrees or the equilency. Officers are still required to have a full degree...to the best of my knowledge.

So no it is not what the military prefers...it is what they have to do because of micro management by civilians.
Your on crack. I went into the Marines in 1986 after dropping out of high school. (Since then I've graduated from college.) I don't believe there was ever a requirement to be a high school graduate. It's based on test scores, not a diploma.
__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.”
- Sarah Huckabee Sanders

YNOT MAIL | THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION
Rochard is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 07:39 AM   #94
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 63,914
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
No, not really. What the fuck do we need European deployments for? To stop the Russians? They are trying to join NATO, not attack it. The administrative stuff, the cooks - well, most of that is outsourced these days, even in a war zone such as Iraq and Afghanistan.

I understand that a large percentage of troops are dedicated to supply and logistics. However, we have two hundred thousand troops in a combat zone and that's only a fraction of the troops we have.
well, it's not a matter of why we have euro deployments, rochard, my (the) point is there are euro deployments, there are homeland deployments, there are deployments across the globe. the logistics that support an invasion of iran are staggering- we don't have the resources available over the next weeks or months to support a u.s. invasion of iran without drawdowns elsewhere. and it's simply not a fact that the military supply chain is outsourced.


we don't need to stop the russians?
dyna mo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 08:10 AM   #95
BFT3K
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
BFT3K's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Narnia
Posts: 10,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by ******* View Post
Before we go to war there needs to be another false flag attack. Look for a dirty bomb to be set off in the USA and/or a USA ship that is off the coast of Iran to be "sunk" by Iran. I am thinking the sparks will begin to fly within the next few months.
Something like this is unfortunately very likely.

I've made similar predictions myself.
BFT3K is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 08:21 AM   #96
cwd
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: In a dream
Posts: 1,955
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2012 View Post
can't wait, let's get everyone trained on how to use an automatic weapon ASAP ... mom too !
wait, everyone's NOT trained yet?!?! wtf?!?!
cwd is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 08:24 AM   #97
DEA - banned for life
V.I.P.
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: InYour Head
Posts: 7,886
Where is the bear jew?
DEA - banned for life is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 08:25 AM   #98
DEA - banned for life
V.I.P.
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: InYour Head
Posts: 7,886
Israel will bomb the iran nuclear sites within the next few months....there wont be any ground war because the army in iran wont show up....The people of iran want a revolution and are not willing to die for the current government....missles may fly and bombs may drop but you wont see a ground war in iran

Last edited by DEA - banned for life; 06-30-2010 at 08:31 AM..
DEA - banned for life is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 08:46 AM   #99
mayabong
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,952
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazytrini85 View Post
This is greatly offensive.

You have to understand two things about the American military.

1) ALL rules of engagement, policies and movement are determined by their civilian leaders. The military is only as good as the politicians allow them to be. Right now their hands are tied and unable to complete the task at hand. This has NOTHING to do with the ability of these brave men and women soldiers.

2) The US military is capable of handling any job. They are brave, well trained, willing and able. Any short comings come from politicians, not those in uniform.

You must understand the system. You can not point fingers at soldiers who's job is to OBEY ORDERS. However if you give them an order or a task, they will complete it with success so long as their hands are not tied, as they are now.
I clump it all together politicans, generals, soldiers... that is the military. Its easy to say well if this wasn't like this or that wasn't like that, we'd be kicking ass. The taliban controls 70% of Afganistan. They probably would control more if we didn't pay them off LOL
__________________
Bitcoin Gambling Sites
mayabong is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 08:50 AM   #100
BFT3K
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
BFT3K's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Narnia
Posts: 10,764
First of all, Iran is HUGE, so it is doubtful anything will happen via "precision" bombings. They most likely have MANY underground nuclear research facilities.



In response to an attack, Iran will instantly target all US and Israeli ships in the Persian Gulf, and maybe even shut down the gulf, causing our gas and power prices to skyrocket.

You also have to imagine Russia and China will not be very happy, and North Korea will feel even more pressure to do something pro-active, as it watches the second of the 3 "axis-of-evil" countries getting attacked.

Nothing good will come from going to war with Iran... no way!

Last edited by BFT3K; 06-30-2010 at 09:04 AM..
BFT3K is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.