Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 08-06-2010, 03:08 AM   #1
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Political Condom Vendors Not Protected by 1st Amendment, Judge Rules

Political Condom Vendors Not Protected by 1st Amendment, Judge Rules

Quote:
NEW YORK — Two street vendors selling politically stirring condoms charged for not carrying vendor licenses cannot claim the 1st Amendment as a defense, a Manhattan judge has ruled.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2010, 08:00 AM   #2
AtlantisCash
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Istanbul - Turkiye
Posts: 3,169
since im not an American, They would know it better but, whats wrong with that?

Last edited by AtlantisCash; 08-06-2010 at 08:01 AM..
AtlantisCash is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2010, 08:01 AM   #3
MrBottomTooth
Confirmed User
 
MrBottomTooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,795
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlantisCash View Post
since im not an American, Americans would know it better but, whats wrong with that?
They were too cheap to get a vendor's license. That's really all there is to the story.

You'd think that a vendor's license would have been cheaper than all their legal fees.
MrBottomTooth is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2010, 09:33 AM   #4
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBottomTooth View Post
They were too cheap to get a vendor's license. That's really all there is to the story.

You'd think that a vendor's license would have been cheaper than all their legal fees.
You would think, buy people don't always think first.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2010, 09:39 AM   #5
AtlantisCash
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Istanbul - Turkiye
Posts: 3,169
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBottomTooth View Post
They were too cheap to get a vendor's license. That's really all there is to the story.

You'd think that a vendor's license would have been cheaper than all their legal fees.

They say it's not easy to get it, isn't it?
AtlantisCash is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2010, 10:04 AM   #6
DamnGoodRatio
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 855
Political Condom Vendors Not Protected by 1st Amendment, Judge Rules

The Headline should be:
Condom vendors fail to get license and try to justify it by saying it is a 1st amendment free speech issue.
If they were giving them away free then it is political speech, if they are charging for them it is a business. . .
__________________
Obama Said: "We can absorb a terrorist attack."
DamnGoodRatio is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2010, 10:06 AM   #7
alias
aliasx
 
alias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 19,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by DamnGoodRatio View Post
Political Condom Vendors Not Protected by 1st Amendment, Judge Rules

The Headline should be:
Condom vendors fail to get license and try to justify it by saying it is a 1st amendment free speech issue.
If they were giving them away free then it is political speech, if they are charging for them it is a business. . .
Sums it up.
__________________
https://porncorporation.com
alias is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2010, 07:34 PM   #8
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by DamnGoodRatio View Post
Political Condom Vendors Not Protected by 1st Amendment, Judge Rules

The Headline should be:
Condom vendors fail to get license and try to justify it by saying it is a 1st amendment free speech issue.
If they were giving them away free then it is political speech, if they are charging for them it is a business. . .
yeah title totally misrepresents that actual jist of the story.

it would be a free speech issue if they had bought the vendor licience.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2010, 07:38 PM   #9
baddog
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: the beach, SoCal
Posts: 107,090
Your point?
baddog is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2010, 08:58 PM   #10
jackknoff
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 545
Charging for a product isn't free speech....


Jack
jackknoff is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2010, 09:26 PM   #11
fatfoo
ICQ:649699063
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 27,763
Licenses are required for ridiculous things sometimes, like a stripper license.
__________________
Send me an email: [email protected]
fatfoo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.