I sent my letter to icann opposing .xxx tld! Have you??

[Redrob]

Originally Posted by Redrob

<A convenient copy and paste letter for your convenience. Be sure to change the color of your text if needed.>

Email to>[email protected]


Dear ICANN,

I am a member of the .XXX sTLD sponsored community. I do not support ICM's application for the .XXX sTLD.

I request that ICANN does the following:
1. Verify that companies which ICM has listed in support are viable adult businesses,
2. Verify that companies listed in support in fact do support ICM?s current application for a .XXX sTLD,
3. Determine how many pre-registrations claimed by ICM are in fact defensive registrations,
4. Determine how many pre-registrations are registrars or companies hoping to re-sell domain names.

Additionally, I also request the following information also be released as requested in the DIDP from the FSC:
1. The list of the IFFOR Board members;
2. The list of proposed members of the Policy Council;
3. IFFOR?s Business Plan/Financials;
4. Business Plan/Financials Years 1-5 utilizing 125,000 Initial Registrations;
5. The list of .XXX sTLD pre-registrants who have been identified to ICANN;
6. ICM?s Proof of Sponsorship Community Support as submitted to ICANN.

<INSERT ADDITIONAL PERSONAL COMMENTS and email to>[email protected]

Now is the time to send in you comments......

Even though FSC has requested and extension of time to the comment period, there is no guarantee that the comment period will be extended. Assume that the comment period will end on 9/23/2010 as previously stated.

[davecummings]

Originally Posted by Redrob

Now is the time to send in you comments......

Even though FSC has requested and extension of time to the comment period, there is no guarantee that the comment period will be extended. Assume that the comment period will end on 9/23/2010 as previously stated.

Like your letter---may I copy it along with an intro saying that I fully support eac and every aspect of it?

[Redrob]

Dave,

Feel free to post it everywhere. What is the EAC? FSC?

Yours,
Redrob

[SpongeBub]

Originally Posted by Redrob

Dave,

Feel free to post it everywhere. What is the EAC? FSC?

Yours,
Redrob

EAC is each without the h. Dave made a typo. He meant to say "each and every aspect of it".

[davecummings]

Originally Posted by SpongeBub

EAC is each without the h. Dave made a typo. He meant to say "each and every aspect of it".

BINGO! Thanks for catching my mistake, and explaining it for me. What a dummy I sometimes am!!!

[Redrob]

I am the dummy<puts on dunce cap>.

[grumpy]

we need more regulations to keep some webmasters in line

[Redrob]

Originally Posted by grumpy

we need more regulations to keep some webmasters in line

Coming from Holland, I am a little surprised at your message assuming you are serious. You sound a bit like ICM's responsible community.

This bring up the point of potential competitive disadvantage of USA adult webmasters if .XXX sTLD were to become a reality and legislation passed requiring relocation of all adult sites to the .XXX. Other countries could keep their .com and get a .xxx; but, we could be placed in an adult ghetto and our domain name access limited to .xxx.

The net neutrality issue is still lurking in the background as well. Once relocated into the .XXX sTLD, ISPs, governments, businesses could easily block or slow access to our content depending on how the net neutrality issues play out.

It is easier to prevent problems like this than have to go back and try and fix them later.

Just my personal opinion.

[Redrob]

Morning bump..

[davecummings]

West coast bump!

[Redrob]

Lunch bump

[Redrob]

Take a moment and send in your comments to ICANN one more time.

Don't let the bastards beat you down.

[u-Bob]

<--- already mailed.

[Redrob]

ICM running scared and post denial of FSC's allegations and requests for information:

Same old shit.....deny, deny, deny......no new information, arguments, reasons that I could see as to why we should want .XXX to rule our world.

Read it for yourself, Lawley just says everything is history....BULLSHIT, history is still being written.

Link to ICM Letter to ICANN

Now send in your comments.....

[Redrob]

Morning Bump....Good Morning, GFYers.

[davecummings]

Let's draft our letters to ICANN this weekend--OK, everyone?!!!!!

[davecummings]

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...1#post17499463
is an indicator why we ALL need to post our feelings at:

Comments can be submitted to [email protected] and viewed at http://forum.icann.org/lists/xxx-revised-icm-agreement/ .

[Alprazolam]

fuck them. if they pass .xxx everyone will be setup offshore so fucking fast.

bye bye tax dollars.

couple other things:

oh yeah, there is only one other thing. the internet is global! it sure isn't going to be a worldwide mandated porn ghetto. stop worrying americans. this isn't shit.

suck it american fags ICM

[Tickler]

Originally Posted by Redrob

This bring up the point of potential competitive disadvantage of USA adult webmasters if .XXX sTLD were to become a reality and legislation passed requiring relocation of all adult sites to the .XXX. Other countries could keep their .com and get a .xxx; but, we could be placed in an adult ghetto and our domain name access limited to .xxx.

I hadn't even thought of that point. I still have time to add to my post.

Some interesting reading on the illegal IP grab at the dotJOBS sTLD in case anybody is wondering how fucked up this can get.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/07...ain_land_grab/

[Nikki_Licks]

Yep, sent mine in, took 3 times as I never got a confirmation link the first two times I submitted. I have always submitted something lengthy and this time around, I just made it short and sweet and they can look in the archives to see my previous comments regarding this issue.
I have reached a point where I am disgusted with the whole thing and the people who will be profiting from it, hence why I kept my comments short and sweet.

[Redrob]

Evening Bump

[davecummings]

Tuesday, 9/14 seems like a great time to post against .xxx---please do it!!

[KillerK]

the only thing wrong with .XXX is how much money Xbiz will make from it.

[Redrob]

Morning bump

[davecummings]

I just sent in my opposition--it was easy and quick to do using the link FSC provided ( http://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/WEB22B6YZULW6R ) at http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=987119

If I can do both, I might still go to the ICANN site and add my opinion there, too!

[Redrob]

Lunch Bump

[davecummings]

This is so important that it needs yet another bump.

[Nikki_Licks]

Originally Posted by davecummings

This is so important that it needs yet another bump.

Yes, it is. You would think the admins would make this a sticky

[davecummings]

Originally Posted by davecummings

I just sent in my opposition--it was easy and quick to do using the link FSC provided ( http://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/WEB22B6YZULW6R ) at http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=987119

If I can do both, I might still go to the ICANN site and add my opinion there, too!

I just queried FSC and got the ok that it was alright to do BOTH:-).

I submitted the quickie comment to the zoomerang url this morning; and, now, I can also post to the ICANN site directly to support what FSC has posted (with links) at their

http://www.freespeechcoalition.com/

Let's ALL make this a priority

[Redrob]

Evening Bump

[Redrob]

Morning Bump

[Nikki_Licks]

Bump, back to the top ;)

[Kelli58]

I sent my letter out today!!

[davecummings]

Originally Posted by Kelli58

I sent my letter out today!!

Thanks for standing up to be counted:-).

[Redrob]

Evening Bump

[JFK]

Originally Posted by Redrob

Evening Bump

early morning bump and yes I sent mine in as well

[Redrob]

Hey, folks.....ICANN is taking comments for only one more week so get them comments in.

[Redrob]

3:00 am Bump....

[Redrob]

Mid morning bump

[davecummings]

Originally Posted by Redrob

3:00 am Bump....

Dang, you shouldn't still be up at 3am:-).

[Redrob]

Evening bump.....last week to submit comments.

[Redrob]

Sunday's "gone to Church" bump.....

[sextoyking]

This needs to be a sticky...

[Redrob]

Morning Bump

[davecummings]

Besides me participating in the link that's at the opening page at www.freespeechcoalition.com , here's a copy/paste of the comments I submitted to ICANN:

"Most of the REAL Sponsored Community Wants .xxx DEFEATED
To: <xxx-revised-icm-agreement@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Most of the REAL Sponsored Community Wants .xxx DEFEATED
From: "Dave C." <davec@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 20:47:46 -0700

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am a REAL stakeholder, with over 10 years in the Sponsored Community! IMO,
ICANN needs to determine if ICM and all of the people it's motivated to
express support for .xxx are, in fact, REAL stakeholders. IMO, ICANN needs
to make certain that ICANN decides who meets stakeholder and sponsored
community status, and not be swayed by any ICM subjective
preferences/definitions/etc of it.

In my REAL stakeholder opinion, ICANN should permanently and totally deny
the ICM .xxx proposal. It seems to me that relatively few Adult Internet
people are in favor of it, while conversely, relatively MANY of the REAL
stakeholders support ICANN denial of the ICM proposed .xxx contract.

I understand that ICANN might possibly be feeling somewhat swayed due to
concern of an ICM lawsuit if .xxx isn't approved for ICM. IMO, ICANN might
indeed be involved in a multitude of lawsuits if .xxx ISN'T denied, and
those legal actions could be near-term, continuing, and long-term (e.g.,
if/when government "ghetto-ization" requires REAL STAKEHOLDERS to close
sites with .com and other presently recognized tlds, and instead use the ICM
.xxx tld; or, when continuing registry and other "issues/problems" come up,
etc---this could go on for years and years).

I worry that unless ICANN totally and permanently "kills" .xxx THIS time,
ICANN will become so overburdened in resolving matters related to .xxx that
ICANN might become unable to properly accomplish its other primary
priorities and responsibilities.

I understand that the Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has brought many IMPORTANT
issues to ICANN in the last few weeks. IMO, ICANN needs to listen to FSC and
resolve all the matters AND requests that FSC has surfaced to ICANN. Like
many other REAL stakeholders in the Sponsored Community, FSC is the overall
voice for me. ICM does not speak for me (or MANY others of the REAL
stakeholders!).

Dave C."

[davecummings]

If you posted at either [email protected] and/or via the link at www.freespeechcoalition.com , please let us know. And, THANKS!!!!!!

All comments, even the ones that don't seem like REAL stakeholders, can be viewed at
http://forum.icann.org/lists/xxx-revised-icm-agreement/

[Alprazolam]

sturat lawley is definitely going to win this round. they are lying cheating and posting all kinds of fake support on the icann threads.

[davecummings]

Originally Posted by Alprazolam

sturat lawley is definitely going to win this round. they are lying cheating and posting all kinds of fake support on the icann threads.

Ouch:-(!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Redrob]

Only 3 days to go

[Alprazolam]

for the people who are slow