Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 01-13-2003, 12:37 AM   #1
UnseenWorld
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Posts: 5,279
Bondage+insertion=patently obscene

I always understood that BDSM could not be legally combined with real sex, so I was a bit surprised to find this gallery:

http://adultsextop.com/gallery/zoya/index.html
__________________
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
UnseenWorld is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2003, 12:47 AM   #2
StacyCat
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,167
1) there isnt any bondage in that picture, besides the hair pulling.

2) I understand the canadian laws against violence in porn, but has there ever actually been an obscenity prosecution and conviction against BDSM and sex?

Is there a list somewhere of all the obscenity convictions of the last, oh, 20-50 years?
StacyCat is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2003, 12:50 AM   #3
Lethal
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 494
What an absurdly inappropriate use of that content. I wonder how Dove would feel about their product packaging being used in porn pics lol.
Lethal is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2003, 12:51 AM   #4
Lethal
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 494
Quote:
Originally posted by StacyCat
1) there isnt any bondage in that picture, besides the hair pulling.
She's handcuffed to the shower rail.
Lethal is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2003, 12:55 AM   #5
UnseenWorld
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Posts: 5,279
Quote:
Originally posted by StacyCat
1) there isnt any bondage in that picture, besides the hair pulling.

2) I understand the canadian laws against violence in porn, but has there ever actually been an obscenity prosecution and conviction against BDSM and sex?

Is there a list somewhere of all the obscenity convictions of the last, oh, 20-50 years?
Not true, she is handcuffed to something. Technically, that's bondage. She is "bound" to the plumbing and plenty of bondage photography uses handcuffs.
__________________
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
UnseenWorld is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2003, 12:58 AM   #6
Nyght
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 438
Some guys get to have all the fun...
Nyght is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2003, 01:13 AM   #7
StacyCat
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,167
Okay, i saw the handcuffs after looking at the pictures. They arent in the thumbnails! Guess im really not into the girl, that I didnt click on the pictures.

Show me the case that has been prosecuted against penetration with bondage.
StacyCat is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2003, 01:15 AM   #8
UnseenWorld
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Posts: 5,279
Quote:
Originally posted by StacyCat
Okay, i saw the handcuffs after looking at the pictures. They arent in the thumbnails! Guess im really not into the girl, that I didnt click on the pictures.

Show me the case that has been prosecuted against penetration with bondage.
Is that your standard: You'll break any law they haven't prosecuted yet? Just from an ethical standpoint, bondage + sex can be construed as a rape image (and those images certainly LOOK like rape images).
__________________
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
UnseenWorld is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2003, 01:20 AM   #9
Jayson
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: CZ
Posts: 554
Im with you unseen, they might as well be rape pics for all intents and purposes. She doesnt look happy and she is bound.

God knows why people film this shit, its only asking for trouble.
__________________
Sapphic Cash - We Do It Right
Jayson is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2003, 01:24 AM   #10
MonkeyMan
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New York.... Not the city... Up north further. Its about a six hour drive to the city from here. I don't like the city much. The air is not as clean, but they do have better strip clubs.
Posts: 1,026
Quote:
Originally posted by Jayson
God knows why people film this shit, its only asking for trouble.

Becasue child killers have credit cards too.
MonkeyMan is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2003, 01:29 AM   #11
Plugger
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: North Coast
Posts: 592
I am not even going to get into a "this is right" or "this is wrong" discussion.

I do propose that they make pics like this because they make, or at least think they will make, money.

Have you ever seen what they do at Extreme Associates?

I personally try to stay with, in the words of Larry Flynt, "Plain old vanilla sex", and leave all of the extreme shit to others. The last place I want to find myself is in jail. If other people want to push the limits then it only make my shit look tame and then the heat is off my ass . . .
Plugger is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2003, 01:34 AM   #12
StacyCat
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,167
Quote:
Originally posted by UnseenWorld


Is that your standard: You'll break any law they haven't prosecuted yet? Just from an ethical standpoint, bondage + sex can be construed as a rape image (and those images certainly LOOK like rape images).
The obscenity laws are written to the point that anything that I do can be considered "obscene" at least in the state where I reside. However, half the things at the adult video store down the road are far worse than anything that I do.

You arent guilty of obscenity until the jury says that you are. That can range from spread shots to fucking to BDSM to almost anything that they want to get you for. Its a risk.

I might think that Max Hardcore or Seymore Butts are obscene. but, they werent convicted. So, are they obscene? Maybe. Are they prosecutable? Not at the moment, for now. Should we worry about more prosecutions? Sure. But, im not going to let the fear of being prosecuted stop me from running my site.

BTW, I didnt click on the pictures simply because the model looked like she wasnt enjoying it. Call it my fetish if you will, the girl has to look like shes enjoying it for me to get off.
StacyCat is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2003, 01:35 AM   #13
eroswebmaster
March 1st, 2003
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Seat 4 @ Venetian Poker Room
Posts: 20,295
Quote:
Originally posted by Plugger

I personally try to stay with, in the words of Larry Flynt, "Plain old vanilla sex", and leave all of the extreme shit to others. The last place I want to find myself is in jail. If other people want to push the limits then it only make my shit look tame and then the heat is off my ass . . .
Funny tho' how our standards have changed...because at one time flynt just filming or photographing 'Plain old vanilla sex," was extreme.
__________________
For rent - ICQ 127-027-910
Click here for more details
eroswebmaster is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2003, 01:38 AM   #14
UnseenWorld
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Posts: 5,279
Quote:
Originally posted by StacyCat


The obscenity laws are written to the point that anything that I do can be considered "obscene" at least in the state where I reside. However, half the things at the adult video store down the road are far worse than anything that I do.

You arent guilty of obscenity until the jury says that you are. That can range from spread shots to fucking to BDSM to almost anything that they want to get you for. Its a risk.

I might think that Max Hardcore or Seymore Butts are obscene. but, they werent convicted. So, are they obscene? Maybe. Are they prosecutable? Not at the moment, for now. Should we worry about more prosecutions? Sure. But, im not going to let the fear of being prosecuted stop me from running my site.

BTW, I didnt click on the pictures simply because the model looked like she wasnt enjoying it. Call it my fetish if you will, the girl has to look like shes enjoying it for me to get off.
I'm not an attorney (I have to say that because the law is starting to get deep here), but let me introduce you to the concept of "patently obscene." What this means is that no jury's opinion is necessary. If you did it, then it's obscene and you're in deep doo-doo.

Scat, child porn, and bondage+sex are among the patently obscene categories.
__________________
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
UnseenWorld is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2003, 01:39 AM   #15
UnseenWorld
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Posts: 5,279
Quote:
Originally posted by eroswebmaster


Funny tho' how our standards have changed...because at one time flynt just filming or photographing 'Plain old vanilla sex," was extreme.
Not to mention that the last time I looked, anal sex and golden showers were pretty standard fare in good ole Hustler Magazine.
__________________
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
UnseenWorld is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2003, 01:53 AM   #16
Forkbeard
Confirmed User
 
Forkbeard's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: I Roam Around
Posts: 2,236
Quote:
Originally posted by UnseenWorld


I'm not an attorney (I have to say that because the law is starting to get deep here), but let me introduce you to the concept of "patently obscene." What this means is that no jury's opinion is necessary. If you did it, then it's obscene and you're in deep doo-doo.

Scat, child porn, and bondage+sex are among the patently obscene categories.
I do not believe there is such a thing as a legal concept of "patently obscene" in most US jurisdictions. Child porn is per se illegal whether it's obscene or not, but everything else requires a jury to determine whether it violates community standards. (Murky & dangerous part is the who/what/where questions surrounding that test.)

All the received rules of thumb (no bondage plus sex, no scat, no animals, etc.) are somewhat stale distillations of good legal guesswork regarding what was likely to trigger successful obscenity prosecutions during the Reagan administration. Except in LA and a couple of bible belt states, there haven't been many non-kiddie obscenity cases in quite a while, although Asshahahahaha threatens periodically to bring them back.

The gallery in question looks a lot like the content in Hustler's Taboo Magazine, and Larry has good lawyers these days. It's edgy, it's far from safe, but it's a ways from sure-thing illegal.

Plus of course the webmaster may not even be subject to the jurisdiction of courts in the US. Sometimes globalization is your friend!
__________________
Offering sponsored blog posts and custom writing services.
Forkbeard is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2003, 01:57 AM   #17
stocktrader23
Let's do some business.
 
stocktrader23's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The dirty south.
Posts: 18,781
Damn You!

Now I visited a gallery that is being monitored by the government for suspected terrorist activity.

Thanks.
__________________


Hands Free Adult - Join Once, Earn For Life

"I try to make a habit of bouncing my eyes up to the face of a beautiful woman, and often repeat “not mine” in my head or even verbally. She’s not mine. God has her set aside. She’s not mine. She’s His little girl, and she needs me to fight for her by keeping my eyes where they should be."
stocktrader23 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2003, 02:54 AM   #18
UnseenWorld
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Posts: 5,279
Quote:
Originally posted by Forkbeard


I do not believe there is such a thing as a legal concept of "patently obscene" in most US jurisdictions. Child porn is per se illegal whether it's obscene or not, but everything else requires a jury to determine whether it violates community standards. (Murky & dangerous part is the who/what/where questions surrounding that test.)

All the received rules of thumb (no bondage plus sex, no scat, no animals, etc.) are somewhat stale distillations of good legal guesswork regarding what was likely to trigger successful obscenity prosecutions during the Reagan administration. Except in LA and a couple of bible belt states, there haven't been many non-kiddie obscenity cases in quite a while, although Asshahahahaha threatens periodically to bring them back.

The gallery in question looks a lot like the content in Hustler's Taboo Magazine, and Larry has good lawyers these days. It's edgy, it's far from safe, but it's a ways from sure-thing illegal.

Plus of course the webmaster may not even be subject to the jurisdiction of courts in the US. Sometimes globalization is your friend!
I'm no lawyer (are you?) so I'm awaiting a judgment from one of our resident attorneys on the fine technical points.

As to Hustler and Taboo, if you have seen any layouts with a bound person being penetrated or clearly engaging in a sex act, I'd like to see that.
__________________
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
UnseenWorld is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2003, 10:33 AM   #19
Forkbeard
Confirmed User
 
Forkbeard's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: I Roam Around
Posts: 2,236
Quote:
Originally posted by UnseenWorld


I'm no lawyer (are you?) so I'm awaiting a judgment from one of our resident attorneys on the fine technical points.

As to Hustler and Taboo, if you have seen any layouts with a bound person being penetrated or clearly engaging in a sex act, I'd like to see that.
As it happens, I am a lawyer, but obviously off-the-cuff BBS remarks are no substitute for a paid-for opinion backed up by a legal malpractice insurance policy. (Nor does the fact that I'm a lawyer add much credibility to the opinions I spout for free, which is why I never mention the fact unless asked directly.) However, I do have a pretty keen interest in obscenity law, and I've never come across the "patently obscene" idea in an obscenity statute or judicial opinion. (The idea may be a corruption of the fact that material must be "patently offensive" in order to even raise the community standards issue that lies at the heart of modern obscenity law.)

If you get more of a "judgement" (or even an firm opinion) without paying some fairly major bucks for it, I'll be pretty surprised. But I'm damn confident the law is not so open-and-shut as the first post in this thread suggests. I'm not saying that shit's not obscene -- I'm betting it wouldn't be too hard to find a jurisdiction where it is -- I'm just saying the rule of thumb doesn't get you there.

And you must not have looked at Taboo lately -- there's a handcuffed blowjob, at least, in just about every issue.
__________________
Offering sponsored blog posts and custom writing services.
Forkbeard is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.