GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Are text tgps pretty much dead? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=653970)

DarkJedi 09-10-2006 10:08 AM

Are text tgps pretty much dead?
 
Aside from a few old skool text tgps (thehun/worldsex etc) are text TGPs dead?

Thumb TGPs are the norm now?


Discuss.

Snake Doctor 09-10-2006 10:13 AM

There are some text guys with some pretty sweet traffic. Not all of them are as old as you think.

Mike/Bike has a text network of TGP's that has alot of traffic, very good traffic too.

ffmihai 09-10-2006 10:13 AM

well there are very few NEW text tgp arround but i think they will come back!

DarkJedi 09-10-2006 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ffmihai
well there are very few NEW text tgp arround but i think they will come back!

Why do you think that?

If I was surfing for porn galleries, nothing could persuade me to browse text TGPs. Thumbs are so much cooler.

pussyluver 09-10-2006 11:19 AM

Text TGP dead?

theshemp
89.com
pussy.org
persiankitty
thehun
richardsrealm
worldsex
al4a
ampland
elephantlist
marks bookmarks


I could go on

Some have other sites or are moving/mixing in thumbs. Text TGPs represent a ton of traffic! Still plenty of modems out there.

HorseShit 09-10-2006 11:28 AM

pinkworld ^^^

Jarmusch 09-10-2006 11:31 AM

Yes text TGP's are dead... in China. 95% of the chinese population prefers Thumb TGP's.

DarkJedi 09-10-2006 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pussyluver
theshemp
89.com
pussy.org
persiankitty
thehun
richardsrealm
worldsex
al4a
ampland
elephantlist
marks bookmarks

.

Yeah but try comparing it to the nuymber of thumb TGPs...

the Shemp 09-10-2006 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi
Yeah but try comparing it to the nuymber of thumb TGPs...

im still amazed sponsors allow their content to be used as "trade bait" on those thumb TGPs

DarkJedi 09-10-2006 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Shemp
im still amazed sponsors allow their content to be used as "trade bait" on those thumb TGPs

Can you please expand on that?

Roald 09-10-2006 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi
Can you please expand on that?

Think he means the skimming part

the Shemp 09-10-2006 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi
Can you please expand on that?

...isnt it obvious?...the thumbs are often being used as trade bait, to redirect the surfer to another TGP...not to the gallery...imo, that is an improper use of sponsors content..

spacedog 09-10-2006 12:07 PM

With the ammended 2257 requirements recently passed & the lack of sponsors willing to allow webmaster physical custody of docs, I went all text on my entire network. (some still have a few thumbs, but they're all non nude thumbs)..

DarkJedi 09-10-2006 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuaShe
Think he means the skimming part

There is no way sponsors could regulate that.

Besides, they are getting free traffic, why would they care.

polish_aristocrat 09-10-2006 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Shemp
...isnt it obvious?...the thumbs are often being used as trade bait, to redirect the surfer to another TGP...not to the gallery...imo, that is an improper use of sponsors content..

who cares about that if the sales are good?

polish_aristocrat 09-10-2006 12:11 PM

if I was a surfer I'd masturbate to dansmovies.com daily

the Shemp 09-10-2006 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi
There is no way sponsors could regulate that.

Besides, they are getting free traffic, why would they care.


you are assuming they are getting as much free traffic back as they are losing...there is no data to back that up...clearly some sponsors will benefit and some will not...

the Shemp 09-10-2006 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat
who cares about that if the sales are good?


you are assuming they are getting as many sales back, as they are losing...there is no data to back that up...clearly some sponsors will benefit and some will not...

DarkJedi 09-10-2006 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat
I masturbate to dansmovies.com daily

Fixed.

:2 cents:

DarkJedi 09-10-2006 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Shemp
you are assuming they are getting as many sales back, as they are losing...there is no data to back that up...clearly some sponsors will benefit and some will not...

They aren't losing any sales. FHGs are all about getting traffic.

Axeman 09-10-2006 12:16 PM

The only sponsor I knew who actively tried to prevent this was ATK. But it is a task virtually impossible to regulate. Possible sure, but very labor intensive.

GTS Mark 09-10-2006 12:17 PM

Text tgp's are some of the largest tgp's in the world.

I don't see them slowing down a bit?

DH

Johny Traffic 09-10-2006 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Shemp
im still amazed sponsors allow their content to be used as "trade bait" on those thumb TGPs


I know a couple that have not let thumb tgp's that skim. All it meant at the end of the day was less affiliates though.

Affiliates wont change their sites to fit sponsors in the main. Most want sponsors who fit their business model

kenny 09-10-2006 12:19 PM

There are always going to be surfers who prefer text TGPs.

BTW, you would think skimming on a thumb TGP would piss the surfer off.

You click the picture because thats what you want to see and then your given another thumb TGP and 90 more thumbs that have to load

DarkJedi 09-10-2006 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kenny
There are always going to be surfers who prefer text TGPs.

BTW, you would think skimming on a thumb TGP would piss the surfer off.

You click the picture because thats what you want to see and then your given another thumb TGP and 90 more thumbs that have to load

Same shit with text tgps, save a few.

polish_aristocrat 09-10-2006 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi
Fixed.

:2 cents:

oh yeah, you must be right

just like with that random pic from google images that you pretend its me :1orglaugh

polish_aristocrat 09-10-2006 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Shemp
you are assuming they are getting as many sales back, as they are losing...there is no data to back that up...clearly some sponsors will benefit and some will not...

no disrecpect to you, but I think all sponsors benefit from that model

but then again, I just came from playing soccer so I'm tired, and since I don't run either a TGP nor a sponsor program, I don't really feel the need to debate it :upsidedow

Panky 09-10-2006 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi
They aren't losing any sales. FHGs are all about getting traffic.

Shemp is talking about sites that when a thumb is clicked, the thumb does not link to the FHG or gallery advertising the sponsor. The link instead leads to another TGP or trade site. The sponsor is losing out because the content is being misused. As Shemp pointed out, it is "trade bait". Linking to a trade using sponsor content does not benefit that sponsor one bit.

Roald 09-10-2006 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kenny
There are always going to be surfers who prefer text TGPs.

BTW, you would think skimming on a thumb TGP would piss the surfer off.

You click the picture because thats what you want to see and then your given another thumb TGP and 90 more thumbs that have to load

Ofcourse it pisses the surfer off. Thats why I rather have a 50k non skim tgp than a 200k skimming one. But its harder to grow ofcourse when they don't skim.

kenny 09-10-2006 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi
Same shit with text tgps, save a few.

Lets put it this way..

I don't think the surfer really gives a fuck either way as long he/she gets what they come for :1orglaugh

Obviously a surfer will like a no skim text TGP over a thumb one set at 60% and vice versa

kenny 09-10-2006 12:32 PM

I don't know if sponsors benifit from having their thumbs skimmed on TGPs.

The surfer might remember the girl and stay away from clicking anything with her image on it. :1orglaugh

especially if they tried it more then once and ended up with spyware or something

xclusive 09-10-2006 12:33 PM

I get some of if not the best quality of traffic from Shemp.com ratios are always great with the traffic.

ThumbLord 09-10-2006 12:36 PM

there is no money in text TGP's, so move along.
there is no traffic coming from text TGP's, now please leave.

Panky 09-10-2006 12:41 PM

To answer the question, no I don't think text TGP sites are dead. The only reason it appears that thumb sites rule, is because of the marketing and that they are visually appealing, so everyone and their brother launched one.

Some people are learning that switching over to a thumb only format, isn't producing as much profit and/or traffic for them as their text only format, so some people are switching back to text or a combination of thumbs and text.

marketsmart 09-10-2006 12:41 PM

i personally think that text tegp's will slow down in the next 5 years. people with content (2257 compliant) are already experimenting with different forms...

Deraj 09-10-2006 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi
Aside from a few old skool text tgps (thehun/worldsex etc) are text TGPs dead?

Thumb TGPs are the norm now?


Discuss.

Text is awesome.. very l33t

Doctor Dre 09-10-2006 12:57 PM

There are a lot of big ones... look at sunporno.

Doug E 09-10-2006 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shemp
...isnt it obvious?...the thumbs are often being used as trade bait, to redirect the surfer to another TGP...not to the gallery...imo, that is an improper use of sponsors content..

I think it should be noted theres a difference between a CJ and a regular thumb TGP. You can't lump them both together.

The CJ sites I can see as being used improperly cuz you cant get a single click to the gallery, meaning the thumb is in no way being used to promote the sponsor so the content is being used improperly according to most sponsor rules.

But theres not much negative said or to be said about the accepted TGP style of 50 - 80 skim. The more traffic a TGP gets from using that thumb as a trade tool results in more traffic going to that thumb link anyways. Who's going to complain about that?

As for text tgp's, we've seen a tonne of American webmasters switch to this format since 2257. Theyre one way to ensure your traffic is good quality I suppose, weeding out the non english speakers. And of course SE is better with them. But thumb TGP's are visually pleasing and hard to beat in an industry that is based on visual pleasure.

the Shemp 09-10-2006 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug E
I think it should be noted theres a difference between a CJ and a regular thumb TGP. You can't lump them both together.

The CJ sites I can see as being used improperly cuz you cant get a single click to the gallery, meaning the thumb is in no way being used to promote the sponsor so the content is being used improperly according to most sponsor rules.

But theres not much negative said or to be said about the accepted TGP style of 50 - 80 skim. The more traffic a TGP gets from using that thumb as a trade tool results in more traffic going to that thumb link anyways. Who's going to complain about that?

As for text tgp's, we've seen a tonne of American webmasters switch to this format since 2257. Theyre one way to ensure your traffic is good quality I suppose, weeding out the non english speakers. And of course SE is better with them. But thumb TGP's are visually pleasing and hard to beat in an industry that is based on visual pleasure.

thanks for the TGP info...i'll make a note of it ;)

Panky 09-10-2006 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug E
I think it should be noted theres a difference between a CJ and a regular thumb TGP. You can't lump them both together.

The CJ sites I can see as being used improperly cuz you cant get a single click to the gallery, meaning the thumb is in no way being used to promote the sponsor so the content is being used improperly according to most sponsor rules.

But theres not much negative said or to be said about the accepted TGP style of 50 - 80 skim. The more traffic a TGP gets from using that thumb as a trade tool results in more traffic going to that thumb link anyways. Who's going to complain about that?

Yes, there is a difference between a CJ and a regular thumb TGP. But the basic point still remains the same. Both a CJ and a regular thumb TGP feed their trades using mostly sponsor provided content, whether it is from a submitter or creating a fake TGP. Few sites consist of purchased content alone. The only benefit to the sponsor would be if the TGP or CJ site concentrated on only their sites within their program. When a site begins to list galleries advertising multiple sponsors, the competition gets fierce for the traffic. Even with 50-80 skim, it's still a misuse of sponsor content.

The only time a CJ or TGP site is not misusing content, is if the site has no skim whatsoever, the site only skims traffic from thumbs of their purchased content, or the skimmed sponsor thumbs link to custom sites or tour pages advertising only that sponsor the thumb belongs to.

Whenever a site uses a sponsor thumb that links to anywhere other than a site, gallery, or custom page solely advertising that sponsor, it's misusing sponsor content no matter what the skim rate is.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123