illegalpreteens.com supported by maximumcash !!!
 

subject stands for itself. It seems that maximumcash doesn't want to shut down affiliates using the worst of the worst domain names to cater traffic. After the incident with childincest.com 4 days ago, I just stumbeld acrosse illegalpreteens.com that is driving traffic to maximumcash. Any comment from maximumcash , why they support this ?????????

Did you send any e-mail to MaximumCash about this?

possible LIBEL

he surely didnt.
maximumcash does honest business - if you email them, they will take care of it. posting on boards before emailing doesnt make you look good bro.

Possible frivolous lawsuit. Who are you now, Johnny Fucking Cochran?!
You sure are sue crazy these days, and I REALLY hope you're just kidding.:1orglaugh

I posted that question just to say he didn't talk to them yet :winkwink:

Hate to say this but it seems the site is still there and still directing towards maximumcash. Seems an email to Visa might be in order.

It's people like this that make it harder and harder for Visa to keep doing business with us.

i think pedohunter needs a large glass of stfu

SHUT THE FUCK UP MORON

pedohunter, if you want to fight pedophiles, start writing emails to ASACP (http://www.asacp.org/) and the sponsors (who probably just didnt notice the site yet).

that will result more action then posting on public boards.

Why? He found someone using illegal words to promote sites. Maybe if we looked after our shop a little better we might have better processing.

This idiot Darkjedi is a pedofile himself. This is probebly his domain...

Maybe revealing it might get them to watch a little closer?

The "Nothing I could do to monitor it, judge" has been thrown out so many times lawyers don't use it any more. Pedohunter found it.

But I assume you have emailed them as well.

he's posted this crap several times now.
whats the point of posting it on a msg board ?
its maximumcashs' business - he shoudl take it up to them.

if he emailed maxcash and didnt get a reply after lets say 3 days - i think it's fine to post public. but i doubt that he emailed maxcash at all. i also dont see much sense in the title "illegalpreteens.com supported by maximumcash !!!" - why do they support this site? do you know that this guy got a payout yet? he might already be banned - you don't know that, so why make such a statement.

oh, and I send a email to ASACP everytime I see childporn anywhere, i just don't post it public on the boards cause that won't help anything.

This could be considered moraly wrong, but not illegal.

There is nothing illegal about the domain - you can find all these words in a dictionary. And the owner doesnt have any illegal content on his site.

I dont think his site could be shut down according to law.

Exactly.
Maxcash can sue his ass off just because of this tittle.

nopt to shut down the site but to get banned from maxcash.

mr and/or ms hunter, are you finding other domains such as these being redirected to sites that promote sponsors other than maxmimumcash?

i find it odd that a simple redirect is being abused solely by maximum cash affiliates.

also, have you contacted the ASACP? and if not, why not?

nope.

the site does not offer any "materials which constitutes child pornography" or "matter which involves depictions of nudity or sexuality by an age inappropriate-looking performer"

so the term "Illegal Pre Teens" does not "constitute child pornography or matter which involves depictions of nudity or sexuality by an age inappropriate-looking performer" ?

No.

"Illegal" is just a word.
"Pre Teens" is just a regular phrase too. Nothing illegal about it.

okay, i hear you. but i think you know what i mean too, so let's see how maxcash will react.

if it was any sponsor other than maxcash you people would be asking for there head on a platter... :Graucho

i'd like mr and/or ms hunter to answer my questions :)

maximumcash is very aware of this affiliate since last Friday, but instead of shutting him off from the affiliate program they do allow this bullshit to continue.

ASCAP as well as some contacts at VISA/Mastercard have been informed as well.

If I was a sponsor, I'd delete this guys affiliate account no questions asked. :2 cents:
Even if they are legal, its fucking disturbing on principle alone. Definitely not something I'd want to see a major program to be associated with. But I still think Pedohunter is doing the wrong thing by posting this shit here - I wonder if he's ever heard of e-mail?

you should have said that in your very first post. it's easter holidays tough...

Show us proof that they are aware of this, then?

illegalpreteens.com is owned by someone on this board, I will spare the red face. Was full of ARS links not so long ago.

Guy mailed me about trades back in 2002. Other than its shitty name I dont think its ever linked to anything other than legal porn.

LOL talk about negative targeting with a name like that and links like those.

So you dont think MaxCash should ban the affiliates account?
Are you a fucking idiot, or am I just reading what you said wrong? :feels-hot

ASCAP is the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers.

so my other question?

Read this:
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...hreadid=266817
and you will see that they know this affiliate already fpr wrong doing with other domain names.

Visa has a rule I think about this, it was a big deal on this board not 2 long ago.

you can not have those words in your title, meta tags, on your page PERIOD.. and dam sure can't have a domain with them in it.


Why in the fuck do you think FlashCash changed there site
LolitaTeen 2 TeenTeen. They did this a long time ago.

titmowse: Are you supporting webmasters making money of using terms like "incest, preteen, underage" ? If yes, then please explain why you support this? From my point of view this is the worst that anyone can use to drive traffic to a site (especially to a porn site) as it clearly shows, that the one doing it, has no idea what can of worms he's opening.

I agree. It's a shitty domain. Don't get me wrong. A domain name is a word, not content. I don't like the practice but I'd be more upset with the domain registrar for not monitoring the activities of this domain all along.

I'm wondering why the affiliate isn't the foremost villian? After the webmaster is doing this.

edit* After all, it's the webmaster who is redirecting the domain.

and i misspelled villain. stupid 60 second edit limit :(

no. and your why-do-you-hate-america spin doesn't work on me.

you still didn't answer my second question.