GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   tube partner program sales? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1141226)

American Psycho 05-21-2014 02:07 PM

tube partner program sales?
 
anyone site owners make DECENT sales from the tube partner uploads?
by decent i mean based on the amount of content uploaded to the site and views.

currently have content on the tubes with LOTS of views AND very few sales to show.

curious about feedback as I'm considering taking them down.

Yanks_Todd 05-21-2014 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by American Psycho (Post 20095071)
anyone site owners make DECENT sales from the tube partner uploads?
by decent i mean based on the amount of content uploaded to the site and views.

currently have content on the tubes with LOTS of views AND very few sales to show.

curious about feedback as I'm considering taking them down.

I make decent sales to the following. When I say decent I mean that I get an ROI on the direct sales and type-in traffic is gravy.

Xhamster, YouPorn, Pornhub, Xtube, Pornerbros, Redtube and Madthumbs.

I submit to a handful of others that I am beginning to look more deeply into the value of the type-in traffic to justify submissions.

However I am in the same boat, pending some analysis I may end up dropping all but 10 or so and increasing submissions to those that are worth it.

It will be interesting to see how that market continues to shake out.

SpicyM 05-21-2014 02:55 PM

Yeah, there are maybe 10 worth uploading to as Todd wrote and the biggest value is the type-ins/Google search traffic resulting from the exposure.

The Porn Nerd 05-21-2014 03:09 PM

What everyone else said. :)

American Psycho 05-21-2014 03:57 PM

Yea were fucked if only 10tubes worth working with

American Psycho 05-21-2014 04:19 PM

Bye thank a for input depressing as it may be

Yanks_Todd 05-21-2014 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by American Psycho (Post 20095220)
Yea were fucked if only 10tubes worth working with

Not necessarily. The reason those other tubes are totally unproductive is because they are buying so much traffic to sell adviews. That isn't sustainable.

Xhamster does so well because there are real people there. There is plenty of free porn there of all kinds and its good stuff, yet those folks buy memberships at a decent clip.

In my opinion its not because they get some totally unique segment that loves free and paid porn, its just that they are in fact real eyeballs on your content and real people clicking through to your site.

Screwed Up 05-21-2014 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by American Psycho (Post 20095071)
anyone site owners make DECENT sales from the tube partner uploads?

That depends on many factors, but sure I do:
http://africanbucks.com/$-per-clip.jpg

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpicyM (Post 20095134)
Yeah, there are maybe 10 worth uploading to as Todd wrote and the biggest value is the type-ins/Google search traffic resulting from the exposure.

My team submits to +200 tubes. Each one of them is worth it to us. Why discriminate? Do you remember the gallery submitting days, sales could come from the weirdest places.

SpicyM 05-22-2014 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Screwed Up (Post 20095484)
Do you remember the gallery submitting days, sales could come from the weirdest places.

Actually, I do. And 99% of my sales came from like 5-6 TGPs, so I cut the list of manually submitted TGPs down and did the rest automatically. Tube clips take much much longer though.. one HD clip I upload can be easily over 500-600 MB or more and my internet line is 100/100 mbit .. so it is waste of time, inefective.

There are many other good reasons for me to fuck the small tubes off.. most of them just want free content and they easily kick you down in Google SERPS for site specific KWs.

Screwed Up 05-22-2014 12:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpicyM (Post 20095554)
Actually, I do. And 99% of my sales came from like 5-6 TGPs, so I cut the list of manually submitted TGPs down and did the rest automatically. Tube clips take much much longer though.. one HD clip I upload can be easily over 500-600 MB or more and my internet line is 100/100 mbit .. so it is waste of time, inefective.

A 500-600 MB HD clip? None of my "clips" is bigger than 70MB...
And sure, pretty much all of the tube uploading is automatized. Even with several employees it's better to automatize as much as possible.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpicyM (Post 20095554)
There are many other good reasons for me to fuck the small tubes off.. most of them just want free content and they easily kick you down in Google SERPS for site specific KWs.

Site specific KWs? You mean your paysite's name? I never use paysite names in the description of the clip. Why would I want to do that? That would just increase the competition for the paysite's name.

Some other things jump to mind. But from reading your post I already got the gist of it: different methods yield different results.:thumbsup

Lilit 05-22-2014 03:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Screwed Up (Post 20095569)
A 500-600 MB HD clip? None of my "clips" is bigger than 70MB...
And sure, pretty much all of the tube uploading is automatized. Even with several employees it's better to automatize as much as possible.


Could you please share which software or services you use for submissions automation?

Screwed Up 05-22-2014 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lilit (Post 20095699)
Could you please share which software or services you use for submissions automation?

Hi, I'll contact you on icq.

Lilit 05-22-2014 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Screwed Up (Post 20095795)
Hi, I'll contact you on icq.

Ok, I'm online, please don't forget :)

American Psycho 05-22-2014 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Screwed Up (Post 20095484)
That depends on many factors, but sure I do:
http://africanbucks.com/$-per-clip.jpg


My team submits to +200 tubes. Each one of them is worth it to us. Why discriminate? Do you remember the gallery submitting days, sales could come from the weirdest places.

i assume that is paid per view?

Screwed Up 05-22-2014 07:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lilit (Post 20095859)
Ok, I'm online, please don't forget :)

It seems that you're offline and not getting my messages. I have to leave for the day. Let's talk tomorrow.

Quote:

Originally Posted by American Psycho (Post 20095876)
i assume that is paid per view?

Haha, are you being sarcastic? :winkwink: That would be great though.
No, it's not paid per view. I think it would be a bit hard to manage all the views of each submitted clip over all the different tubes.
Hey, do you mean $ per view or do you mean Pimprolls paidperview?:helpme

It's an excel spreadsheet that tells me how much $ I've made per uploaded clip.
Like Relentless would say: I know how much clips I've uploaded. And I know how many sales I make. All the rest is irrelevant. If a paysite doesn't convert, I drop it.

The Porn Nerd 05-22-2014 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lilit (Post 20095699)
Could you please share which software or services you use for submissions automation?

Chameleon's Tube Site Submitter.

American Psycho 05-22-2014 09:38 AM

Not sarcastic. Meant pimprolls ppv
The column title say $ per clip....

How the heck do you track sales per video from tube uploads?

SpicyM 05-22-2014 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Screwed Up (Post 20095569)
A 500-600 MB HD clip? None of my "clips" is bigger than 70MB...
And sure, pretty much all of the tube uploading is automatized. Even with several employees it's better to automatize as much as possible.

We upload quality HD videos and I do those few tubes by hand. Tested the submitter, most of the sites were useless. Waste of time for me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Screwed Up (Post 20095569)
Site specific KWs? You mean your paysite's name? I never use paysite names in the description of the clip. Why would I want to do that? That would just increase the competition for the paysite's name.

Some other things jump to mind. But from reading your post I already got the gist of it: different methods yield different results.:thumbsup

Well, not just KWs, but the channel names as well. The small tubes dont usually offer content partner program so you are left to only promote your brand with the watermark. It is also easier to control the content and productivity on 10-15 tubes instead of spreading it across 150 tubes that send 10 views a day.

Guess it depends on the niche too. :winkwink:

American Psycho 05-22-2014 03:21 PM

biz bump....

slavdogg 05-22-2014 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yanks_Todd (Post 20095274)
Not necessarily. The reason those other tubes are totally unproductive is because they are buying so much traffic to sell adviews. That isn't sustainable.

.

you should demand to get paid for the ad views AND get the benefits of the traffic affiliate links.

American Psycho 05-22-2014 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slavdogg (Post 20096706)
you should demand to get paid for the ad views AND get the benefits of the traffic affiliate links.


Agreed. Anything else is a scam

jack-exploitedbabysitters 05-22-2014 04:27 PM

the funny thing is this regardless if u a tube partner or not, ur stolen vids will still wind up on the tube anyway.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123