GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   its several weeks later. what is france doing about ISIS? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1181763)

Joshua G 12-28-2015 03:49 PM

its several weeks later. what is france doing about ISIS?
 
im unable to find anything in the press, that france did anything other than launch a few sorties the weekend after the bloodbath.

the left wing security plan: ban guns, insert women into combat jobs, & never deploy them when the people you disarmed get slaughtered.

:Oh crap

L-Pink 12-28-2015 03:54 PM

http://i.imgur.com/I4Eoplh.jpg

Joshua G 12-28-2015 04:00 PM

im sorry, here is the rest of the left wing security plan:

http://cdn.scahw.com.au/cdn-1d11f5f8...eanjullien.JPG

maybe ISIS will doodle peace symbols back...

klinton 12-28-2015 04:03 PM

usually agression means contragression that leads to more agression.
thanks for the Iraq guys !

Europe very much much appreciates that :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Joshua G 12-28-2015 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by klinton (Post 20681371)
thanks for the Iraq guys !

Europe very much much appreciates that :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

always funny how people subjectively decide that Iraq is the start of all current problems, when Iraq could not happen until al qaeda made the USA very insecure, & willing to do anything the president wanted.

& when al qaeda declared war on the USA in 98, & clinton did nothing. & when al qaeda bombed the USS cole, & clinton took a hummer from the intern. Maybe i can be just as subjective like you & decide clinton is to blame for all of this, for letting al qaeda grow on his watch.

or maybe the enemy, ISIS al queda wahhabi et al...maybe they are to blame.

pfft. :2 cents:

$money$ 12-28-2015 04:47 PM

if it's not on the news why care

Joshua G 12-28-2015 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by $money$ (Post 20681418)
if it's not on the news why care

why? because the republicans are insane & do things like needlessly invading Iraq. its important that cooler heads on the left have the balls to win this war. or else we will live in the same mind-state as israelis, who vote for the racist apartheid govt because they fear the weakness of the left.

so it would be nice if a euro country made some attempt to lead a victory over ISIS, cause obama definitely is not going to. the syrians are moving to europe so it would seem logical there should be a more agressive foreign policy response from europe. But that does not appear to be in the cards. no leadership.

:2 cents:

klinton 12-29-2015 03:33 AM

yes they are to blame, but you put more oil into the fire all the time basically.
you armed mudjahedins that were fighting USRR= Al Qaeda grow. you even grow that beared guy ben laden that way
you armed so called "free syrian army" in Syria - ISIS took all their arms...
you removed Saddam - Iraq got totally ruined and you have "mad max" reality over there, not your beloved "democracy". you know what - some guys just dont know how to have democratic govern. they just need either tyrran (thank god if the guy will be good for its nation) or they will have mad max reality.
your friends removed Gaddafi - see what happened in Iraq.
you/ your friends tried/ try to remove Assad - see Iraq example.
you know where wahabis come from ? from your favorite Allies in Middle east - Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G (Post 20681414)
always funny how people subjectively decide that Iraq is the start of all current problems, when Iraq could not happen until al qaeda made the USA very insecure, & willing to do anything the president wanted.

& when al qaeda declared war on the USA in 98, & clinton did nothing. & when al qaeda bombed the USS cole, & clinton took a hummer from the intern. Maybe i can be just as subjective like you & decide clinton is to blame for all of this, for letting al qaeda grow on his watch.

or maybe the enemy, ISIS al queda wahhabi et al...maybe they are to blame.

pfft. :2 cents:


MiamiBoyz 12-29-2015 04:42 AM

Nuke the entire middle east and let Allah sort them out.

http://49.media.tumblr.com/e754c5192...igeqo1_400.gif

_Richard_ 12-29-2015 05:01 AM

yea, i mean, cause the world is still basking in the intellectual glow from the last non-leftie government.

j3rkules 12-29-2015 05:50 AM

Terrorist attacks in 3...2...1

Joshua G 12-29-2015 01:50 PM

i see the libs here have nothing to say, cept blame america, blame bush. This is the quality of thinking that goes with the left. blame shift to 13 years ago! no taking responsibility, no solutions to the mess obama made.

i guess we're gonna get another right winger in 2016. Dems got nothing to offer.

dyna mo 12-29-2015 01:58 PM

Don't worry frenchies, USA has your back.
https://www.rt.com/usa/327368-isis-i...esolve-report/

You're welcome.

bronco67 12-29-2015 03:06 PM

I don't think any one thing is to blame for ISIS...it's a problem that's been a long time in the making, even before Russia invaded Afghanistan. Invading Iraq and destabilizing the region sure as fuck sped up the process a little.

kkkkkk 12-29-2015 03:12 PM

The muslims haven't been pussified as we have and things could get ugly fast! I think I will go eat another bonbon now while we await our future ISIS overlords. um bonbons.

slapass 12-29-2015 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G (Post 20682376)
i see the libs here have nothing to say, cept blame america, blame bush. This is the quality of thinking that goes with the left. blame shift to 13 years ago! no taking responsibility, no solutions to the mess obama made.

i guess we're gonna get another right winger in 2016. Dems got nothing to offer.

They killed two Americans. We have been bombing them for 2 years. How upset over Isis do you expect everyone to get?

Joshua G 12-29-2015 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 20682470)
I don't think any one thing is to blame for ISIS...it's a problem that's been a long time in the making, even before Russia invaded Afghanistan. Invading Iraq and destabilizing the region sure as fuck sped up the process a little.

so stop bringing up 13 years ago & talk about frances solution, obamas solution, today. you do understand that it is impossible to defeat an army with someone elses army, right? you really think militias backed by iran or kurds or turks are gonna get the job done? hurray, they got back ramadi. wow. coulda been done with 300 green berets in 3 hours. but no libbies will put real boots on the ground. didnt you see the breaking bad episode "half measures" & do you understand the left wing war on ISIS is nothing more than half measures?

:helpme

Sarn 12-29-2015 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G (Post 20681414)
always funny how people subjectively decide that Iraq is the start of all current problems, when Iraq could not happen until al qaeda made the USA very insecure, & willing to do anything the president wanted.

& when al qaeda declared war on the USA in 98, & clinton did nothing. & when al qaeda bombed the USS cole, & clinton took a hummer from the intern. Maybe i can be just as subjective like you & decide clinton is to blame for all of this, for letting al qaeda grow on his watch.

or maybe the enemy, ISIS al queda wahhabi et al...maybe they are to blame.

pfft. :2 cents:

Iraq-Libia-Syria
hussain-kaddafi-assad is not al qaeda.
al qaeda - created by the US organization.
US transferred control in the Iraq-Libya-Syria in the hands of al qaeda and other terrorist groups, such as isis.
the US is not fighting with isis or Al Qaeda.
And even on the contrary, want to ban it for the Russia, no-fly zone, Putin must stop NATO through Turkey even shot down our plane bomber.
so there are two conclusion - US idiots or they do specifically.
If you do specifically to whom it is harmful?
For Russia,Europe and China.

bronco67 12-29-2015 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G (Post 20682791)
so stop bringing up 13 years ago & talk about frances solution, obamas solution, today. you do understand that it is impossible to defeat an army with someone elses army, right? you really think militias backed by iran or kurds or turks are gonna get the job done? hurray, they got back ramadi. wow. coulda been done with 300 green berets in 3 hours. but no libbies will put real boots on the ground. didnt you see the breaking bad episode "half measures" & do you understand the left wing war on ISIS is nothing more than half measures?

:helpme

Sounds like you have all the answers. They should put you in charge.

crockett 12-29-2015 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G (Post 20681369)
im sorry, here is the rest of the left wing security plan:

http://cdn.scahw.com.au/cdn-1d11f5f8...eanjullien.JPG

maybe ISIS will doodle peace symbols back...

Waiting for you to go sign up to fight the Muslims.. When y'all big talking conservitards going? ... Or yea just talk tough on the Internet? Or perhaps you are too busy volunteering With the wall building on the Mexican boarder? ..or are you like every other internet hero and just talk big while doing jack shit?

I do find it quite amazing that you big bad ass conservitards are always held back by those wimpy liberals you love to complain about.. Hell, must mean you can't be as tough as all your talk if them liberals are always pissing in your Cheerios and all you do is eat it by the spoon full..

dyna mo 12-29-2015 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G (Post 20682791)
so stop bringing up 13 years ago & talk about frances solution, obamas solution, today. you do understand that it is impossible to defeat an army with someone elses army, right? you really think militias backed by iran or kurds or turks are gonna get the job done? hurray, they got back ramadi. wow. coulda been done with 300 green berets in 3 hours. but no libbies will put real boots on the ground. didnt you see the breaking bad episode "half measures" & do you understand the left wing war on ISIS is nothing more than half measures?

:helpme

I'm not sure I agree with this. From what I've read ramadi was quite complicated to gain back control. And that's even after USA figured out how to do it with alqauda .


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc