GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Webcams.com Runs a Youtube site with Full movies (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=807056)

Tjeezers 02-12-2008 06:16 PM

Webcams.com Runs a Youtube site with Full movies
 
Hello

I found www.thatfreesite.com property of webcams.com
They have a youtube production online with long play movies.
Portal is stuffed with categories and 1000s of full movies.

I asked webcams.com why they do this, they say it is for testing purposes to test what sells best of a sponsor

Movies are from 10 minutes to 45 minutes.

Is this legal?

L-Pink 02-12-2008 06:18 PM

The sleeze never ends ..... testing purposes hahaha

tony286 02-12-2008 06:20 PM

makes me want to throw up

FlexxAeon 02-12-2008 06:20 PM

jeezus...

Tjeezers 02-12-2008 06:21 PM

Jago Webcams.com ‎(12-2-2008 22:08):
that is called testing to see how well it works with what sponsors

stickyfingerz 02-12-2008 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sex2Have (Post 13772458)
Hello

I found www.thatfreesite.com property of webcams.com
They have a youtube production online with long play movies.
Portal is stuffed with categories and 1000s of full movies.

I asked webcams.com why they do this, they say it is for testing purposes to test what sells best of a sponsor

Movies are from 10 minutes to 45 minutes.

Is this legal?

Looked to me like most of the long movies were all the intro portion of the videos and very little actual porn there. And who owns the sites for the vids? Looked like mostly same sites. Just cause its a video site doesnt mean shit is bad.

If I own the rights to a video I can give it away if I want right?

Fat Panda 02-12-2008 06:28 PM

here we go

Fat Panda 02-12-2008 06:29 PM

takes me to freeporn.com . . what a great domain name!

Fap 02-12-2008 06:30 PM

eh its the new thing it looks like

pornask 02-12-2008 06:32 PM

somebody fill me in - why do those full vid "porn sites" have social bookmarking buttons like digg, del.icio.us, etc there. I thought those social bookmarks didn't accept adult content :helpme:

OzMan 02-12-2008 06:32 PM

ok now bend over.... and don't worry, this is just for testing purposes. :thumbsup

TampaToker 02-12-2008 06:34 PM

Actually i don't see a problem with what webcams.com is doing. If sponsors allow them to use there content like then the affiliate needs to take up the problem with the sponsor. First page i see nastydollars stuff if they let them use it as a affiliate i would be pissed. Now im just curious if webcams.com is using the user submitted loop hole on this deal...:upsidedow

pr0 02-12-2008 06:37 PM

damn that site looks dope!

and its obviously legit...all the videos are stamped & not user submitted

i think you got some bogus info...i saw you post on another board earlier today....seems like you got a hard on for webcams :2 cents:

L-Pink 02-12-2008 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TampaToker (Post 13772549)
Now im just curious if webcams.com is using the user submitted loop hole on this deal...:upsidedow

:2 cents:

PR_Sebas 02-12-2008 06:48 PM

seems like more and more people are going the way of "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em"

OzMan 02-12-2008 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr0 (Post 13772560)
damn that site looks dope!

and its obviously legit...all the videos are stamped & not user submitted

i think you got some bogus info...i saw you post on another board earlier today....seems like you got a hard on for webcams :2 cents:

legit as in they have permission so all is good?

- It's cool for Webcams.com to give away their own long videos free but not let their affiliates do it?

-It's cool for other sponsors to let Webcams.com use their long videos but not let other affiliates do it?

-It's just cool to give away long videos to surfers?

or all of the above? :error

stickyfingerz 02-12-2008 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OzMan (Post 13772709)
legit as in they have permission so all is good?

- It's cool for Webcams.com to give away their own long videos free but not let their affiliates do it?

-It's cool for other sponsors to let Webcams.com use their long videos but not let other affiliates do it?

-It's just cool to give away long videos to surfers?

or all of the above? :error

If someone has the right to do it, then I guess they can do it. All the rest is opinion.

pr0 02-12-2008 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OzMan (Post 13772709)
legit as in they have permission so all is good?

- It's cool for Webcams.com to give away their own long videos free but not let their affiliates do it?

-It's cool for other sponsors to let Webcams.com use their long videos but not let other affiliates do it?

-It's just cool to give away long videos to surfers?

or all of the above? :error

who do you work for? what do you do? do you have 1 company who can vouch for you as to being in the business?

http://impact2jc.shackspace.com/hatorade2.jpg

pr0 02-12-2008 07:39 PM

nevermind...obviously you know ice & send sales to playboy

still whats with all the hatoraide?

will76 02-12-2008 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sex2Have (Post 13772458)
Hello

I found www.thatfreesite.com property of webcams.com
They have a youtube production online with long play movies.
Portal is stuffed with categories and 1000s of full movies.

I asked webcams.com why they do this, they say it is for testing purposes to test what sells best of a sponsor

Movies are from 10 minutes to 45 minutes.

Is this legal?


Is this legal? Who owns movieroom? does webcams.com own it? if not does webcams.com have permission to from the owners of movieroom.com to use their content. If yes, then it is legal.

If they own the content or have the sponsor's permission to use the content then its case closed. If they want to show 2 hour long videos they own or have permission to use they can do what the hell they want.

They are obviously trying to see if they can make money with a tube site. Oh look they have AFF banners. All of you people who touch AFF, i hope you burn in hell. :thumbsup

HouseHead 02-12-2008 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr0 (Post 13772560)
damn that site looks dope!

and its obviously legit...all the videos are stamped & not user submitted

i think you got some bogus info...i saw you post on another board earlier today....seems like you got a hard on for webcams :2 cents:

thats what im sayin.

JFK 02-12-2008 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OzMan (Post 13772541)
ok now bend over.... and don't worry, this is just for testing purposes. :thumbsup

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:thumbsup

will76 02-12-2008 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornreviewsource (Post 13772607)
seems like more and more people are going the way of "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em"

if it is legal, its called trying to stay ahead of the game and making money. A lot of people here don't like legl tube sites, but if people are making money with them and more and more doing it, you can either complain about it and watch your sales suffer or you can try to make changes to adapt to it.


i have a big problem with the sites who steal content and use it to make money. I have no problem with sites who own the content or have permission to use it.

What is happening here is that picture and videos are becoming advertising tools for interactive membership sites, cam sites, and dating sites. If you own a picture and video site with no interaction then you are being squeezed out of business. Unfortunetly there is no way to stop it.

Tube sites are the final step in the evolution of picture and videos being used for promotional purposes to make upsells. It started with 10 pictures on a tgp - > 4 video clips 30 seconds long on a MGP page -> tube sites with 2min - full video clips.

will76 02-12-2008 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OzMan (Post 13772709)
legit as in they have permission so all is good?

- It's cool for Webcams.com to give away their own long videos free but not let their affiliates do it?

-It's cool for other sponsors to let Webcams.com use their long videos but not let other affiliates do it?

-It's just cool to give away long videos to surfers?

or all of the above? :error

cool ? no, but their decission to do so. It's not like they are stealling from their affiliates or other affiliates.

I see the same as a company saying we are the only ones who can bid on our domain name, our affiliates can not bid on our domain name. I don't think that is cool, but they aren't fucking anyone with a decission like that.

Zorgman 02-12-2008 07:59 PM

I don't get this. I checked the site out and found a "we live together" video. But the only adverts on the page were to webcams.com and some text adverts to other paysites. No link at all to We live together - Nasty Dollars.

If you use a paysite content you should atleast have a fucken link to their site.

Tjeezers 02-12-2008 09:17 PM

Need more input on this.

OzMan 02-12-2008 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr0 (Post 13772739)
who do you work for? what do you do? do you have 1 company who can vouch for you as to being in the business?

http://impact2jc.shackspace.com/hatorade2.jpg

I'm a nobody so you don't need to answer the questions.

Shaze 02-12-2008 09:30 PM

yes!!! more free full length clips for me to masturbate tooo!!! keep em coming guys!! i love the porn industry...can someone start burning full length porn DVD's for me also and host them on your streaming server???

Shaze 02-12-2008 09:30 PM

Free Porn For Everyone!!!

bashbug 02-12-2008 09:33 PM

didnt think webcams.com owned freeporn.com

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 02-12-2008 09:44 PM

Quote:

U.S.C. 2257 has been ruled unconstitutional but as a responsible distributor of adult content we still ensure that any performers published on our site are at least 18 years old

We are not responsible for the production of any content distributed through our site. Any and all video content located in said site has been licensed from various studios and/or production houses and/or producers.


ADG

OzMan 02-12-2008 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 13772860)
cool ? no, but their decission to do so. It's not like they are stealling from their affiliates or other affiliates.

I see the same as a company saying we are the only ones who can bid on our domain name, our affiliates can not bid on our domain name. I don't think that is cool, but they aren't fucking anyone with a decission like that.

I think it is pretty close to stealing if they can offer a lot more free content direct to the surfer or allow only certain affiliates to do so openly.

This is basically taking sales away from affiliates.

Say if Clickcash paid me the same as you but my surfers didn't need to enter CC info to join. Would you say "not cool but up to them" or would you be screaming foul. Not the same situation but I hope you see where I'm coming from.

or if you went to Ifriends directly, not thru' an affiliate link they would give you a 10 hour credit if you signed up there... would your sales be affected?

Basically what I'm saying is it doesn't seem fair for a company to be directly offering so much free content to surfers but not letting all it's affiliates do the same. I don't see that the same as non compete on domain name and other keywords.

Also as was stated earlier it seems weird that a company would let its content be used and be quite happy with other companies banners on the same page?

Seems it would have the same negative affect on us as affiliates as a torrent site or illegal tube site that has content for free that we are trying to get the surfer to pay for would have.

Yes I need to "evolve or die" etc not saying I'm not but it appears in this particular case the affiliates are being cut out of the deal.

John. 02-12-2008 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pr0 (Post 13772800)
nevermind...obviously you know ice & send sales to playboy

still whats with all the hatoraide?

Maybe you should write your posts but wait 10-15 minutes before pressing the button each time.

Pornwolf 02-12-2008 09:59 PM

After clicking a few links I can say it's definitely a different slant on the whole Tube Model.

will76 02-13-2008 02:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OzMan (Post 13773296)
I think it is pretty close to stealing if they can offer a lot more free content direct to the surfer or allow only certain affiliates to do so openly.

This is basically taking sales away from affiliates.

Say if Clickcash paid me the same as you but my surfers didn't need to enter CC info to join. Would you say "not cool but up to them" or would you be screaming foul. Not the same situation but I hope you see where I'm coming from.

or if you went to Ifriends directly, not thru' an affiliate link they would give you a 10 hour credit if you signed up there... would your sales be affected?

Basically what I'm saying is it doesn't seem fair for a company to be directly offering so much free content to surfers but not letting all it's affiliates do the same. I don't see that the same as non compete on domain name and other keywords.

Also as was stated earlier it seems weird that a company would let its content be used and be quite happy with other companies banners on the same page?

Seems it would have the same negative affect on us as affiliates as a torrent site or illegal tube site that has content for free that we are trying to get the surfer to pay for would have.

Yes I need to "evolve or die" etc not saying I'm not but it appears in this particular case the affiliates are being cut out of the deal.


Fair ? :1orglaugh just don't use that company then. If the affiliates are being cut out, then they should move on to a better deal and not promote that company. That is such a simple and obvious solution you wouldnt think anyone would have to mention it.

There is a HUGE difference in what you are talking about here.

Point 1: if a company offers one thing to one affiliate and something less to you, then don't promote them. Thats not stealling. Some companies pay certain affiliates more per sale then they do others, is that stealing from the person who is paid less, no? is it fair ? If you don't like their policies don't use them.

The things I have problem with is companies who's policies steal from everyone else, whether is black and white such as with stolen content, or by using spyware to steal traffic. If clickcash offers you more money than me, or they offer their own traffic $10 free, fine. I decided if I want to use them or another company. No big deal. I might think it is shitty but shitty and stealing are two totally different things.

Point 2: Giving away content is not stealling if the company giving it away owns it or has rights to use it. It's not even close to stealing. If i give away a 10 minute clip and I make sales because of it, I am making sales. The more sales i make the less you make. In theory then, every sale I make would be stealling because that is one less sale you would make. It's called sales and marketing. 30 seconds videos, 2 min videos, 2 hour videos, if people want to use long videos, and they own the video, and they can make money from doing it, more power to them. They are not stealing from you. If they do it with stolen content then it is a different story.

pr0 02-13-2008 02:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John. (Post 13773310)
Maybe you should write your posts but wait 10-15 minutes before pressing the button each time.

because combating crying ass bitches is a full time job

and I've got the day job too ya know :thumbsup

Why 02-13-2008 02:35 AM

this thread makes me laugh, so do you people just hate ALL tubes sites or just too stupid to know the differance between the ones that use the content legally and the ones that dont. of course sponsors give longer promo clips to webcams, they own freeporn.com and that in theory would mean a lot of traffic for me as a sponsor if i give in and make them a few extra long clips.

Violetta 02-13-2008 02:48 AM

the sky is falling...

hand-held 02-13-2008 02:54 AM

Heh heh heh...

http://freeporn.com/static/pages/2257.php

Code:

403 Forbidden

Request forbidden -- authorization will not help

Page handler: None
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/CherryPy-2.2.1-py2.4.egg/cherrypy/_cphttptools.py", line 103, in _run
    applyFilters('before_main')
  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/CherryPy-2.2.1-py2.4.egg/cherrypy/filters/__init__.py", line 151, in applyFilters
    method()
  File "/home/webcams/freeporn.com/tfs/controllers.py", line 93, in before_main
    raise cherrypy.HTTPError(403)
HTTPError: 403

Powered by CherryPy 2.2.1


OzMan 02-13-2008 02:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 13773987)
If you don't like their policies don't use them.

Well that is the answer to everything of course but doesn't really address the problem. The definition of stealing also varies with how you look at it. Most concerns affiliates have with sponsors are indeed about being fair rather than the sponsor doing something illegal and are posted in the hope (sig views aside) that the sponsor will correct the problem or at least explain their position so that the affiliate won't have to drop them or other sponsors doing the same thing.

I would like to hear Webcams.com reasoning behind the site. If the site was in the affiliate tools area as a ready made cobranded tube site with randomized videos with my codes etc I would love it but I'm lazy like that. They've been on the cutting edge before with the ability to customize feeds and videos better than anyone else so who knows maybe this really is a "test" of some sorts.

Actually that will probably be the next thing lazy affiliates are demanding from sponsors. It only took most of them two to three years to provide rss feeds or even hosted blogs so expect most sponsors to have plug in tube sites for affiliates sometime around 2010... if there are any non dating/cam sites left by then that is :winkwink:

Semi-Retired-Dave 02-13-2008 03:05 AM

When is all this free shit going to stop??? This is horrible.

Zorgman 02-13-2008 03:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OzMan (Post 13774052)
expect most sponsors to have plug in tube sites for affiliates sometime around 2010...

Don't you mean 2008. We're closer then you think!

Tjeezers 02-13-2008 05:22 AM

What they do, I can do also

But would my sponsors be happy?

Tjeezers 02-13-2008 05:44 PM

Back to page 1

Klen 02-13-2008 06:08 PM

Huh,they have aff and fling ads at same time.

Tjeezers 02-14-2008 02:41 AM

Webcams.com are amateurs

I say this personally, cause i find a sponsor who needs this tactics, low, dirty and smelly

No respect for people like that

Dogs..... that is what they are

PornMogul 02-14-2008 02:42 AM

wow thread of the year! seriously. This is fuckin huge. Freeporn.com, and webcams.com, FUCK man. Seriously webcams.com hit me up! lol

Tjeezers 02-15-2008 05:56 AM

Back to the Top

I wait for replay of Jago

Jago, Why dont you tell to everyone here what you told me on ICQ
Or don`t you have balls?

Common boy, put your hands where your mouth is and make a stand
Otherwise i keep on bumping and bumping!!!!!!!!!!!

Soon i go the board(s) where you guys brag about yourself.

Tjeezers 02-15-2008 11:22 AM

Spice it up a little


Jago Webcams stealer ‎(12-2-2008 22:08):
that is called testing to see how well it works with what sponsors

Jago Webcams stealer ‎(12-2-2008 22:08):
just because thats whats there now doesnt mean thats whats going to stay

Harry AWMS-Network ‎(12-2-2008 22:08):
testing is really the weakest excuse i heard

Jago Webcams stealer ‎(12-2-2008 22:08):
ok harry im blocking you if you cant be reasonable


Jago, you really can do all you want
but being responsible is something you have not learned
Whats up with you man?

Tjeezers 02-15-2008 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris (Post 13777496)
Huh,they have aff and fling ads at same time.

Thats called testing
to see what works

I wish to know on what traffic they test?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc