![]() |
would this FHG get accepted by TGPs?
would this FHG get accepted by TGPs?
http://classycontent.com/gallery-6 If not why not? Thanks guys for help. |
I don't see why not
|
it should, galleries like this often sell better, i know thehun loves these type of galleries, trying submitting it there.
|
I would add some text to is and make a header instead of the banner
|
looks good.
|
Nice and clean, just how I like 'em...
|
I think the people that said yes didn't look at the source... newbs would list this gallery... noone else would... I certainly wouldn't. Most tgps do not list galleries that have dynamic images and secondly there is no header or anything... the html is all fucked up. Another no-no is the scripting... most tgps don't accept galleries with JavaScript in them.
|
Yeah. I would change that last photo to either a pussy flash or panties flash at the very least.
|
Guyes thanks lot. I am happy that white plane simple backround does not bother you.
I am working to change other things. |
Old school, looks good!
|
Quote:
:2 cents: |
Psst... don't complain about the sponsor if it makes no sales either, because your ccbill code is wrong.
|
Not bad, but I think javascript is a no-no on galleries.
|
I'm all for minimalistic designs but that's too much, or too little actually. If you are going to keep it that simple and only have one text link and one banner, then that is one VERY important piece of text.
"Hot pretty teen exposing herself" doesn't really inspire clicks.. and of course all the comments that were made about your html, the lame lightbox for the images. I know that's cool right now on blogs etc, but it doesn't work for galleries. I have my resolution cranked up pretty high and I still couldn't see the girls face and the button to click for the next pic without scrolling. It just doesn't work. Make it a normal gallery, increase the font size on that text link, write some juicier text, and ultimately, the banner should be replaced too. NO ONE clicks on generic banners anymore. Hell, that was true 5 years ago. |
I have a pet hate for galleries which break the browsing experience. For people who are used to clicking back, or pressing backspace, using flash or j/s to display pics is going to piss them off. :2 cents:
Another thing I notice about that script is that it doesn't display the image until it's fully loaded. Not going to be popular if the surfer's connection is slow. I dunno, maybe I'm a dinosaur, I like to keep things simple... :) |
on most, yes
|
Quote:
Good point. thank you |
Quote:
|
with a cherry ontop
|
"Hot pretty" is redundant. Choose one.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123