would this FHG get accepted by TGPs? - GoFuckYourself.com

Peace · 05-04-2009, 05:52 AM

would this FHG get accepted by TGPs?

http://classycontent.com/gallery-6

If not why not? Thanks guys for help.

Spunky · 05-04-2009, 05:54 AM

I don't see why not

fris · 05-04-2009, 05:54 AM

it should, galleries like this often sell better, i know thehun loves these type of galleries, trying submitting it there.

Rick Diculous · 05-04-2009, 05:55 AM

I would add some text to is and make a header instead of the banner

u-Bob · 05-04-2009, 06:24 AM

looks good.

CaptainHowdy · 05-04-2009, 06:44 AM

Nice and clean, just how I like 'em...

nation-x · 05-04-2009, 06:50 AM

I think the people that said yes didn't look at the source... newbs would list this gallery... noone else would... I certainly wouldn't. Most tgps do not list galleries that have dynamic images and secondly there is no header or anything... the html is all fucked up. Another no-no is the scripting... most tgps don't accept galleries with JavaScript in them.

pornguy · 05-04-2009, 06:52 AM

Yeah. I would change that last photo to either a pussy flash or panties flash at the very least.

Peace · 05-04-2009, 06:57 AM

Guyes thanks lot. I am happy that white plane simple backround does not bother you.
I am working to change other things.

alias · 05-04-2009, 06:58 AM

Old school, looks good!

alias · 05-04-2009, 07:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peace

Guyes thanks lot. I am happy that white plane simple backround does not bother you.
I am working to change other things.

Something like 90+ percent of all the text you read in your life [especially while learning] is black text on a white background. This is the most trusted color combination.

Iron Fist · 05-04-2009, 07:12 AM

Psst... don't complain about the sponsor if it makes no sales either, because your ccbill code is wrong.

Matyko · 05-04-2009, 08:07 AM

Not bad, but I think javascript is a no-no on galleries.

PSD CSS XHTML · 05-04-2009, 10:29 AM

I'm all for minimalistic designs but that's too much, or too little actually. If you are going to keep it that simple and only have one text link and one banner, then that is one VERY important piece of text.

"Hot pretty teen exposing herself" doesn't really inspire clicks..

and of course all the comments that were made about your html, the lame lightbox for the images. I know that's cool right now on blogs etc, but it doesn't work for galleries.

I have my resolution cranked up pretty high and I still couldn't see the girls face and the button to click for the next pic without scrolling. It just doesn't work.

Make it a normal gallery, increase the font size on that text link, write some juicier text, and ultimately, the banner should be replaced too. NO ONE clicks on generic banners anymore. Hell, that was true 5 years ago.

rowan · 05-04-2009, 01:32 PM

I have a pet hate for galleries which break the browsing experience. For people who are used to clicking back, or pressing backspace, using flash or j/s to display pics is going to piss them off.

Another thing I notice about that script is that it doesn't display the image until it's fully loaded. Not going to be popular if the surfer's connection is slow.

I dunno, maybe I'm a dinosaur, I like to keep things simple...

05-04-2009, 01:36 PM

on most, yes

Peace · 05-04-2009, 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rowan

I have a pet hate for galleries which break the browsing experience. For people who are used to clicking back, or pressing backspace, using flash or j/s to display pics is going to piss them off.

Another thing I notice about that script is that it doesn't display the image until it's fully loaded. Not going to be popular if the surfer's connection is slow.

I dunno, maybe I'm a dinosaur, I like to keep things simple...

Good point. thank you

seeandsee · 05-04-2009, 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peace

would this FHG get accepted by TGPs?

http://classycontent.com/gallery-6

If not why not? Thanks guys for help.

could go easy

Si · 05-04-2009, 03:28 PM

with a cherry ontop

Useless Warrior · 05-04-2009, 03:36 PM

"Hot pretty" is redundant. Choose one.

Barefootsies · 05-04-2009, 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nation-x

I think the people that said yes didn't look at the source... newbs would list this gallery... noone else would... I certainly wouldn't. Most tgps do not list galleries that have dynamic images and secondly there is no header or anything... the html is all fucked up. Another no-no is the scripting... most tgps don't accept galleries with JavaScript in them.

My thoughts exactly.

05-04-2009, 05:52 AM	#1
Peace Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: NY and Moscow Posts: 5,519	would this FHG get accepted by TGPs? would this FHG get accepted by TGPs? http://classycontent.com/gallery-6 If not why not? Thanks guys for help. __________________ Need Custom or Licensed Content? Visit PhotoVideoContent.com Email: [email protected] / Telegram: @romatibet / Skype: Peace888

05-04-2009, 05:54 AM	#2
Spunky I need a beer Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: ♠ Toiletville ♠ Posts: 133,940	I don't see why not __________________ *YOUR INFORMATION HERE*

05-04-2009, 05:54 AM	#3
fris Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 55,372	it should, galleries like this often sell better, i know thehun loves these type of galleries, trying submitting it there. __________________ Since 1999: 69 Adult Industry awards for Best Hosting Company and professional excellence. WP Stuff

05-04-2009, 05:55 AM	#4
Rick Diculous Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 2,370	I would add some text to is and make a header instead of the banner __________________ 100+ adult blogs looking for hardlink trades ICQ: 383 631 174 jason @ pornblogempire . com

05-04-2009, 06:50 AM	#7
nation-x Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Rock Hill, SC Posts: 5,370	I think the people that said yes didn't look at the source... newbs would list this gallery... noone else would... I certainly wouldn't. Most tgps do not list galleries that have dynamic images and secondly there is no header or anything... the html is all fucked up. Another no-no is the scripting... most tgps don't accept galleries with JavaScript in them. Last edited by nation-x; 05-04-2009 at 06:52 AM..

05-04-2009, 06:24 AM	#5
u-Bob there's no $$$ in porn Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: icq: 195./568.-230 (btw: not getting offline msgs) Posts: 33,063	looks good.

05-04-2009, 06:44 AM	#6
CaptainHowdy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Happy in the dark. Posts: 93,565	Nice and clean, just how I like 'em...

05-04-2009, 06:52 AM	#8
pornguy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Homeless Posts: 62,911	Yeah. I would change that last photo to either a pussy flash or panties flash at the very least. __________________ PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com \| Angeles Cid \| Mariana Cordoba \| MAILERS WELCOME!

05-04-2009, 06:57 AM	#9
Peace Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: NY and Moscow Posts: 5,519	Guyes thanks lot. I am happy that white plane simple backround does not bother you. I am working to change other things. __________________ Need Custom or Licensed Content? Visit PhotoVideoContent.com Email: [email protected] / Telegram: @romatibet / Skype: Peace888

05-04-2009, 06:58 AM	#10
alias aliasx Join Date: Apr 2001 Posts: 19,010	Old school, looks good! __________________ https://porncorporation.com

05-04-2009, 07:12 AM	#12
Iron Fist Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 23,400	Psst... don't complain about the sponsor if it makes no sales either, because your ccbill code is wrong. __________________ i like waffles

05-04-2009, 08:07 AM	#13
Matyko PsyHead Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Hungary Posts: 8,671	Not bad, but I think javascript is a no-no on galleries. __________________ -=- Register with our ref link and we help you with the setup! -=- AdSpyglass.com - Double your profit from brokers

05-04-2009, 10:29 AM	#14
PSD CSS XHTML Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: I was right here a minute ago Posts: 546	I'm all for minimalistic designs but that's too much, or too little actually. If you are going to keep it that simple and only have one text link and one banner, then that is one VERY important piece of text. "Hot pretty teen exposing herself" doesn't really inspire clicks.. and of course all the comments that were made about your html, the lame lightbox for the images. I know that's cool right now on blogs etc, but it doesn't work for galleries. I have my resolution cranked up pretty high and I still couldn't see the girls face and the button to click for the next pic without scrolling. It just doesn't work. Make it a normal gallery, increase the font size on that text link, write some juicier text, and ultimately, the banner should be replaced too. NO ONE clicks on generic banners anymore. Hell, that was true 5 years ago. __________________ . . psd to xhtml/css conversions . . cost effective css template solutions . . and now offering css lessons . . My XBIZ profile

05-04-2009, 01:32 PM	#15
rowan Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Australia Posts: 17,393	I have a pet hate for galleries which break the browsing experience. For people who are used to clicking back, or pressing backspace, using flash or j/s to display pics is going to piss them off. Another thing I notice about that script is that it doesn't display the image until it's fully loaded. Not going to be popular if the surfer's connection is slow. I dunno, maybe I'm a dinosaur, I like to keep things simple...

05-04-2009, 01:36 PM	#16
AntiDrama Guest Posts: n/a	on most, yes

05-04-2009, 03:28 PM	#19
Si Such Fun! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 13,900	with a cherry ontop

05-04-2009, 03:36 PM	#20
Useless Warrior Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 975	"Hot pretty" is redundant. Choose one.