RabbitsReviews Top Ten Sites for January

[Doug of Montreal]

RabbitsReviews top ten new reviews for January are out. If you're looking to add some new sites to your lineup, the following may be a good choice:

Site / Program / Score
1. Tera Patrick, Fame Dollars, 84
2. Black Brazilian Shemales, Exotic Gold, 83
3. Fucked Up Handjobs, Meat Cash, 83
4. Cum Into My Ass, Gay Pay, 83
5. Amy Fisher Caught On Tape, Red Light Revenue, 83
6. Score 2 Go, Score Cash, 83
7. She Mature, Exotic Gold, 82
8. Areeyas World, Exotic Gold, 82
9. Pamela Spice, Latin Teen Cash, 82
10. Chillout Boys, Gay Pay, 82

Don't forget, you can also promote all of these sites at the same time through Rabbit's affiliate program.

*Sites may not be new themselves, but new to RabbitsReviews.
*Sites are rated based on our criteria.

[The Ghost]

Look at Exoticgold.com kickin ass on the list. Go Rami!

[C H R I S]

Nice list doug.

[LB-69]

Look at Exoticgold.com kickin ass on the list. Go Rami!

Hehe, made me proud with 3 of our sites listed, hard work coming back !

[Violetta]

Congrats to the top sites!

[Doug of Montreal]

Hehe, made me proud with 3 of our sites listed, hard work coming back !

Your sites and your content certainly deserve the scores they get. It's a pleasure doing business ;)

[pornbilly]

Nice list Doug... To follow up on the same line of thought, here are the ones for PornBilly for January 2008:

1- Liz Vicious (Jayman Cash) 84.9/100
2- Domai (Domai) 84.2/100
3- Cali Teens (Radical Cash) 84/100
4- Big Tits Boss (Nasty Dollars) 83.2/100
5- Jizz Jugglers (Cherry Pimps) 80.5/100
6- Hot Wives And Girlfriends (Amateur Net Cash) 80.5/100
7- Faith Lightspeed (Lightspeed Cash) 80.3/100
8- Creampie Ebony (Amateur Net Cash) 80.1/100
9- MILF Thing (Perfect Gonzo) 80/100
10- Hidden Camera Tapes (Serious Cash) 78.5/100

These were rated following our rating critera.

[tranza]

Thanks for that list..

[Kellie]

GREAT to see Pamela Spice up there :D

[ManuteBol]

amy fisher smells like cigarettes

[Miguel T]

Very nice for Rami @ ExoticGold!

[rabbit]

Nice list Doug... To follow up on the same line of thought, here are the ones for PornBilly for January 2008:

stealing from me is not enough for you? you have to hijack my threads now too?

[rvincent]

Congrats Rami & ExoticGold!

[BluMedia]

Nice list.

Mark

[HAPPYPEEKERS]

Nice list Doug... To follow up on the same line of thought, here are the ones for PornBilly for January 2008:

1- Liz Vicious (Jayman Cash) 84.9/100
2- Domai (Domai) 84.2/100
3- Cali Teens (Radical Cash) 84/100
4- Big Tits Boss (Nasty Dollars) 83.2/100
5- Jizz Jugglers (Cherry Pimps) 80.5/100
6- Hot Wives And Girlfriends (Amateur Net Cash) 80.5/100
7- Faith Lightspeed (Lightspeed Cash) 80.3/100
8- Creampie Ebony (Amateur Net Cash) 8.1/100
9- MILF Thing (Perfect Gonzo) 80/100
10- Hidden Camera Tapes (Serious Cash) 78.5/100

These were rated following our rating critera.

Shame on you.
So Not Cool , for sure shows how professional you are

[Zebra]

Damn, looking at Porn Billy it looks like they pretty much copied the layout of Rabbit's Reviews and just reversed the color scheme of the site. Not cool.

[rabbit]

Damn, looking at Porn Billy it looks like they pretty much copied the layout of Rabbit's Reviews and just reversed the color scheme of the site. Not cool.

no its much worse than that. he's an ex employee

[Ramos]

Great list

[Zebra]

no its much worse than that. he's an ex employee

Ouch. Yeah, that is much worse.

[Sebastian Sands]

Rabbit's traffic is bomb... good going Doug

[PR_Sebas]

oh damn... thats crazy rabbit... not cool that he hijacked your thread

[Socks]

Here's my top 10 list for this month too!

... just kidding.. What's up rabbit. ;)

[Doug of Montreal]

All I wanted was a happy post about reviews... really... that's it...

[scoreman]

Thanks for the high rating on www.score2go.com and for making our site the #1 rated mobile site. The traffic being sent to score2go is converting really well too. 1:270 last pay period.

[Doug of Montreal]

Score2Go rocks... this is what my iPhone was made for ;)

[kmanrox]

nice! LB69 rockin the boat!

[Gallardo]

Lookss like it's a time for ExoticGold

[pornbilly]

stealing from me is not enough for you? you have to hijack my threads now too?

Rabbit, accusation of stealing is something that you take very lightly and I've seen you using it many times over around this board. But not with us, not this time. You have to get your facts straight and base your judgment on proven grounds before you make such an accusation.

As for thread hijacking, no harm was meant by posting our list of sites. It was considered to be "along the same line of thought" and an added value for the readers, not "steering a discussion off-topic by discussing a subject entirely unrelated to the subject at hand" (as wikipedia puts it).

I'll keep it at that, I really don't want to hijack this thread. But serious accusations like the ones you're making had to be addressed and will not be tolerated.

Tiger - Pornbilly

[Doug of Montreal]

Rabbit, accusation of stealing is something that you take very lightly Tiger - Pornbilly

Tiger - given, your post was pretty much thread-related, but considering the circumstances involving our two companies, posting in this thread was just a really stupid move on your part. I'm surprised someone over there wasn't awake enough to point this out to you. Ever heard the old adage, let sleeping dogs lie?

[CaptainHowdy]

Tera still has it !

[pornbilly]

Tiger - given, your post was pretty much thread-related, but considering the circumstances involving our two companies, posting in this thread was just a really stupid move on your part. I'm surprised someone over there wasn't awake enough to point this out to you. Ever heard the old adage, let sleeping dogs lie?

Doug, you too should know all the facts before you jump to any "stupid move" kind of conclusions. You might have a distorted version on the "circumstances". I'll gladly discuss it with you off-board (ICQ 472798329).

[Doug of Montreal]

Doug, you too should know all the facts before you jump to any "stupid move" kind of conclusions. You might have a distorted version on the "circumstances". I'll gladly discuss it with you off-board (ICQ 472798329).

Off board? Naw, that's no fun. There's only one way for this to be done... I think there's even a thread on it. You should check it. I agree, I don't have all the facts, but I know the docs that were signed and I know that PornBilly is a review site. I'd say working for a review site, of any of the possible avenues to persue, would be in direct conflict with the non-compete.

I'd prefer to keep out of this and leave it between you guys, but again, this is my thread and you had to go and do something stupid like post in it.

[gimo33]

this looks promising... ill also take a seat here....

[lot]

once I spend few hours reviewing different sites, where I subscribed myself and found that I don't agree with some of the reviewers. Scoring is not perfectly done, but anyway Doug, you'r rocking. Good Job!

[Doug of Montreal]

once I spend few hours reviewing different sites, where I subscribed myself and found that I don't agree with some of the reviewers. Scoring is not perfectly done, but anyway Doug, you'r rocking. Good Job!

That's it... there are so many different possible ways to review and score sites that it's impossible to have the perfect way to rate and rank f or everyone. However, after the many years that Rabbits has been doing it, we're pretty happy in our ability to point surfers towards sites that hold value. It doesn't mean the criteria isn't changed periodically as the times change. It's just always a work in progress. Rock on right back at ya ;)

[pornbilly]

Off board? Naw, that's no fun. There's only one way for this to be done... I think there's even a thread on it. You should check it. I agree, I don't have all the facts, but I know the docs that were signed and I know that PornBilly is a review site. I'd say working for a review site, of any of the possible avenues to persue, would be in direct conflict with the non-compete.

I'd prefer to keep out of this and leave it between you guys, but again, this is my thread and you had to go and do something stupid like post in it.

Doug, you don't know diddly-squat. First, you're addressing the wrong person. Second, you're completely misinformed and I can prove it.

You're either in or out of it; oxymorons like "I don't have all the facts, but I know the docs that were signed" will only make a fool out of you in your own thread. As you said, just let us deal with it.

[Doug of Montreal]

First, you're addressing the wrong person.

You're either in or out of it; oxymorons like "I don't have all the facts, but I know the docs that were signed" will only make a fool out of you in your own thread.

Now you're just wading in... deeper and deeper...

You're posting as PornBilly. Who else am I supposed to be addressing here? I don't care which one of you it is. You're all the same to me...

Second, you are a moron. An oxymoron is: A phrase combining two contradictory terms.

Clearly, you're suffering from comprehension issues. I said I didn't have all the facts. That doesn't mean I don't have some, dumbass.

Again, I kindly suggest you step away from the keyboard. You're out of your league here.

[Fuckaholelot]

Now you're just wading in... deeper and deeper...

You're posting as PornBilly. Who else am I supposed to be addressing here? I don't care which one of you it is. You're all the same to me...

Second, you are a moron. An oxymoron is: A phrase combining two contradictory terms.

Clearly, you're suffering from comprehension issues. I said I didn't have all the facts. That doesn't mean I don't have some, dumbass.

Again, I kindly suggest you step away from the keyboard. You're out of your league here.

(Clearly, you're suffering from comprehension issues. I said I didn't have all the facts. That doesn't mean I don't have some, dumbass.

If you don't have all the facts then maybe you don't know the whole truth. If you don't know the whole truth then he's right. You are an oxymoron. But you just proved that you are also a complete moron as well.

[Doug of Montreal]

(Clearly, you're suffering from comprehension issues. I said I didn't have all the facts. That doesn't mean I don't have some, dumbass.

If you don't have all the facts then maybe you don't know the whole truth. If you don't know the whole truth then he's right. You are an oxymoron. But you just proved that you are also a complete moron as well.

Dear Mr No Sig, Tiny Post Count...

If I sign with a company and tell them I'm not going to compete with them and then I go out and start a site that does the exact same thing, it would take a complete arse to suggest that his actions are beyond reproach.

As for the whole truth, there's another thread with the supposed "whole truth" in it. So far I have yet to see anything that would vindicate PornBilly.

By the way, do you need a definition for "vindicate," or can you puzzle that one out on your own?

[Johny Traffic]

Nice list Doug... To follow up on the same line of thought, here are the ones for PornBilly for January 2008:

1- Liz Vicious (Jayman Cash) 84.9/100
2- Domai (Domai) 84.2/100
3- Cali Teens (Radical Cash) 84/100
4- Big Tits Boss (Nasty Dollars) 83.2/100
5- Jizz Jugglers (Cherry Pimps) 80.5/100
6- Hot Wives And Girlfriends (Amateur Net Cash) 80.5/100
7- Faith Lightspeed (Lightspeed Cash) 80.3/100
8- Creampie Ebony (Amateur Net Cash) 80.1/100
9- MILF Thing (Perfect Gonzo) 80/100
10- Hidden Camera Tapes (Serious Cash) 78.5/100

These were rated following our rating critera.

Who do you think gives a fuck?

No one has even heard of your shitty site. Thief

[Johny Traffic]

(Clearly, you're suffering from comprehension issues. I said I didn't have all the facts. That doesn't mean I don't have some, dumbass.

If you don't have all the facts then maybe you don't know the whole truth. If you don't know the whole truth then he's right. You are an oxymoron. But you just proved that you are also a complete moron as well.

Great fake nick pornbilly

[Johny Traffic]

Rabbit, accusation of stealing is something that you take very lightly and I've seen you using it many times over around this board. But not with us, not this time.

Why what you going to do thief?

[C-Bass]

DOUG!

where you hiding at man? How's life?

[Doug of Montreal]

DOUG!

where you hiding at man? How's life?

I'm down the Rabbit hole, of course! How you been? What's shakin in your world?

[Pleasurepays]

wow.


haha... weirdest thread in a while.

what an asshole.

[HouseHead]

now this is a shame to see..

other than that numbers look good

[Christina Muller]

keep up the good work Doug

[lot]

That's it... there are so many different possible ways to review and score sites that it's impossible to have the perfect way to rate and rank f or everyone. However, after the many years that Rabbits has been doing it, we're pretty happy in our ability to point surfers towards sites that hold value. It doesn't mean the criteria isn't changed periodically as the times change. It's just always a work in progress. Rock on right back at ya ;)

I think you also need to think, that this rating is not only for the customers but also for site owners. When site owners see the ways for improovement, thats reaaly good for business.

but

When some sites are on upper position than yours, you think that your site should be worse in some criterias. When the reviewer is not a professional in exact niche, he might score the site from his point of view. And only the really niche lovers and ppl who have enough knowledges can estimate the site correctly for the surfers. I'm talking about not a mainstream sites, but the niche sites, where the key point is not a quantity.

This is some ideas for you, I hope you will hear them

[Bollocks]

RabbitsReviews top ten new reviews for January are out. If you're looking to add some new sites to your lineup, the following may be a good choice:

Do you post this every month? Its first time I've seen it.

Congrats Exoctic

[Doug of Montreal]

And only the really niche lovers and ppl who have enough knowledges can estimate the site correctly for the surfers. I'm talking about not a mainstream sites, but the niche sites, where the key point is not a quantity.

Well, in the end, a large part about rating sites is subjective. For me, I think that in order to get the most out of reviews from a surfers and site owners perspective, you can't look at the exact numbers. Having someone ask why their site got an 75 vs another site getting an 78 isn't productive. The idea is to look at the site and score in a general sense. And I'm not sure a skilled reviewer who just does shemales will necessarily give a better review over someone who has done a similar number of reviews, but in different categories.

One thing you can't score for when it comes to adult content is taste. That applies to all levels, be it taste in production values, models and/or scenarios. As long as a reviewer can stay objective about matters of taste, and the criteria is similar, there shouldn't be much of a difference in the reviews, no matter what nice they specialize in. When it comes to taste, as you say, the key point is no longer quantity in most cases.

People just want to see what they want to see. By cataloging as many sites by niche as we can, hopefully people will be able to find exactly what it is they're looking for. A higher score just means they'll see those sites first. Taste will take care of whether they convert or not.