![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
|
New Webmasters ask "How-To" questions here. This is where other fucking Webmasters help. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 26
|
![]() First of hello. this is my first post here but I have been reading the forum for a while.
I am looking to get into the adult business and while doing my market research I think I may have come up with some solutions so some complaints I have heard. How about creating a union for porn producers and promoters? objectives of the union could be
One of the most common complaints that I have heard is that people are stealing content for tube sites and claiming it as user generated content. It seems to me that this could be tackled by 2257 legislation? along with the standard intellectual property laws? Like I said I am new here. It will take someone with a lot more experience to do this so feel free to run with the idea if you want. right now its just a crude idea but what do you think about it? feel free to give feedback or even just welcome me to the board ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: 418194907
Posts: 3,134
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 94
|
Quote:
Unions seek to stop exploitation of the workers and the porn biz, ahem,...(cough, cough) well now, how do i put this....... |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: 388 753 309
Posts: 2,438
|
I for one think that a union can be a perfect weapon for producers to put pressure on websites with illegal content. The sooner these websites are closed the better for everyone!
__________________
Main sites: Duclerck.com & Diderote.com My Hosting: AmeriNOC My Sponsors: NewNudeCash, Silvercash, Sapphic Cash, BCash4you Email: webmaster @ duclerck.com |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Homeless
Posts: 62,912
|
Quote:
this is a bad idea and should be dropped before it causes issues.
__________________
PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME! |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 26
|
Quote:
I cant really see how an organisation that is there to protect porn promoters could do more damage than having a site-rip on torrent sites, or unlicensed full videos on a tube site? Could you describe what your worried about? |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 64
|
I think that has been done, it's called the republican party.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
in a van by the river
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 76,806
|
The problem with Unions is they tend to try to tell people how to run their own business. It becomes a control thing at some point by using the power of the union to make the business do what the union wants.
Considering the porn biz is typically made up by people whom don't like to conform.. well it's destined to fail from the beginning.
__________________
In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Hot Horny Colombia
Posts: 1,614
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
We are looking for CAM Sites where our Colombian Models can work.
Grupo Bedoya - www.GRUPO-BEDOYA.com Please let us know about your Business Skype - richard.grupobedoya |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 594
|
better still a union against illegal tube sites like redtube and pornhub!
__________________
ICQ:477-732-268 |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,065
|
That being said Unions tend to help individuals in an already structured environment, not small business owners. The ideal of the union would conflict to greatly what the concept of free enterprise and that in itself would make this a bad idea.
__________________
Kandy AI 🍭🍬 Take a bite out of censorship 🍭🍬 We believe in empowering adults to use AI as they see fit. 👉 Get AI to write your scene descriptions for you 👈 |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 407
|
porn union concept has come up before
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 175
|
Why a Union?
Why does it have to be a union. Why can't there just be an organization that is in charge of supporting legal porn, and being a watch dog against illegal porn. When the legislators slid the "Anti Poker" bill in the Poker Players Alliance was started. It is supported by Poker Players, and online casinos. I think something like that would have a much higher chance of being accepted industry wide. Both adultproducersalliance.com and pornproducersalliance.com are available.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,687
|
illegal content is killing the porn industry.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chatsworth, CA
Posts: 1,964
|
the porn industry has the mentality it's everyone for themselves. rarely ever do they come together on anything.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |