![]() |
Quote:
"No, it's fine. Banning it would infringe on freedoms" White Power White History Month etc... :thumbsup |
Quote:
:1orglaugh |
Why stop with banning just a flag? Let's ban message boards and porn.
|
Quote:
:1orglaugh http://www.hiddenhispanicheritage.co...18328_orig.jpg |
Quote:
|
No one is really suggesting that the government ban the Confederate flag, that is just silly. Any private citizen can fly any damn flag they want, be it the US flag, Confederate flag, or even Nazi flag. That is an individual free speech 1st Amendment right.
Rather, people are protesting the State government to remove the flag from state government buildings. Many people feel that if the proponents of the flag want it to be remembered for "heritage" or "historical" reasons, the flag should be displayed in museums or on private property instead, not flown high on current government buildings/property. Those are two different issues. Simply asking whether the government should ban the confederate flag is a superficial analysis that simply clouds the issue. |
No. Just to keep brassmonkeys busy
|
Speaking of brassmonkey - he is quiet today..
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
(cf 1st amendment, a flag is a message) |
50 bad ideas
|
Governor of SC Nikki Haley calls for removal of Confederate Flag from state capitol grounds...
Article here - Washington Post |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The answer is "Yes. Ban it as s state flag or flown on government buildings or government property (exception: historical reenactment or at historical location where appropriate to tell the story." Ban it outright? "No." Why not? I want to see who the racists are. |
The Confederate flag did not make that crazy boy shoot those people in that church, neither did his gun. The people who "have feelings" abot the flag, will find something else to be butthurt about.
Soon we'll see people who have feelings about the American flag's history calling for it to be removed, at minimum, redesigned, just you wait and see. "Just too much negative history behind it" |
Quote:
The confederate flag is the flag of treason against America. They went to war against an elected standing American president. End of story. |
yeah the flag is shooting and killing people ...
|
Quote:
oh yeah..... I see that being the fault of some piece of shit flag hanging on some shitty building is SC... makes perfect sense and thank God POTUS is shouting out to his 'niggas' in the media..... we should have gotten rid of that piece of shit flag 150 years ago and we would all be sitting around the campfire singing Kumbaya in racial fucking harmony!!!!!! |
Voted for yes.
|
Quote:
"The Confederate flag did not make that crazy boy shoot those people in that church, neither did his gun. The people who "have feelings" about the flag, will find something else to be butthurt about. " Work on your reading comprehension skills. I gave no definition to your confederate flag, thus no revisionism on my part, I've set your idiocy aside. When the President of the United States is a black man, and he uses the word neeger in a conversation about race, and is bleeped, you know there is something very wrong in our country. |
Flying the Confederate flag on a US Gov't building is flying a rebel flag for traitors. The South wanted to break away and become their own country. It's ridiculous and remains there simply to race bait and stir up the population because it suits a political agenda by the powers that be. It's retarded and Southerners who relish their 'tradition'....well, I could go on and on about how retarded they are.
Hey Southern States: Get rid of the flag or we'll pull a General Sherman on you and burn your cities to the ground. Remember those fun times? No? Rent Gone With The Wind. Larry Wilmore on The Nightly Show pretty much summed it up well. His two best points: 1. Take it down NOW then 'debate' whether to put it back up or not. How about that? 2. Why don't we fly the Union Jack on The White House lawn as 'respect' for our 'traditions'? Whatever. Like abortion, guns, taxes, immigration and welfare (and many others) this topic is simply distraction and diversion so the people in power can continue to do whatever the fuck they want while Americans 'debate' this nonsense. Carry on.... |
Quote:
The first line out of the Walmart spokesman's mouth regarding their decision: ""We never want to offend anyone with the products that we offer. " |
Quote:
|
Let societal and free market pressure take care of it. Banning involves government coercion limiting free speech. If people wish to vote to bring down the flag from a government building, that's fine. However they don't have the right to dictate to individuals or private businesses what they can say, or flag they fly, with the use of government force.
Even speaking as a Jew, I object to the banning of the Nazi flag, or banning holocaust denial, or banning ANY kind of speech. Does some speech offend me? Sure. Do I have some right to not be offended by anybody, which enables me to use government force to dictate what they can say, or what symbols they can use? NO!! . |
Quote:
Idiot. :1orglaugh |
Quote:
*Africa is the garden of Eden until the white man fucks it up *Egyptian were the greatest black race ever lived and had flying saucers until the white homosexual child killers came and fucked it up *Egyptians founded Greece and then Greeks founded Rome and it was awesome until white homosexual child killers came and fucked it up *black Christopher Columbus discovered America 1000 years after black Egyptians had already been here and left... because the blacks loved and respected the American Indians *black taken as slaves by the white homosexual child killers. *the civil war *whitey fucks black people over *George Washington Carver invents peanut butter *martin Luther King *whitey fucks black people over *Barck Jesus Obama *kanya west *whitey fucks black people over |
Quote:
|
Quote:
There may be another time in the future when a state votes that they wish to secede from the union, (maybe New Hampshire), and they will, and should, have the right to do so without being invaded by federal troops. :2 cents: |
Quote:
the Constitution created a confederation of sovereign states. |
Quote:
Please cite the passages that say what you are claiming. I am unfamiliar with your assertion. |
I don't see anyone advocating that the US Government should ban an individual from displaying any flag. So please stop raising that as an issue...it does not exist.
|
Quote:
Unless, of course, you are in the business of racism. Ever been to Charleston? I have. It's like a living breathing museum of racism, the Confederacy and slavery. Fun, bring the whole family. |
Quote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secess..._United_States |
Quote:
Some say they had no right to secede and others say they did. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason Quote:
|
Years ago there was a Jewish professor at a college in NY and someone painted a swastika on his office door. The offenders were arrested and punished, but the professor wasn't in a hurry to remove the swastika. When he was asked about it by the local news he told them the swastika was a constant reminder of a time when good triumphed over evil. For him the swastika wasn't a symbol of hate, but instead a symbol of hope.
The confederate flag is very similar. It represents a massive failure by the southern states. While I understand it's a part of our history and should not be ignore, it also should not be flown on government buildings. |
Quote:
That court said state secession might be possible through consent of the States...which means all the other states have to agree...which is not going to happen obviously. |
Quote:
:1orglaugh |
|
Quote:
And if you look around any Government office you will find some interesting religious icons. |
Quote:
Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution enumerates the powers granted to the federal government, and the power to prevent secession is not one of them. The Ninth and Tenth Amendments state that the powers not delegated to the United States (federal government) by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. This being the case, there was no legal force to use federal troops to oppose secession. In the Federalist papers, Hamilton and Madison hoped secession would never happen, but they never denied that it was an acceptable possibility. They envisioned the people taking arms against the federal government if it exceeded its delegated powers (delegated by the sovereign states), or invaded their rights, and they admitted that this would be justified. Secession, including the resort to arms, was the final remedy against tyranny. (This is the one of the points of the Second Amendment). :2 cents: . |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123