Is Chris Lebrun working for .XXX and Joan Irvine???
 

Hey Chris, rumor has it you are going to work for .XXX is that why you are trying to get so many people to sell you their sig?



There are no secrets in this biz, kid...

Yes!
Wait - who?
Then no.
Yes?
I dunno.
Fuck him!

interesting rumour:2 cents:

lol
 

lol:1orglaugh

wouldn't surprise me in the least.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

FUCK .xxx

Only scum would work for dotxxx.

Chris always been a good guy... I'm sure he have his reasons if that's even true :)

If it is true we should boycott trafficshop.

IF, he left Trafic Shop, what is the sense in boycotting them ?:2 cents:

Links pulled.

Who cares?

I would enjoy carrying a sig for .xxx

if others have no qualms with card bangers and tube affiliated companies in theirs...

Wow what a rumor.

and ??? yes or no ?:winkwink:

Proof or Ban - thats a mighty strong accustaion.

Fake nick arent you Banned already>?

Ineedafix= https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=979901

Put the dots together....

very serious allegation.

good old shitdrizzle. not surprising.

Kb has had a harD on for me for years- let it go man.

is that a Freudian Slip ??:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Haha Jules you caught b4 the edit- iPhone Predictive text suck!

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh Hate predictive text with a passion have in on my bb as well:winkwink:

but besides that, here is a reply from KB :winkwink:

KB (2:18 PM) :
why would I have it in for lebrun anymore? that was years ago man

Hmmm well who knows. I still request a ban

Is it still banworthy if it turns out to be true? (it hasn't been denied)

Btw, I will sell .XXX my sig for the right price. Let me know! :)

At least deny it first before asking for the ban, but technically the initial post was phrased as a question so probably not ban worthy. Yes Kb is Ineedafix, he's had 3 other nicks banned here. Kb usually is pretty good at getting the inside scoop, so it makes me wonder if there is some truth to this. I would have thought your initial reaction would be to instantly deny the rumor if you had no involvement with .xxx.

Is it true?

there has been NO direct denial ?:2 cents:

i will sell my sig for .xxx that's it.

Not even an indirect one. I guess I should write my article soon, huh?

Indeed, it could be time:2 cents:

Need to write a quick one for my new gig, then I will. Tonight.

God I hope this isn't true.

Riddle me this though... (and not just aimed at Chris)... why is it that everyone and anyone involved with .xxx won't just come out and admit it. The dancing around the subject, the games, the non-response. OR the BS responses. C'mon...

What
The
Fuck

I mean goddamn... just admit it people. It passed, it's done, we all know it's not there to save the children but rather a cash grab. Whatever. Make your money. But for the love of all things holy, why won't people just take a stand.

As with every business, it's safer to neither confirm or deny anything until proof is presented. Then, some pr work, a little time, and it's business as usual.

icq is going here, telling me the rumour is true:winkwink:

From people other than KB?

yes:thumbsup I have no axe to grind here, its just curious, that there is no direct denial from Chris !