GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   how to hide traffic sources from sponsors? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1131031)

American Psycho 01-14-2014 07:59 PM

how to hide traffic sources from sponsors?
 
does anyone here know how to hide the referring URL when sending an sponsors traffic?

CyberHustler 01-14-2014 08:03 PM

http://yourls.org/

iwantchixx 01-14-2014 08:05 PM

wacha hidin?

American Psycho 01-14-2014 08:15 PM

Traffic sources duh.

iSpyCams 01-14-2014 08:18 PM

Hide them in you underpants. No one will ever check there.

brassmonkey 01-14-2014 08:25 PM

thick blankets :2 cents: or spoofing

Elite Profit 01-15-2014 03:06 AM

are you sure that its a good idea? :)))

seeandsee 01-15-2014 04:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberHustler (Post 19945087)

my choice also...:thumbsup +1

Mr_Woodman 01-15-2014 05:52 AM

they not interested in ur sourcing

mamaliga 01-15-2014 05:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Woodman (Post 19945456)
they not interested in ur sourcing

you`ll be surprised how many sponsors are interesting in such info.
tiny url is one solution.

Lichen 01-15-2014 06:04 AM

setup a .php redirect script through some other domain

you can find redirect code in google

Evil Chris 01-15-2014 06:08 AM

Sounds fishy.
Why would any above-board affiliate want to hide their traffic source from the programs they're pushing?
I'd be looking very carefully at CB ratios on those kinds of accounts.

Matyko 01-15-2014 06:17 AM

Absolutely not fishy! Sponsors DO CHECK this, if you send them significant traffic, especially if the conversion is good. And they will clone your method if they can. Been there done that. Nothing fishy here. 'Self-defense' :pimp

Evil Chris 01-15-2014 06:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matyko (Post 19945478)
Absolutely not fishy! Sponsors DO CHECK this, if you send them significant traffic, especially if the conversion is good. And they will clone your method if they can. Been there done that. Nothing fishy here. 'Self-defense' :pimp

I'm sure I agree that your intentions are ok, but for every one of you there may be 10 that do it for different reasons. I'd just keep an eye on those accounts and make sure there's no fraud problems.

Sexier 01-15-2014 06:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matyko (Post 19945478)
Absolutely not fishy! Sponsors DO CHECK this, if you send them significant traffic, especially if the conversion is good. And they will clone your method if they can. Been there done that. Nothing fishy here. 'Self-defense' :pimp

what he said.:thumbsup

American Psycho 01-15-2014 07:05 AM

Chris. Nothing fishy here except ur vajine

mamaliga 01-15-2014 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matyko (Post 19945478)
Absolutely not fishy! Sponsors DO CHECK this, if you send them significant traffic, especially if the conversion is good. And they will clone your method if they can. Been there done that. Nothing fishy here. 'Self-defense' :pimp

Great said Matyko. There were sponsors i have promoted in the past who bought traffic from EXACTLY same sources i have used when promoting their program. Of course ratio went to shit soon or later.

pornguy 01-15-2014 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matyko (Post 19945478)
Absolutely not fishy! Sponsors DO CHECK this, if you send them significant traffic, especially if the conversion is good. And they will clone your method if they can. Been there done that. Nothing fishy here. 'Self-defense' :pimp

True some do. But at the same time Im sure you can see the potential for fraud as well.

OldJeff 01-15-2014 07:36 AM

If a sponsor will jack your methods, you should be using a different sponsor. 99 out of 100 spoofing / hiding urls are pushing fraud

atom 01-15-2014 07:54 AM

Every case of fraud I have found in our program over the last year has done exactly what you are intending to do. I don't think you are trying to be shady about it. Just giving you a sponsors point of view. Of course there are other variables we check besides just that, but, that is a HUGE red flag.

Denny 01-15-2014 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matyko (Post 19945478)
Absolutely not fishy! Sponsors DO CHECK this, if you send them significant traffic, especially if the conversion is good. And they will clone your method if they can. Been there done that. Nothing fishy here. 'Self-defense' :pimp

:2 cents::2 cents:

12clicks 01-15-2014 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldJeff (Post 19945549)
If a sponsor will jack your methods, you should be using a different sponsor. 99 out of 100 spoofing / hiding urls are pushing fraud

exactly.

baggg 01-15-2014 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldJeff (Post 19945549)
If a sponsor will jack your methods, you should be using a different sponsor. 99 out of 100 spoofing / hiding urls are pushing fraud

No.It is the other way around.Sponsors do jack your traffic sources all the time.There is nothing to protect affiliates.If you is directly sending traffic to a program and is not your own property you must be mentally challenged.Welcome to 2014.

Lichen 01-15-2014 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evil Chris (Post 19945473)
Sounds fishy.
Why would any above-board affiliate want to hide their traffic source from the programs they're pushing?
I'd be looking very carefully at CB ratios on those kinds of accounts.

You don't sound too smart.

It is a known fact that some Affiliate Programs jack your traffic source and then terminate you for some bullshit reason (thus avoiding paying you sales commission)

OldJeff 01-15-2014 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baggg (Post 19945585)
No.It is the other way around.Sponsors do jack your traffic sources all the time.There is nothing to protect affiliates.If you is directly sending traffic to a program and is not your own property you must be mentally challenged.Welcome to 2014.

As I said you are using the wrong sponsor, correct sponsor / affiliate relation is a partnership, everyone makes money. Of course I only send to people I personally know, and have known for a decade. I also only buy from verified affiliates, so I guess my world is different from most on this board.

PR_Glen 01-15-2014 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matyko (Post 19945478)
Absolutely not fishy! Sponsors DO CHECK this, if you send them significant traffic, especially if the conversion is good. And they will clone your method if they can. Been there done that. Nothing fishy here. 'Self-defense' :pimp

You truly believe that you or anyone else have traffic sources that programs aren't aware of already?

originality doesn't exist.

PR_Glen 01-15-2014 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lichen (Post 19945590)
You don't sound too smart.

It is a known fact that some Affiliate Programs jack your traffic source and then terminate you for some bullshit reason (thus avoiding paying you sales commission)

how would any affiliate program survive with a model like that? please explain how this is a workable business plan.

ITraffic 01-15-2014 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen (Post 19945613)
You truly believe that you or anyone else have traffic sources that programs aren't aware of already?

originality doesn't exist.

he's also talking about copying banners, landers and so on, which some do.

freecartoonporn 01-15-2014 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen (Post 19945613)
You truly believe that you or anyone else have traffic sources that programs aren't aware of already?

originality doesn't exist.

originality depends on the knowledge/time spent in current biz of sponsor.

there are so many traffic sources out there, maybe you know them all, but not all sponsors know them.

PR_Glen 01-15-2014 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ITraffic (Post 19945616)
he's also talking about copying banners, landers and so on, which some do.

I understand that. But why stay with any program that does this?

rastan 01-15-2014 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matyko (Post 19945478)
Absolutely not fishy! Sponsors DO CHECK this, if you send them significant traffic, especially if the conversion is good. And they will clone your method if they can. Been there done that. Nothing fishy here. 'Self-defense' :pimp

Not only that, but we can also see which types of sites have good ratios and offer those webmasters more promo material or incentives to `keep doing what you're doing!` :thumbsup

Lichen 01-15-2014 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen (Post 19945615)
how would any affiliate program survive with a model like that? please explain how this is a workable business plan.

They leave all the small webmasters alone, but check on the whale webmasters.

If you're dumb enough to not disguise your traffic, you're gonna get jacked.

OldJeff 01-15-2014 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lichen (Post 19945644)
They leave all the small webmasters alone, but check on the whale webmasters.

If you're dumb enough to not disguise your traffic, you're gonna get jacked.

That is a recipe for non existence, Been working with affiliates for 15 years now, you never ever fuck over your whales

atom 01-15-2014 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lichen (Post 19945644)
They leave all the small webmasters alone, but check on the whale webmasters.

If you're dumb enough to not disguise your traffic, you're gonna get jacked.


This makes even less sense. By what you're saying we would copy/exploit the webmasters that make us the most money? Absolutely not! These are the guys we want to build trust and long term relationships with. Not try and steal/copy the way they are sending sales. If we or any other program did this they would not have affiliates for very long.

ITraffic 01-15-2014 09:59 AM

people are just speaking from their experience, not some fantasy. adult companies have never done things that have been stupid, greedy and short term before?

PAR 01-15-2014 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by atom (Post 19945567)
Every case of fraud I have found in our program over the last year has done exactly what you are intending to do. I don't think you are trying to be shady about it. Just giving you a sponsors point of view. Of course there are other variables we check besides just that, but, that is a HUGE red flag.


Yep and you can hide it all you want if they really want to know they can findout simple enough.. just takes a little time..

fris 01-15-2014 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberHustler (Post 19945087)

does that actually hide the refer?

I know with bit.ly etc it doesnt hide the actual url, it passes that info on.

BlackCrayon 01-15-2014 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen (Post 19945619)
I understand that. But why stay with any program that does this?

most of the biggest sponsors do it, they do not term your account or anything like that but they will copy your methods, purchase keywords and buy the traffic you were buying only after you did it first.

freecartoonporn 01-15-2014 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by atom (Post 19945679)
This makes even less sense. By what you're saying we would copy/exploit the webmasters that make us the most money? Absolutely not! These are the guys we want to build trust and long term relationships with. Not try and steal/copy the way they are sending sales. If we or any other program did this they would not have affiliates for very long.

obviously but then they dont need those whales as they have already stolen/copied their method. so it doesnt matter for them.

adultmobile 01-15-2014 11:11 AM

As a cam program/sponsor I can confirm it is normal to look the http referer (along with IP's etc.) of every new affiliate signups at least before the first payout, just to check if this is a fraud. Any program not doing this would be bankrupt soon due to fraud, in fact we see 8 out of 10 new affiliates who signups being fraud (esp. the pay per free lead ones). It means: 1 every 5 new affiliates is good, rest is fake signups. This is not just us, other programs confirmed such dramatic affiliate fraud ratio, we need to check, sorry.

Said this, it is unavoidable that we the programs see also data of those 1 every 5 affiliates who is legit; and if http referer it is not hidden, we can't "unsee" it to forget. Even in good faith, we can get to know the method. But 1) in 99% of the cases we know the method already, no geniuses, 2) We can not always "copy" it, for ex. if a tube owner sends own direct traffic, what we copy? 3) Most tricky methods would cost us more to do ourselves than what we pay to this affiliate, since time is money: going ask skype contacts in chatroom, add them, talk, then spam the link one by one? Just an example.

Further, I tell that rather than hiding (empty) http referer, we often see fake one. Like, they send from place1, but fake http referer of place2. This is mostly made by fraudsters, thinking this looks less fishy than empty or clearly hidden source, but we check the same :)
Be careful if you put fakesite com http referer rather than empty, you are more likely questioned for fraud, than empty. In case of empty http referer and strange signups we contact the affiliate anyway, in general to see if they reply with a "Sir... " and so on.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123