Senator Elizabeth Warren (DEM) would make a fine GFY member (your tax dollars at work)
 

Elizabeth Warren keeps up verbal assault on Donald Trump - Election 2016 - CBS News


Sen. Elizabeth Warren continued her personal crusade against Donald Trump on Saturday afternoon when she addressed the New Hampshire Democratic State Convention, calling the presumptive GOP nominee, "a thin-skinned, racist, sexist bully."

Just another crook worshipped by the libtards.

It's funny and entertaining seeing Trump get ''pussy whipped'', Oh the irony ... :1orglaugh

Someone needs to photochop Warren's head on a Mistress with a whip and Trump's head on a slave waving little hands :thumbsup

funny haha or funny sad?

imo, it's a mockery of the USA political institution for Senators to get into name calling attacks. i don't see her calling the orlando terrorist names. i don't see her calling the isis names. i don't see her calling mass shooters names. in fact, i don't even see her trying to do her job and pass legislation dealing with homegrown terrorism and/or mass shootings at all. she's obviously too busy calling Trump names. priorities.

When you have as many skeletons in your closet as hillary does - nothing funny about that!

Warren and Sanders have a lot of the same views. Odd that someone that claims to support Sanders would whine about Warren telling the truth about Trump.

you need to remember what works with discussing points with me. it's not about the person making an opinion, it's the opinion.

if you want to continue in my thread, you'll need to make a cogent point about the topic and not worry your head about trying to figure out why i think like i do, because you haven't been able to yet and more than likely, won't ever be able to process on my level.

and that has nothing to do with the Senator resorting to name calling attacks.

I'll continue in any thread I want and I'll say anything I want, who died and made you mod?

Just pointing out you're one of those Trumpanzees that are to embarrassed to admit it. Don't deny your true essence.

no. you're pointing out that you fail at comprehending complex viewpoints, i.e., how someone can be for Sanders without having to call Trump names.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

jtfc, you simpletons make me look like einstein, that's why i like posting here, btw.

Whoa, Josh made the same exact statement a few days ago. Odd.

I've lost a lot of respect for Warren. It's painfully obvious she's become nothing more than a lapdog for the Democratic machine.

IRL

Coup = keeping it irl.

you've really maxed out your capacity for reason. you had done a good job (for a few weeks anyway) of realizing i'm not the guy to attack around here. you should get back on that wagon ASAP.

Oh the irony :1orglaugh Trumplets pissed over "verbal attack" on their miniature Hitler :1orglaugh

i was trying to help you. you'll just keep embarrassing yourself trying to gotcha me on not being a Sanders Supporter. gfyers (slightly) smarter than you and better at arguing have tried and failed- miserably.

why that's so important to you (and the others) is beyond reason.

stay classy Elizabeth!

Actually I figured you finally found some medication that was working for your anger issues, but in that same time Joshy girl went off the deep end even more. Very very odd.

Maybe you should stick to your prediction that Clinton wouldn't even be in the race. Your Orange faced cheer leading rah rah's are getting boring.

:1orglaugh

the lack of liberal logic is appalling.

can the liberal lynch mob even think for themselves for even a second?

you're attacking me for not attacking Trump simply because i expressed criticism over a sitting Senator using her senatorial prestige and resources to name call someone.

the fact the liberal lynch mobsters can't see something as simple as that easily reveals that you are simpletons. the clincher is how you utterly fail at being able to comprehend my complex viewpoint.

too bad Senator Warren isn't a GFY member, she could join in with the sot liberal lynch mobster in attacking me for sharing my opinion. she's got the name calling down good!

jtfc, the lack of logic behind exclaiming that someone isn't a Sanders Supporter because they don't join the gfy liberal lynch mob in calling Trump names.

Its funny you always cry foul when it's a democrat doing it, but you never say a word when Trump mocked the handicapped lady or belittles everyone in his cross hairs..

IMO Warren showed her colors when she failed to give support to Sanders who is closer to her own agenda than Hillary. Instead she played both sides of the coin just to better her position.

Hillary has the bankers in her pocket and to see Warren now pandering to her shows she is only in it for herself.

I really don't think there has been an honest debate in US politics for a long time.

When we get to the point of having a reality show huckster running for POTUS we have hit rock-bottom. I would expect a rock-bottom reply.

I am considering changing my voter registration to the Green Party because the Democrat and Republican Parties have become total TV clowns without any real substance. At least I could say in good faith -- your political policy problems are not of my making -- the new Libertarians could say the same.

The only way to effect change is to abandon these dead end pols en masse.

your observation skills are severely lacking. i've pointed out plenty of negatives about Trump. one thing liberal lynch mobsters like you can't grasp is i am more concerned about politicians in office and their lack of doing their job while name calling, than i am re: high 5ing liberals by joining in the Trump name calling. most importantly, i'm smart enough to observe that Trump name calling hasn't worked. i tend to not bother with shit that doesn't work.

the truly epically funny part of this youtube is you post it to try and snub me, a Sanders Supporter, with it.

:1orglaugh

you really do fail at debating me.

its funny...that we have certain viewpoints that are identical, your NSA post, your agreement with mo that warren is not living up to her pre-politician excellence.

but i know we could never carry a dialogue without venom due to your abject racism against all of the GOP, regardless that there are a multitude of viewpoints on the right, exactly like there are divisions on the left.

so when trump says anything pro-LGBT, you dismiss it as bullshit, when he is in fact a new york republican on that issue. & you fail to recognize his hyperbole, is just for the press, & to piss you off. you might think trump not being a doctrinaire conservative would win him points with you. nope. your too simple to even understand the nuance.

so i will always own you. always.

:1orglaugh

I think the point is that libtards and demtards try to paint themselves as tolerant and peaceful etc, yet do the same thing they are supposed to dislike.

You really need to look up definition of debate. if I take time to read your own "arguments" and prove how dumb you are for not reading it, it's no debate son. Debate involves TWO different point, sources, etc.. Two. I just take 3 minutes of my time to speed read your own sources and post quotes. LOL.. Das no debate hommie... :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

You ought to become a trumpateer.

Donald Trump, Donald Trump how do well spell his name?
D-O-N-A-L-D T-R-U-M-P

Donald Trump, Donald Trump for ever wear your "MAKE AMERICA GREAT HAT".

You have made yourself into a joke.

Everybody knows Hillary Clinton is a party machine politician and has a very high negative polling -- it's just that your butt buddy Donald has a 70% negative poll rating -- a certified asshole.

No matter if the Dems or the Reps win this election we are headed for an economic black hole -- you can only kick the can so far down the road until you miss.
whoop whoop whoop and yay. <yawn>

Actually you only started pointing out bad stuff about Trump after we kept giving you shit about it. I'm just pointing out that anytime a Democrat does something wrong you seem to treat them with a double standard while picking and choosing what to call Republicans out for.

You play almost the exact same game Robbie plays. Except he never mutters a bad word about a Republican.

Meanwhile I will sit right here and point out exactly what I dislike about Hillary, Obama and even Sanders yet because I troll gfy Republicans you guys try to claim I only shun the right.

I have also publicly stated there are certain Republicans I've supported when they do the right thing..

Example, I've said several times I think Paul Ryan has grown up a lot since he became the majority leader and he is actually trying to better the Republican party. I also supported Rand Paul on his views of the NSA spying..

Not to mention I've even stated I was very disappointed in Trump going off the deep end because at the start I thought he was in a very unique position to be a real middle of the road candidate.

Yet because I troll GFY retards that blame all their problems on liberals..I'm of course a liberal myself or a hater..

It takes two to tango. Just like gay people - the least tolerant to anybody. Religions nuts, rednecks ... you name it.

Full Definition of debate
: a contention by words or arguments: as
a : the formal discussion of a motion before a deliberative body according to the rules of parliamentary procedure
b : a regulated discussion of a proposition between two matched sides


You are no match if you can't read your own sources.
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

here's one of your liberal lynch mob colleagues, y'all have lot in common. he also doesn't know much, so he over-compensates like you do.

You don't seem to understand how reality works. No one has to be tolerant of people like Trump who practices hate speech.

It's like saying people should be tolerant of the KKK, Hitler or groups like BLM.

again, your observation skills are severely lacking. you acknowledge my posts about Trump because i had to jam them down your throat in a bunch of over the top posts to bitch slap the gfy liberal lynch mob when i pointed out the incessant need your mob has for me to verbally attack Trump along side you.

The Founding Fathers did not enshrine a Two Party system -- they enshrined a bicameral legislative body with with divided powers.

They also set the Electoral College up for a reason *and* not for the reason to rubber stamp the election of a Party Administration :2 cents: