GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   The Rock pays $22,454 a month in child support (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=831771)

jhauser 05-30-2008 03:17 PM
I want him to be my big daddy too.

Socks 05-30-2008 03:17 PM
The Rock pays $22,454 a month in child support
 
wtffffff.. What kinda kid needs that kinda "support" ? Where was my fucking support! :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

SykkBoy 05-30-2008 03:17 PM
Damn....mine isn't so bad afterall....

Socks 05-30-2008 03:18 PM
http://members.cox.net/dogmatix/Thread%20Hijacked.JPG

jhauser 05-30-2008 03:18 PM
hey how did my post get above yours? I just hit refresh.

pr0 05-30-2008 03:24 PM
big city apartment, or mansion

+ private school

+ driver

+ security

+ chef

22k goes quick

Persius 05-30-2008 03:46 PM
Always use a condom... how many times do i have to say it!

DaddyHalbucks 05-30-2008 04:10 PM
That'll provide a nice lifestyle.

directfiesta 05-30-2008 05:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Persius (Post 14258266)
Always use a condom... how many times do i have to say it!
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :thumbsup

GAMEFINEST 05-30-2008 07:09 PM
he aint no rock

broke 05-30-2008 07:13 PM
The fact that "The Rock" earns enough to pay $22K a month is what is sad.

:1orglaugh

eightmotives 05-30-2008 07:19 PM
No pussy is worth that much.

xentech 05-30-2008 07:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eightmotives (Post 14258985)
No pussy is worth that much.
Too right

Spunky 05-30-2008 07:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eightmotives (Post 14258985)
No pussy is worth that much.
You don't think about the consequences at the time you're banging it

bringer 05-30-2008 07:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pr0 (Post 14258209)
big city apartment, or mansion

+ private school

+ driver

+ security

+ chef

22k goes quick
luckily the court was there to force him to pay for all those luxuries for his child AND ex wife. its not like those are the perks for living with him, they're entitled to that money right? :eyecrazy

Socks 05-30-2008 07:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bringer (Post 14259052)
luckily the court was there to force him to pay for all those luxuries for his child AND ex wife. its not like those are the perks for living with him, they're entitled to that money right? :eyecrazy
She's some kind of stock broker and made $700k herself last year. :helpme

bringer 05-30-2008 07:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Socks (Post 14259063)
She's some kind of stock broker and made $700k herself last year. :helpme
now i see why people shootup courthouses

Peaches 05-30-2008 08:00 PM
Why shouldn't he continue to keep the child(ren) living in the style they were living in when the parents were together? If he doesn't like it, he can sue for custody and see how easy it is to raise a kid as a single parent.

Iron Fist 05-30-2008 08:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eightmotives (Post 14258985)
No pussy is worth that much.
Exactly. :thumbsup

bringer 05-30-2008 08:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peaches (Post 14259077)
Why shouldn't he continue to keep the child(ren) living in the style they were living in when the parents were together? If he doesn't like it, he can sue for custody and see how easy it is to raise a kid as a single parent.
it was a perk of living with him, not something they're entitled to now because they've lived that lifestyle and cant move back down. you have entire families living on 3-4k/month OR LESS and this kid is entitled to 22k/month? somethings wrong if you think thats ok :Oh crap

ps, since when did it require 22k/month to raise a child?

Profits of Doom 05-30-2008 08:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by broke (Post 14258974)
The fact that "The Rock" earns enough to pay $22K a month is what is sad.

:1orglaugh
He's a rising Hollywood movie star that makes millions, and $22,454 is a fucking drop in the bucket to him. You're an anonymous internet loser that that is trying to laugh when you really want to cry. Who is the really sad party here?

As for The Rock and his wife, they are still very close and she still handles a lot of his financial interests and investments, and they are still in business together on a few different ventures. So what, her pays around $250,000 in child support? You think he is sweating that one bit, when he probably paid every bit that much when he was still married?

Peaches 05-30-2008 08:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bringer (Post 14259088)
it was a perk of living with him, not something they're entitled to now because they've lived that lifestyle and cant move back down. you have entire families living on 3-4k/month OR LESS and this kid is entitled to 22k/month? somethings wrong if you think thats ok :Oh crap

ps, since when did it require 22k/month to raise a child?
You have entire families living on food stamps and some living on millions a year. WTF does that have to do with anything?

If $22K a month is what a court/judge/the parents agreed to, then obviously that's 1. what the dude can afford and 2. what will keep the child in the same style they would be living in if the parents stayed married. That's how it's been working for years - even when my parents got divorced 35 years ago.

I'm sure if he disagreed with the amount he has a legal team to take care of it who might be a little more familiar with his financial situation than posters here :)

syntacks 05-30-2008 08:21 PM
sliding scale child support sucks.

but i pay it without question.

bringer 05-30-2008 08:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peaches (Post 14259099)
You have entire families living on food stamps and some living on millions a year. WTF does that have to do with anything?
because 22k/month is excessive.

Quote:
If $22K a month is what a court/judge/the parents agreed to, then obviously that's 1. what the dude can afford and 2. what will keep the child in the same style they would be living in if the parents stayed married. That's how it's been working for years - even when my parents got divorced 35 years ago.
what if this were 1mil/month? as long as he can afford it thats ok right? maybe the rock doesn't fall into that cat but some do. btw, 35 years ago, did your dad have to pay 22k/month? how was life growing up without your personal limo taking you to private school?

Quote:
I'm sure if he disagreed with the amount he has a legal team to take care of it who might be a little more familiar with his financial situation than posters here :)
who cares what his financial situation is, the court ordering someone to pay that much for a kid is ridiculous. you may think this is ok, but when you look at how this translates to the avg joe, its sickening. i have a good friend who lost his house and now is paying 65% of his income in child support because the court set the amount when he was making more $. he now gets to pickup his kids on the weekends from the house he inherited from his grandparents, ( wife got it in the divorce ) , and takes them back to his studio apartment which is stockpiled with flavorless generic food. its a fucked up situation that gives me a little dif opinion on these matters. can the rock afford it? im sure. maybe he can afford 100k/month. so what?

edit: if we followed your logic, my ex girlfriend is entitled to 5k/month to support the lifestyle she enjoyed living with me for 2 years. is she now entitled to that lifestyle at my expense because i let her live and enjoy it while she was with me?

broke 05-30-2008 08:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Profits of Doom (Post 14259095)
He's a rising Hollywood movie star that makes millions, and $22,454 is a fucking drop in the bucket to him. You're an anonymous internet loser that that is trying to laugh when you really want to cry. Who is the really sad party here?
Not me.

1. He's a dreadful actor.
2. He was barely a tolerable "wrestler".

It's sad that you missed the entire point of my commentary.

Do you honestly think I begrudge him the money he currently has and all his future earnings? I don't. I just think he's a no talent hack, who isn't worthy of MY money. The more of YOUR money he has the better. Feel free to enrich him all you want - after all he's a "rising Hollywood movie star".

My point was it's sad that people like YOU exist.

geeknik 05-30-2008 08:38 PM
Somehow I don't feel as bad paying what I pay. I'd die if I had to pay that much.

Azlord 05-30-2008 08:40 PM
The money goes into a fund for the child to pay for her education... and the wife made 700k last year on her own. Just a couple things I read on this story.

AmeliaG 05-30-2008 08:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Profits of Doom (Post 14259095)
He's a rising Hollywood movie star that makes millions, and $22,454 is a fucking drop in the bucket to him. You're an anonymous internet loser that that is trying to laugh when you really want to cry. Who is the really sad party here?

As for The Rock and his wife, they are still very close and she still handles a lot of his financial interests and investments, and they are still in business together on a few different ventures. So what, her pays around $250,000 in child support? You think he is sweating that one bit, when he probably paid every bit that much when he was still married?
That's sad that they broke up. I remember reading an interview with them on a plane when his star first started rising and thinking their relationship sounded really cool. If they are still friends and business partners, though, it doesn't seem likely that he objects to pampering his kid.

I would have a different opinion if there were an acrimonious split and he did not want to pay it. Fucking someone a few times should not entitle a woman to live in whatever style the man can afford.

born2blog 05-30-2008 09:03 PM
and think most people don't even make that in a year!!

pr0 05-30-2008 09:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peaches (Post 14259077)
Why shouldn't he continue to keep the child(ren) living in the style they were living in when the parents were together? If he doesn't like it, he can sue for custody and see how easy it is to raise a kid as a single parent.
It's as easy as hiring an illegal immigrant nanny for $8 an hour.

You lazy ass bitch's down south just make it look hard. :1orglaugh

Kingfish 05-30-2008 09:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bringer (Post 14259151)
because 22k/month is excessive.



what if this were 1mil/month? as long as he can afford it thats ok right? maybe the rock doesn't fall into that cat but some do. btw, 35 years ago, did your dad have to pay 22k/month? how was life growing up without your personal limo taking you to private school?



who cares what his financial situation is, the court ordering someone to pay that much for a kid is ridiculous. you may think this is ok, but when you look at how this translates to the avg joe, its sickening. i have a good friend who lost his house and now is paying 65% of his income in child support because the court set the amount when he was making more $. he now gets to pickup his kids on the weekends from the house he inherited from his grandparents, ( wife got it in the divorce ) , and takes them back to his studio apartment which is stockpiled with flavorless generic food. its a fucked up situation that gives me a little dif opinion on these matters. can the rock afford it? im sure. maybe he can afford 100k/month. so what?

edit: if we followed your logic, my ex girlfriend is entitled to 5k/month to support the lifestyle she enjoyed living with me for 2 years. is she now entitled to that lifestyle at my expense because i let her live and enjoy it while she was with me?
It has been that way for years now. Child support is based on a sliding scale, and every state has child support guidelines. It amazes me how many people separate from a person they have a child with and think that their child should suddenly downgrade their lifestyle that they were previously raised in. If your friend’s story is true he is entitled to a modification. If his circumstances have changed there is no need for him to keep paying based on what he made when the support order was entered. BTW your girlfirend isn't entitled to anything it is your kids that are entitled to your support.

V_RocKs 05-30-2008 09:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bringer (Post 14259088)
it was a perk of living with him, not something they're entitled to now because they've lived that lifestyle and cant move back down. you have entire families living on 3-4k/month OR LESS and this kid is entitled to 22k/month? somethings wrong if you think thats ok :Oh crap

ps, since when did it require 22k/month to raise a child?
The kid is entitled to the same life style it enjoyed when the Rock was with the mom.

If you don't like, don't get married and don't have kids.

bringer 05-30-2008 10:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by V_RocKs (Post 14259272)
The kid is entitled to the same life style it enjoyed when the Rock was with the mom.

If you don't like, don't get married and don't have kids.
uhhh... because stonecold says so? just because thats the standard today doesnt make it right.

starpimps 05-30-2008 11:59 PM
charlie sheen is paying 52k/month child support + 60k/month for spousal support

GatorB 05-31-2008 12:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingfish (Post 14259258)
It has been that way for years now. Child support is based on a sliding scale, and every state has child support guidelines. It amazes me how many people separate from a person they have a child with and think that their child should suddenly downgrade their lifestyle that they were previously raised in.
There a lot of women who fuck famous guys and never have any kind of relationship with them who already have kids with other men and lived a normal or lowclass lifestyle. She and her kids NEVER were accustom to a "rich" lifestyle. So why should they get tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars of child support per month because one kid is from a famous guy? Most of that support isn't really going to that kid anyways.

Quote:
BTW your girlfirend isn't entitled to anything it is your kids that are entitled to your support.
And yet it's the ex-wife or girlfriend that tends to get the most benefit not the kids. My best friends has his kids for the summer. Yet he is still required to pay his ex child support durring the next 2 months. Um WHY? She as always will spend this money on her and her new hubby. Shouldn't my friend be able to keep that money so he can support the children which is what CHILD SUPPORT is SUPPOSED to be for?

Socks 05-31-2008 12:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by starpimps (Post 14259566)
charlie sheen is paying 52k/month child support + 60k/month for spousal support
He may lose more dollars to that woman than single sperm donations..

Crazy!

gideongallery 05-31-2008 06:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bringer (Post 14259151)
because 22k/month is excessive.



what if this were 1mil/month? as long as he can afford it thats ok right? maybe the rock doesn't fall into that cat but some do. btw, 35 years ago, did your dad have to pay 22k/month? how was life growing up without your personal limo taking you to private school?



who cares what his financial situation is, the court ordering someone to pay that much for a kid is ridiculous. you may think this is ok, but when you look at how this translates to the avg joe, its sickening. i have a good friend who lost his house and now is paying 65% of his income in child support because the court set the amount when he was making more $. he now gets to pickup his kids on the weekends from the house he inherited from his grandparents, ( wife got it in the divorce ) , and takes them back to his studio apartment which is stockpiled with flavorless generic food. its a fucked up situation that gives me a little dif opinion on these matters. can the rock afford it? im sure. maybe he can afford 100k/month. so what?

edit: if we followed your logic, my ex girlfriend is entitled to 5k/month to support the lifestyle she enjoyed living with me for 2 years. is she now entitled to that lifestyle at my expense because i let her live and enjoy it while she was with me?
you do realize that his kids suffer negatitive impacts on their lives because they are his kids.

How many photographers are camped out side your house invading your privacy. Imagine what your teenage years if photographers were following you around too.

That child support pays for private schools, security etc things that counter act the detriments of "the Rocks" public lifestyle.

If we lived it a world where you could snap your fingers and the photojournist disappeared that level of support would not be needed.

testpie 05-31-2008 06:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhauser (Post 14258154)
I want him to be my big daddy too.
http://imagecache2.allposters.com/im...er-Posters.jpg

SmokeyTheBear 05-31-2008 09:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peaches (Post 14259077)
Why shouldn't he continue to keep the child(ren) living in the style they were living in when the parents were together? If he doesn't like it, he can sue for custody and see how easy it is to raise a kid as a single parent.
:thumbsup

Violetta 05-31-2008 10:35 AM
that's some nice cash!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:39 AM.
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123