Fox news great job at debunking 9/11 for good.
 

Great article from a fox news reporter who was actually on the scene. According to his article though, Larry Silverstein's buildings are always wired for controlled demolition, and it was no secret, there was no conspiracy.

Of course fox attacks Jesse Ventura cause he has long hair and smokes pot, but will not go after Dr. Alan Sabrosky, former Director of Studies at the US Army War College who flat out said it was was an inside job and israel was behind it, last month. Fair and Balanced! ROFL

LOL @ the crickets, sorry I had to :winkwink: I think I'm the only person with you not on ignore so maybe it's a good thing for you? Either way, fuck Fox and no one will ever know the real truth behind 9/11 IMHO. Neither you nor I know anything legitimate that wasn't read/seen on the web.

Thanks buddy, :)

Jesse Ventura is my hero:

Fox "News"... lol
they are less credible than religion.

Yeah his book isn't half bad, quick read backed up with documentation. Glad to see a few people on this board are open to things. I don't even ignore demon.

You do realise that Gannett News is owned and operated by Gannett Company, Inc. and not News Corp. that owns Fox News.

On a side note, Dr. Alan Sabrosky has not only been on Red Eye but the Alan Colmes Radio show and Geraldo Rivera's show debating the Popular Science magazine theories.

So in one fail swoop i have destroyed your entire post by knowing facts rather than making things up like you did up above.

Another uneducated Fucktard destroyed...whos next?

so it was a controlled demolition. why didn't they clear that up before? "building7 caught on fire and fall by itself" wasn't much credible to begin with.

Hmm was I debating who owned fox news? I don't trust any mainstream news station. Second, my question is why aren't they covering the fact that people in the military actually think that israel was behind this. If alan was on their shows I never heard them, but I believe you.

Thirdly, the main point of my post is that the reporter himself is saying that controlled demolition was an option and that everyone on the scene knew this. Are all buildings wired to come down at any time in NYC? This takes weeks of planning. Seems his attempt at crushing the truther movement actually made it stronger.

You didn't destroy anything in my post cause you totally ignored the main point I was bringing up, and called me a fucktard, just like O'rielly would do. BAaa

They didn't make it clear cause it takes weeks to plan a controlled demolition, and that would indicate a plan. Of course don't listen to me this is all crazy talk. Everyone knows you can just run up into a building with a few explosives in a moments notice (even when the foundation is in an unstable state) and bring it down.

Just cause some Gannet guy says he was there doesn't debunk anything. There were plenty of people who were there, cops, firemen and other city workers, who will testify to the opposite of what he says.

:D

You said "Great article from a fox news reporter who was actually on the scene." But in the article is says he works for Gannett News, there is no relation between the two companies. If Bill O'Reilly actually called someone a Fucktard on his show he wouldn't have a job.

And the rest of what you said i cant even comment on becuase we still have no idea who this so called reporter is that wrote the article that you posted.

> Larry Silverstein's buildings are always wired for controlled demolition
does it mean they plan demolition in advance? maybe at the moment of construction took place, not sure how safe that would be.

Sorry I didn't post the article, here it is, attempting to debunk the 9/11 truth movement. Actually this is the first testamony I've heard of someone claiming to be right there. Where are these other testimonies that you speak of? Of course you have the video of silverstein saying they decided to pull the building. You also have the videos of workers, reporters, and firefighers talking of explosions and molten metal. I'm sure there are others that can debunk their claims .. somewhere.. somewhere.. right?

Article here.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/...ro-sept-shame/

You should know that articles and testings published in Pop Sci have been fraud in the past.

not mine either but he makes some pretty good points .

... when you're reeeeeeeeeealy HIGH!

mayabong

Its funny that he's considered a kook, a couple weeks ago Doctor Alan Sabrosky, teacher at the Army war college, and vietnam vet didn't just say its an inside job, he flat out said israel was behind it. He also said that high levels of the military know this and are very angry. (search for yourself). Ask yourself, Why wasn't that on your fair and balanced news? Maybe Cause its a little easier to discredit jessee cause he smokes pot and has long hair. According to patriotsquestion911 (dot) com 400+ Medical Professionals 200+ Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials 1,100+ Engineers and Architects 250+ Pilots and Aviation Professionals 400+ Professors Question 9/11 300+ 9/11 Survivors and Family Members 200+ Artists, Entertainers, and Media Professionals All think the offical story is a sham. Fox news has brainwashed you people into trusting them and not researching things on your own. P.S. According to your article, silverstein has his building wired for demolition at all times?? you got to be kidding me.. if anything that makes the truth movement stronger. LOL

Thursday, April 22, 2010 at 2:06 PM

It only makes perfect sense to intellectually honest people like yourselves to ignore everything concluded by the world's foremost experts on these matters in the NIST report, and instead talk about eye witness accounts instead. Bravo.

yea so? are all those people kooks too?

OH yeah nist! you mean this guy?


Bravo!

Oy, this is what that article says:
"I was working as a journalist for Gannett News at Ground Zero that day, and I remember very clearly what I saw and heard."

Didn't you read what you posted?

The research for this is pretty intensive and not as easy to find as all the official conspiracy theory versions, but if you put in a little time, it's there. One of the easiest sources is right there at the New York Times site.

These are the oral accounts of members of the FDNY and other first responders:
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/package...s_full_01.html

You might also want to give this site a read, it's insanely dense with facts and sources:

http://www.historycommons.org/timeli...e_911_timeline

:D

not sure where that guy is coming from. Nobody has admitted building 7 was pulled infact quite the opposite. The only thing that was said was by silverstein himself saying they made the decision to pull the building. This could have meant "pull out of" not "pull down"

I realized that after I posted it, that fox news was not even mentioned in the article. He is a fox news contributor, does the fact that he worked somewhere before discredit him or something?

As far as your links thanks I'll check them out. Unlike most here, I'm open.

Who he worked for at the time =/= who published the article. Fox News published the article.

You know times are nuts when people in the military can come out and say 9/11 was an inside job and the "patriots" of the country brush them off as loons, and actually believe what Bill O'rielly or any other news anchor says as truth.. its really fucking unbelieveable. They deserve what they get in the end from their government for being dumb as a box of rocks.

Big list at http://patriotsquestion911.com

All I'm saying is these big corporate news outlet reps are about as credible as Pat Robertson saying Haitians brought the earthquake on themselves because of a deal with the devil or that coalition forces shot and killed "known insurgents" in the latest news from Afghanistan.

:D

Yeah, because, you know, it's not like ten billion tons of concrete and what not just happened to fall right next to it, the impact of which was so strong it registered as a fucking earthquake.

Saw Ventura on a show the other day. He is a fucking moron.

So this rep is obviously a loon. I'm sure if he would have left those couple sentences out about the demolition, he would have been just fine, and noone would even think to question his credibility.

The fact that its actually an anti-truther article and he mentions that to make his case, makes him alot more "credible" in my book.
Wow i'm taking up for a fox news reporter.

From a job with made up injuries, to a job with made up promises, to a job with made up subjects.

Awesome.

See haiti and Chili if you'd like to see what happens when an earthquake hits a building.

Floors pancake on top eachother.

yeah ground shake makes a building fall straight up to its foundation, among all, the strongest building in the area, hours later

FYI one of the towers fell DIRECTLY ONTO one of the smaller world trade centers, and it still had to be demolished, by workers. Explain that one.

That wasn't so hard was it? I mean it literally takes seconds to destroy the arguments on this forum.

Yes its easy when you dodge the main point.. Also demon I posed the link directly to fox news afterwards.. yes your beloved fox news with facts says that everyone knew controlled demolition was an option...
wow..
hahahah

oh wait that reporter isn't credible!!

::::Yawn:::::

Exactly move on sheep

simple, that one didn't catch a fire

Rofl