ccbill still scrubbing? - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

12clicks · 12-21-2010, 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marktruman

A while back I heard conversions and ratios were crap, any improvement? Looking to get a merchant account from them

I wouldnt take your business. It could be just a language issue with how your question is phrased though.
Is intelligence your second language?

MobiusMike · 12-21-2010, 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CCBill Paul

Every processor scrubs. Scrubbing simply means to verify the information the customer has given. If we did not do this we would have been out of business a long time ago due to credit card fraud. We have been doing this for over 12 years and have gotten very good at it.

Our job is to ensure as many transactions are processed as possible while still keeping the fraud to a minimum. Contrary to what some people think we are not constantly adjusting our scrub or allowing more transactions one day compared to the next. We are in the business of accepting transactions.

If anyone has any questions about our system or why certain declines were issued, all they have to do is ask.

Paul:

I'm not sure that "verifying the information the customer has given" completely covers the overall activities of scrubbing, but maybe I'm misunderstanding your definition.

Verification would indicate that you were doing one or more of several checks to verify the validity of the card and the cardholder including:

Card Number Validation
AVS - Address Verification w/parameters to handle response
CVV2/Security Code Check
IP MisMatch (possibly)

Obviously Customer information verification can and should check the above and integrate them so that, as an example:

AVS is a partial match but the inbound Geo IP is a mismatch, customer is declined.

"Scrubbing" would, in my understanding of the definition, include tracking card history, at least internal to CCBill's systems and scoring the transaction based on the history. CCBill's internal systems would then approve/decline based on this score prior to the transaction being submitted to your processor.

I.E., Customer A has no historic record in CCBill and passes all "verification" checks and is approved by your internal systems and sent to processor.

Customer B has a history with one or more of your Merchants for initiating returns but not in 6 months, passes internal checks.

Customer C has charged back a transaction to one or more of your Merchants in the last 6 months, declined, no transaction passed to processor.

This pre-authorization internal decision is what can be "tuned" either to make the decision making process more or less restrictive, correct?

carzygirls · 12-22-2010, 01:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

I wouldnt take your business. It could be just a language issue with how your question is phrased though.
Is intelligence your second language?

ah stop... lol you would take anything you could get.