Homeland Security Tries And Fails To Explain Why Seized Domains Are Different From Google - GoFuckYourself.com

Harmon · 02-07-2011, 01:29 PM

Interesting read, and listen.
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/201...t-google.shtml

Barefootsies · 02-07-2011, 01:31 PM

Sweet justice. Tax dollars hard at work.

u-Bob · 02-07-2011, 01:40 PM

"Finally, Moe asks: if a site links and embeds to all the same content, but does not profit from it (i.e., does not have advertising), is it criminal? Hayes totally punts and says he'd have to check the law. Yes, really. So the guy is not an expert on the technology and admits he's not an expert on the law in question. So what is he an expert in and why is he leading these questionable seizures? "

SmokeyTheBear · 02-07-2011, 03:16 PM

google profits directly from torrents

try a search for "gfrevenge"

ads on top , many torrents in top 10

infact it is almost blackmail, if gfrevenge or an affiliate doesn't buy the adspot , the majority of the top sites would be torrent sites.

Due · 02-07-2011, 04:17 PM

Bastards, you guys should all add noindex, nofollow to your metas. That will teach google not to mess with you

seeandsee · 02-07-2011, 04:22 PM

so google can do it, other cant, interesting

Harmon · 02-07-2011, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seeandsee

so google can do it, other cant, interesting

More or less, yes.

CyberHustler · 02-07-2011, 08:25 PM

Fuck it... Life goes on.

harvey · 02-07-2011, 09:07 PM

For what I've read and based on former legal cases affecting Google, it's my understanding that the difference is Google links to EVERYBODY by automatically crawling sites, which makes impossible not to link to questionable/illegal sites, while the sites seized ONLY LINK TO ILLEGAL SITES and there's a human effort to do that. In other words: Google may fail at filtering the illegal sites between billions of sites while the other domains have an illegal purpose by definition

moeloubani · 02-07-2011, 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies

Sweet justice. Tax dollars hard at work.

LOL What? I wish they would have gone after you for selling stolen pictures.

LOL A thieving pirate turning around and calling sweet justice when other pirates get caught.

Damn yous a dumb little bitch Barefootsies.

epitome · 02-07-2011, 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Due

Bastards, you guys should all add noindex, nofollow to your metas. That will teach google not to mess with you

Done! And I pulled all links to all sponsors. That will show those pirates!

pristine · 02-07-2011, 09:32 PM

Does this have to do with that retard "Alex" from Seizethedomain.com?

Oh, of course not, no one actually pays attention to that retarded faggot.

closer · 02-08-2011, 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by harvey

For what I've read and based on former legal cases affecting Google, it's my understanding that the difference is Google links to EVERYBODY by automatically crawling sites, which makes impossible not to link to questionable/illegal sites, while the sites seized ONLY LINK TO ILLEGAL SITES and there's a human effort to do that. In other words: Google may fail at filtering the illegal sites between billions of sites while the other domains have an illegal purpose by definition

An interesting point of view, could even hold up in court

tiger · 02-08-2011, 01:27 AM

Big surprise huge corporations can do what ever they fucking want but if you try it plan on going to jail, this is nothing new.

harvey · 02-08-2011, 02:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by closer

An interesting point of view, could even hold up in court

I didn't think it by myself, Google and Yahoo uses this argument every single time they're taken to court. Sometimes they lose, but most of the times they have won

02-07-2011, 01:29 PM	#1
Harmon ( ͡ʘ╭͜ʖ╮͡ʘ) Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 20,004	Homeland Security Tries And Fails To Explain Why Seized Domains Are Different From Google Interesting read, and listen. http://www.techdirt.com/articles/201...t-google.shtml __________________ [email protected]

02-07-2011, 01:31 PM	#2
Barefootsies Choice is an Illusion Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Land of Obama Posts: 42,635	Sweet justice. Tax dollars hard at work. __________________ Should You Email Your Members? Link1 \| Link2 \| Link3 Enough Said. "Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"

02-07-2011, 03:16 PM	#4
SmokeyTheBear ►SouthOfHeaven Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer Posts: 28,609	google profits directly from torrents try a search for "gfrevenge" ads on top , many torrents in top 10 infact it is almost blackmail, if gfrevenge or an affiliate doesn't buy the adspot , the majority of the top sites would be torrent sites. __________________ hatisblack at yahoo.com

02-07-2011, 04:17 PM	#5
Due Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Murrieta, CA Posts: 3,620	Bastards, you guys should all add noindex, nofollow to your metas. That will teach google not to mess with you __________________ I buy plugs Skype: Due_Global /Due

02-07-2011, 04:22 PM	#6
seeandsee Check SIG! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Europe (Skype: gojkoas) Posts: 50,945	so google can do it, other cant, interesting __________________ BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year Contact here

02-07-2011, 01:40 PM	#3
u-Bob there's no $$$ in porn Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: icq: 195./568.-230 (btw: not getting offline msgs) Posts: 33,063	"Finally, Moe asks: if a site links and embeds to all the same content, but does not profit from it (i.e., does not have advertising), is it criminal? Hayes totally punts and says he'd have to check the law. Yes, really. So the guy is not an expert on the technology and admits he's not an expert on the law in question. So what is he an expert in and why is he leading these questionable seizures? "

02-07-2011, 08:25 PM	#8
CyberHustler Unregistered Abuser Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 25,364	Fuck it... Life goes on.

02-07-2011, 09:07 PM	#9
harvey Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: 127.0.0.1 Posts: 9,266	For what I've read and based on former legal cases affecting Google, it's my understanding that the difference is Google links to EVERYBODY by automatically crawling sites, which makes impossible not to link to questionable/illegal sites, while the sites seized ONLY LINK TO ILLEGAL SITES and there's a human effort to do that. In other words: Google may fail at filtering the illegal sites between billions of sites while the other domains have an illegal purpose by definition __________________ This post is endorsed by CIA, KGB, MI6, the Mafia, Illuminati, Kim Jong Il, Worldwide Ninjas Association, Klingon Empire and lolcats. Don't mess around with it, just accept it and embrace the truth

02-07-2011, 09:32 PM	#12
pristine So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 1,176	Does this have to do with that retard "Alex" from Seizethedomain.com? Oh, of course not, no one actually pays attention to that retarded faggot.

02-08-2011, 01:27 AM	#14
tiger Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 6,986	Big surprise huge corporations can do what ever they fucking want but if you try it plan on going to jail, this is nothing new. __________________