ICM also will oversee systems that will process payments and verify users are at least 18 years old. - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

DVTimes · 11-11-2011, 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DotXXX

It matters in earning trust from consumers. All .XXX sites are automatically labeled.

No. There has never been any plan to lobby to make .XXX mandatory and regulated.

I presdict in 3 years time, very few sites will be .xxx.

The adult biz is dying as it is.

A lot of people buy .com as they are (a) cheap, (b) well known.

The consumer does not care about .xxx and never will. You can waffel as much as you want about consumer benafites, but, no one cares.

Its likly a lot will panick buy, or buto try to sell on. I have seen this with .mobi and that is now dead.

Today I see sites closing, rather than open. A lot of people are dropping domain names, rather than buying.

.xxx would have sold well 8 years ago. But today far too late.

Its rather amuzing to see people try to push .xxx as it reminds me of small businesses trying to sell products no one wants, yet they keep on going.

Logic sugests .xxx will fail, for several reasons. (1) too expensive.If they had been the same cost as .com I may have got a few just to see. But at the cost they are, no chance. )2) far too few customers. .xxx is adult, so that cuts out non adult. Then when you consider most adult sites are free tgp, blogs, tubes and so on. The whole point is they are cheap to set up. So .xxx makes it pointless to buy. (3) Afilliates will not promote .xxx sites. OK a few might, but so far I have only seen 1 .xxx site I thought worth promoting, but I will not. The thought of promoting a .xxx site makes me sick. In fact I have said I will drop any system that has even one .xxx site.

So as I say give it 3 years and .xxx will be no more considered than .mobi.

In fact lets be honest, .xxx has no benafits, just negatives.

Sure some will panick buy.

What I find amuzing is the .xxx bribes, how they have given .xxx to a lot of people (from the looks of it free) to encurage people to use.xxx. Everything about .xxx just feels desperate.

Of course the chaps behind .xxx probably presumed that .xxx was a licence to print money. Charge a fortune, and people will still buy. But I suspect those behind .xxx are not thinking 'oh cricky'.

A lot were against having .xxx, but i have come to the conclusion its great. Its great as I belive that .xxx will fail. And as such its the best way to kill it.

.xxx will fail.

u-Bob · 11-12-2011, 06:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EukerVoorn

I can't believe the extreme stupidity in this thread and it explains a lot of why many in the porn biz are having a hard time. Why would it be neccessary to use special tags and coding to label an .xxx domain? THE LABEL IS ALREADY THERE IN THE FORM OF THE XXX EXTENSION!!!!

It's Stuart Lawley and the ICM that have come up with the idea that .xxx will be required use certain metatags.

IFFOR baseline policy:
D. Labeling Requirements

All registrants in the sTLD must label their .xxx sites, and any site irrespective of top level domain to which such sites are automatically redirected, using an IFFOR approved label.

Quote:

Originally Posted by EukerVoorn

In fact under the current landrush, they don't require anything, apart from a payment.

IFFOR policies always apply to .xxx domains.

Barry-xlovecam · 11-12-2011, 07:28 AM

You can only polish a turd so much ... A turd is always a turd ...

DotXXX · 11-14-2011, 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by u-Bob

that statement contradicts the "Appendix B IFFOR Baseline Policies ":

You're saying IFFOR/ICM doesn't require access to password protected areas.
The IFFOR Policies documents say that you do require access to password protected areas.

Or do you not consider "password protection" to be a "means" to limit access to certain content?
If that's the case, there's no way for IFFOR/ICM to monitor an entire site for compliance with IFFOR policies (including the anti cp one) and the ICMs statement about guaranteeing that .xxx domains are free from cp become meaningless.

Access to password protected areas is not a requirement, and password protection is not a 'technical means to defeat.' We monitor what we can, and have tip lines for what we can't.

marlboroack · 11-14-2011, 04:01 PM

xxx haters make less than 3000 monthly.

DotXXX · 11-14-2011, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marlboroack

xxx haters make less than 3000 monthly.

I don't believe that is necessarily the case. I do believe that there has been a distinct lack of information available directly to the Adult community in recent months, that hasn't been surrounded by drama of some sort. We'd like to fix that.

DVTimes · 11-14-2011, 04:21 PM

It would seem that most of those buying .xxx are NON adult. Simply firms buing to prevent cyber squotting.

sales in adult would seem very low.

CyberHustler · 11-14-2011, 04:22 PM

You can't fix it homie...

DotXXX · 11-14-2011, 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVTimes

It would seem that most of those buying .xxx are NON adult. Simply firms buing to prevent cyber squotting.

sales in adult would seem very low.

Can you link me to those stats?

keysync · 11-14-2011, 04:24 PM

sounds like a chris mallick scam to me. Just sayin

DotXXX · 11-14-2011, 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberHustler

You can't fix it homie...

I'm sure that in some cases that will be true. In the meanwhile, I'll continue to make the effort.

CyberHustler · 11-14-2011, 04:28 PM

If there was an "Occupy Porn" movement, XXX would probably be one of the most talked about issues.

DotXXX · 11-14-2011, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keysync

sounds like a chris mallick scam to me. Just sayin

How can one possibly draw a comparison with ePassporte? Just curious.

DotXXX · 11-14-2011, 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberHustler

If there was an "Occupy Porn" movement, XXX would probably be one of the most talked about issues.

Over and above piracy, do you think?

CyberHustler · 11-14-2011, 04:40 PM

Not over and above... no.

keysync · 11-14-2011, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DotXXX

How can one possibly draw a comparison with ePassporte? Just curious.

The system will offer micropayment opportunities and will be offered exclusively to .XXX domain owners providing very competitive rates.

How convenient for you.

I didn't say you were Mallick, I said it sounds like something he would do.

DotXXX · 11-14-2011, 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keysync

The system will offer micropayment opportunities and will be offered exclusively to .XXX domain owners providing very competitive rates.

How convenient for you.

I didn't say you were Mallick, I said it sounds like something he would do.

And I didn't understand where you could draw the comparison, but I appreciate your clarifying.

Yes, there is a micropayment system in development, and will be using payment partners that will be instantly recognizable. No high risk offshore structures or banks, but an onshore, full regulated and licensed offering which will mean full capital adequacy requirements, as per regulations.

Exciting isn't it?

baddog · 11-14-2011, 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DotXXX

I don't believe that is necessarily the case. I do believe that there has been a distinct lack of information available directly to the Adult community in recent months, that hasn't been surrounded by drama of some sort. We'd like to fix that.

I can't help but believe knowing who we are talking to would help a lot. As it stands, we can only believe you are associated with ICM. The fact that you gave me a different response than Tony Farrow did to the same question makes me wonder who is right. Since you won't reveal who you are, your responses have to be taken with a grain of salt.

Sorry.

Frank21 · 11-14-2011, 06:48 PM

Soon they will add in fineprint in 1 of the many rules and regulations that all content you upload is free to use for .xxx company.
And you will never get your copyrite back just like facebook does with your pictures.

DotXXX · 11-14-2011, 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

I can't help but believe knowing who we are talking to would help a lot. As it stands, we can only believe you are associated with ICM. The fact that you gave me a different response than Tony Farrow did to the same question makes me wonder who is right. Since you won't reveal who you are, your responses have to be taken with a grain of salt.

Sorry.

You are more than welcome to email me at the address in my signature to verify that it won't bounce.

Can you tell me what the conflicted response is? Re: McAfee? I've been trying to answer a lot of questions, so I'm not certain if you mean one of those in general or the one that you posed directly. I'd be more than happy to get clarification for you wherever you find conflict.

11-14-2011, 04:21 PM	#57
DVTimes xxx Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: UK Posts: 31,544	It would seem that most of those buying .xxx are NON adult. Simply firms buing to prevent cyber squotting. sales in adult would seem very low. __________________ The Affiliate Program

11-14-2011, 04:24 PM	#60
keysync Living the Dream Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Murica Posts: 2,376	sounds like a chris mallick scam to me. Just sayin __________________

11-14-2011, 06:48 PM	#69
Frank21 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 733	Soon they will add in fineprint in 1 of the many rules and regulations that all content you upload is free to use for .xxx company. And you will never get your copyrite back just like facebook does with your pictures. __________________ www.Rate-My-Pussylips.com - FuckingFetish.com - for sale!!! - ExxGfs.com icq#: 598425939

11-12-2011, 07:28 AM	#53
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	You can only polish a turd so much ... A turd is always a turd ...

11-14-2011, 04:01 PM	#55
marlboroack So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: ☣ Posts: 9,327	xxx haters make less than 3000 monthly.

11-14-2011, 04:22 PM	#58
CyberHustler So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 25,214	You can't fix it homie...

11-14-2011, 04:28 PM	#62
CyberHustler So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 25,214	If there was an "Occupy Porn" movement, XXX would probably be one of the most talked about issues.

11-14-2011, 04:40 PM	#65
CyberHustler So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 25,214	Not over and above... no.