Megaupload.com shutdown by feds and owners have been charged - Page 6 - GoFuckYourself.com

Quentin · 01-20-2012, 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery

right now in congress senetor backing sopa are saying they need the law to go after foreign infringers because the current laws don't cut it

taking down a foreign infringer with the current "inferior" laws absolutely proves that argument false.

Except that it is my understanding that MegaUpload.com is not a "foreign site" as that term is defined under SOPA.

Under SOPA both the terms "foreign site" and "foreign domain name" are defined in the negative -- meaning that they are defined as an "internet site that is not a domestic Internet site," and "a domain name that is not a domestic domain name."

Here is SOPA's statutory definition of a domestic domain name:

Quote:

(3) DOMESTIC DOMAIN NAME- The term `domestic domain name' means a domain name that is registered or assigned by a domain name registrar, domain name registry, or other domain name registration authority, that is located within a judicial district of the United States.

As the argument goes (and it's an argument the U.S. courts have accepted, thus far), since all .COMs are under the auspices of Verisign, by the statutory definition above, all .COM sites, including MegaUpload.com, are "domestic." This has actually been identified as an ironic weakness of SOPA by some of its critics, in fact.

Further, under Section 102 of SOPA, a "foreign infringing site" is a site that "would, by reason of acts described in paragraph (1), be subject to seizure in the United States in an action brought by the Attorney General if such site were a domestic Internet site."

I think it is safe to conclude, based on the fact that MegaUpload.com has now been seized in an action brought by the US Attorney General (actions taken by the US DOJ are actions taken on behalf of the US AG), that MU is therefore NOT a foreign infringing site as that term is defined under SOPA.

GayBunny · 01-20-2012, 10:51 AM

If i were kickasstorrents, i would be pretty worried!

scottybuzz · 01-20-2012, 11:16 AM

fuck sake. i wanted to download a file from there in my bookmarks

BIGTYMER · 01-20-2012, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottybuzz

fuck sake. i wanted to download a file from there in my bookmarks

I'm sure Google will help you find it on another filehost.

lucas131 · 01-20-2012, 11:27 AM

i am selling my megaupload premium account, expire jan 2013, 10% discount. any takers?

candyflip · 01-20-2012, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GayBunny

If i were kickasstorrents, i would be pretty worried!

They dumped the Kickasstorrent.com domain a while ago, as did a bunch of other torrent sites as well.

KAT.PH
Demonoid.me

Just two examples.

pimpware · 01-20-2012, 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lucas131

i am selling my megaupload premium account, expire jan 2013, 10% discount. any takers?

Do you accept epass?

seolinker · 01-20-2012, 01:59 PM

pornbay.org, those are the guys who stealing your sales, not mega crew

cosis · 01-20-2012, 02:05 PM

they all look pretty scared

FlexxAeon · 01-20-2012, 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCORE Ralph

Whether it was 'framed' or not, how else could you construe such an attack?

Anons call it protesting

lucas131 · 01-20-2012, 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pimpware

Do you accept epass?

nope i dont want to be mallicked again

brassmonkey · 01-20-2012, 02:12 PM

they will be back up in a bit

Zorgman · 01-20-2012, 02:19 PM

1 network down, 500 to go.

chaze · 01-20-2012, 02:23 PM

Not to take sides but how this site was ever alive I never got.

I mean they have tons of illegal stuff on there, everyone knows it.

I don't think they need SOPA to deal with such obvious file trading.

gideongallery · 01-20-2012, 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quentin

Except that it is my understanding that MegaUpload.com is not a "foreign site" as that term is defined under SOPA.

Under SOPA both the terms "foreign site" and "foreign domain name" are defined in the negative -- meaning that they are defined as an "internet site that is not a domestic Internet site," and "a domain name that is not a domestic domain name."

Here is SOPA's statutory definition of a domestic domain name:

As the argument goes (and it's an argument the U.S. courts have accepted, thus far), since all .COMs are under the auspices of Verisign, by the statutory definition above, all .COM sites, including MegaUpload.com, are "domestic." This has actually been identified as an ironic weakness of SOPA by some of its critics, in fact.

Further, under Section 102 of SOPA, a "foreign infringing site" is a site that "would, by reason of acts described in paragraph (1), be subject to seizure in the United States in an action brought by the Attorney General if such site were a domestic Internet site."

I think it is safe to conclude, based on the fact that MegaUpload.com has now been seized in an action brought by the US Attorney General (actions taken by the US DOJ are actions taken on behalf of the US AG), that MU is therefore NOT a foreign infringing site as that term is defined under SOPA.

then why did they take down the non US servers, domains and cash.

if this only happened because it was .com then DOJ seriously over stepped their bounds.

brassmonkey · 01-20-2012, 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chaze

Not to take sides but how this site was ever alive I never got.

I mean they have tons of illegal stuff on there, everyone knows it.

I don't think they need SOPA to deal with such obvious file trading.

youtube has illegal stuff on it. its reported and removed

helterskelter808 · 01-20-2012, 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nautilus

You mean 50 years in federal prison sucking Bubba's dick every day? Go ahead.

She wasn't referring to that lifestyle, but it probably is the icing on the cake for her.

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlexxAeon

Anons call it protesting

If it's all a carefully planned conspiracy against Anon, why assume an actual DDOS even happened?

FlexxAeon · 01-20-2012, 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by helterskelter808

If it's all a carefully planned conspiracy against Anon, why assume an actual DDOS even happened?

actually i don't 100% assume it was anon, but i haven't been wearing my 10-gallon tinfoil hat lately, only my tinfoil beanie

plus, anyone with loic and a guy fawkes mask can be/is anon so it's more than likely

brassmonkey · 01-20-2012, 03:33 PM

game over

anexsia · 01-20-2012, 03:55 PM

The porn industry could have celebrated if it was Oron or Filesonic taken down...not sure if some here don't realize that Oron is the one that holds a LARGE number of porn videos, from the biggest content all the way down to the small niche/fetish videos. Megaupload was more movies,games, and nulled scripts.

JimmyStephans · 01-20-2012, 03:59 PM

Actually, MegaUpload was full of adult content and had many other names (MegaErotic, etc.).

The full 72 page indictment: http://truebabes.com/mega.pdf

Vjo · 01-20-2012, 05:21 PM

this goes out to all the wanted felons with illegal file sharing sites

out there the law's a coming
i get so tired of running

run joey, joey run run
the hogs are on your trail

SAS_Jack · 01-20-2012, 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimmyStephans

Actually, MegaUpload was full of adult content and had many other names (MegaErotic, etc.).

The full 72 page indictment:

I'm upto page 25 on the indictment and its pretty damning. And its stuff that the majority of us in this industry have know for a while.

Quote:

22. When a file is being uploaded to Megaupload.com, the Conspiracy’s automated system calculates a unique identifier for the file (called a “MD5 hash”) that is generated using a mathematical algorithm. If, after the MD5 hash calculation, the system determines that the uploading file already exists on a server controlled by the Mega Conspiracy, Megaupload.com does not reproduce a second copy of the file on that server. Instead, the system provides a new and unique URL link to the new user that is pointed to the original file already present on the server. If there is more than one URL link to a file, then any attempt by the copyright holder to terminate access to the file using the Abuse Tool or other DMCA takedown request will fail because the additional access links will continue to be available.

23. The infringing copy of the copyrighted work, therefore, remains on the Conspiracy’s systems (and accessible to at least one member of the public) as long as a single 11 link remains unknown to the copyright holder. The Conspiracy’s internal reference database tracks the links that have been generated by the system, but duplicative links to infringing materials are neither disclosed to copyright holders, nor are they automatically deleted when a copyright holder either uses the Abuse Tool or makes a standard DMCA copyright infringement takedown request. During the course of the Conspiracy, the Mega Conspiracy has received many millions of requests (through the Abuse Tool and otherwise) to remove infringing copies of copyrighted works and yet the Conspiracy has, at best, only deleted the particular URL ofw hich the copyright holder complained, and purposefully left the actual infringing copy of the copyrighted work on the Mega Conspiracy-controlled server and any other access links completely intact.

Quote:

54. It was further part of the Conspiracy, from at least September 2005 until July 2011, that the Conspiracy provided financial incentives for users to upload infringing copies of popular copyrighted works. The Conspiracy made payments to uploaders who were known to have uploaded infringing copies of copyrighted works.

55. It was further part of the Conspiracy that members of the Conspiracy generally did not terminate the user accounts of known copyright infringing users, when it had the right and ability under its Terms of Service to do so.

56. It was further part of the Conspiracy that the Conspiracy made no significant effort to identify users who were using the Mega Sites or services to infringe copyrights, to prevent the uploading of infringing copies of copyrighted materials, or to identify infringing copies of copyrighted works located on computer servers controlled by the Conspiracy.

Sorry for the spam, but so far, these are pretty important when it comes to safe harbour under the DMCA Act.

Nautilus · 01-20-2012, 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAS_Jack

Sorry for the spam, but so far, these are pretty important when it comes to safe harbour under the DMCA Act.

Those are very important parts indeed, thanks for posting.

anexsia · 01-20-2012, 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimmyStephans

Actually, MegaUpload was full of adult content and had many other names (MegaErotic, etc.).

The full 72 page indictment: http://truebabes.com/mega.pdf

Oh I never said they didn't have a bunch of adult on there, it's just that most of porn video searches include Oron. You didn't see megaupload links nearly as much as Oron for porn.

gideongallery · 01-20-2012, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAS_Jack

I'm upto page 25 on the indictment and its pretty damning. And its stuff that the majority of us in this industry have know for a while.

Sorry for the spam, but so far, these are pretty important when it comes to safe harbour under the DMCA Act.

Quote:

22. When a file is being uploaded to Megaupload.com, the Conspiracy?s automated system calculates a unique identifier for the file (called a ?MD5 hash?) that is generated using a mathematical algorithm. If, after the MD5 hash calculation, the system determines that the uploading file already exists on a server controlled by the Mega Conspiracy, Megaupload.com does not reproduce a second copy of the file on that server. Instead, the system provides a new and unique URL link to the new user that is pointed to the original file already present on the server. If there is more than one URL link to a file, then any attempt by the copyright holder to terminate access to the file using the Abuse Tool or other DMCA takedown request will fail because the additional access links will continue to be available.

23. The infringing copy of the copyrighted work, therefore, remains on the Conspiracy?s systems (and accessible to at least one member of the public) as long as a single 11 link remains unknown to the copyright holder. The Conspiracy?s internal reference database tracks the links that have been generated by the system, but duplicative links to infringing materials are neither disclosed to copyright holders, nor are they automatically deleted when a copyright holder either uses the Abuse Tool or makes a standard DMCA copyright infringement takedown request. During the course of the Conspiracy, the Mega Conspiracy has received many millions of requests (through the Abuse Tool and otherwise) to remove infringing copies of copyrighted works and yet the Conspiracy has, at best, only deleted the particular URL ofw hich the copyright holder complained, and purposefully left the actual infringing copy of the copyrighted work on the Mega Conspiracy-controlled server and any other access links completely intact.

so if person a put a video that he want to backup on mega upload but doesn't share with anyone (and therefore stays hidden from the copyright holder)

you want his backup to be wiped out because someone else decides to infringe (share)

or are you saying your expecting mega upload to put up 11 copies of the content waste resources and completely eliminate the network effect benefits.

If they did that the same exact consequence would happen (only the reported one would go down)

brassmonkey · 01-20-2012, 07:45 PM

funny they go get this guy, but didnt do shit about epass.

porno jew · 01-20-2012, 07:45 PM

PiracyPitbull · 01-20-2012, 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery

or are you saying your expecting mega upload to put up 11 copies of the content waste resources and completely eliminate the network effect benefits.

If they did that the same exact consequence would happen (only the reported one would go down)

Yes. Each uploader to upload a file. Their system resources are not our problem.

Full file removal and a proper ban for repeat infringers.

"your expecting mega upload to put up 11 copies of the content" and technically, MU or any other filehost shouldn't be putting anything anywhere.

SAS_Jack · 01-20-2012, 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery

so if person a put a video that he want to backup on mega upload but doesn't share with anyone (and therefore stays hidden from the copyright holder)

you want his backup to be wiped out because someone else decides to infringe (share)

Working on your theory

I suppose its just a coincidence that the file someone is "backing up" happens to have the same md5 hash as a file being shared by a ton of piraters?

Mainstream movies that are pirated by scene or p2p groups have multiple different filenames and filesizes dependant on that group. If a user is backing up a file that has all of the same information as a pirated "backup" then that isn't coincidence is it?

Give it up.

INever · 01-20-2012, 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EukerVoorn

What happened is a huge victory for legit content producers and it cripples piracy tremendously. Because starting today filelockers are now being known as "criminal" which means that a growing amount of companies and individuals won't want to work with/for them anymore. And that includes Visa, MasterCard and PayPal. Of course it's impossible to kill piracy completely but severely crippling it will be second best.

Because of the crime stigma, future innovations in piracy that might have developed to quench demand will be perceived as much riskier investments.

SAS_Jack · 01-20-2012, 08:23 PM

And another thing - Filesonic, Oron and other filehosts allow their servers to be indexed by search engines. Meaning someone can "backup" a file and it will be available to the general public for download. This isn't acceptable.

gideongallery · 01-20-2012, 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PiracyPitbull

Yes. Each uploader to upload a file. Their system resources are not our problem.

Full file removal and a proper ban for repeat infringers.

so your demanding the deliberate fucking over of people who are not sharing a single thing
committing no infringement at all

Your talking about taking away their right to backup the content they paid for.

Quote:

"your expecting mega upload to put up 11 copies of the content" and technically, MU or any other filehost shouldn't be putting anything anywhere.

and they aren't they are simply connecting the identical files together to minimize costs.

gideongallery · 01-20-2012, 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAS_Jack

And another thing - Filesonic, Oron and other filehosts allow their servers to be indexed by search engines. Meaning someone can "backup" a file and it will be available to the general public for download. This isn't acceptable.

only if the "back up"er put the link into the public somehow

Of course in this example that would be the links that could be found.

The links the copyright holder couldn't find, those are people who specifically choose to use the service as a completely hidden, only accessible by themselves service.

PiracyPitbull · 01-20-2012, 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery

so your demanding the deliberate fucking over of people who are not sharing a single thing
committing no infringement at all

Your talking about taking away their right to backup the content they paid for.

No I'm not. They can back up separately from other uploaders. One person uploads, they get a link for that upload back in return, associated to the relevant file.

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery

they aren't they are simply connecting the identical files together to minimize costs.

And therefore, they don't qualify for safe harbor.

seeric · 01-20-2012, 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brassmonkey

game over

50 million unique visitors a day now learning that what they were doing is not legal and that people are watching and taking actions.

Few more of these should really wake up those people who don't think they're breaking the law downloading any movie they want for free.

helterskelter808 · 01-20-2012, 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seeric

50 million unique visitors a day now learning that what they were doing is not legal and that people are watching and taking actions.

Feds should put some banners up.

FlexxAeon · 01-20-2012, 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by helterskelter808

Feds should put some banners up.

feds suck at monetizing traffic

salvo visalli · 01-21-2012, 02:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyberxxx

Would be nice if pornolab.net will end like this too...

SomeCreep · 01-21-2012, 03:10 AM

Wow, megaupload has an alexa rank of 72!! Insane! Other File sharing sites must be shitting in their pants.

just a punk · 01-21-2012, 03:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anexsia

The porn industry could have celebrated if it was Oron or Filesonic taken down...not sure if some here don't realize that Oron is the one that holds a LARGE number of porn videos, from the biggest content all the way down to the small niche/fetish videos.

Including illegal ones like "zoo", "scat" etc...

just a punk · 01-21-2012, 03:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SomeCreep

Wow, megaupload has an alexa rank of 72!! Insane! Other File sharing sites must be shitting in their pants.

They are already. Check this out: http://www.wjunction.com/14-news-cur...rget-list.html

SlutsBukkake · 01-21-2012, 03:26 AM

I dont see how they can shut down an entire site that is not solely hosted in the US.

So in theory could they shutdown YouTube?

What about all those people who were just using it for backup of thier personal or work files? Isn't the FBI accessing/deleting these doing something illegal?

While i dont agree with the copright offences, i think something smells fishy and that this is setting a very bad precedent for the government to be able to shut down any website/business and not give them a chance to defend themselves in court.

NewNick · 01-21-2012, 03:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SlutsBukkake

I dont see how they can shut down an entire site that is not solely hosted in the US.

So in theory could they shutdown YouTube?

What about all those people who were just using it for backup of thier personal or work files? Isn't the FBI accessing/deleting these doing something illegal?

While i dont agree with the copright offences, i think something smells fishy and that this is setting a very bad precedent for the government to be able to shut down any website/business and not give them a chance to defend themselves in court.

Fool. Wake up.

gideongallery · 01-21-2012, 06:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PiracyPitbull

No I'm not. They can back up separately from other uploaders. One person uploads, they get a link for that upload back in return, associated to the relevant file.

so you think that raising the cost and therefore raising the price is nct screwing over the legit consumers

Quote:

And therefore, they don't qualify for safe harbor.

bullshit read the safe harbor

Once notice is given to the service provider, or in circumstances where the service provider discovers the infringing material itself, it is required to expeditiously remove, or disable access to, the material.

think of it this way if i purchased an online backup service and my password got hacked

your saying the only way the host could be protected safe harbor provision was to destroy my backup even though they could remove infringing access by simply changing the password and notify me.

the people using megaupload as an onliine backup with zero distribution (keeping the link private) are within the bounds of fair use and are therefore not an example of infringing material.

fris · 01-21-2012, 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anexsia

The porn industry could have celebrated if it was Oron or Filesonic taken down...not sure if some here don't realize that Oron is the one that holds a LARGE number of porn videos, from the biggest content all the way down to the small niche/fetish videos. Megaupload was more movies,games, and nulled scripts.

oron owns pornbb.org , and people that post on the forum are only permitted to use oron as a file service.

so of course its got a huge % of porn content.

fris · 01-21-2012, 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SomeCreep

Wow, megaupload has an alexa rank of 72!! Insane! Other File sharing sites must be shitting in their pants.

megavideo.com alexa of 172 as well

PiracyPitbull · 01-21-2012, 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery

so you think that raising the cost and therefore raising the price is nct screwing over the legit consumers

If that what it costs to run a service, then no.

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery

bullshit read the safe harbor

Once notice is given to the service provider, or in circumstances where the service provider discovers the infringing material itself, it is required to expeditiously remove, or disable access to, the material.

think of it this way if i purchased an online backup service and my password got hacked

your saying the only way the host could be protected safe harbor provision was to destroy my backup even though they could remove infringing access by simply changing the password and notify me.

the people using megaupload as an onliine backup with zero distribution (keeping the link private) are within the bounds of fair use and are therefore not an example of infringing material.

So in instances where 500 people upload a cinema recording of "Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol ", clearly an infringing upload and not currently available for sale.

The Filehost should be able to bundle all 500 copies as one, issue links as normal - and should they receive 10 take-down requests, only pay attention to those, disable those 10 links but leave the remaining 490 links live ? - is that what you're saying ?

scottybuzz · 01-21-2012, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PiracyPitbull

If that what it costs to run a service, then no.

So in instances where 500 people upload a cinema recording of "Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol ", clearly an infringing upload and not currently available for sale.

The Filehost should be able to bundle all 500 copies as one, issue links as normal - and should they receive 10 take-down requests, only pay attention to those, disable those 10 links but leave the remaining 490 links live ? - is that what you're saying ?

mr pitbull, i dont understand, without piracy your business gets no clients. why are you so against it?

InfoGuy · 01-21-2012, 04:31 PM

300 nails in the piracy coffin

01-20-2012, 10:51 AM	#252
GayBunny Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 131	If i were kickasstorrents, i would be pretty worried! __________________ Gaybunny.com - Gay Tube Site

01-20-2012, 11:16 AM	#253
scottybuzz Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: May 2006 Location: NY Posts: 14,800	fuck sake. i wanted to download a file from there in my bookmarks __________________ $$$$$ MAKE HUGE MONEY IN CAMS - CLICK HERE $$$$$

01-20-2012, 02:12 PM	#262
brassmonkey Pay It Forward Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Yo Mama House Posts: 77,229	they will be back up in a bit __________________ TRUMP 2025 KEKAW!!! - The Laken Riley Act Is Law! DACA ENDED - SUPPORT AZ HCR 2060 52R - email: brassballz-at-techie.com

01-20-2012, 02:19 PM	#263
Zorgman Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 6,103	1 network down, 500 to go. __________________ ---

01-20-2012, 03:33 PM	#269
brassmonkey Pay It Forward Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Yo Mama House Posts: 77,229	game over __________________ TRUMP 2025 KEKAW!!! - The Laken Riley Act Is Law! DACA ENDED - SUPPORT AZ HCR 2060 52R - email: brassballz-at-techie.com

01-20-2012, 11:27 AM	#255
lucas131 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 11,475	i am selling my megaupload premium account, expire jan 2013, 10% discount. any takers?

01-20-2012, 01:59 PM	#258
seolinker Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 243	pornbay.org, those are the guys who stealing your sales, not mega crew

01-20-2012, 02:05 PM	#259
cosis Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Beach Posts: 5,280	they all look pretty scared

01-20-2012, 02:23 PM	#264
chaze Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 9,752	Not to take sides but how this site was ever alive I never got. I mean they have tons of illegal stuff on there, everyone knows it. I don't think they need SOPA to deal with such obvious file trading.

01-20-2012, 03:55 PM	#270
anexsia Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 5,735	The porn industry could have celebrated if it was Oron or Filesonic taken down...not sure if some here don't realize that Oron is the one that holds a LARGE number of porn videos, from the biggest content all the way down to the small niche/fetish videos. Megaupload was more movies,games, and nulled scripts.

01-20-2012, 03:59 PM	#271
JimmyStephans Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Littleton, Colorado. USA Posts: 558	Actually, MegaUpload was full of adult content and had many other names (MegaErotic, etc.). The full 72 page indictment: http://truebabes.com/mega.pdf __________________ http://TrueBabes.com/

01-20-2012, 05:21 PM	#272
Vjo So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Happy 4th of July :) Posts: 6,082	this goes out to all the wanted felons with illegal file sharing sites out there the law's a coming i get so tired of running run joey, joey run run the hogs are on your trail Last edited by Vjo; 01-20-2012 at 05:34 PM..

01-20-2012, 07:45 PM	#277
brassmonkey Pay It Forward Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Yo Mama House Posts: 77,229	funny they go get this guy, but didnt do shit about epass. __________________ TRUMP 2025 KEKAW!!! - The Laken Riley Act Is Law! DACA ENDED - SUPPORT AZ HCR 2060 52R - email: brassballz-at-techie.com

01-20-2012, 07:45 PM	#278
porno jew Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 10,166

01-20-2012, 08:23 PM	#282
SAS_Jack Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 19	And another thing - Filesonic, Oron and other filehosts allow their servers to be indexed by search engines. Meaning someone can "backup" a file and it will be available to the general public for download. This isn't acceptable.

01-21-2012, 03:10 AM	#290
SomeCreep :glugglug Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Where the Wild Things Are Posts: 26,118	Wow, megaupload has an alexa rank of 72!! Insane! Other File sharing sites must be shitting in their pants. __________________ Webair Hosting I use and recommend Webair for hosting.

01-21-2012, 03:26 AM	#293
SlutsBukkake Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2012 Posts: 147	I dont see how they can shut down an entire site that is not solely hosted in the US. So in theory could they shutdown YouTube? What about all those people who were just using it for backup of thier personal or work files? Isn't the FBI accessing/deleting these doing something illegal? While i dont agree with the copright offences, i think something smells fishy and that this is setting a very bad precedent for the government to be able to shut down any website/business and not give them a chance to defend themselves in court. __________________ Bukkake Sluts Asian Sluts Facial Sluts Gangbang Sluts

01-21-2012, 04:31 PM	#300
InfoGuy 80/20 Rule Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 3,051	300 nails in the piracy coffin __________________ Support American Heroes \| How Bad is My Batch? \| Vaccine Deaths & Adverse Reactions \| Free Speech Coalition \| <WARNING> ePayService / Guerra Capital, INC / MTACC payments \| Flirt4Free Fucks their Affiliates \| Don't do business with piece of shit Andy Alvarez from Webmaster Central / VR3000, who said: "If it was up to me, they would have shot all 30,000 of those country loving shitheads"