So Zimmerman raped his 6 year old cousin for 10 years? - Page 3 - GoFuckYourself.com

_Richard_ · 07-16-2013, 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornMD

So this started when she was 6 and he was 7, ended when she was 16 and he was 17. She didn't tell anyone until now, when he is 28, and he's potentially facing charges for this? How in the world is she going to be able to prove anything in a court of law?

think this is the problem most rape victims have

yesterday someone was posting about Tawana Brawley case.. big 'hoax' etc etc etc..

with the prosecuters/accuseds wife leaving him in the end.

riiiiight.

brassmonkey · 07-16-2013, 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornMD

So this started when she was 6 and he was 7, ended when she was 16 and he was 17. She didn't tell anyone until now, when he is 28, and he's potentially facing charges for this? How in the world is she going to be able to prove anything in a court of law?

maybe if she went to therapy?

L-Pink · 07-16-2013, 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_

think this is the problem most rape victims have

yesterday someone was posting about Tawana Brawley case.. big 'hoax' etc etc etc..

with the prosecuters/accuseds wife leaving him in the end.

riiiiight.

It was a hoax, from the New York Times ?..

"Attorney General Robert Abrams, the special prosecutor in the case who guided the grand jury's work, said yesterday that he had asked New York State judicial disciplinary authorities to investigate the conduct of Miss Brawley's lawyers, Alton H. Maddox Jr. and C. Vernon Mason. [ Page B5. ] With a 10-page letter detailing acts of ''irresponsible behavior'' ranging from ''spreading lies'' about the case to advising their clients to withhold cooperation with law-enforcement authorities, Mr. Abrams began a process that could lead to the lawyers' suspension from practicing law or disbarment for violating professional canons of ethics."

Don't bend facts to suit your opinion.

.

_Richard_ · 07-16-2013, 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

It was a hoax, from the New York Times ?..

"Attorney General Robert Abrams, the special prosecutor in the case who guided the grand jury's work, said yesterday that he had asked New York State judicial disciplinary authorities to investigate the conduct of Miss Brawley's lawyers, Alton H. Maddox Jr. and C. Vernon Mason. [ Page B5. ] With a 10-page letter detailing acts of ''irresponsible behavior'' ranging from ''spreading lies'' about the case to advising their clients to withhold cooperation with law-enforcement authorities, Mr. Abrams began a process that could lead to the lawyers' suspension from practicing law or disbarment for violating professional canons of ethics."

Don't bend facts to suit your opinion.

.

bend facts? the woman left her 'falsely accused' husband.

L-Pink · 07-16-2013, 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_

bend facts? the woman left her 'falsely accused' husband.

I thought you just posted the story was a hoax. If you didn't I apologize.

.

PornMD · 07-16-2013, 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brassmonkey

maybe if she went to therapy?

That'd probably be the only way. At least per that FindLaw link, the statute of limitations is up on it anyways, but who knows...they might find a way to prosecute just to appease the people that feel he should have been found guilty in the Trayvon case.

I'm not saying it didn't happen, but seems it'd be really hard to prove at this point. At least it sounds like she was trying to come out with it during the trial rather than after.

_Richard_ · 07-16-2013, 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

I thought you just posted the story was a hoax. If you didn't I apologize.

.

i quotation marked 'hoax' to show my feelings on the subject..

and this story is fubar.

baddog · 07-16-2013, 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brassmonkey

sure there was a crime.

just like you saying oj is guilty even after the court case anyway the court side is over

No there was not; if there was. GZ would be in jail right now. You are not smarter than a court of law. Your opinion holds zero weight.

brassmonkey · 07-16-2013, 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornMD

That'd probably be the only way. At least per that FindLaw link, the statute of limitations is up on it anyways, but who knows...they might find a way to prosecute just to appease the people that feel he should have been found guilty in the Trayvon case.

I'm not saying it didn't happen, but seems it'd be really hard to prove at this point. At least it sounds like she was trying to come out with it during the trial rather than after.

i don't think there is a limitation on rape. i just looked at a case a man arrested earlier this year for rape he did in 1984. he just died i think a few weeks ago.

_Richard_ · 07-16-2013, 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

No there was not; if there was. GZ would be in jail right now. You are not smarter than a court of law. Your opinion holds zero weight.

either are you, and so do you.

unless you have something to tell everyone?

brassmonkey · 07-16-2013, 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

No there was not; if there was. GZ would be in jail right now. You are not smarter than a court of law. Your opinion holds zero weight.

its an opinion

just like saying oj is guilty of murder. go take some micro beer pics

brassmonkey · 07-16-2013, 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_

either are you, and so do you.

unless you have something to tell everyone?

oh he has plenty to say.

Rochard · 07-16-2013, 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

No there was not; if there was. GZ would be in jail right now. You are not smarter than a court of law. Your opinion holds zero weight.

Of course Baddog is right about everything. No one's opinion ever holds any weight.

Do you have any proof that no crime has been committed Baddog?

baddog · 07-16-2013, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Do you have any proof that no crime has been committed Baddog?

As a matter of fact I do; sorry you missed it

Rochard · 07-16-2013, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

As a matter of fact I do; sorry you missed it

That for the shooting. Not for raping his cousin.

brassmonkey · 07-16-2013, 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

That for the shooting. Not for raping his cousin.

all in the family?

baddog · 07-16-2013, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

That for the shooting. Not for raping his cousin.

And brashmonkey and I were discussing the TM/GZ case, not the alleged rape. Have charges been filed against GZ for rape?

_Richard_ · 07-16-2013, 01:34 PM

were charges filed against him for murder? lol

24/7 Blogging Crew · 07-16-2013, 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_

were charges filed against him for murder? lol

Rochard · 07-16-2013, 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

And brashmonkey and I were discussing the TM/GZ case, not the alleged rape. Have charges been filed against GZ for rape?

Not yet... But it will be interesting to see if they do.

theking · 07-16-2013, 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Not yet... But it will be interesting to see if they do.

There will not be any charges filed against Zimmerman for rape...end of story.

brassmonkey · 07-16-2013, 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking

There will not be any charges filed against Zimmerman for rape...end of story.

reading right now http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...n_1676729.html take a gander

baddog · 07-16-2013, 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Not yet... But it will be interesting to see if they do.

I stand by my comment.

PornMD · 07-16-2013, 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brassmonkey

i don't think there is a limitation on rape. i just looked at a case a man arrested earlier this year for rape he did in 1984. he just died i think a few weeks ago.

I thought I read somewhere that it varies by state. It may vary also by what kind of rape, i.e. in this case with it being minor on minor, maybe it's seen legally as not as big of a deal.

2MuchMark · 07-16-2013, 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog

He also tortured puppies and clubbed baby seals...

That would be illegal.

Mutt · 07-17-2013, 01:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

So it's normal for a seventeen year old boy to force his younger cousin to allow him to fondle her?

I was talking about when they were 6 and 7 - children can't rape each other, they don't understand the nature of their actions.

as for when they were teenagers - that's family business, creepy cousin is grabbing my tits and ass - go tell your parents or his parents. unless he fucked her against her will it's nobody's business but their families. if i had a cousin who was a creep i'd let his/her parents know what was going on and if that didn't help, i wouldn't go to family events he was invited to.

SuckOnThis · 07-17-2013, 03:12 AM

Conservatives think touching your 6 year old cousin is normal, not a crime and "family business"? Not surprised.

Rochard · 07-17-2013, 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt

I was talking about when they were 6 and 7 - children can't rape each other, they don't understand the nature of their actions.

as for when they were teenagers - that's family business, creepy cousin is grabbing my tits and ass - go tell your parents or his parents. unless he fucked her against her will it's nobody's business but their families. if i had a cousin who was a creep i'd let his/her parents know what was going on and if that didn't help, i wouldn't go to family events he was invited to.

I don't recall molesting a family member when I was six. All I wanted to do was play with matchbox cars.

This is ten years of Zimmerman molesting and raping someone, plain and simple. It's acceptable at age six or sixteen or sixty.

24/7 Blogging Crew · 07-17-2013, 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

I don't recall molesting a family member when I was six. All I wanted to do was play with matchbox cars.

This is ten years of Zimmerman molesting and raping someone, plain and simple. It's NOT acceptable at age six or sixteen or sixty.

fixed that for you

icymelon · 07-17-2013, 12:03 PM

I particularly like the part about the Zimmerman family not liking blacks.

24/7 Blogging Crew · 07-17-2013, 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by icymelon

I particularly like the part about the Zimmerman family not liking blacks.

Yeah the Z Family are all a bunch of trash! fucking racists

Rochard · 07-17-2013, 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 24/7 Blogging Crew

fixed that for you

Thank you.

07-17-2013, 12:03 PM	#130
icymelon Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Las Vegas Posts: 3,220	I particularly like the part about the Zimmerman family not liking blacks. __________________ Network Of Adult Blogs With Hardlink Rentals Available

07-16-2013, 01:34 PM	#118
_Richard_ Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Vancouver Posts: 30,985	were charges filed against him for murder? lol

07-17-2013, 03:12 AM	#127
SuckOnThis So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: In my head Posts: 6,844	Conservatives think touching your 6 year old cousin is normal, not a crime and "family business"? Not surprised.