Shocking Shit! Internet Porn in the UK to become Opt-in. Blocked by default. - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

Scott McD · 07-22-2013, 10:07 AM

The UK government priority list is laughable...

Due · 07-22-2013, 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by halfpint

If you buy a new mobile or get a new sim card they are also blocked until you contact them to unblock it. They do the same with dongles. I couldent even get onto Youtbe until I phoned them and they wanted my credit card details to unblock it .

the so called adult filter in UK is but a real adult filter, it blocks everything by default and then they add approved sites to it rather than blocking "offensive" sites.

anyone using the internet for regular purposes would need to opt-out of the filter.

AtlantisCash · 07-22-2013, 11:14 AM

i posted this 1-2 months ago and except few, none of you motherfuckers gave damn shit about it, this is our job, our business and we should do something to protect not only our self interests but also the liberties itself.

a troll at the first page talks about damaging affects of porn, how easy we people are seriously to be fooled by nonsense studies and bs?

we all know that yet 20-30 years ago these doctors with tv shows smoking cigarettes appeared on tv within telling to public how smoking is healthy etc, but today they talk shit about cigarettes to sell those "end smoking addiction crap) and who knows what else they aimed.

don't buy every fucking so called study, most of the time what ever you see on media is plain bullshit.

again i say let's do something, we are community and we can do lots of things if we want.

Cyber Fucker · 07-22-2013, 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Due

the so called adult filter in UK is but a real adult filter, it blocks everything by default and then they add approved sites to it rather than blocking "offensive" sites.

anyone using the internet for regular purposes would need to opt-out of the filter.

Oh my, that's fucked up. It will make people mad. It surely sounds like some insane censorship shit. Did they even ask people if they want it? Where is the referendum? I'm sure most society would be against, only some religious freaks would be pro this bullshit. So soon GFY.com will get unaccessible from the United Kingdom unless a one opted out bullshit filter.

Who will decide which sites are ok and which are not? Any site that has user created content had, have or will have explicit adult content, that's how the web function.

I already posted this in the other thread:

Quote:

It is a parents role to take care of their kids. I think any of such default on filter is the rape of freedom. They will start with porn and end on political stuff censoring what's inconvenient for them. This is not right. Besides it's impossible to block all adult content and this will do more harm than good. Parents will think that all the job is done for them... which will be far from truth. While fully legit stable adult websites that care about minors will get their traffic hurt while some bullshit scam sites that just popped yesterday with nasty stuff and illegal content and malware on will find it as a great opportunity.

And I still think this would end like this.

The Porn Nerd · 07-22-2013, 12:15 PM

Good - bring this to the USA immediately!

BFT3K · 07-22-2013, 12:17 PM

What is the definition of "porn" ?

Is my boobs-only site considered "porn" for example?

http://www.BoobieMovies.com/Big-Boun.../windex01.html

StickyGreen · 07-22-2013, 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtlantisCash

a troll at the first page talks about damaging affects of porn, how easy we people are seriously to be fooled by nonsense studies and bs?

Troll? lol, hardly. The affects on the brain from chronic porn/masturbation have been scientifically proven, you are most likely just too stupid or lazy to try to understand how it works. I doubt you have even seriously looked into the matter at all.

And just because I understand that internet porn when abused can be mentally damaging and addictive does not mean that I condone government censorship.

Cyber Fucker · 07-22-2013, 01:32 PM

I wonder who will take the responsibility for costs and loses caused by this. Probably no one.
For example people who needed to access certain websites but could not because they could not opt out the filter due to busy ISP support what happens quite often or who did not know what was the problem with unaccessible site at all.
Example: A guy needs to renew his domain today worth $10.000 and he cannot access registrar site due to the filter neither contact busy ISP.
Example2: A guy needs to cancel his membership today that prolongs annually (cost $200). He just got to know by an email about his membership, but wtf he cannot access a site. ISP on phone is busy, he sent an email which will be answered a few days later.
etc. etc.

I wonder also if there will be any massage or something indicating why people cannot access a certain website. It should be. Some people don't read the news and they may not know what the fuck and why they cannot access certain websites.

On a side note most of you will take thing more serious when you will see the decrease in traffic and sales. The UK is a serious adult market and I'm sure the decrease of traffic will be significant.

BFT3K · 07-22-2013, 01:45 PM

I don't pretend to understand how this will work, so this may not make any sense, but...

...if I were to get internet access from (fill in the blank) service provider, and by default the provider filtered out access to "adult sites" (however that determination is made), but then I could simply "opt-in" as a customer that does NOT want this content filtered out, then I would just simply "opt-in" and that would be that, no?

Again, I don't pretend to know any of the specific details, but if what I wrote above is close to how it would work, then why would you lose traffic or sales?

halfpint · 07-22-2013, 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K

I don't pretend to understand how this will work, so this may not make any sense, but...

...if I were to get internet access from (fill in the blank) service provider, and by default the provider filtered out access to "adult sites" (however that determination is made), but then I could simply "opt-in" as a customer that does NOT want this content filtered out, then I would just simply "opt-in" and that would be that, no?

Again, I don't pretend to know any of the specific details, but if what I wrote above is close to how it would work, then why would you lose traffic or sales?

That is one of the sugestions the other one is to have it turned on by default which you can turn off but will then automaticcally reset to on again by a certain time. They are also trying to get search engines to block certian types of search terms and these other measures as well

Other measures announced by the prime minister included:

New laws so videos streamed online in the UK will be subject to the same restrictions as those sold in shops
Search engines having until October to introduce further measures to block illegal content
Experts from the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre being given more powers to examine secretive file-sharing networks
A secure database of banned child pornography images gathered by police across the country will be used to trace illegal content and the paedophiles viewing it

Mr Cameron also called for warning pages to pop up with helpline numbers when people try to search for illegal content.

AtlantisCash · 07-22-2013, 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen

Troll? lol, hardly. The affects on the brain from chronic porn/masturbation have been scientifically proven, you are most likely just too stupid or lazy to try to understand how it works. I doubt you have even seriously looked into the matter at all.

And just because I understand that internet porn when abused can be mentally damaging and addictive does not mean that I condone government censorship.

yea yea, we were discussing about that so called porn addiction in case.

DamianJ · 07-22-2013, 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen

Troll? lol, hardly. The affects on the brain from chronic porn/masturbation have been scientifically proven, you are most likely just too stupid or lazy to try to understand how it works. I doubt you have even seriously looked into the matter at all.

And just because I understand that internet porn when abused can be mentally damaging and addictive does not mean that I condone government censorship.

And the links to peer reviewed published papers proving this are where?

DamianJ · 07-22-2013, 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen

Nonsense? I wish it was.

Well I am sure you have lots of links to peer reviewed published scientific papers proving all the utter shit you spout?

No?

Can't imagine why?

Do you watch Fox News frequently?

Thought so.

pinkz · 07-22-2013, 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VenzuelanChick

Exactly what I was thinking, Mobile porn in the UK about to go up.

it already works like this with Mobile companies, the default is family friendly, so you have to call to unblock porn, however thats a call you can make at any time and your wife doenst have to know.

not too sure about a call, I had to turn up in store with ID (Im 48 and I got carded!) to get an EE phone unblocked.

I agree if mobile access is restricted so should landline providers restrict their services in the same way by default.

pinkz · 07-22-2013, 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zealotry

Other measures being announced by Mr Cameron today include adult content filters on all new mobile phones

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-opt-rule.html

correct me if wrong, by default all mobile providers in the UK are opt in.

StickyGreen · 07-22-2013, 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamianJ

Well I am sure you have lots of links to peer reviewed published scientific papers proving all the utter shit you spout?

No?

Can't imagine why?

Do you watch Fox News frequently?

Thought so.

It's not utter shit, it's simple science. I guess you have no clue about how the brain works and what dopamine receptors are.

Sure I could dig up some links for you if I felt like it, but why should I help you out with anything? You're a piece of shit apparently. lol

And no I don't watch fucking Fox News you assumption making idiot... I don't watch any TV news at all...

Cyber Fucker · 07-22-2013, 03:57 PM

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interne...United_Kingdom
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...web-users.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/ar...line-porn.html

It seems also like they want to ban extreme porn

Quote:

The Prime Minister will also announce that pornography which depicts rape will become illegal and that it will become illegal to possess pornography which is "so extreme it can't even be purchased in a licensed sex shop

WTF they mean by this? BDSM? Gang Bang? Bukake? Spanking? Fem domination?

So what next?

Maybe same as on mobiles?

Quote:

"UK code of practice for the self-regulation of new forms of content on mobiles"[edit]

Numerous British ISPs, including BT, block many innocent sites, redirecting the user to http://btsupport.custhelp.com/app/an...ank/a_id/12756 which states:

Content blocked
In compliance with a new UK voluntary code of practice you are not able to access this site and have been redirected by the BT Content Administrator Service

This uses a barring and filtering mechanism to restrict access to all WAP and Internet sites that are considered to have an 'over 18' status. To date, these include sites which contain information on any of the following categories:

* Adult / sexually explicit
* Chat
* Criminal skills
* Drugs, alcohol and tobacco
* Gambling
* Hacking
* Hate
* Personal and dating
* Violence
* Weapons

Examples of such sites are dictionaries (e.g. http://www.urbandictionary.com/

Let's be straight with this, this is censorship and the rape of freedom of speech probably to mask unconvinced political shit.

_Richard_ · 07-22-2013, 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyber Fucker

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interne...United_Kingdom
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...web-users.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/ar...line-porn.html

It seems also like they want to ban extreme porn
WTF they mean by this? BDSM? Gang Bang? Bukake? Spanking? Fem domination?

So what next?

Maybe same as on mobiles?

Let's be straight with this, this is censorship and the rape of freedom of speech probably to mask unconvinced political shit.

why is that quoted text you posted show urbandictionary as an example?

NewNick · 07-22-2013, 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamianJ

Please post a link to a single piece of evidence that backs up that nonsense.

He does not need to - it is already accepted as fact by the Daily Mail, and our glorious leader can sniff out a vote at 300 yards.

No need to let logic get in the way when you have made up statistics to quote.

Cyber Fucker · 07-22-2013, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_

why is that quoted text you posted show urbandictionary as an example?

I don't know. It's like that on Wikipedia as an example.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interne..._on_mobiles.22

I can only assume that ISPs blocked mobile accesses to it on because of "inappropriate" content. Probably because of definitions of "inappropriate" words or something.
I never really used mobile web, now it got me curious what I can access and what not on my phone.

RegUser · 07-22-2013, 04:22 PM

porn should definately be controlled, the mother fucking tube sites and even youtube have made a bloody mess. There are no warning pages, nothing nada. All the hardcore shit right in front of you. That includes children as well. Excess of everything is bad.
Internet needs policing

Cyber Fucker · 07-22-2013, 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RegUser

porn should definately be controlled, the mother fucking tube sites and even youtube have made a bloody mess. There are no warning pages, nothing nada. All the hardcore shit right in front of you. That includes children as well. Excess of everything is bad.
Internet needs policing

Nope. It's people who click and decide where they click and who should have freedom of making choice where they want to click. Illegal content

Quote:

That includes children..

is illegal and should be fought and removed by law enforcement agencies.

wehateporn · 07-22-2013, 04:48 PM

Don't fall for the 'Save The Children' excuse, they use the same to go to war and kills thousands of children, this is a pretext to create a mechanism for Internet censorship; porn is just the thin end of the wedge.

Due · 07-22-2013, 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyber Fucker

Oh my, that's fucked up. It will make people mad. It surely sounds like some insane censorship shit. Did they even ask people if they want it? Where is the referendum? I'm sure most society would be against, only some religious freaks would be pro this bullshit. So soon GFY.com will get unaccessible from the United Kingdom unless a one opted out bullshit filter.

Who will decide which sites are ok and which are not? Any site that has user created content had, have or will have explicit adult content, that's how the web function.

I already posted this in the other thread:

And I still think this would end like this.

if there should be a filter then the way it's made for mobile phones are perfect.
you basically can't use it unless you opt out of it.
it's not a porn filter its designed to remove everything you don't wish a 8 should see, including violence, bad language etc.
people who can enjoy the internet with such limitations would not be your typical customer.

RegUser · 07-22-2013, 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyber Fucker

Nope. It's people who click and decide where they click and who should have freedom of making choice where they want to click. Illegal content is illegal and should be fought and removed by law enforcement agencies.

by children I meant our children who can find such hardcore in your face porn shit with a single search and click.
There are well defined rules for brick and mortar shop to display and sell such stuff. Internet became a fucking jungle.
Paysites are finished anyways, now it is tubes's turn to face the carnage

DamianJ · 07-23-2013, 01:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen

It's not utter shit, it's simple science.

Yet you can't provide a single link to a peer reviewed paper?

How odd...

Dirty Dane · 07-23-2013, 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dpapa

Why we are so worried. Its like an email to opti-inn Those who got credit card will opt inn whoch will filter traffic. I am pretty sure productivity and signup ratio will get increase. We run network from uk and when this impose we will opt inn surely

Ratios up won't help much if total sales goes down. Unless you have huge costs per freebie.

AtlantisCash · 07-24-2013, 12:08 AM

Guys, i suggest we launch a campaign against this bs, so what we need is gather contacts of all major newspapers, tvs, political parties, isps and the companies who work mostly on internet and the NGOs that fights for civil liberties.

Help gathering this info and let's start out a campaign before it's too late.

AtlantisCash · 07-24-2013, 01:56 AM

bump bump

RubyGoodnight · 07-24-2013, 02:03 AM

Cameron is already starting the u-turn on this one.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...e-8726991.html

wehateporn · 07-24-2013, 02:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RubyGoodnight

Cameron is already starting the u-turn on this one.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...e-8726991.html

Let's hope WeHatePorn.com slips through this filter then

Of course, this was never about porn at all, just about getting the filter in place

DVTimes · 07-24-2013, 03:13 AM

Just give them mp's a grand, and they will loby for you.

its easy to get things done your way in the uk, as mp's take back handers.

DVTimes · 07-24-2013, 03:20 AM

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...e-8726991.html

Filtering porn: problems with the plan

Can the filters work effectively?

Filtering pornography is fiendishly difficult to do accurately. Although the technology is improving, filters set up in hospitals several years ago had to be switched off after doctors were unable to access clinical studies on breast cancer.

Even if they do work, can they be circumvented?

Some schools have used web filters to stop children accessing Facebook when they were meant to be working. But some children reportedly got around them by using “proxy websites” that re-diverted them to Facebook around the filters. Such problems could also exist for pornography – while parents think there are safeguards in place.

What is pornography?

Some women’s groups believe that Page 3 in The Sun is pornography – not a view David Cameron shares. Computer algorithms may not be the best means of deciding what is and what is not pornographic.

Do we want to live in a nanny state?

The basis of Mr Cameron’s argument is that people should have to make a conscious decision to watch pornography. But civil liberties groups take the opposite approach and accuse him of hypocrisy. It was Mr Cameron who used to decry Labour’s nanny state.

And what about marital harmony?

Some men (and women) in happy relationships may secretly watch pornography without their partner’s knowledge. This, as Mr Cameron admits, will force them to fess up or abstain. A husband whose wife finds he has secretly turned off the porn filter could find himself in trouble – possibly straining the institution Mr Cameron cares most about: marriage.

AtlantisCash · 07-24-2013, 04:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtlantisCash

Guys, i suggest we launch a campaign against this bs, so what we need is gather contacts of all major newspapers, tvs, political parties, isps and the companies who work mostly on internet and the NGOs that fights for civil liberties.

Help gathering this info and let's start out a campaign before it's too late.

Guys as i said let's something more than talking on the board, i will be the one WHO voluntary starts campaign, help me gather the contact infos and we are good to go.

i expect a campaign like have been done against file lockers here, so let's gather and make a list of foundations and individuals to contact.

RubyGoodnight · 07-24-2013, 05:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtlantisCash

Guys as i said let's something more than talking on the board, i will be the one WHO voluntary starts campaign, help me gather the contact infos and we are good to go.

i expect a campaign like have been done against file lockers here, so let's gather and make a list of foundations and individuals to contact.

You can start by signing this. http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/51746

100K sigs and they'll debate it in the House of Commons.

SamChapman · 07-24-2013, 05:42 AM

This is workable in practice but unworkable in reality. Who decides what's considered porn? David Cameron himself admits that 'page 3' type material won't be blocked. What about adult dating sites? Will they suffer because of the filter? Terrible news for the UK if it goes ahead. Watch this space...

AtlantisCash · 07-24-2013, 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RubyGoodnight

You can start by signing this. http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/51746

100K sigs and they'll debate it in the House of Commons.

'^

Done, but , i believe we should do something more.

i also make a thread regarding this e-petition or You do it if English is your mother language.

_Richard_ · 07-24-2013, 07:35 AM

some mp in canada is harping about it now:

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/canadians-o...214612025.html

'A Tory MP from Winnipeg wants to see Canadians "opt in" before they’re allowed to view pornography online.
Conservative MP Joy Smith says she wants to see Canada adopt legislation that requires residents to request access to pornography from their internet service providers or have all pornographic material preemptively blocked.'

however, the article and basically everyone talking about it thinks it's some cute joke

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtlantisCash

i also make a thread regarding this e-petition or You do it if English is your mother language.

need uk address

msk19994 · 07-24-2013, 07:45 AM

Oh Noez now how will men jerk them selves off in the uk if they dont have a gf or wife :P

BlackCrayon · 07-24-2013, 07:47 AM

thats gonna cause some problems in the homes of many men. this law will also bring with it more domestic abuse, divorce, etc.

BlackCrayon · 07-24-2013, 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen

Used to be if you wanted porn online you had to actually pay for it... now anyone of any age can watch millions of videos for free instantly on the fucking tube sites... which is why we have problems with young people getting hooked on this shit and fucking up the way they view women and sex and literally screwing up the chemical dopamine reactions in their brains, there are lots of new studies coming out about the negative effects of chronic porn use on the brain... no one should be surprised that laws like this are going to start being introduced by all these fucking orwellian governments who want to control every aspect of our lives... get used to it because you know you ain't gonna do shit about it...

this coming from a guy names stickygreen. newsflash...marijuana does the same thing. as does chocolate, and fast food, etc, etc.

Dankasaur · 07-24-2013, 08:17 AM

Cyber Fucker · 07-24-2013, 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RubyGoodnight

You can start by signing this. http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/51746

100K sigs and they'll debate it in the House of Commons.

Will this change anything? I mean they seem to not care what society wants.
I put it in my sig. I guess the necessary number of votes could be gathered very quickly if biggest adult sites put some notice about it in visible place.

_Richard_ · 07-24-2013, 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyber Fucker

Will this change anything? I mean they seem to not care what society wants.
I put it in my sig. I guess the necessary number of votes could get gathered very quickly if biggest adult sites put some notice about it in visible place.

uk boys need to cough up some phony addresses

sandman! · 07-24-2013, 10:05 AM

shimmy2 · 07-24-2013, 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB

Right now some of you dick heads are plotting ways to get around it so you can shove black dicks down their throat even if they opt out.

AtlantisCash · 07-24-2013, 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyber Fucker

Will this change anything? I mean they seem to not care what society wants.
I put it in my sig. I guess the necessary number of votes could be gathered very quickly if biggest adult sites put some notice about it in visible place.

Good idea, Let's ask all adult webmasters to put some nessage stating that on their websites.

Best-In-BC · 07-24-2013, 10:43 AM

Petitions, ROFL

AtlantisCash · 07-24-2013, 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_

need uk address

i don't know about that, although there are to options to choose from weather you are from uk or outside.

pornmasta · 07-24-2013, 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scott McD

The UK government priority list is laughable...

07-22-2013, 10:07 AM	#51
Scott McD Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Glasgow, Scotland Posts: 67,795	The UK government priority list is laughable... __________________ I Buy My High Quality Traffic Here, You Should Too!

07-22-2013, 12:15 PM	#55
The Porn Nerd Living The Dream Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Inside a Monitor Posts: 19,521	Good - bring this to the USA immediately! __________________ My Affiliate Programs: Porn Nerd Cash \| Porn Showcase \| Aggressive Gold Over 90 paysites to promote! Now on Teams: peabodymedia

07-22-2013, 01:32 PM	#58
Cyber Fucker Hmm Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: On an endless road around the world for rock and roll. Posts: 12,642	I wonder who will take the responsibility for costs and loses caused by this. Probably no one. For example people who needed to access certain websites but could not because they could not opt out the filter due to busy ISP support what happens quite often or who did not know what was the problem with unaccessible site at all. Example: A guy needs to renew his domain today worth $10.000 and he cannot access registrar site due to the filter neither contact busy ISP. Example2: A guy needs to cancel his membership today that prolongs annually (cost $200). He just got to know by an email about his membership, but wtf he cannot access a site. ISP on phone is busy, he sent an email which will be answered a few days later. etc. etc. I wonder also if there will be any massage or something indicating why people cannot access a certain website. It should be. Some people don't read the news and they may not know what the fuck and why they cannot access certain websites. On a side note most of you will take thing more serious when you will see the decrease in traffic and sales. The UK is a serious adult market and I'm sure the decrease of traffic will be significant. __________________ Last edited by Cyber Fucker; 07-22-2013 at 01:34 PM..

07-22-2013, 01:45 PM	#59
BFT3K Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Narnia Posts: 10,764	I don't pretend to understand how this will work, so this may not make any sense, but... ...if I were to get internet access from (fill in the blank) service provider, and by default the provider filtered out access to "adult sites" (however that determination is made), but then I could simply "opt-in" as a customer that does NOT want this content filtered out, then I would just simply "opt-in" and that would be that, no? Again, I don't pretend to know any of the specific details, but if what I wrote above is close to how it would work, then why would you lose traffic or sales? Last edited by BFT3K; 07-22-2013 at 01:48 PM..

07-22-2013, 04:48 PM	#73
wehateporn Promoting Debate on GFY Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 27,173	Don't fall for the 'Save The Children' excuse, they use the same to go to war and kills thousands of children, this is a pretext to create a mechanism for Internet censorship; porn is just the thin end of the wedge. __________________ Sexy Girls Teasing

07-22-2013, 11:14 AM	#53
AtlantisCash Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Istanbul - Turkiye Posts: 3,169	i posted this 1-2 months ago and except few, none of you motherfuckers gave damn shit about it, this is our job, our business and we should do something to protect not only our self interests but also the liberties itself. a troll at the first page talks about damaging affects of porn, how easy we people are seriously to be fooled by nonsense studies and bs? we all know that yet 20-30 years ago these doctors with tv shows smoking cigarettes appeared on tv within telling to public how smoking is healthy etc, but today they talk shit about cigarettes to sell those "end smoking addiction crap) and who knows what else they aimed. don't buy every fucking so called study, most of the time what ever you see on media is plain bullshit. again i say let's do something, we are community and we can do lots of things if we want.

07-22-2013, 12:17 PM	#56
BFT3K Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Narnia Posts: 10,764	What is the definition of "porn" ? Is my boobs-only site considered "porn" for example? http://www.BoobieMovies.com/Big-Boun.../windex01.html

07-22-2013, 04:22 PM	#71
RegUser Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 1,472	porn should definately be controlled, the mother fucking tube sites and even youtube have made a bloody mess. There are no warning pages, nothing nada. All the hardcore shit right in front of you. That includes children as well. Excess of everything is bad. Internet needs policing

07-24-2013, 12:08 AM	#78
AtlantisCash Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Istanbul - Turkiye Posts: 3,169	Guys, i suggest we launch a campaign against this bs, so what we need is gather contacts of all major newspapers, tvs, political parties, isps and the companies who work mostly on internet and the NGOs that fights for civil liberties. Help gathering this info and let's start out a campaign before it's too late.

07-24-2013, 01:56 AM	#79
AtlantisCash Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Istanbul - Turkiye Posts: 3,169	bump bump

07-24-2013, 02:03 AM	#80
RubyGoodnight Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: SE New England Posts: 577	Cameron is already starting the u-turn on this one. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...e-8726991.html

07-24-2013, 03:13 AM	#82
DVTimes xxx Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: UK Posts: 31,544	Just give them mp's a grand, and they will loby for you. its easy to get things done your way in the uk, as mp's take back handers. __________________ The Affiliate Program

07-24-2013, 03:20 AM	#83
DVTimes xxx Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: UK Posts: 31,544	http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...e-8726991.html Filtering porn: problems with the plan Can the filters work effectively? Filtering pornography is fiendishly difficult to do accurately. Although the technology is improving, filters set up in hospitals several years ago had to be switched off after doctors were unable to access clinical studies on breast cancer. Even if they do work, can they be circumvented? Some schools have used web filters to stop children accessing Facebook when they were meant to be working. But some children reportedly got around them by using “proxy websites” that re-diverted them to Facebook around the filters. Such problems could also exist for pornography – while parents think there are safeguards in place. What is pornography? Some women’s groups believe that Page 3 in The Sun is pornography – not a view David Cameron shares. Computer algorithms may not be the best means of deciding what is and what is not pornographic. Do we want to live in a nanny state? The basis of Mr Cameron’s argument is that people should have to make a conscious decision to watch pornography. But civil liberties groups take the opposite approach and accuse him of hypocrisy. It was Mr Cameron who used to decry Labour’s nanny state. And what about marital harmony? Some men (and women) in happy relationships may secretly watch pornography without their partner’s knowledge. This, as Mr Cameron admits, will force them to fess up or abstain. A husband whose wife finds he has secretly turned off the porn filter could find himself in trouble – possibly straining the institution Mr Cameron cares most about: marriage. __________________ The Affiliate Program

07-24-2013, 05:42 AM	#86
SamChapman Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: London Posts: 1	This is workable in practice but unworkable in reality. Who decides what's considered porn? David Cameron himself admits that 'page 3' type material won't be blocked. What about adult dating sites? Will they suffer because of the filter? Terrible news for the UK if it goes ahead. Watch this space... __________________ Webmaster for http://www.local-sex-search.com

07-24-2013, 07:45 AM	#89
msk19994 Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2012 Posts: 79	Oh Noez now how will men jerk them selves off in the uk if they dont have a gf or wife :P

07-24-2013, 07:47 AM	#90
BlackCrayon Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Ottawa Posts: 19,631	thats gonna cause some problems in the homes of many men. this law will also bring with it more domestic abuse, divorce, etc. __________________ you don't know you're wearing a leash if you sit by the peg all day..

07-24-2013, 08:17 AM	#92
Dankasaur So Fucking Fossilized Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2011 Posts: 1,432

07-24-2013, 10:05 AM	#95
sandman! Icq: 14420613 Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: chicago Posts: 15,432	__________________ Need WebHosting ? Email me for some great deals [email protected]

07-24-2013, 10:43 AM	#98
Best-In-BC Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 9,506	Petitions, ROFL __________________ Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More Unparked domains burning a hole in your pocket? 5 Simple Ways to Make Easy $$$ from Unused Domains