Massachusetts court says 'upskirt' photos are legal - GoFuckYourself.com

PornoMonster · 03-05-2014, 09:57 PM

http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/05/us/mas...html?hpt=hp_t2

Massachusetts' highest court ruled Wednesday that it is not illegal to secretly photograph underneath a person's clothing -- a practice known as "upskirting" -- prompting one prosecutor to call for a revision of state law.

The high court ruled that the practice did not violate the law because the women who were photographed while riding Boston public transportation were not nude or partially nude.

"A female passenger on a MBTA trolley who is wearing a skirt, dress, or the like covering these parts of her body is not a person who is 'partially nude,' no matter what is or is not underneath the skirt by way of underwear or other clothing," wrote Justice Margot Botsford of the state Supreme Judicial Court.

Harmon · 03-05-2014, 10:03 PM

It's still a creepy and disgusting thing to do. If I ever caught somebody doing that to my wife or kids, I'd fucking snap their fucking neck right then and there. Anybody that supports this ruling should have their kneecaps snapped.

My guess is that the case was presented wrong.

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude · 03-05-2014, 10:10 PM

ADG

sandman! · 03-05-2014, 10:20 PM

im sure there will be a new law that fixes this

JockoHomo · 03-05-2014, 10:58 PM

I think it's perfectly fine to shoot up some whores skirt. If they don't like it then wear fucking pants bitches!

Harmon · 03-05-2014, 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JockoHomo

I think it's perfectly fine to shoot up some whores skirt. If they don't like it then wear fucking pants bitches!

Why don't you just go have some more little boys piss on you, faggot.

Axeman · 03-05-2014, 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sandman!

im sure there will be a new law that fixes this

Yes, they are already moving to close the loophole in the language to match other states. I believe even in the ruling, it was suggested that it be fixed.

Seth Manson · 03-05-2014, 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harmon

It's still a creepy and disgusting thing to do. If I ever caught somebody doing that to my wife or kids, I'd fucking snap their fucking neck right then and there.

How well could you provide for them from prison?

Harmon · 03-05-2014, 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seth Manson

How well could you provide for them from prison?

Why don't you give it a go and we'll find out.

Captain Kawaii · 03-05-2014, 11:42 PM

What is the sound of Japanese producers packing for Boston?

brassmonkey · 03-06-2014, 12:13 AM

damn its on now!!

OneHungLo · 03-06-2014, 12:37 AM

Tootourist2014 · 03-06-2014, 12:41 AM

that's some good PR in that pic.

ErectMedia · 03-06-2014, 12:52 AM

Ridership should go up now, although it will be 80% male

John-ACWM · 03-06-2014, 01:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude

ADG

JockoHomo · 03-06-2014, 03:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harmon

Why don't you just go have some more little boys piss on you, faggot.

You mean like this faggot?

Seth Manson · 03-06-2014, 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harmon

Why don't you give it a go and we'll find out.

Oh noes!!11!!1

harmon gonna kill meh!!11!1!1!!!

wehateporn · 03-06-2014, 06:07 AM

Guy who filmed this needs to go to jail

seeandsee · 03-06-2014, 06:17 AM

freaking freaks can do this now with law protecting them, nice

notinmybackyard · 03-06-2014, 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harmon

It's still a creepy and disgusting thing to do. If I ever caught somebody doing that to my wife or kids, I'd fucking snap their fucking neck right then and there. Anybody that supports this ruling should have their kneecaps snapped.

I agree with you.
The problem today is society is too civilized and the assholes are walking all over us.

dehash · 03-06-2014, 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harmon

It's still a creepy and disgusting thing to do. If I ever caught somebody doing that to my wife or kids, I'd fucking snap their fucking neck right then and there. Anybody that supports this ruling should have their kneecaps snapped.

My guess is that the case was presented wrong.

Man, sometimes I think you account was stolen and you are not aware. Or you share it with someone. Or you you have two person live in one body. :troll

InfoGuy · 03-06-2014, 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornoMonster

http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/05/us/mas...html?hpt=hp_t2

Massachusetts' highest court ruled Wednesday that it is not illegal to secretly photograph underneath a person's clothing -- a practice known as "upskirting" -- prompting one prosecutor to call for a revision of state law.

The high court ruled that the practice did not violate the law because the women who were photographed while riding Boston public transportation were not nude or partially nude.

"A female passenger on a MBTA trolley who is wearing a skirt, dress, or the like covering these parts of her body is not a person who is 'partially nude,' no matter what is or is not underneath the skirt by way of underwear or other clothing," wrote Justice Margot Botsford of the state Supreme Judicial Court.

It's interesting that the judge was a woman.

borked · 03-06-2014, 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notinmybackyard

I agree with you.
The problem today is society is too civilized and the assholes are walking all over us.

going out on a lynching limb here, but I've never understood the hoopla behind upskirts from both sides:

1) From the voyeur's side - why is looking up a skirt any more thrilling that walking down a beach in summer? You see the same thing right?

For #2, I have to admit, I'm male so I wouldn't understand... but:
2) Why do women detest being spied up the skirt, yet walk down a beach in the skimpiest of bikinis possible?

I'm using the beach/bikini scenario as my sole example of no real difference in what is seen, with the caveat that yes, lingerie isn't the same as a bikini (but not far from) and you don't have ST wings sticking out from bikini bottoms...
But that aside, I don't get it, from both perspectives. Certainly not to the limit of "breaking someone's neck"

notinmybackyard · 03-07-2014, 05:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by borked

going out on a lynching limb here, but I've never understood the hoopla behind upskirts from both sides:

1) From the voyeur's side - why is looking up a skirt any more thrilling that walking down a beach in summer? You see the same thing right?

For #2, I have to admit, I'm male so I wouldn't understand... but:
2) Why do women detest being spied up the skirt, yet walk down a beach in the skimpiest of bikinis possible?

I'm using the beach/bikini scenario as my sole example of no real difference in what is seen, with the caveat that yes, lingerie isn't the same as a bikini (but not far from) and you don't have ST wings sticking out from bikini bottoms...
But that aside, I don't get it, from both perspectives. Certainly not to the limit of "breaking someone's neck"

The upskirt pervert is a mentally a little boy doing something naughty. The trip is therefore 50% infantile curioisities about zizis and bumsies. The other 50% is the possibility that he will be caught.

As for the rest,
I do not advocate breaking a neck for non-consentual upskirt looking. But I think it would be ok to shove that cell phone/camera in their eye socket. Or perhaps break a finger or two to stop them clicking. It is less for the punishement of the perpetrator and more to send a message to other perverts considering doing the same.

dehash · 03-07-2014, 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by borked

going out on a lynching limb here, but I've never understood the hoopla behind upskirts from both sides:

1) From the voyeur's side - why is looking up a skirt any more thrilling that walking down a beach in summer? You see the same thing right?

For #2, I have to admit, I'm male so I wouldn't understand... but:
2) Why do women detest being spied up the skirt, yet walk down a beach in the skimpiest of bikinis possible?

I'm using the beach/bikini scenario as my sole example of no real difference in what is seen, with the caveat that yes, lingerie isn't the same as a bikini (but not far from) and you don't have ST wings sticking out from bikini bottoms...
But that aside, I don't get it, from both perspectives. Certainly not to the limit of "breaking someone's neck"

Because it is free will show off on the beach against someone sneaking under girl skirt (when she is hiding her legs).

Harmon · 03-07-2014, 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notinmybackyard

The upskirt pervert is a mentally a little boy doing something naughty. The trip is therefore 50% infantile curioisities about zizis and bumsies. The other 50% is the possibility that he will be caught.

As for the rest,
I do not advocate breaking a neck for non-consentual upskirt looking. But I think it would be ok to shove that cell phone/camera in their eye socket. Or perhaps break a finger or two to stop them clicking. It is less for the punishement of the perpetrator and more to send a message to other perverts considering doing the same.

I officially like you.

michael.kickass · 03-07-2014, 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notinmybackyard

The upskirt pervert is a mentally a little boy doing something naughty. The trip is therefore 50% infantile curioisities about zizis and bumsies. The other 50% is the possibility that he will be caught.

As for the rest,
I do not advocate breaking a neck for non-consentual upskirt looking. But I think it would be ok to shove that cell phone/camera in their eye socket. Or perhaps break a finger or two to stop them clicking. It is less for the punishement of the perpetrator and more to send a message to other perverts considering doing the same.

Agreed!!

Scott McD · 03-07-2014, 10:04 AM

baddog · 03-07-2014, 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn

Guy who filmed this needs to go to jail

You should be committed.

03-05-2014, 09:57 PM	#1
PornoMonster Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 2,257	Massachusetts court says 'upskirt' photos are legal http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/05/us/mas...html?hpt=hp_t2 Massachusetts' highest court ruled Wednesday that it is not illegal to secretly photograph underneath a person's clothing -- a practice known as "upskirting" -- prompting one prosecutor to call for a revision of state law. The high court ruled that the practice did not violate the law because the women who were photographed while riding Boston public transportation were not nude or partially nude. "A female passenger on a MBTA trolley who is wearing a skirt, dress, or the like covering these parts of her body is not a person who is 'partially nude,' no matter what is or is not underneath the skirt by way of underwear or other clothing," wrote Justice Margot Botsford of the state Supreme Judicial Court. __________________ $6 a Month 4 Blade Razors, 4 Cartridges, Includes shipping! Domains 4 Sale CashForVideos.com - Pussy.biz - FootPorn.com - SoloMovie.com - CollegeGirlCams.com - AmateurCamGirls.com - PR3 4 Letter Domain

03-05-2014, 10:10 PM	#3
AsianDivaGirlsWebDude Purveyor, Fine Asian Porn Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: San Francisco Bay Area Posts: 38,323	ADG __________________ Asian Diva Girls - Exclusive Photos and Videos Asian Diva Girls Affiliate Program (50% ccBill Revshare)

03-05-2014, 10:20 PM	#4
sandman! Icq: 14420613 Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: chicago Posts: 15,432	im sure there will be a new law that fixes this __________________ Need WebHosting ? Email me for some great deals [email protected]

03-06-2014, 12:13 AM	#11
brassmonkey Pay It Forward Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Yo Mama House Posts: 77,116	damn its on now!! __________________ TRUMP 2025 KEKAW!!! - The Laken Riley Act Is Law! DACA ENDED - SUPPORT AZ HCR 2060 52R - email: brassballz-at-techie.com

03-06-2014, 12:41 AM	#13
Tootourist2014 Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2014 Posts: 49	that's some good PR in that pic. __________________ Tootot Office YT Guide

03-05-2014, 10:03 PM	#2
Harmon ( ͡ʘ╭͜ʖ╮͡ʘ) Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 20,006	It's still a creepy and disgusting thing to do. If I ever caught somebody doing that to my wife or kids, I'd fucking snap their fucking neck right then and there. Anybody that supports this ruling should have their kneecaps snapped. My guess is that the case was presented wrong. __________________ [email protected]

03-05-2014, 10:58 PM	#5
JockoHomo "LIKE I GIVE A SHIT" Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Dark side of the moon Posts: 1,523	I think it's perfectly fine to shoot up some whores skirt. If they don't like it then wear fucking pants bitches!

03-05-2014, 11:42 PM	#10
Captain Kawaii So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 6,748	What is the sound of Japanese producers packing for Boston?

03-06-2014, 12:37 AM	#12
OneHungLo So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Location: Your mom's front hole Posts: 40,906

03-06-2014, 12:52 AM	#14
ErectMedia Confirmed Chicago Pimp Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Chicago Posts: 7,100	Ridership should go up now, although it will be 80% male __________________ Domain Name Registration Web3 Domains

03-06-2014, 06:07 AM	#18
wehateporn Promoting Debate on GFY Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 27,173	Guy who filmed this needs to go to jail __________________ Sexy Girls Teasing

03-06-2014, 06:17 AM	#19
seeandsee Check SIG! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Europe (Skype: gojkoas) Posts: 50,945	freaking freaks can do this now with law protecting them, nice __________________ BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year Contact here

03-07-2014, 10:04 AM	#28
Scott McD Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Glasgow, Scotland Posts: 67,795	__________________ I Buy My High Quality Traffic Here, You Should Too!