The End of the British Royal Family - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

PR_Phil · 08-08-2014, 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ross

I'm by no means a Royal.

I'll stop bowing when you walk in the room then

NewNick · 08-08-2014, 06:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd

The Royal Family of England are really GERMAN by heritage. About 100 years ago their changed their name to the made-up moniker 'Windsor' during WWI. Fucking bullshit, and why ANYONE cares about these in-bred freaks is beyond me. PLUS when brits go all ga-ga over these Royal Twits they seem to ignore/forget the above fact (they are GERMAN, not ENGLISH you bloody wankers).

I am an AMERICAN and I do not like KINGS (or QUEENS).

Fuck !

No shit.

georgeyw · 08-08-2014, 06:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manfap

What does it cost when Obama/Chinese visit?

Hardly comparable, Kim kardashian or economic heavy weight, hmmm which is the better investment?

Manfap · 08-08-2014, 06:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by georgeyw

Hardly comparable, Kim kardashian or economic heavy weight, hmmm which is the better investment?

Didnt you have the chance to vote on becoming a republic?

I thought the Poms were the whinny ones.. you're doing a pretty good job.

Still about 20 billion in trade between the 2 counties, US is only 35.
If the British didn't buy all your fosters, you'd be stuck with it.

Mutt · 08-08-2014, 08:08 AM

The British Royal Family are not merely German, they are Jews, Jews I tell you!!!

Quote:

There have been widespread rumours since George 1 ( coronation 1714 ) that the British Royal Family are secretly jewish. In 1694 the Bank of England was created giving control of the British money supply to several jewish banking families. Seven years later in 1701 the Bevis Marks Synagogue was established in the City of London by the Bank of England.

In 1714 the Hanoverian Royal Family were invited by the City of London to be the British Royal Family , the Hanoverian Royal Family later changed their family name to Windsor. The Hanoverian Royal Family were originally a jewish family that claimed to have converted to Christianity in the 15th Century. The Sovereign Bible that all British Kings and Queens use at their Coronation has been in Hebrew since 1714.
All British Monarchs have to attend secret ceremonies at the Bevis Marks Synagogue (established 1701) in the City of London the night before their Coronation , these ceremonies are always attended by Britains? senior jews and bankers.

Queen Victoria always claimed to be a direct descendent of jewish King David. Several items in the Crown Jewels are engraved with the Star of David.In all Royal Palaces and other premises both Saturday and Sunday are treated equally as the Sabbath Day.
The Prince of Wales, Charles, was circumcised by Rabbi Jacob Snowman M.D, at the time the leading mohel in London and the circumciser to the Royal Family. This has long been a source of pride within the British jewish community.Rabbi Jacob Snowman M.D has only ever circumcised jewish patients. All British Kings have been circumcised by jewish Doctors since 1714.

Prince Charles has his own blue velvet kippa with a royal crest on it in silver to wear at jewish weddings , he also has other jewish regalia the exact purpose of which is not known. At ALL synagogues in the UK two daily prayers are always held, one for the Royal Family and one for the State of Israel.

Princess Diana?s mother, Frances Shand Kydd, was jewish ? born Frances Ruth Burke Roche, a Rothschild. That is sufficient for Princess Diana to be certified as jewish, as well as her son, Prince William, the future King of England. This also makes Prince Harry jewish , it is believed his appearance in a Nazi uniform at a party in January 2005 was his confused reaction to realising he was jewish.

Princess Kate?s mother, Carole Goldsmith (maiden name ) is the daughter of Ronald Goldsmith and Dorothy Harrison who were both jewish. That makes Carole Goldsmith jewish and, according to jewish law, her daughter Princess Kate Middleton would also be Bearing this in mind that would make Prince William and Princess Kate?s baby boy Prince George born on 23rd July 2013 jewish as well.

aka123 · 08-08-2014, 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt

The British Royal Family are not merely German, they are Jews, Jews I tell you!!!

The horror.

Mutt · 08-08-2014, 08:40 AM

Quote:

Upon hearing that his cousin had changed the name of the British royal house to Windsor, German Emperor Wilhelm II remarked jokingly that he planned to see Shakespeare's play "The Merry Wives of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha", a play on the actual title of Shakespeare's work The Merry Wives of Windsor.

What a cutup that Wilhelm was.

The Porn Nerd · 08-08-2014, 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aka123

Royals have traditionally wed cross country, that's how they have made alliances with another countries. It's really not a big deal. These Germans didn't invade England to take the crown, one of them married English queen and the descendents got the father's family name.

Quote:

Originally Posted by RazorSharpe

You're making my point for me really ....

Yah but the Royals are all so BRITISH hoity-toity about it. "We're BRITISH and we're ROYALTY (better than you punters) and we're fucking RICH and we're BRITISH..."

No you aren't, you are GERMAN you bloody "Windsors".

Achtung baby!

Scott McD · 08-08-2014, 11:58 AM

The only Royal worth hitting!

georgeyw · 08-08-2014, 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manfap

Didnt you have the chance to vote on becoming a republic?

I thought the Poms were the whinny ones.. you're doing a pretty good job.

Still about 20 billion in trade between the 2 counties, US is only 35.
If the British didn't buy all your fosters, you'd be stuck with it.

So you turn to insukts for what reason?

aka123 · 08-08-2014, 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd

Yah but the Royals are all so BRITISH hoity-toity about it. "We're BRITISH and we're ROYALTY (better than you punters) and we're fucking RICH and we're BRITISH..."

No you aren't, you are GERMAN you bloody "Windsors".

Achtung baby!

Okay, so who you Americans are? Exactly?

LOL.

I have relatives in US and Canada, and their parents or grandparents and so on weren't Americans when they moved in. But maybe they are now sooo... Americans.. soo Americans. Hallelujah, God bles America.

And damn those fucking fake British Windsors.

Manfap · 08-08-2014, 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by georgeyw

So you turn to insukts for what reason?

No insults there at all.
The country has the choice to have them or not. The British dont get that option.

scarlettcontent · 08-08-2014, 02:04 PM

royals rock

rogueteens · 08-08-2014, 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd

That England was conquered many times and morphed into what it is today.

really?

rogueteens · 08-08-2014, 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd

Yes, thank you for pointing out how much better America is. :D

Indians never ruled shit, and obviously someone named Obama didn't feel the need to change his name. But if he was British he'd change it to Marley. LOL

so you guys have now decided that he is American after all? birth certificate or not?

The Porn Nerd · 08-08-2014, 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aka123

Okay, so who you Americans are? Exactly?

LOL.

I have relatives in US and Canada, and their parents or grandparents and so on weren't Americans when they moved in. But maybe they are now sooo... Americans.. soo Americans. Hallelujah, God bles America.

And damn those fucking fake British Windsors.

Glad you are finally seeing things my way. :D

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogueteens

really?

Yup. You can start in 1066 with William the Bloody Conquerer if you want tho some would say Rome long before then. Then there's the French (the Royal language of the Court was not English but bloody FRENCH for a couple hundred years). Then there are those pesky Vikings...

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogueteens

so you guys have now decided that he is American after all? birth certificate or not?

Being a country of immigrants there's bound to be a bureaucratic glitch here or there.

Mutt · 08-08-2014, 07:12 PM

So I continued reading about the British royal family - it's incredible how many lunatics attempted to assassinate ol' Queen Victoria.

rogueteens · 08-09-2014, 12:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd

Yup. You can start in 1066 with William the Bloody Conquerer if you want tho some would say Rome long before then. Then there's the French (the Royal language of the Court was not English but bloody FRENCH for a couple hundred years). Then there are those pesky Vikings...

okay, so after 1066, how many times was England successfully invaded?

The Porn Nerd · 08-09-2014, 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogueteens

okay, so after 1066, how many times was England successfully invaded?

Once is enough bro. LOL

"Invaded" is one thing, 'conquered' is another. You can be conquered without firing a shot. How did the FRENCH impose THEIR language on the ENGLISH court for 200+ years?

Then we have all the "in-fighting" like the War of the Roses, the Scottish rebellion (Braveheart), the irish rebellions, on and on (and let's not even bring up those capitulating WELSH fuckers).

Just saying that "England" is an amalgamation of Roman, French, Norsemen (Vikings), Celts, Druids, Germans and God knows who else, all mixing together to form "Britain". That's why you have blond Brits and redheaded Brits and black-haired Brits and so on. it is NOT one clear line of succession to form some British dynasty. All of which is fine IF today's current Britons didn't get all mushy-faced over "royalty" that isn't even from their own bloody country.

Just sayin'. LOL

rogueteens · 08-09-2014, 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd

Once is enough bro. LOL

"Invaded" is one thing, 'conquered' is another. You can be conquered without firing a shot. How did the FRENCH impose THEIR language on the ENGLISH court for 200+ years?

Then we have all the "in-fighting" like the War of the Roses, the Scottish rebellion (Braveheart), the irish rebellions, on and on (and let's not even bring up those capitulating WELSH fuckers).

Just saying that "England" is an amalgamation of Roman, French, Norsemen (Vikings), Celts, Druids, Germans and God knows who else, all mixing together to form "Britain". That's why you have blond Brits and redheaded Brits and black-haired Brits and so on. it is NOT one clear line of succession to form some British dynasty. All of which is fine IF today's current Britons didn't get all mushy-faced over "royalty" that isn't even from their own bloody country.

Just sayin'. LOL

So your original point was wrong? England has not been conquered many times.

LOL, you cannot even distinguish the difference between Britain and England!

And while we are talking about your fail, you do realise that the French, Norse, Celts (not that they ever existed as Celts anyway) and Germans were all branches of the same root tribe?
The Druids were an indigenous religious order - not an invading tribe!
Read up on the real Braveheart and you'll see that it was mainly a scot on scot fight, not what Hollywood tells you is history.
The French imposed their language on the English court? LOL! You have failed on every single point you tried to make!

Your post was very funny indeed. Gave me a right chuckle.

aka123 · 08-09-2014, 10:40 AM

Britain has been conquered some times and for other times part of it, and it has had impact to it's population. Also Britains own rule has made the population more diverse (in Britain), most notably regarding Indians. Although probably not a single time in a scale as Britain is today, not to speak of when it had India and so on.

The Porn Nerd · 08-09-2014, 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogueteens

So your original point was wrong? England has not been conquered many times.

LOL, you cannot even distinguish the difference between Britain and England!

And while we are talking about your fail, you do realise that the French, Norse, Celts (not that they ever existed as Celts anyway) and Germans were all branches of the same root tribe?
The Druids were an indigenous religious order - not an invading tribe!
Read up on the real Braveheart and you'll see that it was mainly a scot on scot fight, not what Hollywood tells you is history.
The French imposed their language on the English court? LOL! You have failed on every single point you tried to make!

Your post was very funny indeed. Gave me a right chuckle.

OK, let's put aside the fact that an AMERICAN knows more about BRITISH history than a Brit.....England was 'conquered' MANY times (I did not say "invaded many times"). Rome, the Celts and Vikings all 'conquered' (invaded) before 1066, and after 1066 the landscape of England changed dramatically in the ways I mentioned before.

(And do your research about how FRENCH was the official language of the BRITISH Roayl court for over 200 years).

And whether this or that ethnicity were part of an original 'root tribe' is meaningless. Vikings and Germans and French and so on, who cares if they shared similar origins? They came to England from different lands, settled there, meshed with the local population, and the entire bloody island morphed into what we have today.

All fine well and good, history is an interesting melting pot. What this thread is about TODAY is how Brits go apeshit over their Royals, who are clearly from Germanic descent and had to change their bloody name to a made-up 'Windsor' so the British population wouldn't revolt against them during WWI while they were fighting their German cousins.

It's all fucking funny to me, that's all. Blah blah.

Captain Kawaii · 08-09-2014, 11:04 AM

This search is more interesting.

https://www.google.com/search?q=Ther...-a&channel=rcs

Jews have always been frustrated with blue bloods around the world. Its the economic war we face now. Battle of jewish bankers vs the blue blood old money.

Kate's mum was a cocktail waitress on airplanes. Impressive.

Blue bloods will always win. Not just the English but the collective group. The English indeed are a sorry lot. Pedophiles and tampon sniffing pervs. lol. That is what Charles wrote to his current wife isn't it?

Thank God Charles's sons take after their mum.

rogueteens · 08-09-2014, 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd

OK, let's put aside the fact that an AMERICAN knows more about BRITISH history than a Brit.....England was 'conquered' MANY times (I did not say "invaded many times"). Rome, the Celts and Vikings all 'conquered' (invaded) before 1066, and after 1066 the landscape of England changed dramatically in the ways I mentioned before.

(And do your research about how FRENCH was the official language of the BRITISH Roayl court for over 200 years).

And whether this or that ethnicity were part of an original 'root tribe' is meaningless. Vikings and Germans and French and so on, who cares if they shared similar origins? They came to England from different lands, settled there, meshed with the local population, and the entire bloody island morphed into what we have today.

All fine well and good, history is an interesting melting pot. What this thread is about TODAY is how Brits go apeshit over their Royals, who are clearly from Germanic descent and had to change their bloody name to a made-up 'Windsor' so the British population wouldn't revolt against them during WWI while they were fighting their German cousins.

It's all fucking funny to me, that's all. Blah blah.

How exactly did either the Celts or the Vikings conquer Britain or even England?
I never said that French wasn't the official language of the English court (which it was) but at no time did the French impose this language which is what you said. And yet again, you STILL cannot understand the difference between England and Britain!

The Brits do not go "mad" for the royals, I don't understand where you get that from but yes, many of us are protective of them but its nothing like the cult of celebrity you guys have over there. And look up the houses of European royals and you'll see that they are all interconnected so there is little point in harping on about them being German, Queen Elizabeth has family ties with previous houses too.

Keep going, your American understanding of British history is hysterical!

aka123 · 08-09-2014, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogueteens

How exactly did either the Celts or the Vikings conquer Britain or even England?

Won't being a king count?

"Sweyn I Forkbeard (Old Norse: Sveinn Tjúguskegg; d. 3 February 1014) was king of Denmark and England, as well as parts of Norway. His name appears as Swegen in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle.[1] He was the son of King Harald Bluetooth of Denmark. He was the father of Cnut the Great.

In the mid 980s, he revolted against his father and seized the throne. Harald was driven into exile and died shortly afterwards in November 986 or 987.[2] In 1000, with allegiance of the Trondejarl, Eric of Lade, he was ruler over most of Norway. After a long effort at conquest and shortly before his death, he became, in 1013, the first of the Danish Kings of England."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sweyn_Forkbeard

There are other vikings too.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_English_monarchs

Captain Kawaii · 08-09-2014, 12:01 PM

Please stop using wikipedia to win arguments. My poor dead cat can edit wikipedia.

Use this.
http://www.burkespeerage.com/home.php

My family, and I mean my DIRECT family line is in it. Is yours?

- We are Norse-Norman-Irish so we don't really "count" though.

Rogue is right. The royal houses are all connected. It was done purposefully for economical reasons and with the hope to make alliances between neighboring countries. Not all that successful but not all that of a failure.

The Porn Nerd · 08-09-2014, 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogueteens

How exactly did either the Celts or the Vikings conquer Britain or even England?
I never said that French wasn't the official language of the English court (which it was) but at no time did the French impose this language which is what you said. And yet again, you STILL cannot understand the difference between England and Britain!

The Brits do not go "mad" for the royals, I don't understand where you get that from but yes, many of us are protective of them but its nothing like the cult of celebrity you guys have over there. And look up the houses of European royals and you'll see that they are all interconnected so there is little point in harping on about them being German, Queen Elizabeth has family ties with previous houses too.

Keep going, your American understanding of British history is hysterical!

OK I will keep going:

William the Conquerer came from.....class? Brittany. Which is where, exactly? Class? FRANCE. (OK, to be fair, he REALLY came from his Viking heritage, who settled Brittany and other parts of coastal France a few hundred years earlier but I will leave the nit-picking to the Brits).

England or Britain? Hmmm....who bloody cares. it's all the same fooking ISLAND yo. LOL

And if the French did not impose their language onto the British Royal court then HOW did they adopt it? Because Brits love all things French so much?

And of course all the Royal Houses are interbred and interconnected. It's what we Americans hate so much about Royalty to begin with (so un-Democratic and snooty, thinking they are better than everyone else and therefore can only inter-breed, thereby producing jugheaded freaks like Prince Charles). This doesn't change the embarrassing FACT that they (the British Royals) had to change their GERMAN surname during WWI. How droll!

Game. Set. Match. Cheers!

aka123 · 08-09-2014, 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Kawaii

Please stop using wikipedia to win arguments. My poor dead cat can edit wikipedia.

Use this.
http://www.burkespeerage.com/home.php

My family, and I mean my DIRECT family line is in it. Is yours?

- We are Norse-Norman-Irish so we don't really "count" though.

Rogue is right. The royal houses are all connected. It was done purposefully for economical reasons and with the hope to make alliances between neighboring countries. Not all that successful but not all that of a failure.

Wikipedia has been studied to be very reliable source of information, and I am not now referring to some wikipedia article. And do you deny the information I gave? Did your dead cat edit that page to add a king or two?

About alliances and such, I already said that before, when that one guy talked about Germans ruling Britain. I don't know how that makes the Rogue right regarding that "conquest" stuff.

The Porn Nerd · 08-09-2014, 12:48 PM

Heil Britannia!!

aka123 · 08-09-2014, 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd

Heil Britannia!!

Nein, mein führer ist Von Klonkendorf. Heil Von Klonkendorf, langlebigkeit für dich.

The Porn Nerd · 08-09-2014, 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aka123

Nein, mein führer ist Von Klonkendorf. Heil Von Klonkendorf, langlebigkeit für dich.

LOL Eich mein dumpkoff. Haha!!

rogueteens · 08-09-2014, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd

Game. Set. Match. Cheers!

LOL, you cannot even grasp the most basic facts!
You think that the druids (!!!), Celts and Vikings conquered England, you think that the French imposed their language on the English royal court!!! You change your argument all the time (Even the youngest school child knows that the royal family changed their name during world war one) but worst of all, you fail to understand the most basic part of the argument that Britain and England are NOT THE SAME THING! you honestly think you have "Game. Set. Match." when even the most fundamental part of your flawed argument is totally and utterly wrong - England is not an island, Britain is but England is NOT!

There is no point arguing with someone who cannot grasp the basics so I'm out.

The Porn Nerd · 08-09-2014, 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogueteens

LOL, you cannot even grasp the most basic facts!
You think that the druids (!!!), Celts and Vikings conquered England, you think that the French imposed their language on the English royal court!!! You change your argument all the time (Even the youngest school child knows that the royal family changed their name during world war one) but worst of all, you fail to understand the most basic part of the argument that Britain and England are NOT THE SAME THING! you honestly think you have "Game. Set. Match." when even the most fundamental part of your flawed argument is totally and utterly wrong - England is not an island, Britain is but England is NOT!

There is no point arguing with someone who cannot grasp the basics so I'm out.

Ah but you fail Sir - to explain the difference between 'England" and "Britain" or "Great Britain" or "UK".

(LOL I DO understand the differences mate - when you bring Scotland, Ireland and even Whales into it all the names change around. But we're still talking about, you know, Merry Ol' whatever.)

Yeah, and if Vikings didn't take parts of England/Britain than how did y'all get all those Viking town names scattered throughout your lovely countryside? And you still haven't explained how FRENCH became the official language of the BRITISH (English whatever) Court. That must still sting after all these years, oui? :D

Cherry7 · 08-09-2014, 04:17 PM

were all branches of the same root tribe?

oops , your fascism is showing.

Hentaikid · 08-09-2014, 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith

Um, the whole point of the smiley at the end of the post you quoted was to illustrate...

ah hell nevermind.

Continue thinking you 'schooled' me. :D

Sorry, I suspected you might know, but this is GFY, you're probably a small minority...

rogueteens · 08-09-2014, 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd

Ah but you fail Sir - to explain the difference between 'England" and "Britain" or "Great Britain" or "UK".

(LOL I DO understand the differences mate - when you bring Scotland, Ireland and even Whales into it all the names change around. But we're still talking about, you know, Merry Ol' whatever.)

Yeah, and if Vikings didn't take parts of England/Britain than how did y'all get all those Viking town names scattered throughout your lovely countryside? And you still haven't explained how FRENCH became the official language of the BRITISH (English whatever) Court. That must still sting after all these years, oui? :D

England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland are countries in their own right.
England, Scotland and Wales make up Great Britain.
England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland make up the United Kingdom.
England, Scotland, Wales, Northern and Southern Ireland make up the British Isles.

French was used in the English courts for a few centuries as it was seen as a "high class" language, a kind of snobbery. in no way was it ever imposed upon them by the French which is what you argued.

Yes, Vikings did settle in parts of Northern England but in no way did they conquer any of it, it was a peaceful settlement. the Vikings that raided the costal towns raided then left - it was just that , a raid.
I think your problem is that you don't understand the meaning of the word "conquer".

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherry7

were all branches of the same root tribe?

oops , your fascism is showing.

Oh god, the idiot is here. I really should put you on ignore like everyone else does.
Either you actually really do believe what you type, in which case I feel sorry for you (walking and chewing gum at the same time must be a big ambition for you). Or you are a very inept troll.

Cherry7 · 08-10-2014, 07:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogueteens

Yes, Vikings did settle in parts of Northern England but in no way did they conquer any of it, it was a peaceful settlement. the Vikings that raided the costal towns raided then left - it was just that , a raid.
I think your problem is that you don't understand the meaning of the word "conquer".

.

the Vikings that raided the costal towns raided (and drove off the natives) then

Vikings did settle in parts of Northern England =- conquered

You almost had it....

TrashyContent · 08-10-2014, 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd

The Royal Family of England are really GERMAN by heritage. About 100 years ago their changed their name to the made-up moniker 'Windsor' during WWI. Fucking bullshit, and why ANYONE cares about these in-bred freaks is beyond me. PLUS when brits go all ga-ga over these Royal Twits they seem to ignore/forget the above fact (they are GERMAN, not ENGLISH you bloody wankers).

I am an AMERICAN and I do not like KINGS (or QUEENS).

I love Dumb Americans... you obviously know shit about History... Your talking about George of Hanover, who if you knew anything would know he was more English/Scottish than he was German :/ He was a great grand-son of King James I...

And you say your American ? What like a Native American ? Otherwise your nothing but a mongrel... with some sort of foreign blood in your linage... maybe even English, how shit would that be

TrashyContent · 08-10-2014, 07:37 AM

All Americans are FAT and drive SUV's

The Porn Nerd · 08-10-2014, 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogueteens

England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland are countries in their own right.
England, Scotland and Wales make up Great Britain.
England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland make up the United Kingdom.
England, Scotland, Wales, Northern and Southern Ireland make up the British Isles.

French was used in the English courts for a few centuries as it was seen as a "high class" language, a kind of snobbery. in no way was it ever imposed upon them by the French which is what you argued.

Yes, Vikings did settle in parts of Northern England but in no way did they conquer any of it, it was a peaceful settlement. the Vikings that raided the costal towns raided then left - it was just that , a raid.
I think your problem is that you don't understand the meaning of the word "conquer".

There ya go!!

Thank you for the breakdown of the various variations on 'England/Britain/UK' etc. Kind of proves my point about the Brits being 'nit picky' tho eh? LOL

(And you are wrong about the Vikings mate. Raids yes but also = conquer. The "problem", really, is for many centuries "England" was a 'work in progress' if you will; meaning there were many shiftings and alliances and wars and battles to secure that Island. So until the population stabilized it was a patchwork of mini-kingdoms, fealties etc. So there wasn't really a unified 'Kingdom" to "conquer" in the traditional sense. So, PARTS of England were conquered along the way is my point.)

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrashyContent

I love Dumb Americans... you obviously know shit about History... Your talking about George of Hanover, who if you knew anything would know he was more English/Scottish than he was German :/ He was a great grand-son of King James I...

And you say your American ? What like a Native American ? Otherwise your nothing but a mongrel... with some sort of foreign blood in your linage... maybe even English, how shit would that be

Regardless of which particular despot - I mean, KING - I am "talking about" the POINT is still the same. Plus, being American, I never claimed to be of pure blood, and certainly not blue. However, I also do not pretend that my Royal Family are British when in fact they are GERMAN.

Heil Windsor!

TrashyContent · 08-10-2014, 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd

There ya go!!

Thank you for the breakdown of the various variations on 'England/Britain/UK' etc. Kind of proves my point about the Brits being 'nit picky' tho eh? LOL

(And you are wrong about the Vikings mate. Raids yes but also = conquer. The "problem", really, is for many centuries "England" was a 'work in progress' if you will; meaning there were many shiftings and alliances and wars and battles to secure that Island. So until the population stabilized it was a patchwork of mini-kingdoms, fealties etc. So there wasn't really a unified 'Kingdom" to "conquer" in the traditional sense. So, PARTS of England were conquered along the way is my point.)

Regardless of which particular despot - I mean, KING - I am "talking about" the POINT is still the same. Plus, being American, I never claimed to be of pure blood, and certainly not blue. However, I also do not pretend that my Royal Family are British when in fact they are GERMAN.

Heil Windsor!

They have German Blood yes... about 3% is you look at the Linage... hardly makes them GERMAN...

The Porn Nerd · 08-10-2014, 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrashyContent

They have German Blood yes... about 3% is you look at the Linage... hardly makes them GERMAN...

Combine that 3% with their German surname and it is enough for me.

We all know how the Brits hate to be embarrassed, always so demure and repressed.
1917 must've been a real sticky wicket eh?

Heil Windsor!!

rogueteens · 08-10-2014, 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherry7

the Vikings that raided the costal towns raided (and drove off the natives) then

Vikings did settle in parts of Northern England =- conquered

You almost had it....

Do you still think Vikings wore hats with horns on too?

Oh and if settling in English towns makes Vikings conquers then all those Asians and Africans doing the same in many British towns are conquers too? No?

mineistaken · 08-10-2014, 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd

Combine that 3% with their German surname and it is enough for me.

We all know how the Brits hate to be embarrassed, always so demure and repressed.
1917 must've been a real sticky wicket eh?

Heil Windsor!!

Yes, 3% German blood makes a person German.

Added to your similar stupid ramblings on football that you showed during Wold cup I think that you may be just stupid and not a troll.

rogueteens · 08-10-2014, 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd

There ya go!!

Thank you for the breakdown of the various variations on 'England/Britain/UK' etc. Kind of proves my point about the Brits being 'nit picky' tho eh? LOL

I see, you are one of those people who hate to learn something even though it was crucial to the argument you was failing to get across.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd

The "problem", really, is for many centuries "England" was a 'work in progress' if you will; meaning there were many shiftings and alliances and wars and battles to secure that Island. So until the population stabilized it was a patchwork of mini-kingdoms, fealties etc. So there wasn't really a unified 'Kingdom" to "conquer" in the traditional sense. So, PARTS of England were conquered along the way is my point.)

yes, that's true (almost every country is built up this way) but when it was a patchwork of little kingdoms, it wasn't England was it? so lets get back to what you originally said, tell us just how many times was England conquered. you claim it was many times.

The Porn Nerd · 08-10-2014, 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken

Yes, 3% German blood makes a person German.

Added to your similar stupid ramblings on football that you showed during Wold cup I think that you may be just stupid and not a troll.

Or maybe I am just fucking around. :D

(But my stance on the World Cup, shared by most Americans, is 100% accurate and truthful. Kick, pass, pass, kick....pass, pass, pass.....pass, pass, kick....SHOOT! Nope, out-of-bounds so let's kick the bloody ball around mid-field for another twenty minutes. Very exciting stuff. And isn't it 'futbol'?)

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogueteens

I see, you are one of those people who hate to learn something even though it was crucial to the argument you was failing to get across.

yes, that's true (almost every country is built up this way) but when it was a patchwork of little kingdoms, it wasn't England was it? so lets get back to what you originally said, tell us just how many times was England conquered. you claim it was many times.

Immigration is not the same as arriving on ships with weapons, kicking the shit out of every weenie English pussy they encountered (and who could not get them to LEAVE), settling their Viking asses down and STAYING, naming every town after some Norse this or that and introducing many words into the 'English' language like 'thing'. Not the same THING as immigrants moving into a town now is it? :D

Who's ignoring embarrassing facts now eh? LOL So, to play into the nit-picky nature of your ilk I will adjust and say this: 'England' (notice the quotes) or whatever the bloody hell it was called during this time period or that, was CONQUERED by many peoples (Rome, Vikings, bloody William, etc) ON ITS WAY to becoming England. So I stand by what I said, little kingdoms or not. The bloody island isn't that fucking BIG yo, it's not like the US or Europe in size. Jeez Louise.

Let's just say the ISLAND was conquered many times. I know this hurts you very deeply to admit this, being the (former) British Empire and the sun never setting, etc etc. But hey, you still have The Falklands, don't you? :D

Cherry7 · 08-10-2014, 03:43 PM

Knock Knock,

Hi we are the Vikings, we just moved in next door. Could we borrow some sugar?

Were not you the gang that raided us last year, burnt our house, raped my wife and killed my son.

My bad, but we have settled down now.

OK I'll just get that sugar for you.

England, never invaded, one race under God until them bloody imigrants came ere.

08-08-2014, 11:58 AM	#59
Scott McD Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Glasgow, Scotland Posts: 67,795	The only Royal worth hitting! __________________ I Buy My High Quality Traffic Here, You Should Too!

08-08-2014, 02:04 PM	#63
scarlettcontent www.scarlettcontent.net Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Pleiades Posts: 6,031	royals rock __________________ Scarlett Content - Adult Content Provider - High Quality Adult Stock Content for your Websites, Mobile Media and Print. Over 3 Million Images (14,000 photo sets) over 5000 Videos - Many Niches, US-2257, Awesome Prices. Over 40 years in the adult industry. [email protected] Follow us on twitter.

08-08-2014, 07:12 PM	#67
Mutt Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 34,431	So I continued reading about the British royal family - it's incredible how many lunatics attempted to assassinate ol' Queen Victoria. __________________ I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!

08-09-2014, 10:40 AM	#71
aka123 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: 64 00 N, 26 00 E Posts: 4,450	Britain has been conquered some times and for other times part of it, and it has had impact to it's population. Also Britains own rule has made the population more diverse (in Britain), most notably regarding Indians. Although probably not a single time in a scale as Britain is today, not to speak of when it had India and so on. Last edited by aka123; 08-09-2014 at 10:50 AM..

08-09-2014, 11:04 AM	#73
Captain Kawaii So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 6,748	This search is more interesting. https://www.google.com/search?q=Ther...-a&channel=rcs Jews have always been frustrated with blue bloods around the world. Its the economic war we face now. Battle of jewish bankers vs the blue blood old money. Kate's mum was a cocktail waitress on airplanes. Impressive. Blue bloods will always win. Not just the English but the collective group. The English indeed are a sorry lot. Pedophiles and tampon sniffing pervs. lol. That is what Charles wrote to his current wife isn't it? Thank God Charles's sons take after their mum. Last edited by Captain Kawaii; 08-09-2014 at 11:13 AM..

08-09-2014, 12:01 PM	#76
Captain Kawaii So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 6,748	Please stop using wikipedia to win arguments. My poor dead cat can edit wikipedia. Use this. http://www.burkespeerage.com/home.php My family, and I mean my DIRECT family line is in it. Is yours? - We are Norse-Norman-Irish so we don't really "count" though. Rogue is right. The royal houses are all connected. It was done purposefully for economical reasons and with the hope to make alliances between neighboring countries. Not all that successful but not all that of a failure. Last edited by Captain Kawaii; 08-09-2014 at 12:04 PM..

08-09-2014, 12:48 PM	#79
The Porn Nerd Living The Dream Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Inside a Monitor Posts: 19,496	Heil Britannia!! __________________ My Affiliate Programs: Porn Nerd Cash \| Porn Showcase \| Aggressive Gold Over 90 paysites to promote! Skype: peabodymedia

08-09-2014, 04:17 PM	#84
Cherry7 Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: UK Posts: 3,564	were all branches of the same root tribe? oops , your fascism is showing. __________________ My Neighbour Butterfly PORN-The Musical The Long Goodbye Cinema Erotique

08-10-2014, 07:37 AM	#89
TrashyContent Confirmed User Join Date: May 2008 Location: England Posts: 2,155	Ps All Americans are FAT and drive SUV's __________________ Trashy Content - High Res Images - HD Video SlutBank.com Home of THOT PORN [email protected] - - Skype - bangbangsteve Great Content Deals Available @ TRASHY CONTENT

08-10-2014, 03:43 PM	#97
Cherry7 Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: UK Posts: 3,564	Knock Knock, Hi we are the Vikings, we just moved in next door. Could we borrow some sugar? Were not you the gang that raided us last year, burnt our house, raped my wife and killed my son. My bad, but we have settled down now. OK I'll just get that sugar for you. England, never invaded, one race under God until them bloody imigrants came ere. __________________ My Neighbour Butterfly PORN-The Musical The Long Goodbye Cinema Erotique