Why haven't they arrested Michael Brown Senior? - GoFuckYourself.com

Rochard · 11-28-2014, 08:57 AM

Really strange.... I saw the father of Michael Brown shouting "Burn this bitch down" during a riot and hours later a dozen buildings were on fire causing millions of dollars of damage. Why haven't they arrested him for inciting a riot?

I mean... He was the center of the protest and he was yelling out to everyone at the protest to "burn the bitch down" and that's exactly what they did.

Captain Kawaii · 11-28-2014, 08:59 AM

with you on this one.

blackmonsters · 11-28-2014, 09:00 AM

Maybe you should organize a protest march to get the grand jury to indict him.

blackmonsters · 11-28-2014, 09:02 AM

Every talking head in American predicted a riot but now we know it was only one guy who started it.

crockett · 11-28-2014, 09:02 AM

Why just arrest him, they should be arresting anyone they can identify. I'm all for people's right to assemble and protest, but they only assemble to loot and vandalize.

Captain Kawaii · 11-28-2014, 09:02 AM

i think he flashed the right gang signs so its a pass...for now.

Rochard · 11-28-2014, 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

Every talking head in American predicted a riot but now we know it was only one guy who started it.

I disagree. It could have been very peaceful. He encouraged very one to "burn the bitch down". And that's exactly what they did.

dyna mo · 11-28-2014, 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

Every talking head in American predicted a riot but now we know it was only one guy who started it.

the inciting a riot law doesn't include a stipulation that a riot actually starts.

According to 18 USCS § 2102 "to incite a riot", or "to organize, promote, encourage, participate in, or carry on a riot", includes, but is not limited to, urging or instigating other persons to riot, but shall not be deemed to mean the mere oral or written (1) advocacy of ideas or (2) expression of belief, not involving advocacy of any act or acts of violence or assertion of the rightness of, or the right to commit, any such act or acts.?

Incite a Riot Law & Legal Definition

Rochard · 11-28-2014, 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

the inciting a riot law doesn't include a stipulation that a riot actually starts.

According to 18 USCS § 2102 "to incite a riot", or "to organize, promote, encourage, participate in, or carry on a riot", includes, but is not limited to, urging or instigating other persons to riot, but shall not be deemed to mean the mere oral or written (1) advocacy of ideas or (2) expression of belief, not involving advocacy of any act or acts of violence or assertion of the rightness of, or the right to commit, any such act or acts.?

Incite a Riot Law & Legal Definition

But a riot did start....

Captain Kawaii · 11-28-2014, 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

Every talking head in American predicted a riot but now we know it was only one guy who started it.

YOU ARE CORRECT. Sharpton and Jackson should be charged as well but they suck the right cock so probably a pass.

dyna mo · 11-28-2014, 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

But a riot did start....

no shit? I had no fucking idea.

nevertheless, a riot starting is not a requirement to charge someone with inciting a riot.

Not sure why you can't see that I am in agreement.

do you need me to say it directly?

blackmonsters · 11-28-2014, 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

the inciting a riot law doesn't include a stipulation that a riot actually starts.

According to 18 USCS § 2102 "to incite a riot", or "to organize, promote, encourage, participate in, or carry on a riot", includes, but is not limited to, urging or instigating other persons to riot, but shall not be deemed to mean the mere oral or written (1) advocacy of ideas or (2) expression of belief, not involving advocacy of any act or acts of violence or assertion of the rightness of, or the right to commit, any such act or acts.?

Incite a Riot Law & Legal Definition

300 posters on this board could be arrested for that.

dyna mo · 11-28-2014, 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

300 posters on this board could be arrested for that.

pornguy · 11-28-2014, 09:14 AM

They wont arrest them because they are scared of the black community in general.

blackmonsters · 11-28-2014, 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Kawaii

YOU ARE CORRECT. Sharpton and Jackson should be charged as well but they suck the right cock so probably a pass.

I hear ya man. A white cop killed a black dude so lets charge every black person we can with a crime to fix that.

dyna mo · 11-28-2014, 09:22 AM

the thing is, this dude had a choice, he could have been george clooney and told everyone to be cool.

VikingMan · 11-28-2014, 09:29 AM

Because everyone is racist and biased and the most racist people are the ones who claim they are not racist.

white guy driving down the street less likely to get pulled over

white person in store less likely to get watched by security guards

white guy attacks a black guy and will probably get charged with a hate crime

black guy yells racial slurs while attacking white person and it is highly unlikely he will get charged with a hate crime and the media will cover it up

black guy incites a riot and media tries covering it up at first but even when the video gets out there are no charges

white guy incites a riot and it will be headline news 24/7 and of course he will get charged with a crime.

And lets not even get into the differences of how the media and law enforcement treat men and women who commit the same exact crimes.

Humans are biased and always will be. Depending on the situation most people treat it much differently based on skin color and gender.

DBS.US · 11-28-2014, 09:31 AM

Darren Wilson Allies Reportedly Fighting For Perjury Charges Against Michael Brown?s Friend

Read more at
Darren Wilson Allies Want Dorian Johnson To Be Charged With Perjury

Axeman · 11-28-2014, 09:32 AM

Because it wasn't Michael Brown Sr who said it.

It was Mike Brown's step father. Not his father.

CDSmith · 11-28-2014, 09:41 AM

Why is it a bad idea to throw gas on a fire?

I agree the guy should have been arrested big time, but come on, think. Yes he was inciting a riot, but THAT would have incited an even bigger outrage.

L-Pink · 11-28-2014, 10:10 AM

Actually issuing a false statement to a police officer by those that saw nothing or fabricated what the did see helped the pot simmer before the grand jury results were even read.

candyflip · 11-28-2014, 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Really strange.... I saw the father of Michael Brown shouting "Burn this bitch down" during a riot and hours later a dozen buildings were on fire causing millions of dollars of damage. Why haven't they arrested him for inciting a riot?

I mean... He was the center of the protest and he was yelling out to everyone at the protest to "burn the bitch down" and that's exactly what they did.

I wouldn't expect you to know this, beacause well...you're semi-retarded, but that was his stepfather. Not his father.

SuckOnThis · 11-28-2014, 10:17 AM

JA$ON · 11-28-2014, 10:30 AM

Because it would be a PR nightmare

Rochard · 11-28-2014, 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Axeman

Because it wasn't Michael Brown Sr who said it.

It was Mike Brown's step father. Not his father.

I didn't know that; I just assumed it was the father.

No matter. He should be arrested. He started a riot that resulted in millions of dollars in damages.

Horatio Caine · 11-28-2014, 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

I hear ya man. A white cop killed a black dude so lets charge every black person we can with a crime to fix that.

Ah, here it is again - every, all, none.. Who elected you to speak for entire community?

stickyfingerz · 11-28-2014, 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by candyflip

I wouldn't expect you to know this, beacause well...you're semi-retarded, but that was his stepfather. Not his father.

Facts don't matter to him from what I've seen.

Cherry7 · 11-28-2014, 11:09 AM

brassmonkey · 11-28-2014, 11:11 AM

because it would be worse!

did you know north korea sides with the father??

dyna mo · 11-28-2014, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherry7

context, not snippets.

::::::::::::

The message seems clear. Martin Luther King Jr. saw violence as a legitimate form of protest.

That assertion, however, couldn?t be more wrong.

King understood the cause of rioting in the mid ?60s, but he hardly approved of them.

King made his comment to Mike Wallace of CBS News in 1966 as his leadership and strategy of non-violence was being theatened by more militant activists like Stokely Carmichael.

?If every Negro in America turns their back on non-violence, I?m going to stand up as the lone voice and say this is the wrong way,? he said in a speech, then reiterated the point in the interview with Wallace.

?I think for the Negro to turn to turn to violence would be both impractical and immoral,? he said.

Wallace pressed King, noting that younger leaders had a different approach, and King acknowledged the new leaders were advocating violence, a strategy that had its followers.

?I don?t think these leaders will be able to make a real dent in the Negro community in terms of swaying 22 million Negroes to this particular point of view. And I contend this cry of ?Black Power? is at bottom a reaction to the reluctance of white power to make the kind of changes necessary to make justice the reality for the Negro.

?I think we?ve got to see that a riot is the language of the unheard and what is it that America has failed to hear? It has failed to hear the economic plight of the Negro poor which has worsened over the last few years,? he said.

?Riots are self defeating and socially destructive,? he said.

brassmonkey · 11-28-2014, 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

context, not snippets.

::::::::::::

The message seems clear. Martin Luther King Jr. saw violence as a legitimate form of protest.

That assertion, however, couldn?t be more wrong.

King understood the cause of rioting in the mid ?60s, but he hardly approved of them.

King made his comment to Mike Wallace of CBS News in 1966 as his leadership and strategy of non-violence was being theatened by more militant activists like Stokely Carmichael.

?If every Negro in America turns their back on non-violence, I?m going to stand up as the lone voice and say this is the wrong way,? he said in a speech, then reiterated the point in the interview with Wallace.

?I think for the Negro to turn to turn to violence would be both impractical and immoral,? he said.

Wallace pressed King, noting that younger leaders had a different approach, and King acknowledged the new leaders were advocating violence, a strategy that had its followers.

?I don?t think these leaders will be able to make a real dent in the Negro community in terms of swaying 22 million Negroes to this particular point of view. And I contend this cry of ?Black Power? is at bottom a reaction to the reluctance of white power to make the kind of changes necessary to make justice the reality for the Negro.

?I think we?ve got to see that a riot is the language of the unheard and what is it that America has failed to hear? It has failed to hear the economic plight of the Negro poor which has worsened over the last few years,? he said.

?Riots are self defeating and socially destructive,? he said.

man you are a fucking idiot

there is no other option

Axeman · 11-28-2014, 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

I didn't know that; I just assumed it was the father.

No matter. He should be arrested. He started a riot that resulted in millions of dollars in damages.

Don't disagree. Also think those most blatant liars that went on the news right away and hyped up the shot in the back and hands up narrative, should also be charged with perjury when they lied to the FBI and Grand Jury. In the end they are what got this whole ball rolling back on August 9th. Of course, the media took that ball and ran with it as fast as possible, and for the most part, still are.

Captain Kawaii · 11-28-2014, 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

I hear ya man. A white cop killed a black dude so lets charge every black person we can with a crime to fix that.

Naw, man. You missin the message. The message: STAY OFF THE RADAR. Work UNDER the radar. It works for the cartels en Mexico.

dyna mo · 11-28-2014, 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brassmonkey

man you are a fucking idiot

there is no other option

you think MLK is an idiot because he preached non-violent demonstrations, got it.

seeandsee · 11-28-2014, 11:33 AM

They will arrest all, give them some time

Sunny Day · 11-28-2014, 11:52 AM

Seems the prosecutors lied to the grand jury about Mo law and whether or not the Supreme Court decisions overrule state law.

Shocking mistake in Darren Wilson grand jury | MSNBC

brassmonkey · 11-28-2014, 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

you think MLK is an idiot because he preached non-violent demonstrations, got it.

no you are!

dyna mo · 11-28-2014, 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brassmonkey

no you are!

you think I'm an idiot for taking the time to look up the MLK quote and read it in the context in which it was meant, got it.

blackmonsters · 11-28-2014, 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sunny Day

Seems the prosecutors lied to the grand jury about Mo law and whether or not the Supreme Court decisions overrule state law.

Shocking mistake in Darren Wilson grand jury | MSNBC

Unbelievable.

Of course I only say unbelievable because that's the thing to say.
I believe every bit of it.

There was no mistake, that was done on purpose.

Tom_PM · 11-28-2014, 12:39 PM

You can't be surprised that the prosecutors did everything they could to get the cop off. Police are not hired to serve and protect. They are hired to enforce existing laws, and more importantly, gather evidence for the prosecutors office in case they want to bring cases. Judges consider their reports and word as facts, so much so that if it doesn't exist in a signed police report, then it didn't happen. They are very very privileged under the law and will get every last benefit that there is to get.

Shenanigans by the asst. prosecutor in giving false law information to the grand jury is super scum baggery and totally expected.

jaYMan · 11-28-2014, 12:52 PM

widespread panic, obstruction, bet there is alot more he could be brought up on. I'd nsa his past 20 years... I mean i know he is in grieving but get people to "burn this bitch" down isn't very smart... don't they live in that "bitch" >>? like shitting where you eat

baddog · 11-28-2014, 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Really strange.... I saw the father of Michael Brown shouting "Burn this bitch down" during a riot and hours later a dozen buildings were on fire causing millions of dollars of damage. Why haven't they arrested him for inciting a riot?

I mean... He was the center of the protest and he was yelling out to everyone at the protest to "burn the bitch down" and that's exactly what they did.

No you did not; that was his step-father

baddog · 11-28-2014, 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom_PM

Shenanigans by the asst. prosecutor in giving false law information to the grand jury is super scum baggery and totally expected.

What false info did he give the grand jury?

dyna mo · 11-28-2014, 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters

Unbelievable.

Of course I only say unbelievable because that's the thing to say.
I believe every bit of it.

There was no mistake, that was done on purpose.

this is an assistant DA in bumfuck missouri, it was total incompetency. She researched the law, came across this statute and did not bother to research further.

dyna mo · 11-28-2014, 01:02 PM

In fact, she corrected her blunder later:
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Previously in the very beginning of this process I printed out a statute for you that was, the statute in Missouri for the use of force to effect an arrest. So if you all want to get those out, what we have discovered, and we have been going along with this, doing our research, is that the statute in the State of Missouri does not comply with the case law . . . and so the statute for the use of force to effect an arrest in the State of Missouri does not comply with Missouri Supreme, I'm sorry, United States Supreme Court cases. So the statute I gave you, if you want to fold that in half just so that you know don't necessarily rely on that because there is a portion of that that doesn't comply with the law. (Emphasis added).

Tom_PM · 11-28-2014, 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

What false info did he give the grand jury?

She handed them a law from before 1985 that allowed police to shoot people who were trying to get away from them. One example of this was a guy who spit on a cop then ran away. He was shot while running and died. There were no charges.

That law was overturned by the supreme court in 1985 and yet somehow, just by random error / rogue employee chance, she accidentally handed the old law to the grand jury who had it for weeks before the so-called "correction" was issued. Shenanigans. Lets not pretend she was incompetent and retains her job. We all know it was intentional to mislead the jury. We KNOW it was. "We" meaning every human on the planet with more than 1/4th of a brain.

Sunny Day · 11-28-2014, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog

What false info did he give the grand jury?

Shocking mistake in Darren Wilson grand jury | MSNBC

nico-t · 11-28-2014, 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brassmonkey

man you are a fucking idiot

there is no other option

so you condone those riots? What the fuck have they accomplished aside from making themselves look like uncivilized dumbasses and destroying their own community? Great success!

Axeman · 11-28-2014, 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom_PM

She handed them a law from before 1985 that allowed police to shoot people who were trying to get away from them. One example of this was a guy who spit on a cop then ran away. He was shot while running and died. There were no charges.

That law was overturned by the supreme court in 1985 and yet somehow, just by random error / rogue employee chance, she accidentally handed the old law to the grand jury who had it for weeks before the so-called "correction" was issued. Shenanigans. Lets not pretend she was incompetent and retains her job. We all know it was intentional to mislead the jury. We KNOW it was. "We" meaning every human on the planet with more than 1/4th of a brain.

Except as Dyna Mo pointed out above you:

"In fact, she corrected her blunder later:
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Previously in the very beginning of this process I printed out a statute for you that was, the statute in Missouri for the use of force to effect an arrest. So if you all want to get those out, what we have discovered, and we have been going along with this, doing our research, is that the statute in the State of Missouri does not comply with the case law . . . and so the statute for the use of force to effect an arrest in the State of Missouri does not comply with Missouri Supreme, I'm sorry, United States Supreme Court cases. So the statute I gave you, if you want to fold that in half just so that you know don't necessarily rely on that because there is a portion of that that doesn't comply with the law. (Emphasis added)."

blackmonsters · 11-28-2014, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

this is an assistant DA in bumfuck missouri, it was total incompetency. She researched the law, came across this statute and did not bother to research further.

Yeah, everybody goes to law school so they be a dumb fuck when asked about the law.
Yep, that's why they pass the bar exam because they don't know shit.
No cop ever killed anybody before so why would a lawyer ever look this shit up right?

When people this smart make mistakes this big it's because they think we are all fucking dumb.

11-28-2014, 08:57 AM	#1
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 73,309	Why haven't they arrested Michael Brown Senior? Really strange.... I saw the father of Michael Brown shouting "Burn this bitch down" during a riot and hours later a dozen buildings were on fire causing millions of dollars of damage. Why haven't they arrested him for inciting a riot? I mean... He was the center of the protest and he was yelling out to everyone at the protest to "burn the bitch down" and that's exactly what they did. __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL \| THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION

11-28-2014, 09:00 AM	#3
blackmonsters Making PHP work Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: 🌎🌅🌈🌇 Posts: 20,282	Maybe you should organize a protest march to get the grand jury to indict him. __________________ Make Money with Porn

11-28-2014, 09:02 AM	#4
blackmonsters Making PHP work Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: 🌎🌅🌈🌇 Posts: 20,282	Every talking head in American predicted a riot but now we know it was only one guy who started it. __________________ Make Money with Porn

11-28-2014, 09:14 AM	#14
pornguy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Homeless Posts: 62,911	They wont arrest them because they are scared of the black community in general. __________________ PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online! TChicks.com \| Angeles Cid \| Mariana Cordoba \| MAILERS WELCOME!

11-28-2014, 09:31 AM	#18
DBS.US Geo Cities Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: North Captiva Island, Florida USA Posts: 11,830	Darren Wilson Allies Reportedly Fighting For Perjury Charges Against Michael Brown?s Friend Read more at Darren Wilson Allies Want Dorian Johnson To Be Charged With Perjury __________________ Make a Free Chaturbate White Label site in 34 minutes and be making money tonight

11-28-2014, 08:59 AM	#2
Captain Kawaii So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 6,748	with you on this one.

11-28-2014, 09:02 AM	#5
crockett in a van by the river Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 76,806	Why just arrest him, they should be arresting anyone they can identify. I'm all for people's right to assemble and protest, but they only assemble to loot and vandalize.

11-28-2014, 09:22 AM	#16
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 64,350	the thing is, this dude had a choice, he could have been george clooney and told everyone to be cool.

11-28-2014, 09:29 AM	#17
VikingMan Exploiting human weakness Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: next to a salmon stream Posts: 6,497	Because everyone is racist and biased and the most racist people are the ones who claim they are not racist. white guy driving down the street less likely to get pulled over white person in store less likely to get watched by security guards white guy attacks a black guy and will probably get charged with a hate crime black guy yells racial slurs while attacking white person and it is highly unlikely he will get charged with a hate crime and the media will cover it up black guy incites a riot and media tries covering it up at first but even when the video gets out there are no charges white guy incites a riot and it will be headline news 24/7 and of course he will get charged with a crime. And lets not even get into the differences of how the media and law enforcement treat men and women who commit the same exact crimes. Humans are biased and always will be. Depending on the situation most people treat it much differently based on skin color and gender.

11-28-2014, 09:32 AM	#19
Axeman Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Swamp Posts: 5,201	Because it wasn't Michael Brown Sr who said it. It was Mike Brown's step father. Not his father. __________________ XXXRewards - Karups - Boyfun - Jawked. Paying on time since 1997. Contact me at brent [at] xxxrewards.com

11-28-2014, 09:41 AM	#20
CDSmith Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Location: My network is hosted at TECHIEMEDIA.net ...Wait, you meant where am I located at? Oh... okay, I'm in Winnipeg, Canada. Oops. :) Posts: 51,460	Why is it a bad idea to throw gas on a fire? I agree the guy should have been arrested big time, but come on, think. Yes he was inciting a riot, but THAT would have incited an even bigger outrage. __________________ *Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!* ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!! Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket. ICQ me at: 31024634

11-28-2014, 10:10 AM	#21
L-Pink working on my tan Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Florida/Kentucky Posts: 39,151	Actually issuing a false statement to a police officer by those that saw nothing or fabricated what the did see helped the pot simmer before the grand jury results were even read.

11-28-2014, 10:17 AM	#23
SuckOnThis So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: In my head Posts: 6,844

11-28-2014, 10:30 AM	#24
JA$ON Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: I'm from Downtown....Im from Mitch & Murry Posts: 1,329	Because it would be a PR nightmare

11-28-2014, 11:09 AM	#28
Cherry7 Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: UK Posts: 3,564	__________________ My Neighbour Butterfly PORN-The Musical The Long Goodbye Cinema Erotique

11-28-2014, 11:11 AM	#29
brassmonkey Pay It Forward Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Yo Mama House Posts: 77,053	because it would be worse! did you know north korea sides with the father?? __________________ TRUMP 2025 KEKAW!!! - The Laken Riley Act Is Law! DACA ENDED - SUPPORT AZ HCR 2060 52R - email: brassballz-at-techie.com

11-28-2014, 11:33 AM	#35
seeandsee Check SIG! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Europe (Skype: gojkoas) Posts: 50,945	They will arrest all, give them some time __________________ BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year Contact here

11-28-2014, 11:52 AM	#36
Sunny Day Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 1,406	Arrest The Real Liars Seems the prosecutors lied to the grand jury about Mo law and whether or not the Supreme Court decisions overrule state law. Shocking mistake in Darren Wilson grand jury \| MSNBC

11-28-2014, 12:39 PM	#40
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	You can't be surprised that the prosecutors did everything they could to get the cop off. Police are not hired to serve and protect. They are hired to enforce existing laws, and more importantly, gather evidence for the prosecutors office in case they want to bring cases. Judges consider their reports and word as facts, so much so that if it doesn't exist in a signed police report, then it didn't happen. They are very very privileged under the law and will get every last benefit that there is to get. Shenanigans by the asst. prosecutor in giving false law information to the grand jury is super scum baggery and totally expected. __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

11-28-2014, 12:52 PM	#41
jaYMan peace&profit, Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2001 Posts: 4,885	widespread panic, obstruction, bet there is alot more he could be brought up on. I'd nsa his past 20 years... I mean i know he is in grieving but get people to "burn this bitch" down isn't very smart... don't they live in that "bitch" >>? like shitting where you eat __________________ peace&profit, jaYMan

11-28-2014, 01:02 PM	#45
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 64,350	In fact, she corrected her blunder later: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Previously in the very beginning of this process I printed out a statute for you that was, the statute in Missouri for the use of force to effect an arrest. So if you all want to get those out, what we have discovered, and we have been going along with this, doing our research, is that the statute in the State of Missouri does not comply with the case law . . . and so the statute for the use of force to effect an arrest in the State of Missouri does not comply with Missouri Supreme, I'm sorry, United States Supreme Court cases. So the statute I gave you, if you want to fold that in half just so that you know don't necessarily rely on that because there is a portion of that that doesn't comply with the law. (Emphasis added).