wehateporn

It's a crime against humanity, causing immeasurable suffering all around the world, the pharmaceuticals want us sick and on drugs for life, this is how they go about it

__________________

ITraffic

but of all the daily crimes against humanity why this one? have you ever thought why?

wehateporn

because this is the one that most people won't work out, they need help with the complexity of the scam

__________________

2MuchMark

Wehateporn,

Pardon me for pointing out the obvious, but you are someone using a fake name, on a porn website, designating medical conspiracy theories from unknown people, calling it information, and trying to tell others not to trust their own doctors.

As I said earlier it's ok to talk about all the fun stuff (fake moon landings) you want, but somebody someday could read your messages and decide not to go to the doctor, which would put their lives in jeopardy. They could die because of something you said. They could fucking die. Do you really want that kind of responsibility?

__________________

Custom Software | Server Management | Integration and Technology Solutions
https://www.2much.net

wehateporn

I'm recommending you to take time and investigate, do the research for yourself, learn the history, become aware of the conflicts of interest, see for yourself if the game is rigged. It would be wrong for anyone to take my word for it. These presentations are an excellent place to start Speakers

__________________

wehateporn

It would be worth moving country over

__________________

ITraffic

why do you want to help them though? by researching and posting on the internet. that part i don't understand.

wehateporn

Firstly I don't like to see healthy kids being poisoned, if only someone had warned my family we could have avoided years of pain. From a selfish perspective it's important to get the word out so as there's enough resistance to prevent them ever forcing this issue and taking away our freedoms

__________________

hadden

Some What

ITraffic

a family member was harmed by vaccines?

wehateporn

Yep, big sister, muscle-wasting disease after anti-Tetanus, slow and sad decline, dead by age 21. Brother-in-law almost killed by a vaccine, doctors said no more vaccines for anyone in his family. Nextdoor neighbor disabled by travel vaccine, being kept alive by expensive drugs.

__________________

Best-In-BC

#stupidpeople

__________________
Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More
Unparked domains burning a hole in your pocket? 5 Simple Ways to Make Easy $$$ from Unused Domains

TheSquealer

Damn.... what a story. That's just so....

I dunno...

Highly improbable and statistically impossible?

__________________
.
Yes, fewer illegal immigrants working equates to more job opportunities for American citizens.

Rochard

wehateporn

That's what they want you to think, problem is that most vaccine damage is not being highlighted as 'vaccine damage', it's being put down to random coincidence

__________________

TheSquealer

Yes... the all powerful, omnipresent "they"

The same "they" that seeks to control you, your life and everything in it. "They" seek to control everything in the world... and only a few lucky readers of "news for the insane", have it all figured out. But the truth is, the thread that connects you and all similar thinking people is not your source of news. It's a misfiring brain.

There are people who's lives are dominated by that dark and all powerful "they". They are usually schizophrenic. Sometimes psychotic. But quite common in anxiety disorders as well.

And interestingly enough,... you let the cat out of the bag once again with this comment above:


Suddenly.... you shifted gears from a dire health concern and let slip that its an issue of "freedoms". Those two things are completely unrelated within the context of all the many health related arguments you've made. But its clearly something that is on your mind.

"Taking away our freedoms". "Controlling me", "Controlling us", "Controlling the world". The perceived lack of "freedom" being the single overarching theme in all your ranting. Always trying to stop "they" from controlling you directly or indirectly... and just with all the bullshit banking/Illuminati and everything else you post.. what is a vaccine? To you, its one more thing forced upon you, by "they". One more thing that empowers "they".

You need meds. You need therapy. Then there will be no more "they" peeking over your shoulder always wanting to be controlling you like a puppet.

I also strongly suspect that your aversion to meds and constant ranting about "big pharma" has more to do with the meds you've been forced to take as some part of treatment. Of course, you won't admit to being sick. Like Cam_girls, a schizophrenic personality, you'd likely say something like "the meds don't help when the voices are real" as he did.

__________________
.
Yes, fewer illegal immigrants working equates to more job opportunities for American citizens.

Rochard

Jel

whp's posts are a lot clearer now... revenge spurred on by a perceived sense of injustice has a powerful effect on the brain. With no specific person to blame and get a sense of closure from, the well-known 'they' enter the equation.

TheSquealer

Surprisingly vague for someone who claimed in this very thread to have "two science degrees" and being an educator of doctors on immunology.

Interesting how someone can have many many years of education that is exactly about specificity, detail and fact and then when it comes to clearly defining the boogeyman and addressing the many many complexities of such a vast and global conspiracy, he gets super vague all of the sudden.

__________________
.
Yes, fewer illegal immigrants working equates to more job opportunities for American citizens.

Rochard

OneHungLo

2 science degrees and what does he have to show for it? A shitty porn blog and an Olympic pen operated out of mom's basement. Fail.

TheSquealer

Well considering his very existence, his site, his persona "wehateporn" expresses his overriding tendency to go in the exact opposite direction of everyone and have it be known, i wouldn't expect him to find much success in anything other than an Alex Jones type website catering to similar lunatics. He can't possibly believe he's "educating" people when everyone is making fun of him every step of the way... he's just not intelligent enough to understand that there is a broad market for his lunacy and its not here.

__________________
.
Yes, fewer illegal immigrants working equates to more job opportunities for American citizens.

Rochard

Jel

Well to be fair, I read a lot of spiritual books/content, and look at a lot of that kind of stuff on the net, and the Dalai Lama has come to me to be educated on certain things more than once. I have 2 spiritual diplomas in staying calm, and putting myself in someone else's shoes, and it's been my interest to chop up ideas and spout them as fact. I totally believe whp, with his maths background, is taken seriously by the medical community as they receive their weekly intake of youtube videos and inside info passed from infowars.

Jel

This. I often look at his posts/threads and 'wish' for want of a better word, that I was able to come up with shit like he does, and present it as fact for the appropriate market. There's big money in generalising 'there's big money in pharm' for the tinfoil hat brigade

TheSquealer

Yeah. There's big money in telling people something or even anything, they want to hear. No money at all in telling people something they don't.

There is an interesting documentary on Netflix called Kumare.. about an Indian guy, born and raised in the US, who was in film school in NY. Having a lot of exposure to Hinduism and having practiced Yoga all his life and easily faking a heavy Indian accent, he started a cult with him as the leader and made a documentary of the experience.

He just grew his hair out, grew his beard out, started wearing an orange robe, had a cool staff and started booking speaking engagements at yoga studios spreading his message which was as vague as could be "I am nobody, you are your own guru" kind of stuff and making up senseless chants. It is kinda troubling watching people respond to him so strongly, when he is saying absolutely nothing at all. It didn't take long at all for him to amass a following and though interesting, it was a bit chilling.

__________________
.
Yes, fewer illegal immigrants working equates to more job opportunities for American citizens.

Rochard

DAMNMAN

Well...... in order to stamp out diseases we must inoculate all. So I agree with manditory vaccines. But it's very difficult for me to get behind the corrupt system in place.
The government should have the strictest regulations and quality controls on vaccines. Companies shouldn't be able to skimp out for profit at our children risk.

More people have dies from the measles vaccine than have died from the measles in the last 10 years in the US.

__________________
email: zmaster (at) earthlink.net
ICQ: 196678616
ZMASTER

One less god!!!
I contend that we are both an atheist. I just belive in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.

Nicholas FirstMobileCash

Sad to see some people refuse medical treatment even though many of the vaccines we get have nearly eliminated the deathcount formerly caused by certain diseases/illnesses.

Not nearly as sad as parents risking the health of their own children and everyone else's as well...

__________________
email: nicholas at firstmobilecash dot com
skype: nicholas.horger
Join First Mobile Cash today!

sperbonzo

Personally, my wife and I decided to delay the administration of vaccines to our son until he was 2 years old, and then we spaced them out more than guidelines suggested. My wife is a Pediatric OT, and Director of Therapy at a clinic here, and our pediatrician respected her choices.

Yes, we wanted him vaccinated, but we did not agree with the government scheduling for them. I would definitely NOT be for some government bureaucrat, with no public accountability, forcing me to inject my son with very powerful medications before we thought that he was ready for them.

We believe that vaccines are essential and lifesaving, but my wife has seen some very strong negative reactions in children under 2 being vaccinated on the schedule currently called for in the US with some serious effects, over the years.

Should we put societal pressure on people to vaccinate their children? Shame them and avoid them? Absolutely.

Should we take away all rights of choice and force vaccinations at possible gunpoint? (since use of force is the ultimate backing of any government law), Absolutely not.





.

__________________
Michael Sperber / Acella Financial LLC/ Online Payment Processing

[email protected] / http://Acellafinancial.com/

ICQ 177961090 / Tel +1 909 NET BILL / Skype msperber

wehateporn

Wise decision, holding off till after age 2 dramatically reduces the risks involved

__________________

Far-L

Interesting...

So while your own wife who also happens to be in pediatrics was reluctant to immunize your own children due to firsthand knowledge and experience with the prevalence of adverse side effects you would still be ok with shaming etc.

That seems sort of contradictory to me.

Few things...

When I was growing up, if a kid had mumps, measles, chicken pox, my mom wanted me to play with them. The common perception at that time was it was better to develop a natural immunity to those illnesses. She was not "bad mom who should be punished for putting her kids at risk". She was considered "good mom" for making sure her kids developed immunity from common childhood illnesses that are much worse in adults.

Next, consider the issues with the small pox vaccine for example, widely seen as the greatest victory of science and a worldwide vaccination effort. The problem is the original strain of the vaccine that was used to culture new vaccinations is in too short a supply and the modern synthetically created small pox vaccine is not nearly as effective. Keeping a culture of effective vaccine is difficult because they weaken over time. This has been known since the Chinese practiced inoculations as early as 1000 AD, yes, well before Jenner's cow pox farm girl "discovery".

Finally, there is a vested interest to the tune of trilions of dollars for drug companies to require vaccinations. It does create a powerful conflict of interest and they have been proven time and time again to push unsafe products, including vaccines, under the guise of everyone will die if you don't do it. Just follow the dollar and the people behind AIDS and there is a very big conflict of interest between non elected officials that sit on powerful drug company boards as well as serve as chairmen of the CDC like Robert Gallo... who told the world that one in four people would be dead of AIDS within five years, the day after the patent came through for his company's test, which btw was not a Gold Standard test.

Now, guess what company claims to have created the vaccine for AIDS, which by its very definition is so broad that literally anything from cancer, to TB, to diarrhea, etc. can be a AIDS defining illness, so unless that vaccine is a preventative against all of AIDS defining illnesses, I would hold that vaccine very suspect. This is not the shadowy speculations of "conspiracy theory" this is historical fact. Whereas, a small pox vaccination actually will most likely prevent... you guessed it... small pox.

In this thread, everyone is railing on WHP but he at least has taken the time to read the actual papers, which I also did when I was studying AIDS when I got into porn. In fact, I hung out with Dr. Kary Mullis and Dr. Peter Duesberg, one a Nobel prizewinner whose invention of the PCR DNA test revolutionized genetic science, and the other a Berkeley research scientist widely considering to be the world's leading authority on retroviruses at the time. Their scientific rebuttals to the AIDS hypothesis put both their careers in hot water due to Political pressures. They could not even publish in peer reviewed journals like New England Journal of Medicine, where science, inquiry and challenge and repeatable results, all should hold a higher standard than the motives of drug companies seeking to profit, especially companies that also are literally helping shape National and International policy.

Some vaccines are obviously good. Some are not. People should know more and scientists should be allowed to review the science and not be dictated to by for profit entities because then it is not about scientific method it is about profit motive.

__________________

_Richard_

thought that was funny too

sperbonzo

Did you read the post? She has no issues with Vaccinations per se, but rather the government mandating them. She has issues with government mandates because of things like forcing people into WHEN they must be administered, and the dangers of government mandates in general. She thinks that they are given too young and without enough time in between them. She totally believes in Vaccinations, just not so young and not so many at once.

The point regarding public shaming is that there is a HUGE difference between people expressing their right to freedom of speech and opposing opinions freely, or in choosing to exercise their right to associate or not associate with people freely... As opposed to the state using force to compel people to vaccinate on the schedule that the state decides.

I can tell my neighbors that they are morons for not vaccinating, and I can keep away from them and keep my kids away from them also. but that is a big difference from sending some guys with guns to their house it force them to do it.

Use of force is world's away from people speaking and associating freely.







.

dyna mo

gfyers are railing on whp for spreading bullshit disinformation, regardless of any papers having been claimed read and more importantly, understood.

Far-L

Of course I read the post. I read that your wife does not agree with what the government determines as a safe window for inoculation in infants. She chose to make her own judgment call based on the information she had available to her. What is different than that and her deciding what vaccines she feels are "safe enough" and those that might not be? It is a very, very fine line if you ask me. She made a mother's choice based on her medical training as well as her practical experience. Shouldn't everyone have that same right? If a kid can't go to school because he or she wasn't inoculated then that is pretty much the same thing as a gun to one's head if you ask me.

I am not anti vaccine and my kids actually went to Waldorf schools where apparently 1 in 3 parents choose not to immunize, which is not true from my experience btw (most kids in fact had been widely vaccinated against a myriad of things and the school recommended vaccinations). As parents, we chose to do some vaccines but not others, like whooping cough. When the kids caught whatever we kept them from other kids, and that is what my mom did too. She pushed us out to catch mumps and measles but when we got them then we didn't get to go out. To this day, it is so rare for me or my kids to come down with anything that maybe there is something to it.

Every one I know that gets vaccines for flu every year gets a nasty flu.

__________________

Far-L

Fair enough...

But what peer reviewed science journals would you consider worthy of following in terms of scientific debate of any given hypothesis?

Unfortunately, when vast research grant money is used as a threat even those institutions are not immune to the infections of greed.

If fellow scientists are not allowed peer review without that bias tainting their findings, then even the most sacred peer reviewed journals, published openly for the purpose of inquiry and debate, become suspect as just another channel for disinformation in the form of unchallenged hypothesis and unsubstantiated "fact".

__________________

TheSquealer

So let's review, a well known lunatic who does nothing but rant about illuminati, conspiracies, lizard people, global banking conspiracies, immunization/"they" etc etc etc has a "wife" who is not only highly educated but also works in what most would agree is one of the highest positions of trust in a society - suddenly isn't against immunizations once he realizes he's losing his audience and comes back with a VERY out of character response which is inexplicably lucid, coherent and well reasoned. For years he's done nothing but post anti immunization propaganda and now claims he thinks they are important and for some odd reason has a fairly reasonable position? Really? That's a bit too transparent, even for the most casual observer. Further, well educated , professional people at the top of their field don't tend to marry and have kids with broke lunatics. A highly unlikely relationship .

Some think you are just a troll. Some think you are just trying to bait people into reacting. I don't. I think you are mentally ill and your "wife" and her "amazing education", "inordinately high achievement " in her field and most of what you say aw just fabrications. All your did is what any psychopath and sociopath or similarly disturbed person does. You run your mouth until you can't deny that you've gone too far ... ten you come back with a well crafted, an almost "too good" sounding response.

SilentKnight

And where do you think the money comes from that the pharmaceutical companies pay out in lawsuit damages?

It all gets filtered back to the consumer to pay in the long run.

TheSquealer

It should also be pointed out that just a few years ago, he was discovered to be a dumb kid living in his parents basement.... and in this very thread claimed to be an educator of doctors.

baddog

SilentKnight

What I don't understand is why peanut allergy has become such a big thing these days.

Growing up, our family moved around a lot. I went to more schools than I can remember (the actual number is around 10 schools). Not once in all those years and variety of schools did we ever hear about a peanut allergy issue. Never. Notta.

PBJ sandwiches were the perennial lunch item growing up. Everybody brought them to school.

So why now? What's changed?

wehateporn

Merck added Peanut Oil into some of their vaccines, some people end up with antibodies to peanuts, immune to them. This is the same reason why some people end up with autoimmune diseases after vaccination, there is no way of 100% controlling exactly which parts of the vaccine you create antibodies too. Artificially inducing antibodies is a dangerous game, it's a gamble. The problem is that in order for vaccines to be effective we also have to make them dangerous, you can't have one without the other; a safe vaccine is a vaccine which won't work.

Listen to the stories of those who have been harmed by the HPV vaccine

http://sanevax.org/victims-2/

__________________

sperbonzo

Yes. Everyone should have that same right. I just said that the government should not regulate it.

Also we have the right to keep our kids away from someone who chooses not to vaccinate.

Also we have the right to tell people who completely refuse to vaccinate against diseases that used to kill many thousands of children, that we think they are idiots.

I'm not sure how many different ways to say the same thing so that you understand it. Public shaming and staying away from people who never vaccinate their kids does not take away their right to make that choice. Government regulations do.





.

Far-L

People are not allergic to peanuts as much as they are allergic to a mold that grows on peanuts. Everyone and anyone that enjoys too much peanuts in their diet can be harmed by this very toxic mold.

From the peanut butter wiki:

The peanut plant is susceptible to the mold Aspergillus flavus which produces a carcinogenic substance called aflatoxin.[14] Since it is impossible to completely remove all aflatoxin, contamination of peanuts and peanut butter is monitored in many countries to ensure safe levels of this carcinogen. In 1990, a study showed that average American peanut butter contained an average of 5.7 parts per billion of aflatoxins, well below the U.S. Food and Drug Administration limit of 20 parts per billion.[15][16]

__________________

Far-L

Maybe you should just try not repeating yourself and re-reading what I wrote since I am pretty much in total agreement with what you are saying and completely honor and agree with the choices you and your wife made.

I wasn't calling you or your wife hypocrites. I was saying that out of all the people in this thread that you two made your own decisions based on knowledge and not blind faith. When it comes to vaccines, which WHP is quite correct are dangerous by nature, that is the best way to go and different people will view the information and decide different levels of risk tolerance.

What if your wife thought you should wait till the kids were 10 to vaccinate? That is all I was saying. Then you would have had that "gun" to your head. I bet she faced a lot of pressure to vaccinate and not wait. I know my wife and I did and we aren't even in the health care profession where that pressure it 10 times worse.

I am not anti vaccine. I am anti ignorance. You are clearly not ignorant so I don't criticize your choices or opinions at all in this.

__________________

SilentKnight

But again, why does it seem to be on the rise these days - and not something that was even an issue a few decades ago?

Far-L

No one knows...

But there is less incidence of the problem in countries that have less access to vaccinations and antibiotics but even higher peanut consumption...

And that would sort of support what WHP was saying...



But no one knows for sure.

__________________

OneHungLo

Who was this directed at? Spermbozo?

dyna mo

Oh, i'm certainly not a "the science is settled" guy. In fact, I rail against that here @ gfy.

we aren't scientists here. We chat about science and our understandings of it is all. WHP is in that group of us.

At the same time, *peer-reviewed* is an expression not many 20 year olds with an infant prolly ever heard of. Let alone spend the vast amount of hours sorting out 1) how to know which are valid and which are not 2) learning the vernacular used in real science documentation and 3) making a logical decision after reading the reams of data collected. not realistic and not needed. Vaccines aren't complicated.

as I understand it, wait till ~2 years old and don't get the all-in-one vaccines. IS there any thing more a responsible parent would do re: vaccinations?

2MuchMark

__________________

Custom Software | Server Management | Integration and Technology Solutions
https://www.2much.net

2MuchMark

From the CDC : Measles | Cases and Outbreaks | CDC

__________________

Custom Software | Server Management | Integration and Technology Solutions
https://www.2much.net

TheSquealer

Wehateporn

__________________
.
Yes, fewer illegal immigrants working equates to more job opportunities for American citizens.

Rochard

Far-L

Not sure. I agree that is about all the people like us that don't necessarily hold advanced degrees in biological sciences can do, get educated until we are comfortable with the information provided to make wise decisions.

I know WHP might post some crazy stuff on GFY but he is making some salient points and not all his reference material that he has posted on this subject is wingnut by any stretch.

For me at least, it is not conspiracy theory to follow the dollars when one looks at how the CDC and WHO function in terms of health issues and who stands to profit the most from worldwide epidemics. It is just dollars and sense.

The other thing I wonder about is why are parents that have vaccinated their children so upset about those that did not... aren't their kids supposed to be 97% immune anyway?

__________________

_Richard_

doesn't europe use a different base? Sesame? i personally have never heard of people with sesame allergies in NA, but i wonder if they exist in Europe...