Rant No hate crime when races are opposite

[mineistaken]

What would be speculated and whispered if races were in opposite order?
Obama would have had a speech already.

[j3rkules]

No racist until brassmonkey says so.

[mineistaken]

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by jerkules

No racist until brassmonkey says so.

Wrong order of the races for him to say so.

[L-Pink]

This was a pissed off black man who thought he was discriminated against so he started killing white people he was pissed at.


"On the same Twitter account that posted video of the shooting, Flanigan also made it clear that he was angry at the reporter and the photographer.

He said that he had filed a report with the United States Equal Opportunity Commission.

Jeffrey A. Marks, WDBJ-TV's general manager, confirmed that Flanigan had filed that EEOC complaint."

[mineistaken]

^ He also banked from his older station in Florida (settlement).
Nice thing they got going on - do not fire us even if we are slacking, otherwise pay settlement for "discrimination".

[Jet Set Cat]

Correct, it was a blatant hate crime.
White people are pussies and the more we ignore this woe is me cause I'm black shit the more its going to happen. Wise up white people, the time is now.

[brassmonkey]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

What would be speculated and whispered if races were in opposite order?
Obama would have had a speech already.

the shooter is dead retard!! charge his dead corpse??

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by brassmonkey

the shooter is dead retard!! charge his dead corpse??

It is not about charging, you moron. It is about acknowledging hate or not hate crime it was.

[brassmonkey]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

It is not about charging, you moron. It is about acknowledging hate or not hate crime it was.

why?? it's a closed case

[aka123]

Thanks, that photo alone tells a lot. Let me guess: he banged your mom because she is white?

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by brassmonkey

why?? it's a closed case

To point out double standards.

[Coup]

Is there any indication the guy was a racist? I mean other than the hopeful conjecture of gfy racists?

According to a foxnews article I read earlier he was a big fan of porn and sex toys lol

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by Coup

Is there any indication the guy was a racist? I mean other than the hopeful conjecture of gfy racists?

You missed the point completely. How anti racist of you

[Coup]

What is the point? Is the guy a racist or not? It's not a hate crime if he did for reasons unrelated to hate. So is there any proof that he did this out of racial hatred?

[Coup]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

You missed the point completely. How anti racist of you

Can't help but notice you didn't call out the others that missed your "point", as well. How racist of you.

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by Coup

What is the point? Is the guy a racist or not? It's not a hate crime if he did for reasons unrelated to hate. So is there any proof that he did this out of racial hatred?

Point is pretty simple: whenever it is white perp and black victim people imply or guess hate/racism.
Whenever it is black perp and white victim people do not imply the same thing. It is just a crime then.

Double standard thinking by people who can not thing critically. Libtards, guilters, anti whiters and such.

Just look at zimmy or ferguson case - there was NOTHING related to racism, but libtards taunted "racisss whitey" mantra all over. In zimmy case - they even had to make hispanic zimmy to be white, so tha they could taunt racism.

Fucking disgrace how any time something bad happens to black dude and the perp is white - first thought in libtards/guilters little brains is "this could have been racism".
Any time races are opposite - they do not think that for a second.

If I have to explain this to you - you are one of the little brain guys as well.

[TCLGirls]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

It is not about charging, you moron. It is about acknowledging hate or not hate crime it was.

The only way for the government to officially "acknowledge" it is a hate crime is for the government to charge a hate crime. And dead people don't get charged with crimes.

[Coup]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

Point is pretty simple: whenever it is white perp and black victim people imply or guess hate/racism.
Whenever it is black perp and white victim people do not imply the same thing. It is just a crime then.

Double standard thinking by people who can not thing critically. Libtards, guilters, anti whiters and such.

That would be because in a lot of those big cases that assumption pans out to be correct. So your solution is to engage in exactly what you seem to be denouncing? Interesting.

[TCLGirls]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

Point is pretty simple: whenever it is white perp and black victim people imply or guess hate/racism.
Whenever it is black perp and white victim people do not imply the same thing. It is just a crime then.

Double standard thinking by people who can not thing critically. Libtards, guilters, anti whiters and such.

No one is stopping you from calling this a hate crime.

[Coup]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

Point is pretty simple: whenever it is white perp and black victim people imply or guess hate/racism.
Whenever it is black perp and white victim people do not imply the same thing. It is just a crime then.

Double standard thinking by people who can not thing critically. Libtards, guilters, anti whiters and such.

Just look at zimmy or ferguson case - there was NOTHING related to racism, but libtards taunted "racisss whitey" mantra all over. In zimmy case - they even had to make hispanic zimmy to be white, so tha they could taunt racism.

Fucking disgrace how any time something bad happens to black dude and the perp is white - first thought in libtards/guilters little brains is "this could have been racism".
Any time races are opposite - they do not think that for a second.

If I have to explain this to you - you are one of the little brain guys as well.

Boo Fucking Hoo.

Put more of your impotent white tears of rage on display. I'm thirsty.

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by Coup

That would be because in a lot of those big cases that assumption pans out to be correct. So your solution is to engage in exactly what you seem to be denouncing? Interesting.

Yes, like it panned out in Ferguson (0.00% racial motivation) and Zimmerman (funny how anti whiters in tv station redacted that 911 call to make it sound racist)

Assuming racism JUST BECAUSE perp is white and victim is black (typical behavior of guilters, libtards and, of course, blacks themselves) is the sign of imbecility.

This is fact on fact^^^

I see that you advocate that
Speaks volumes about your intelligence level...

[Coup]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

Yes, like it panned out in Ferguson (0.00% racial motivation) and Zimmerman (funny how anti whiters in tv station redacted that 911 call to make it sound racist)

Assuming racism JUST BECAUSE perp is white and victim is black (typical behavior of guilters, libtards and, of course, blacks themselves) is the sign of imbecility.

I see that you advocate that
Speaks volumes about your intelligence level...

Keep going until my cup runs over with your tears. So.. Very.. Thirsty

[Coup]

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by TCLGirls

The only way for the government to officially "acknowledge" it is a hate crime is for the government to charge a hate crime. And dead people don't get charged with crimes.

Idiot strikes again with 100% irrelevant remark. Nobody is speaking about government.
According to your and BM logic: you can make a hate crime, but if you shoot yourself afterwards, that ceases to be hate crime

Originally Posted by TCLGirls

No one is stopping you from calling this a hate crime.

Moron, I have no interest in calling this a hate crime.
I am not like those idiots who call hate crime JUST BECAUSE PERP IS OF ONE COLOR AND VICTIM OF ANOTHER. Only imbeciles do so, only imbeciles reason like that.

The point of this thread was not to call it a hate crime, but merely poke fun of imbeciles who would do that if the races were opposite.

[Coup]

[Coup]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

Idiot strikes again with 100% irrelevant remark. Nobody is speaking about government.
According to your and BM logic: you can make a hate crime, but if you shoot yourself afterwards, that ceases to be hate crime



Moron, I have no interest in calling this a hate crime.
I am not like those idiots who call hate crime JUST BECAUSE PERP IS OF ONE COLOR AND VICTIM OF ANOTHER. Only imbeciles do so, only imbeciles reason like that.

The point of this thread was not to call it a hate crime, but merely poke fun of imbeciles who would do that if the races were opposite.

MMM Delicious!

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by Coup

Moron, I am not crying, merely pointing out simple facts.

[Coup]

[Coup]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

Moron, I am not crying, merely pointing out simple facts.

Nah you mad. And I'm filling my belly with your YUMMY tears

[Coup]

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by Jet Set Cat

White people are pussies and the more we ignore this woe is me cause I'm black shit the more its going to happen. Wise up white people, the time is now.

Not sure if the can wake up, it seems live they are being dumbed down and grow in numbers.

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by Coup

Nah you mad. And I'm filling my belly with your YUMMY tears

I am pretty sure being mad and crying is different emotions.

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by Coup

Perfect example of double standards.
Flaunt this image and you are ok.
Flaunt the same with different color - all hell break loose.

[Coup]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

I am pretty sure being mad and crying is different emotions.

[Coup]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

Perfect example of double standards.
Flaunt this image and you are ok.
Flaunt the same with different color - all hell break loose.

ROFL

[Coup]

[TCLGirls]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

Point is pretty simple: whenever it is white perp and black victim people imply or guess hate/racism.
Whenever it is black perp and white victim people do not imply the same thing. It is just a crime then.

Originally Posted by mineistaken

Moron, I have no interest in calling this a hate crime.

So if this incident is not a hate crime, then why are you using it as an example of "whenever it is black perp and white victim people do not imply the same thing. It is just a crime then."

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by Coup

ROFL

boo-hoo, woo woo woo.

See, I can speak your language.

[TCLGirls]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

Idiot strikes again with 100% irrelevant remark. Nobody is speaking about government.
According to your and BM logic: you can make a hate crime, but if you shoot yourself afterwards, that ceases to be hate crime

Who said this incident was not a hate crime? I said the killer cannot be charged with a hate crime. Those are two different things.

[escorpio]

Originally Posted by Coup

Sip some Trayvon, bitch.

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by TCLGirls

So if this incident is not a hate crime, then why are you using it as an example of "whenever it is black perp and white victim people do not imply the same thing. It is just a crime then."

Because we are not talking whether one or another crime is hate crime or not.

We are talking about the perception. Laughing at how some morons assume hate crime JUST BECAUSE perp and victim are of the same race.

So I am laughing at how there were no perception of hate crime in this case and how it would have been if the races were opposite.

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by TCLGirls

Who said this incident was not a hate crime? I said the killer cannot be charged with a hate crime. Those are two different things.

Why did you speak about charging then? After I already answered to BM that I was not talking about charging?
You brought up charging again, after I already said that charging was not what I was talking about at all.
So don't point at me.

[TCLGirls]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

Because we are not talking whether one or another crime is hate crime or not.

We are talking about the perception. Laughing at how some morons assume hate crime JUST BECAUSE perp and victim are of the same race.

So I am laughing at how there were no perception of hate crime in this case and how it would have been if the races were opposite.

So you "are not talking whether one or another crime is hate crime or not"...but in your first post you bring up the specific example of the black reporter killing the two white people. That makes no sense.

[brassmonkey]

Originally Posted by Coup

[brassmonkey]

Originally Posted by Coup

[TCLGirls]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

Why did you speak about charging then? After I already answered to BM that I am not talking about charging?
You brought up charging again, after I already said that charging was not what I was talking about at all.
So don't point at me.

I brought up charging because "hate crime" is a legal term. You said it is not "acknowledged" that this was a hate crime. The only body that can officially and unanimously acknowledge a hate crime is the government. And the government does not charge dead people with crimes.

If you want to general public to acknowledge this as a hate crime good luck with that, because the general public never agrees 100% on anything.

[TCLGirls]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

So I am laughing at how there were no perception of hate crime in this case and how it would have been if the races were opposite.

Again, why are you laughing that there is no perception of a hate crime here? No one is stopping you from perceiving a hate crime exists. If there really is no perception of a hate crime, that means YOU ALSO do not perceive a hate crime exists...so then you are just laughing at your own perception. Strange.

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by TCLGirls

I brought up charging because "hate crime" is a legal term. You said it is not "acknowledged" that this was a hate crime. The only body that can officially and unanimously acknowledge a hate crime is the government. And the government does not charge dead people with crimes.

If you want to general public to acknowledge this as a hate crime good luck with that, because the general public never agrees 100% on anything.

Ok, imagine situation. Dude starts shouting racial slurs and shoots people of opposite race. Then shoots himself.
We (most of us) would acknowledge that this was a hate crime. You, on the other hand, would come in and say - hey, wait, perp is dead, government did not charge him, so we can not acknowledge.

We agree to disagree on this.

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by TCLGirls

Again, why are you laughing that there is no perception of a hate crime here? No one is stopping you from perceiving a hate crime exists. If there really is no perception of a hate crime, that means YOU ALSO do not perceive a hate crime exists...so then you are just laughing at your own perception. Strange.

Man, you are stupid....
I will not repeat myself as this was already answered.

Ok, maybe I will repeat once again to point out your misunderstanding.

You say: "laughing that there is no perception of a hate crime here"

Wrong. I am not laughing that there is no perception HERE.

Forget THIS case completely.

I am laughing that WHEN there is white perp black victim there are lots of hate crime assumptions, while same people do not assume the same thing if races are opposite. I am laughing at their double standard reasoning. Get it? This case was merely the chance to remind those double standards. Do not go into THIS case wondering if there was a hate crime or not because that is 100% irrelevant. Case was just a chance to bring the general topic up.

I hope I wont have to repeat that for the fifth time!