Any Physics Enthusiasts? - GoFuckYourself.com

Idigmygirls · 02-14-2016, 04:57 PM

I have published a new theory of Relativity, called the Quantum Angular Offset Theory of Relativity.

It's quite complicated, but here are a few key points and summary. If anyone enjoys popular physics and wants to challenge themselves, I invite you to read the document. I'm currently working with some mathematicians on the final geometry proofs, but the math isn't necessary to understand the theory from the layman's perspective.

LINK WHERE YOU CAN DOWNLOAD QAO Theory of Relativity

What is the speed of light from the perspective of a photon of light? It is infinite. It has moved the entire distance through space with the passage of zero time.

Einstein's Relativity relies on the premise that light in a vacuum is a constant for all observers regardless of the motion of the light source.

There is an exception to this rule that Einstein did not note: Light itself will measure it's speed to be different from all normal matter. This leads me to the following notions:

Exceptional Relativity:

1- All normal mass with identical Event Counts will observe the speed of light in a vacuum to be a constant, and;
2- A photon in a vacuum will always measure its own speed to be infinite.

The question that needs to be answered is that if light measures the speed of light to be infinity, then why isn't the speed of light always infinite for other observers?

A short answer is that the speed of light is both infinite and finite - and this is a result of what I call the Quantum Angular Offset - which basically means that geometric angles are subject to the same uncertainty principle as other measurements. This means that when light moves away from a source, it is moving at an angle that is known only within a margin of error.

Here is my preface, and from here, I invite anyone who is interested to take a read. I wrote this Theory to be accessible to people who are science enthusiasts as well as actual physicists, but nevertheless, it does get a bit complicated

â??The Universe is woven together by two equivalent types of dimensions: Spatial and Temporal. The dimensions are distinguished by the property that â??Passageâ?? through a Temporal dimension is a function of mass, whereas â??Movementâ?? through a Spatial dimension is a function of energy. Though the Spatial and Temporal dimensions are closely (but not perfectly) bound together at the quantum level by gravity, the dimensions exist in very different forms from each other. Spatial dimensions can be thought of as energy dimensions, and Temporal dimensions as mass dimensions.

Gravity is a charged force that is expressed by the dimension themselves - attracting unlike dimension-types to each other, and repelling like dimension types away from one-another. It is this force that collapses the three spatial dimensions into the shape of lines, and orients those lines at right-angles to one another (by like-charge repulsion) while holding them â??in-orbitâ? (by dislike-charge attraction) close-to, but not on top of, each other and the Time dimension (i.e. within a Quantum Sphere).

There is an absolute compass to the universe which sets out a specific Root set of axes - aligning the Time dimension uniformly, everywhere throughout spacetime. This compass is validly reestablished at every Event in spacetime. In the absence of mass, the three Spatial dimensions are offset from each other at right angles due to the repulsive like-force of gravity; however, the Spatial axes themselves have no set universal orientation, only relative orientation, and thus the spatial-axes system is freely rotated.

All particles must be able to determine a distinct location for themselves in spacetime in order to exist in spacetime; and particles must be able do to this with only the information they have about themselves.â?

mce · 02-14-2016, 04:59 PM

I like the sensation of money entering my bank account

That's the extent of my interest in physics

420 · 02-14-2016, 05:06 PM

So confusing. Please explain through song.

dyna mo · 02-14-2016, 05:12 PM

Re: photons of light, just like they don't experience time, they don't experience movement either right?

Also, isn't your quantum angular offset answered by perspective? Time and speed depend on from where and what perspwctive it's measured from right?

Just asking.

GFED · 02-14-2016, 05:19 PM

Used to love math and physics in college. But reading that now just hurts my brain.

Idigmygirls · 02-14-2016, 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

Re: photons of light, just like they don't experience time, they don't experience movement either right?

Also, isn't your quantum angular offset answered by perspective? Time and speed depend on from where and what perspwctive it's measured from right?

Just asking.

Not quite. Photons don't experience time, but they do "experience" movement. From the perspective of a photon of light, it will move the entire distance from its origination to its final destination as "X number of light years travelled" in zero time. That instantaneous movement through space is infinite speed.

The QAO is not answered by perspective. This is much harder to summarize in a paragraph, since I have a dozen pages devoted to explaining it, but the simple notion is that in four dimensional spacetime, everything moves at a relative angle to everything else. If you measure two objects, they will have a definite perspective. From that measurement, things are absolute (according to current physics) but I contend that they are absolute subject to uncertainty, which means we can never actually measure their relative motion with certainty. This means that even infinite speed is not able to be calculated with certainty, and that uncertainty is what gives light a finite speed when measured by mass. (lol, best I could do in the space provided).

dyna mo · 02-14-2016, 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Idigmygirls

Not quite. Photons don't experience time, but they do "experience" movement. From the perspective of a photon of light, it will move the entire distance from its origination to its final destination as "X number of light years travelled" in zero time. That instantaneous movement through space is infinite speed.

The QAO is not answered by perspective. This is much harder to summarize in a paragraph, since I have a dozen pages devoted to explaining it, but the simple notion is that in four dimensional spacetime, everything moves at a relative angle to everything else. If you measure two objects, they will have a definite perspective. From that measurement, things are absolute (according to current physics) but I contend that they are absolute subject to uncertainty, which means we can never actually measure their relative motion with certainty. This means that even infinite speed is not able to be calculated with certainty, and that uncertainty is what gives light a finite speed when measured by mass. (lol, best I could do in the space provided).

I think I see what you're stating now. Your qao accounts for the uncertainty in perspective?

Idigmygirls · 02-14-2016, 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

I think I see what you're stating now. Your qao accounts for the uncertainty in perspective?

Yes, that is one aspect of what I've put forward. And when you realize that it is from this QAO that light gets its measurable, constant speed, then the mystery is solved and all kinds of other answers - the true nature of gravity for example - become very clear.

I'm now mired in the math proofs, but everything does balance, so I'm getting close to sending this out to the physics journals for publication

2MuchMark · 02-14-2016, 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Idigmygirls

Not quite. Photons don't experience time, but they do "experience" movement..

Help! I'm lost. If Photons don't experience time, then how can they move? And since we know that light can travel 186,000 miles in 1 second, doesn't that 1 second count as time?

noshit · 02-14-2016, 07:01 PM

Excellent thread and this is Impressive!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Idigmygirls

Yes, that is one aspect of what I've put forward. And when you realize that it is from this QAO that light gets its measurable, constant speed, then the mystery is solved and all kinds of other answers - the true nature of gravity for example - become very clear.

I'm now mired in the math proofs, but everything does balance, so I'm getting close to sending this out to the physics journals for publication

All I know is the Moon doesn't exist and in reality is just a giant mirror reflecting the sun.

BUT ...Great stuff and I hope you get published!

dyna mo · 02-14-2016, 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Idigmygirls

Yes, that is one aspect of what I've put forward. And when you realize that it is from this QAO that light gets its measurable, constant speed, then the mystery is solved and all kinds of other answers - the true nature of gravity for example - become very clear.

I'm now mired in the math proofs, but everything does balance, so I'm getting close to sending this out to the physics journals for publication

Hey, good luck. Is there a non-pdf version, I'd be interested in reading it.

Mutt · 02-14-2016, 07:16 PM

I'm curious, what is the highest level of formal physics and math education you studied at?

Mutt · 02-14-2016, 07:30 PM

You should post this same post on Stack Exchange Physics Stack Exchange You'll get honest knowledgeable feedback there

I like to read about physics but it's way over my head, I am thrilled when I just get the gist of things like gravitational waves thanks to good science writers who can explain concepts in a way an average person can understand.

Idigmygirls · 02-14-2016, 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt

You should post this same post on Stack Exchange Physics Stack Exchange You'll get honest knowledgeable feedback there

I like to read about physics but it's way over my head, I am thrilled when I just get the gist of things like gravitational waves thanks to good science writers who can explain concepts in a way an average person can understand.

Oh, that's a good suggestion. I'm so used to just posting stuff here on GFY that I wasn't really thinking about putting it on Stack Exchange. I shall do it!

Quote:

Originally Posted by **********

Help! I'm lost. If Photons don't experience time, then how can they move? And since we know that light can travel 186,000 miles in 1 second, doesn't that 1 second count as time?

That's the beauty. For all observers that are not moving at the speed of light, they will agree with you that light will always move ~186,000 miles in one second. But from the perspective of the photon itself, it will not experience any time passage. If it had a clock, the clock would show no time at all transpires for it from the "time" it's born until the "time" it dies, zero time passes.

One other way to think about it is like this: when we look through a telescope, we see an image that is made up of photons that have travelled the universe. If we look very far away, we can see back in time - like a billion years ago for example - by looking at a system a billion light-years distant. We observe the photons just at they were when they were created. They "believe" they are giving current information to our telescope because no time has passed for them.

plaster · 02-14-2016, 08:56 PM

wow... crazy shit.

I think what really intrigued me was the cone graph with y being space, x being time, and any vertex going in any direction... so what's z? Time space perspective?

But why a cone then? If some travel 5 million miles in 1 second, and others travel 30 million miles in 1 second... at the bottom of the cone you can have zero travelling anywhere. It has to have no cone for concept to work.

Edit: Nevermind, you cited that as flaws in your theory.

"There are multiple inherent flaws in this representation; however, the most obvious of
these is that we have assigned arbitrary units of measurement to the two axes: Space is
measured in terms of distance per second (d/t) and Time is measured in terms of seconds
(thus always yielding one second of distance in one second, which is totally meaningless
– producing a 45-degree angle). "

Where did you get your education from? I will read the full thesis at some point.

TheSquealer · 02-14-2016, 08:57 PM

this is sounding eerily like my understanding of my life accomplishments vs my parents understanding of my life accomplishments.

Idigmygirls · 02-14-2016, 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by plaster

wow... crazy shit.
Where did you get your education from? I will read the full thesis at some point.

I did undergraduate at UCLA, but my theoretical physics education is all informal. It's been a passion of mine for the past decade or so.

plaster · 02-14-2016, 10:29 PM

So my stab:

Space is infinite.
Stars are center of gravity for each solar system.
All time is dependant on center of star/sun/gravity
All x, y, and z components are time.
The 4th dimension is space.
You can leave center of sun and return 4 billion years later and no time elapsed because you returned to 0,0,0,0 point.
All solar systems (i.e. ours), revolves around the sun/star. We have a gravitational pull within. Any solar system adjacent has same qualities.
Black Holes also exist between.
You can travel between solar systems by gravitational pull from sun to break out of solar system and be injected into another solar system (through black hole if lucky).
Time only matters at the center of each solar system though. Because time goes in x, y, z and direction. Space is a function of time and the z' function.

Time is complicated to calculate on earth because we are a distance from center of gravity, sun, so it really doesn't work except for what has been accepted.

What do you think?

EddyTheDog · 02-14-2016, 10:39 PM

I like physics, but it doesn't like me...

DraX · 02-15-2016, 03:14 AM

So when can I see you accept the Nobel Prize in physics?

Keep it up

MiamiBoyz · 02-15-2016, 03:30 AM

ContentPimp · 02-15-2016, 04:20 AM

Pussy filled with honey viscosity 8-10 Pa.s in cP 8k-10 have a cock approaching with speed of 6,8988m/s which is covered with chocolate syrup cP 22k-24k .Cock touches the A spot of the pussy at 12:46:98 what time will cock reach its end destination if length of a cock is 23cm and pressure outside is 1007,0 mb ?
And what will be the highest speed of a cock before it reaches the end?

sperbonzo · 02-15-2016, 07:07 AM

So then are you postulating that, within the light cone of an event, that from the photon's perspective, it exists at all possible points in the light cone simultaneously?

.

CaptainHowdy · 02-15-2016, 07:22 AM

How the universe works doesn't really interest me ...

Relentless · 02-15-2016, 08:52 AM

Loving the far fetched possibility that a history changing scientific theory may be first published in the GFY Journal Main Forum rather than one of those old stodgy peer reviewed academic publications ;)

dyna mo · 02-15-2016, 09:11 AM

Gravity sucks!

in2cams · 02-15-2016, 09:12 AM

No, not to my knowledge. Have you looked up the yellow pages?

adultmobile · 02-15-2016, 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt

You should post this same post on Stack Exchange Physics Stack Exchange You'll get honest knowledgeable feedback there

I am into advanced math (even if not up to read string theory stuff in arXiv.org e-Print archive like it is gfy thread, but I do read arXiv.org e-Print archive daily) and... your 50+ pages document misses the math formulas. This make it more difficult to verify or understand the whole thing. You state "I am admittedly over my head when it comes to providing mathematical proof of the Theory from this point". Probably everyone else at GFY too.

So I also suggest you post that in Physics Stack Exchange and give us here the URL of the post so we can follow. Also, post here: Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community and http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/6-physics/ in the proper section, again give us the URL so we follow.

By the way, even with lots of math (correct one) it is difficult to understand stuff at times. For example Shinichi Mochizuki's Inter-universal Teichmüller theory (yes, I've read it, understood 1%):

http://www.nature.com/news/the-bigge...-proof-1.18509
https://www.quantamagazine.org/20151...for-abc-proof/
http://phys.org/news/2015-12-math-mi...ure-proof.html
https://www.reddit.com/r/math/commen...of_series_of/?

seeandsee · 02-15-2016, 12:42 PM

i bet this will go for Nobel prize!

CaptainHowdy · 02-15-2016, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

Gravity sucks!

Mutt · 02-15-2016, 02:26 PM

here's an article about photons/light not experiencing time or distance Does Light Experience Time? - Universe Today

I don't understand it really, a photon has no mind, so it's impossible for it to know what time and distance are. The speed of light is a known fact and a constant in physics but that's light in a vacuum - we don't live in a vacuum down here on Earth, light also doesn't travel at that speed in different types of matter i.e. Water

"But for light itself, which is already moving at light speedâ?¦ You guessed it, the photons reach zero distance and zero time."

Einstein was such a freak, I don't even know how his mind asked the questions that led to his theories of special and general relativity. We hadn't even fired a rocket or anything into space at the time.

Mutt · 02-15-2016, 02:30 PM

In fact when Einstein won the Nobel Prize we, including him, thought the Milky Way galaxy was the entire universe.

Relic · 02-15-2016, 03:35 PM

If you need help doing your graphing in three dimensions instead of two or just want to chat about infinity, hit me up.

sperbonzo · 02-15-2016, 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

So then are you postulating that, within the light cone of an event, that from the photon's perspective, it exists at all possible points in the light cone simultaneously?

.

I wasn't just asking for effect, I'm really interested!

.

johnnyloadproductions · 02-15-2016, 10:23 PM

Post on physics stack exchange, you'll get real feedback there and they'll let you know.

Quora may be good too.

adultmobile · 02-16-2016, 06:35 AM

Little big dick video getting more popular as thread than this:

https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...4754-dick.html

Bumping thread.

sperbonzo · 02-18-2016, 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

So then are you postulating that, within the light cone of an event, that from the photon's perspective, it exists at all possible points in the light cone simultaneously?

.

Bumping one more time, hoping to find out!

It's an interesting idea

.

ITraffic · 02-18-2016, 10:39 AM

sounds legit.

links pulled.

duk75 · 02-18-2016, 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by plaster

The 4th dimension is space.

The space is the first 3 dimensions, actually: length, width, depth; all are qualities of the space, aren't they?

redwhiteandblue · 02-18-2016, 11:06 AM

blogspot · 02-18-2016, 02:14 PM

for fucks sake

PornoPlopedia · 02-18-2016, 02:55 PM

interesting. I did not get to analyze the details (and probably wont) but the spatial dimension is like studying the Coriolis effect at the quantum level

Joe Obenberger · 02-18-2016, 03:37 PM

Were it but true that all posts here were as interesting as this post is.

What a remarkable jump from Serbian Nationalism (and why that's posted here never ceases to amaze me) to find this.

Idigmygirls · 02-18-2016, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

So then are you postulating that, within the light cone of an event, that from the photon's perspective, it exists at all possible points in the light cone simultaneously?

.

Sorry, I was away for a bit.

I'm not really saying that.

What I say about light in a light-cone is that current physics portrays light-cones as being the entirely of the universe upon which a photon of light can possibly interact. It also depicts light cones as 45-degree angles.

I think this is the biggest travesty in the history of physics, as it has indoctrinated generations of students into thinking of light having a large swath of "Other" or "unreal" space that can't be acted upon. It's total BS

The only reason light cones are depicted at 45-degree angels is because the units chosen for Time and Space are the same: "Light (seconds)" divided by "seconds" yields nonsense. It yields 1 unit of space per 1 unit of time always, thus a 45-degree angle.

In fact, I postulate that along the Temporal dimension, light "moves" (I call it Passes) infinitely quickly. In other words, it has no movement at all in that "direction." Thus, light cones should be properly represented at 90-degree angles.

Once that concept is understood, then we are left with a single question: Why do we not observe the speed of light to be infinite?

The answer to that is the basis of my theory. I postulate that light moves both infinitely quickly (in one respect) and at a constant speed in another respect. It is not easy to summarize how that can be so, other than to say that thinking in four dimensions, you can have a line that is perpendicular to one dimension and therefore only moves in the other three. For the perpendicular dimension, the speed would be measured to be infinite, but in the other three dimensions, you would be able to measure the speed.

adultmobile · 02-19-2016, 10:19 AM

Let me the first one to claim this theory is wrong, but, allow me some days to put in writing an (easy enough) explanation of why.

sperbonzo · 02-19-2016, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Idigmygirls

Sorry, I was away for a bit.

I'm not really saying that.

What I say about light in a light-cone is that current physics portrays light-cones as being the entirely of the universe upon which a photon of light can possibly interact. It also depicts light cones as 45-degree angles.

I think this is the biggest travesty in the history of physics, as it has indoctrinated generations of students into thinking of light having a large swath of "Other" or "unreal" space that can't be acted upon. It's total BS

The only reason light cones are depicted at 45-degree angels is because the units chosen for Time and Space are the same: "Light (seconds)" divided by "seconds" yields nonsense. It yields 1 unit of space per 1 unit of time always, thus a 45-degree angle.

In fact, I postulate that along the Temporal dimension, light "moves" (I call it Passes) infinitely quickly. In other words, it has no movement at all in that "direction." Thus, light cones should be properly represented at 90-degree angles.

Once that concept is understood, then we are left with a single question: Why do we not observe the speed of light to be infinite?

The answer to that is the basis of my theory. I postulate that light moves both infinitely quickly (in one respect) and at a constant speed in another respect. It is not easy to summarize how that can be so, other than to say that thinking in four dimensions, you can have a line that is perpendicular to one dimension and therefore only moves in the other three. For the perpendicular dimension, the speed would be measured to be infinite, but in the other three dimensions, you would be able to measure the speed.

Fantastic answer. Thank you for the interesting clarification. Something for me to mull over.

.

xXXtesy10 · 02-19-2016, 11:30 AM

no physics but did take these:

Card Banging 101
Click Bots 101
Malware Injection 101 & 102
Browser Hijacking 101
Money Laundering 101
Tax Evasion, Offshore Corporations (By bro request only)
Video Theft 101

are my past classes

2MuchMark · 05-14-2018, 08:06 AM

Bump (for interesting topic!)

02-14-2016, 04:57 PM	#1
Idigmygirls Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Vancouver, BC Posts: 498	Any Physics Enthusiasts? I have published a new theory of Relativity, called the Quantum Angular Offset Theory of Relativity. It's quite complicated, but here are a few key points and summary. If anyone enjoys popular physics and wants to challenge themselves, I invite you to read the document. I'm currently working with some mathematicians on the final geometry proofs, but the math isn't necessary to understand the theory from the layman's perspective. LINK WHERE YOU CAN DOWNLOAD QAO Theory of Relativity What is the speed of light from the perspective of a photon of light? It is infinite. It has moved the entire distance through space with the passage of zero time. Einstein's Relativity relies on the premise that light in a vacuum is a constant for all observers regardless of the motion of the light source. There is an exception to this rule that Einstein did not note: Light itself will measure it's speed to be different from all normal matter. This leads me to the following notions: Exceptional Relativity: 1- All normal mass with identical Event Counts will observe the speed of light in a vacuum to be a constant, and; 2- A photon in a vacuum will always measure its own speed to be infinite. The question that needs to be answered is that if light measures the speed of light to be infinity, then why isn't the speed of light always infinite for other observers? A short answer is that the speed of light is both infinite and finite - and this is a result of what I call the Quantum Angular Offset - which basically means that geometric angles are subject to the same uncertainty principle as other measurements. This means that when light moves away from a source, it is moving at an angle that is known only within a margin of error. Here is my preface, and from here, I invite anyone who is interested to take a read. I wrote this Theory to be accessible to people who are science enthusiasts as well as actual physicists, but nevertheless, it does get a bit complicated â??The Universe is woven together by two equivalent types of dimensions: Spatial and Temporal. The dimensions are distinguished by the property that â??Passageâ?? through a Temporal dimension is a function of mass, whereas â??Movementâ?? through a Spatial dimension is a function of energy. Though the Spatial and Temporal dimensions are closely (but not perfectly) bound together at the quantum level by gravity, the dimensions exist in very different forms from each other. Spatial dimensions can be thought of as energy dimensions, and Temporal dimensions as mass dimensions. Gravity is a charged force that is expressed by the dimension themselves - attracting unlike dimension-types to each other, and repelling like dimension types away from one-another. It is this force that collapses the three spatial dimensions into the shape of lines, and orients those lines at right-angles to one another (by like-charge repulsion) while holding them â??in-orbitâ? (by dislike-charge attraction) close-to, but not on top of, each other and the Time dimension (i.e. within a Quantum Sphere). There is an absolute compass to the universe which sets out a specific Root set of axes - aligning the Time dimension uniformly, everywhere throughout spacetime. This compass is validly reestablished at every Event in spacetime. In the absence of mass, the three Spatial dimensions are offset from each other at right angles due to the repulsive like-force of gravity; however, the Spatial axes themselves have no set universal orientation, only relative orientation, and thus the spatial-axes system is freely rotated. All particles must be able to determine a distinct location for themselves in spacetime in order to exist in spacetime; and particles must be able do to this with only the information they have about themselves.â? __________________ Red Light Center - Adult Metaverse https://www.redlightcenter.com

02-14-2016, 04:59 PM	#2
mce Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: All Over Posts: 3,917	I like the sensation of money entering my bank account That's the extent of my interest in physics __________________ Pay Virtual Assistants Based on RESULTS instead of TIME STOP getting FUCKED IN THE ASS by your VA

02-14-2016, 07:16 PM	#12
Mutt Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 34,431	I'm curious, what is the highest level of formal physics and math education you studied at? __________________ I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!

02-14-2016, 07:30 PM	#13
Mutt Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 34,431	You should post this same post on Stack Exchange Physics Stack Exchange You'll get honest knowledgeable feedback there I like to read about physics but it's way over my head, I am thrilled when I just get the gist of things like gravitational waves thanks to good science writers who can explain concepts in a way an average person can understand. __________________ I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!

02-14-2016, 08:57 PM	#16
TheSquealer BANNED Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: In Your Head Posts: 25,102	this is sounding eerily like my understanding of my life accomplishments vs my parents understanding of my life accomplishments. __________________ . Yes, fewer illegal immigrants working equates to more job opportunities for American citizens. Rochard

02-14-2016, 05:06 PM	#3
420 cuck Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 11,571	So confusing. Please explain through song.

02-14-2016, 05:12 PM	#4
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 64,031	Re: photons of light, just like they don't experience time, they don't experience movement either right? Also, isn't your quantum angular offset answered by perspective? Time and speed depend on from where and what perspwctive it's measured from right? Just asking.

02-14-2016, 05:19 PM	#5
GFED Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 8,098	Used to love math and physics in college. But reading that now just hurts my brain.

02-14-2016, 08:56 PM	#15
plaster So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2015 Posts: 2,295	wow... crazy shit. I think what really intrigued me was the cone graph with y being space, x being time, and any vertex going in any direction... so what's z? Time space perspective? But why a cone then? If some travel 5 million miles in 1 second, and others travel 30 million miles in 1 second... at the bottom of the cone you can have zero travelling anywhere. It has to have no cone for concept to work. Edit: Nevermind, you cited that as flaws in your theory. "There are multiple inherent flaws in this representation; however, the most obvious of these is that we have assigned arbitrary units of measurement to the two axes: Space is measured in terms of distance per second (d/t) and Time is measured in terms of seconds (thus always yielding one second of distance in one second, which is totally meaningless – producing a 45-degree angle). " Where did you get your education from? I will read the full thesis at some point.

02-14-2016, 10:29 PM	#18
plaster So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2015 Posts: 2,295	So my stab: Space is infinite. Stars are center of gravity for each solar system. All time is dependant on center of star/sun/gravity All x, y, and z components are time. The 4th dimension is space. You can leave center of sun and return 4 billion years later and no time elapsed because you returned to 0,0,0,0 point. All solar systems (i.e. ours), revolves around the sun/star. We have a gravitational pull within. Any solar system adjacent has same qualities. Black Holes also exist between. You can travel between solar systems by gravitational pull from sun to break out of solar system and be injected into another solar system (through black hole if lucky). Time only matters at the center of each solar system though. Because time goes in x, y, z and direction. Space is a function of time and the z' function. Time is complicated to calculate on earth because we are a distance from center of gravity, sun, so it really doesn't work except for what has been accepted. What do you think?

02-14-2016, 10:39 PM	#19
EddyTheDog Just Doing My Own Thing Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: London, Spain, New Zealand, GFY - Not Croydon... Posts: 25,040	I like physics, but it doesn't like me... __________________ - Chaturbate Script - https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-b...er-issues.html - Now supports White Labels

02-15-2016, 03:14 AM	#20
DraX Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: In wonderland.. Posts: 7,147	So when can I see you accept the Nobel Prize in physics? Keep it up __________________ Deposit Today With BTC - Play With Bitcoins

02-15-2016, 03:30 AM	#21
MiamiBoyz fgfdftre6 Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: In the closet with your dad! Posts: 6,690

02-15-2016, 04:20 AM	#22
ContentPimp Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 3,184	Pussy filled with honey viscosity 8-10 Pa.s in cP 8k-10 have a cock approaching with speed of 6,8988m/s which is covered with chocolate syrup cP 22k-24k .Cock touches the A spot of the pussy at 12:46:98 what time will cock reach its end destination if length of a cock is 23cm and pressure outside is 1007,0 mb ? And what will be the highest speed of a cock before it reaches the end? __________________ Blog Post Writing and Reviews are 2 cents per word & Titles and Gallery Descriptions 1 cent per word We also write Pay Site Reviews, SEO and Mainstream text www.contentpimp.info Contact me on ICQ at 400792466 Payoneer, Paxum and Paypal Accepted forms of Payment by the Pimp Last edited by ContentPimp; 02-15-2016 at 04:21 AM.. Reason: missing q mark!

02-15-2016, 07:07 AM	#23
sperbonzo I'd rather be on my boat. Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Location: Miami, FL Posts: 9,743	So then are you postulating that, within the light cone of an event, that from the photon's perspective, it exists at all possible points in the light cone simultaneously? .

02-15-2016, 07:22 AM	#24
CaptainHowdy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Happy in the dark. Posts: 93,109	How the universe works doesn't really interest me ... __________________ FLASH SALE INSANITY! deal with a 100% Trusted Seller Buy Traffic Spots on a High-Quality Network 1 Year or Lifetime — That’s Right, Until the Internet Explodes!

02-15-2016, 08:52 AM	#25
Relentless www.EngineFood.com Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 5,697	Loving the far fetched possibility that a history changing scientific theory may be first published in the GFY Journal Main Forum rather than one of those old stodgy peer reviewed academic publications ;) __________________ Website Secure \| Engine Food ICQ# 266-942-896

02-15-2016, 09:11 AM	#26
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 64,031	Gravity sucks!

02-15-2016, 09:12 AM	#27
in2cams Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2016 Posts: 63	No, not to my knowledge. Have you looked up the yellow pages? __________________

02-15-2016, 12:42 PM	#29
seeandsee Check SIG! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Europe (Skype: gojkoas) Posts: 50,945	i bet this will go for Nobel prize! __________________ BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year Contact here

02-15-2016, 02:26 PM	#31
Mutt Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 34,431	here's an article about photons/light not experiencing time or distance Does Light Experience Time? - Universe Today I don't understand it really, a photon has no mind, so it's impossible for it to know what time and distance are. The speed of light is a known fact and a constant in physics but that's light in a vacuum - we don't live in a vacuum down here on Earth, light also doesn't travel at that speed in different types of matter i.e. Water "But for light itself, which is already moving at light speedâ?¦ You guessed it, the photons reach zero distance and zero time." Einstein was such a freak, I don't even know how his mind asked the questions that led to his theories of special and general relativity. We hadn't even fired a rocket or anything into space at the time. __________________ I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!

02-15-2016, 02:30 PM	#32
Mutt Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 34,431	In fact when Einstein won the Nobel Prize we, including him, thought the Milky Way galaxy was the entire universe. __________________ I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!

02-15-2016, 03:35 PM	#33
Relic So Fucking Banned Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 10,300	If you need help doing your graphing in three dimensions instead of two or just want to chat about infinity, hit me up.

02-15-2016, 10:23 PM	#35
johnnyloadproductions Account Shutdown Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Gone Posts: 3,611	Post on physics stack exchange, you'll get real feedback there and they'll let you know. Quora may be good too.

02-16-2016, 06:35 AM	#36
adultmobile No, I am not banned Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: ChatGF.com Posts: 5,345	Little big dick video getting more popular as thread than this: https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...4754-dick.html Bumping thread. __________________ TubeCamGirl.com

02-18-2016, 10:39 AM	#38
ITraffic Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2013 Posts: 2,725	sounds legit. links pulled.

02-18-2016, 11:06 AM	#40
redwhiteandblue Bollocks Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Bollocks Posts: 2,792	__________________ Interserver unmanaged AMD Ryzen servers from $73.00

02-18-2016, 02:14 PM	#41
blogspot So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2016 Posts: 292	for fucks sake

02-18-2016, 02:55 PM	#42
PornoPlopedia Curing asexual impotence Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2014 Location: Try My Products ! Posts: 465	interesting. I did not get to analyze the details (and probably wont) but the spatial dimension is like studying the Coriolis effect at the quantum level

02-18-2016, 03:37 PM	#43
Joe Obenberger Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Location: Chicago Posts: 466	Were it but true that all posts here were as interesting as this post is. What a remarkable jump from Serbian Nationalism (and why that's posted here never ceases to amaze me) to find this. __________________ Extremism in the defense of Liberty is no vice. . . Restraint in the pursuit of Justice is no virtue. Senator Barry Goldwater, 1964

02-19-2016, 10:19 AM	#45
adultmobile No, I am not banned Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: ChatGF.com Posts: 5,345	Let me the first one to claim this theory is wrong, but, allow me some days to put in writing an (easy enough) explanation of why. __________________ TubeCamGirl.com

02-19-2016, 11:30 AM	#47
xXXtesy10 Fakecoin Investor Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: New Delhi, IN Posts: 7,127	no physics but did take these: Card Banging 101 Click Bots 101 Malware Injection 101 & 102 Browser Hijacking 101 Money Laundering 101 Tax Evasion, Offshore Corporations (By bro request only) Video Theft 101 are my past classes __________________ WARNING: Stay Away From Marlboroack aka aka Brandon Ackerman https://gfy.com/21169705-post8.html Donny Long is Felon, Stalker, Scammer & Coward http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/...lon-int-761244

05-14-2018, 08:06 AM	#48
2MuchMark Videochat Solutions Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 48,642	Bump (for interesting topic!) __________________ Custom Software \| Server Management \| Integration and Technology Solutions https://www.2much.net