Trump says beating Clinton will be ?easy.? He?s delusional. Literally.

[Horatio Caine]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...nal-literally/

This has Robbie written all over it.

It has become fashionable to claim, as Andrew Sullivan does, that Trump supporters are rallying to him in part because liberals have somehow made them feel culturally inferior, and Trump will make them feel great again.
It is true, as Sullivan also claims, that Democrats are partly complicit in the economic quasi-abandonment of blue collar whites, and it’s possible Trump is successfully tapping into that.

Then there’s the electoral college. As Chris Cillizza shows, if Dems win the states they’ve won in the last six presidential elections, all they need is Florida to win. Demographic changes are slowly edging states like Virginia and North Carolina towards the Dem column, giving Republicans a lot less room for error.
Trump is already viewed unfavorably by enormous majorities of women, nonwhites, young voters, and college educated whites

Guess what?

Florida poll: Hillary Clinton easily beats Ted Cruz or Donald Trump | Tampa Bay Times

[SuckOnThis]

Latest CNN poll has Clinton 54, Trump 41 nationally.

This changes everything.

RealClearPolitics - 2016 Latest Polls

[Evil Chris]

Also this: Sanders 56, Trump 40

[Barry-xlovecam]

Scooby Doo wins with 70%

What a joke this is becoming ...

[Scott McD]

Still amuses me that people see Hillary Clinton as a good choice

Say what you want about Trump yeah, guys a loon, but to think Hillary 'fuckin' Clinton is the answer lol...

[TheLegacy]

Polls as we all know change over the course of time.
From an outsider staring in - just looks like the people are tired of the same ol' shit and are using this to tell the government that they simply are tired of it all.

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by TheLegacy

Polls as we all know change over the course of time.
From an outsider staring in - just looks like the people are tired of the same ol' shit and are using this to tell the government that they simply are tired of it all.

a voice of reason. nicely done.

[JFK]

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

Scooby Doo wins with 70%

What a joke this is becoming ...

I knew he had a chance

[MrMaxwell]

It's unimaginable to contemplate the very thought of anyone being incoherent enough to ever vote for or even to simply not despise hillary
Unthinkable

[Rochard]

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis

Latest CNN poll has Clinton 54, Trump 41 nationally.

This changes everything.

RealClearPolitics - 2016 Latest Polls

This doesn't change anything at all.

About this time before the last election, Obama was beating Romeny by 1% and Obama won. Right now, Clinton has a 13% lead over Trump. Trump will never be able to overcome that. Surely those numbers will become closer over time, and some polls might even put Trump on top, but he will never get close enough to win.

[2MuchMark]

As another outsider looking in, I used to think this trump stuff was a joke, and thought he would have been defeated a long time ago. It's getting spooky-serious now.

I think Hillary can beat Trump. She looks strong and knows her stuff. Bernie is smart but he looks feeble beside Trump.

Scary stuff.

[AntonMG]

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

Scooby Doo wins with 70%

What a joke this is becoming ...

Scooby Doo is by far the most popular US citizen ever.
And I'm talking world wide.

[mineistaken]

Not speaking about the OP, I was amazed how disgusting washington post reports on Trump/GOP.

I love their live statistics during the primaries so I open washington post often and those "opinion columns" about Trump were constantly flowing and were highest level of libtard rants.
Disgusting libby paper, not as bad as libby shit post aka huff post, but high on libby shit paper scale.

Now about polls - it was explained why the polls are WAY too early due to unusual circumstances (was not that too early in all previous elections because circumstances were normal). Trump can close a gap when he starts on Hilary, when GOP stops pouring negative ads and starts pumping positive money etc etc - these are part of those unusual circumstances and this is the reason you can not blindly follow the polls just yet.

[mikesouth]

Its a long time till November and a lot can happen....I do know this...they could charge 19.99 PPV for the first Trump/Clinton debate and make bank...Id pay it....

As an aside I kinda think the convention to watch will be the democratic one...I am convinced that Hillary was promised the nomination in exchange for stepping aside for Obama in 08. I think that bernie was installed simply for show and to give Hillary someone to appear to the right of. I think as bernie got popular and people started saying hey man you could win this, it went to his head a bit. I also think that all of these disenfranchised Democratic voters are NOT going to be happy with Hillary running away with the nomination when arguably Sanders should have won it

[Relentless]

The ONLY person who could get Hillary elected is Trump. Hillary is the fat homely girl nobody wants to fuck, until the party is ending and the only other option is her annoying friend who never shuts the fuck up. Trump is that annoying girl.

[Robbie]

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis

Latest CNN poll has Clinton 54, Trump 41 nationally.

This changes everything.

RealClearPolitics - 2016 Latest Polls

I just looked up that CNN poll which came out yesterday and makes it the latest poll.
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2016/im...16.general.pdf

"BASED ON 878 REGISTERED VOTERS AND 12 INDIVIDUALS WHO PLAN TO REGISTER TO
VOTE, FOR A TOTAL OF 890 REGISTERED VOTERS"

WTF? That's how they are checking the pulse of a nation of over 300 million people?
And who picks these people being polled? I'd say that 900 people from Chicago would have a completely different political view than 900 people from Kentucky.

Anyway, it's just kind of jolting to see how few people these polls really represent.
For some reason I thought that all the Presidential polls used at least several thousand people nationwide.

[Relentless]

CNN is not news and has not been a news source for nearly a decade.

[atom]

People and the Media have been saying for the past year Trump doesn't have a chance. Love him or hate him he has continually proven people wrong.

Come November its going to be a hell of a lot closer than people think.

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by atom

People and the Media have been saying for the past year Trump doesn't have a chance. Love him or hate him he has continually proven people wrong.

Come November its going to be a hell of a lot closer than people think.

Agreed. Now is when Trump moves more to the left for the GE.

HRC is the smartest of the three. Sanders is great at selling pipe dreams. Trump is excellent at branding himself in a positive way & his opponents in the negative.

[12clicks]

If trump isn't elected, it simply proves that the electorate has been dumbed down enough to the point that they think change isn't necessary, or that hillary will change things. If the majority of Americans believe that, we're fucked.

[crockett]

Originally Posted by Scott McD

Still amuses me that people see Hillary Clinton as a good choice

Say what you want about Trump yeah, guys a loon, but to think Hillary 'fuckin' Clinton is the answer lol...

She isn't a good choice but she isn't Trump.

[TampaToker]

Originally Posted by **********

As another outsider looking in, I used to think this trump stuff was a joke, and thought he would have been defeated a long time ago. It's getting spooky-serious now.

I think Hillary can beat Trump. She looks strong and knows her stuff. Bernie is smart but he looks feeble beside Trump.

Scary stuff.

Wait till Trump makes the announcement next week that Monica Lewinsky joined Trumps campaign team. You gonna see Hillary rattled like you never seen her rattled before

[crockett]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

Not speaking about the OP, I was amazed how disgusting washington post reports on Trump/GOP.

I love their live statistics during the primaries so I open washington post often and those "opinion columns" about Trump were constantly flowing and were highest level of libtard rants.
Disgusting libby paper, not as bad as libby shit post aka huff post, but high on libby shit paper scale.

Now about polls - it was explained why the polls are WAY too early due to unusual circumstances (was not that too early in all previous elections because circumstances were normal). Trump can close a gap when he starts on Hilary, when GOP stops pouring negative ads and starts pumping positive money etc etc - these are part of those unusual circumstances and this is the reason you can not blindly follow the polls just yet.

We get it, anything you don't like or agree with is libby shit..

Got it.

[12clicks]

Trump is popular in florida and will win it in the general. He'll pick Kasich as VP who will deliver ohio.
If trump wins florida and ohio, he's the next president.

[Dvae]

Originally Posted by **********

As another outsider looking in, I used to think this trump stuff was a joke, and thought he would have been defeated a long time ago. It's getting spooky-serious now.

I think Hillary can beat Trump. She looks strong and knows her stuff. Bernie is smart but he looks feeble beside Trump.

Scary stuff.

I want to leave you with an image you can't forget Mark.

[Joshua G]

OP - the points you make is tired, obsolete analysis, the same nonsense the libtard media been selling since last june. candidates without major endorsements never won the nomination. candidates who never ran before never won the nomination. trends broken.

who cares what the dems won in their last 6? means nothing. what does matter is turnout in swing states. maybe look into whose getting people to turn out. & remember, crooked hilary, not bernie, is your candidate. the DNC made sure of that.

[Barry-xlovecam]

[Horatio Caine]

Originally Posted by Robbie

I just looked up that CNN poll which came out yesterday and makes it the latest poll.
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2016/im...16.general.pdf

"BASED ON 878 REGISTERED VOTERS AND 12 INDIVIDUALS WHO PLAN TO REGISTER TO
VOTE, FOR A TOTAL OF 890 REGISTERED VOTERS"

WTF? That's how they are checking the pulse of a nation of over 300 million people?
And who picks these people being polled? I'd say that 900 people from Chicago would have a completely different political view than 900 people from Kentucky.

Anyway, it's just kind of jolting to see how few people these polls really represent.
For some reason I thought that all the Presidential polls used at least several thousand people nationwide.

Clown shoes, 2 days ago you posted a 1000 people poll - "General Election Just Changed" , now it's who's holding a pulse?

[Horatio Caine]

Originally Posted by Joshua G

OP - the points you make is tired, obsolete analysis, the same nonsense the libtard media been selling since last june. candidates without major endorsements never won the nomination. candidates who never ran before never won the nomination. trends broken.

who cares what the dems won in their last 6? means nothing. what does matter is turnout in swing states. maybe look into whose getting people to turn out. & remember, crooked hilary, not bernie, is your candidate. the DNC made sure of that.

And is much as you hate it, she will be #45.

[ilnjscb]

Originally Posted by mikesouth

Its a long time till November and a lot can happen....I do know this...they could charge 19.99 PPV for the first Trump/Clinton debate and make bank...Id pay it....

As an aside I kinda think the convention to watch will be the democratic one...I am convinced that Hillary was promised the nomination in exchange for stepping aside for Obama in 08. I think that bernie was installed simply for show and to give Hillary someone to appear to the right of. I think as bernie got popular and people started saying hey man you could win this, it went to his head a bit. I also think that all of these disenfranchised Democratic voters are NOT going to be happy with Hillary running away with the nomination when arguably Sanders should have won it

Mike you're like a fuckin celebrity, are you serious with this? Dude, how many people would need to be complicit in something like that? You are actually IN the media! Presidential politics is chaotic and messy. There is no ruling body (of Jews, democrats or otherwise) that could make or enforce these decisions. Obama won because he got more pledged delegates. He was 100 delegates ahead. She was very gracious when she dropped the race, and urged her voters to support Obama. That may have had something to do with why Obama made her Secretary of State.

She ran and expects to win because she raised tens of millions, has hundreds of powerful democrats supporting her, and she is a Clinton. You would too, had you been in her shoes.

Bernie Sanders tapped the young progressives, and they have done amazing things.

There isn't any conspiracy. Sanders has dedicated supporters who work very hard for him. She has always been "on top" so there wasn't much urgency among her supporters. No one expected Bill Clinton or Obama to win either. Al Gore was an establishment candidate who lost to a person who said "noo-culer". People like unscripted candidates.

[Shedevils]

It's a long time until November and anything can happen. I'm voting Trump. I simply cannot imagine where America would be after eight years of Clinton.

It all hinges on younger voters and whether or not they perceive Trump as a threat to their degeneracy. If they don't show on election day it will be very close indeed.

[Robbie]

Originally Posted by ilnjscb

Mike you're like a fuckin celebrity, are you serious with this? Dude, how many people would need to be complicit in something like that?

The group of donors who contribute giant sums of money. That's exactly how many.

Just like with the Republicans. They had already anointed Jeb Bush.
Didn't work out for them. But it's the same thing.

[ilnjscb]

Originally Posted by Robbie

The group of donors who contribute giant sums of money. That's exactly how many.

Just like with the Republicans. They had already anointed Jeb Bush.
Didn't work out for them. But it's the same thing.

Supporting a person and "promising them the nomination" are two different things. If I tell you I'll support you if you run for office, that is "support". If I tell you I'll give you the office, I'm either a criminal or delusional.

Clinton has a lot of support, and so did Bush. If the voters mirror that support, she wins. If not, she loses. There is no person with the power to give the nomination or the presidency.

[MrMaxwell]

Originally Posted by Robbie

I just looked up that CNN poll which came out yesterday and makes it the latest poll.
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2016/im...16.general.pdf

"BASED ON 878 REGISTERED VOTERS AND 12 INDIVIDUALS WHO PLAN TO REGISTER TO
VOTE, FOR A TOTAL OF 890 REGISTERED VOTERS"

WTF? That's how they are checking the pulse of a nation of over 300 million people?
And who picks these people being polled? I'd say that 900 people from Chicago would have a completely different political view than 900 people from Kentucky.

Anyway, it's just kind of jolting to see how few people these polls really represent.
For some reason I thought that all the Presidential polls used at least several thousand people nationwide.

Absolutely agreed - the other day I watched billo and the poll he showed had a sample size of only 1500 idiots . I could not fucking believe it.

I guess when AB testing traffic, one only needs 4-7 uniques and you must then have all of the information you will ever need

Works for our media

[Horatio Caine]

Originally Posted by MrMaxwell

Absolutely agreed - the other day I watched billo and the poll he showed had a sample size of only 1500 idiots . I could not fucking believe it.

I guess when AB testing traffic, one only needs 4-7 uniques and you must then have all of the information you will ever need

Works for our media

Don't have to watch Bill. We have our own tool claiming 1000 people is more than enough to change general election poll.

https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...n-changed.html

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by ilnjscb

Supporting a person and "promising them the nomination" are two different things. If I tell you I'll support you if you run for office, that is "support". If I tell you I'll give you the office, I'm either a criminal or delusional.

Clinton has a lot of support, and so did Bush. If the voters mirror that support, she wins. If not, she loses. There is no person with the power to give the nomination or the presidency.

dear hillarycock sucker, you have no fucking clue wtf you are yapping about.

[ilnjscb]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

neither party has ever held the WH for 3 consecutive terms..

Fixed it for you, methhead bitch, hey did you post this or not? Coward. Own up to your stupidity.

You haven't mentioned your support for Bernie Sanders in a while - first you were for someone else, it isn't important who, then you were for Sanders, now you're for Trump. So apparently you don't know who the fuck you're for, or why.

Do you think Sanders or Trump want a vacillating methhead bitch for a supporter?

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by ilnjscb

Fixed it for you, methhead bitch, hey did you post this or not? Coward. Own up to your stupidity.

You haven't mentioned your support for Bernie Sanders in a while - first you were for someone else, it isn't important who, then you were for Sanders, now you're for Trump. So apparently you don't know who the fuck you're for, or why.

Do you think Sanders or Trump want a vacillating methhead bitch for a supporter?

you're an even bigger pussified hillarycock sucker than you think i think you are.

i'm not for Trump you stupid fucking nitwit. simpletons like you get confused when your higher ups can see more clearly than you.

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by ilnjscb

Fixed it for you, methhead bitch, hey did you post this or not? Coward. Own up to your stupidity.

You haven't mentioned your support for Bernie Sanders in a while - first you were for someone else, it isn't important who, then you were for Sanders, now you're for Trump. So apparently you don't know who the fuck you're for, or why.

Do you think Sanders or Trump want a vacillating methhead bitch for a supporter?

dumbfuck, you're the one exclaiming hillary has an historic edge in something that's never happened.

historic edge.

you fucking miserable joke.

[ilnjscb]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

of course i posted that.

you dumb bitch, you just admitted it, because you had no choice. You ignorant methhead bitch!

Go learn something before you post with adults.

[dyna mo]

dumbfuck hillarycock sucker,

i know what the intent was, it wasn't the specifics, it was the widely known fact that history is not behind hillary becoming potus. you're butthurt because that goes against your ludicrous exclamation that hillary has an historic edge.

you get torqued-up and distracted because you're an emotional hillarycock sucker.

[ilnjscb]

Originally Posted by dyna mo

dumbfuck hillarycock sucker,

i know what the intent was, it wasn't the specifics, it was the widely known fact that history is not behind hillary becoming potus. you're butthurt because that goes against your ludicrous exclamation that hillary has an historic edge.

you get torqued-up and distracted because you're an emotional hillarycock sucker.

Listen, methhead, I've had my fun with you. You say so many stupid things it isn't a challenge. You're a wasted, dried up, methhead bitch posting multiple garbled nonsense posts that no one reads, like the tweaking bitch you are.

I know your daddy is giving you bad meth, but that isn't my problem.

This isn't about politics, is it? You're tired of what your life has become. I can't say I sympathize, because you chose to do meth, but you can turn it around.

Good luck, Tex. I won't respond unless you post something that makes sense.

[dyna mo]

you keep promising to shut your fucking mouth yet you keep yapping like the hillarycock sucker you are.

[dyna mo]

only a dumbfuck uninformed sexist hillarycock sucker would imagine that people will turn out to vote for Hillary just because she's a female. historic edge. you fucking reject.

[noshit]

Below is example of an Anti-Trump Marshmallow Circling the Toilet Honking like a Goose..!

Originally Posted by Horatio Caine

Trump says beating Clinton will be ?easy.? He?s delusional. Literally.

.

[Black All Through]

His loss margin is among women voters, not even republican women like him that much

[dyna mo]

Originally Posted by Black All Through

His loss margin is among women voters, not even republican women like him that much

and the female (democrats) have been scolded by hillary's feminazi lynch squad

Sorry, Madeleine Albright, but I?d Rather Go to Hell Than Support Hillary Clinton

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by Black All Through

His loss margin is among women voters, not even republican women like him that much

A lot can happen in 6 months

[bronco67]

Literally delusional? Is it possible to be figuratively delusional? I think not writing about black people for once has thrown you off your game a little.

[kane]

Here is a little look into the uphill battle Trump has ahead of him. I took this from electoral-vote.com

"As the Washington Post's Chris Cillizza points out, there are 19 states plus D.C. that the Democrats have won in every election from 1992 to 2012. Together they add up to 242 of the 270 electoral votes needed to win the White House.A new general-election poll of a Clinton-Trump matchup shows Clinton ahead by 13 points in Florida, a state with 29 electoral votes. A simple sum shows 242 + 29 = 271. Game over."

This means for Trump to win he either needs to take some democrat strong states away from Hillary or he will basically have to win all of the battleground states. Neither are easy prospects.

So far nothing has gone as expected with this election so there is no reason to think that things can't change and strange things can't happen, but it is pretty clear, if Trump wants to win he has a major uphill climb ahead of him.