Why isn't female circumcision promoted alongside male circumcision?

[Matt 26z]

Female circumcision has been grouped in with the most aggressive form of female genital mutilation, but the two are actually not the same. Female circumcision removes "excess skin" just like male circumcision.

Mothers who get their boys done do it largely for cosmetic reasons. So why not use the same motive to have baby girls done? If foreskins look gross, then don't roast beef lips look gross also?

[mce]

It is not even remotely close to male circumcism

FGM involves lopping off the clitoris

On a nerve for nerve basis, that's like having your penis cut off at the base.

[Matt 26z]

Originally Posted by mce

It is not even remotely close to male circumcism

FGM involves lopping off the clitoris

On a nerve for nerve basis, that's like having your penis cut off at the base.

I'm not talking about FGM as it is commonly defined. There are multiple degrees of FGM. The least intrusive of them all, female circumcision, has been grouped in with FGM as mothers wouldn't dare cut their baby girls but they will cut their baby boys.

[Matt 26z]

Here are two points of reference on the subject. It appears as though female circumcision does go by the name clitoral hood reduction and is somewhat in practice. But certainly nothing done to baby girls the way it is very commonly done to baby boys in the US and Canada.

Eradicate HIV: 50 Difference between Female Circumcision and Female Genital Mutilation (FGM)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clitoral_hood_reduction

[pimpmaster9000]

ask one hung lo he is a victim of snip dick and is very angry about it

[lys11]

Male circumcision is for medical reasons, with the goal of preventing diseases

[pimpmaster9000]

Originally Posted by lys11

Male circumcision is for medical reasons, with the goal of preventing diseases

Yes 1in 400 circumcised men will not get a urinary tract infection and won't have to take a pill to cure it...Also they can neglect hygiene longer LOL

[notinmybackyard]

Originally Posted by Matt 26z

Female circumcision has been grouped in with the most aggressive form of female genital mutilation, but the two are actually not the same. Female circumcision removes "excess skin" just like male circumcision.

Mothers who get their boys done do it largely for cosmetic reasons. So why not use the same motive to have baby girls done? If foreskins look gross, then don't roast beef lips look gross also?

Frankly I never heard of "roast beef lips" until I read this thread. Just the same I like big lips just as much as little ones and I also prefer my women with a big natural full bush. - So "roast beef" with with pubic hair that's never been cut since birth and I'm a very happy man.

But the fact is that I don't care if a woman young or old, short or tall, fat or skinny, married or single, shaved or hairy. All I care about is she a crazy pervert like me that enjoys fucking and are her orgasms real.

Leave them all fucking natural that's my vote.

[CaptainHowdy]

My moves in bed makes women feel circumcised ...

[jbvryant]

Men who's culture is into circumcision only expects to feel pain once on their lives.
Women has to endure pain in ear piercing , painful first time sex, potential sexual abuse and child birth. Yeah right maybe we should add female circumcision/genital mutilation to that list.

[celandina]

In WW2 Germans used a cirumscission as a proof that that person was a Jew...( or an American).....now analyse who and why promoted that

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by celandina

In WW2 Germans used a cirumscission as a proof that that person was a Jew...( or an American).....now analyse who and why promoted that

Huh? Circumcision amongst Jews were popular well before that century.
So yeah, if you have that Germans are not being circumcised and Jews are being circumcised, surely you can use that to distinguish who is a likely Jew and who is likely not.

[bronco67]

Originally Posted by Matt 26z

Female circumcision has been grouped in with the most aggressive form of female genital mutilation, but the two are actually not the same. Female circumcision removes "excess skin" just like male circumcision.

Mothers who get their boys done do it largely for cosmetic reasons. So why not use the same motive to have baby girls done? If foreskins look gross, then don't roast beef lips look gross also?

Are you able to do anything except look like a gaping asshole? I feel sorry for anyone who has to deal with you on a personal basis. They all probably wish you were dead every time you open your stupid mouth hole. What I'm saying is, not only are you ignorant...but you're a fucking clown asshole with shitty ideas. Kill yourself.

Stop having thoughts. It's not your thing. I reiterate...kill yourself soon.

[celandina]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

Huh? Circumcision amongst Jews were popular well before that century.
So yeah, if you have that Germans are not being circumcised and Jews are being circumcised, surely you can use that to distinguish who is a likely Jew and who is likely not.

I guess you just repeated my point. So no cigar. Here is a hint : Why is there so much cirumscicion in America and so little in Europe.???.

[mineistaken]

Originally Posted by celandina

I guess you just repeated my point. So no cigar. Here is a hint : Why is there so much cirumscicion in America and so little in Europe.???.

Your post sounded as if those who promoted it anticipated ww2/nazi germany etc or had something to do with nazis or ww2 or simething.
My mistake if you did not mean that, but you can agree that it certainly sounded along those lines

[NatalieK]

Originally Posted by Matt 26z

Mothers who get their boys done do it largely for cosmetic reasons. So why not use the same motive to have baby girls done? If foreskins look gross, then don't roast beef lips look gross also?

I would have thought most circumcisions are for both hygiene or religion & not cosmetic

[starling]

Originally Posted by CaptainHowdy

My moves in bed makes women feel circumcised ...

In pain, unsatisfied and feeling like they're missing something?

[EddyTheDog]

Originally Posted by Matt 26z

Female circumcision has been grouped in with the most aggressive form of female genital mutilation, but the two are actually not the same. Female circumcision removes "excess skin" just like male circumcision.

Mothers who get their boys done do it largely for cosmetic reasons. So why not use the same motive to have baby girls done? If foreskins look gross, then don't roast beef lips look gross also?

Female circumcision is to stop women enjoying sex - It's a means of control...

To compare them shows what a retard you are.....

[Paul Markham]

There is no excess skin around a pussy. Matt, you should hire a girl so you can learn what a pussy is.

[celandina]

Originally Posted by mineistaken

Your post sounded as if those who promoted it anticipated ww2/nazi germany etc or had something to do with nazis or ww2 or simething.
My mistake if you did not mean that, but you can agree that it certainly sounded along those lines

My point was that Hitler banned all Jewish doctors from practice in Germany in 1935, then by 1939 he started killing them all over the Europe. So by 1945 there were very few ( to none) practicing Jewish doctors in the Continental Europe, whilst in USA there was (and is) a large proprtion of Jewish doctors, so the cirumscission was promoted by them. I am NOT commenting if cirumscission is good or not, nor discussing any propaganda, just statistics.

[CaptainHowdy]

Originally Posted by starling

In pain, unsatisfied and feeling like they're missing something?

Unsatisfied ...

[CaptainHowdy]

Originally Posted by CaptainHowdy

Unsatisfied ...

... like a cliteroctomy.

[VikingMan]

All I need to do if I am determining if someone had critical thinking skills is to ask them about their view on male circumcision.

Is female genital mutilation worse? Yes of course it is worse but using that as the argument of why male genital mutilation is acceptable is like saying shooting someone in the leg is bad but shooting them in toe is perfectly fine.

[MaDalton]

Originally Posted by Matt 26z

Female circumcision has been grouped in with the most aggressive form of female genital mutilation, but the two are actually not the same. Female circumcision removes "excess skin" just like male circumcision.

Mothers who get their boys done do it largely for cosmetic reasons. So why not use the same motive to have baby girls done? If foreskins look gross, then don't roast beef lips look gross also?

for being a troll you are not funny or annoying enough - therefore you must be just incredibly stupid

[Matt 26z]

Originally Posted by EddyTheDog

Female circumcision is to stop women enjoying sex - It's a means of control...

To compare them shows what a retard you are.....

No, that is female genital mutilation. Muslims do that so their women are more likely to remain virgin until marriage.

Female circumcision is more commonly known as clitoral hood reduction and some women who want a pretty pussy have the prosedure done.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clitoral_hood_reduction
I merely asked why that procedure wasn't done at birth since the male equivalent of it often is.

[EddyTheDog]

Originally Posted by Matt 26z

No, that is female genital mutilation. Muslims do that so their women are more likely to remain virgin until marriage.

Female circumcision is more commonly known as clitoral hood reduction and some women who want a pretty pussy have the prosedure done.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clitoral_hood_reduction
I merely asked why that procedure wasn't done at birth since the male equivalent of it often is.

OK my bad for falling for your troll...

[dillfly2000]

I'm just glad I don't remember it.