Trump Bans All Transgenders From the U.S. Military - Page 3 - GoFuckYourself.com

The Porn Nerd · 07-26-2017, 06:18 PM

Great, there goes another dream of being called 'Major Porn'.

BaldBastard · 07-26-2017, 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio

Men with tits invaders...how desperate was USIS for mercenaries when they could not find enough high school drop outs so they resorted to women and men with tits...

OK let's face it: the US army is the most faggot army in the world now...I back up this claim with the fact that the USA has 5x more gays than any other country per capita, and the only army to allow men who dress like women...also they invaded more countries than the Roman empire so it's not just literally a faggot army but also in a wider sense...

Just sayin ...

Nope that certainly goes to the Russians, I go to Thailand a lot and its a freaking mecca for them and I cringe when a Russian military guys comes near because they are all fags, its like the land of the fag come's to the beach, as soon as they think no ones watching them. They get like a week break there after training in jungles.

I go to Thailand with my wife, shes on the beach all day reading books and perving, and I can't stand sand, so I hang in coffee shops and bars all day... perving, usually with my tablet working. But because I'm there alone, the Ruski fags all think I'm some hot meat for them. Russia is fag central, you just all deny it.

And as for Trumps ban.. what ever, I'd guess very few are on the ground with guns, most are tied up in logistics, support and administration. So it seems senseless but then again nearly everything Trup says/does is.

RedFred · 07-26-2017, 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Are you serious? JoshuaG's Dad is a tranny and he fucks trannies too.?

I thought this was common knowledge. But it's not JoshuaG, his real name is Joshua W. I won't reveal the rest.

Rochard · 07-26-2017, 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

The military by definition isn't the place to have PC values. Anyone who thinks it is is an idiot.

A member of my family is in the frontline and sometimes beyond it. Women don't have the physical strength to be in the front line, they might cause men to be more caring, loving, hating towards their fellow combatants. Because they are women.

By all means, put transgender behind a desk in an office far away from the fight. But for fuck's sake, the military is about killing people and that's not PC.

So what you are saying is... A woman cannot pull a trigger?

I am a Marine, went through Paris Island; Paris Island is where they train women Marines. (We called them "WMs" although I believe that term is no longer used.) Marines in training, in boot camp, go through something called the crucible. It's a three day event where they go through simulated combat situations and are not allowed to sleep. Women Marines go through this also.

What you just said here Paul is exactly what they said about blacks sixty and seventy years ago. They said "They aren't smart enough" and "They aren't strong enough".

We've come a long way since then.

Rochard · 07-26-2017, 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

No, it wasn't. The British Empire had serving black soldiers. The only reasons the US used them was because they were short of men to fight. It was still a segregated army up until WW2.

The United States military has ALWAYS been the catalyst for social change. There have been books written about this very subject. Blacks, women, and then gays - the US military always led the way.

Bladewire · 07-26-2017, 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

The United States military has ALWAYS been the catalyst for social change. There have been books written about this very subject. Blacks, women, and then gays - the US military always led the way.

Sssshh Paul is an expert on everything American 😆😂🤣

King Mark · 07-26-2017, 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slapass

Not that long ago they were against blacks. Dude, you are talking crazy. What is the difference between serving with a straight guy or a gay guy?

Just a heads up to the butthurt... My comment was towards the trannies, not the gays. Nothing against trannies, but come on man...

Paul Markham · 07-26-2017, 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

You always call me PC. I'm not PC. You're such a one way street mind stuffed with negative stereotypes and judgements. Dust out the cobwebs Paul! Anyone not Trump & for equal rights is a patriot. It's the American way "Liberty and justice for all"

I asked that the serving soldiers should be asked. Not politicians and the PC brigade. Tell me what's wrong with that?

Paul Markham · 07-26-2017, 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Get the stick out of your ass Paul Trump ran on a pro Gay rights and pro transgender platform you're being a dope. Clearly, yet again, you're clueless to American politics.

Which is fine. But when it comes to soldiers on the front line it becomes a different question. You're playing with peoples lives.

Paul Markham · 07-26-2017, 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slapass

Not that long ago they were against blacks. Dude, you are talking crazy. What is the difference between serving with a straight guy or a gay guy?

If you don't know I can't tell you. It has to come down to individual cases and once you start to do that it's impossible to decide.

One transgender man in a fighting unit can have a difference. 50/50 between Black and White doesn't. Not so long ago 1 Black in a unit did make a difference.

Paul Markham · 07-26-2017, 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane

One of my best friends served in the Marines. He was in combat in the Persian Gulf War and he was also stationed in Somalia for a while and saw some really nasty shit. Here is his take on gay soldiers in combat: "When bullets are flying and shit is hitting the fan, I don't care whose cock you may or may not have sucked so long as you stay cool under pressure and hit what you shoot at."

My cousin is fighting in the Special Forces. He's anti gays, women, transgender in his unit. For exactly that reason.

Paul Markham · 07-26-2017, 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GspotProductions

why is anyone´s lives at risk!

You know that many transgender people have fought wars & have saved many lives over the years, many kept it to themselves, because of the wankers in life like you

No, I don't do you?

Paul Markham · 07-26-2017, 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe

Good move on the Donald's part. Now repeal allowing gays to serve as well as women. The WAVES's, WAC's, SPAR's etc. needs to be reactivated if women want to serve. BTW the draft should also be reinstated as well. Also the pay should be minimal for draftees, and for those that choose to re-enlist for a second term be paid well.

So long as they don't want to serve on the front line then fine.

Paul Markham · 07-26-2017, 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

So what you are saying is... A woman cannot pull a trigger?

I am a Marine, went through Paris Island; Paris Island is where they train women Marines. (We called them "WMs" although I believe that term is no longer used.) Marines in training, in boot camp, go through something called the crucible. It's a three day event where they go through simulated combat situations and are not allowed to sleep. Women Marines go through this also.

What you just said here Paul is exactly what they said about blacks sixty and seventy years ago. They said "They aren't smart enough" and "They aren't strong enough".

We've come a long way since then.

There's a lot more to fighting than firing a bullet. Did you fight in a war?

Women are not as physical as men. That's why they have women's and men's sports. Whereas Blacks do very well at all sports, beating men.

I'm not anti, women, gays, transgender, I base my feeling on those of the serving soldiers and they should make this decision.

Paul Markham · 07-26-2017, 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

The United States military has ALWAYS been the catalyst for social change. There have been books written about this very subject. Blacks, women, and then gays - the US military always led the way.

My reply was about Blacks in the Army. Not social change.

AndyA · 07-26-2017, 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

If you don't know I can't tell you. It has to come down to individual cases and once you start to do that it's impossible to decide.

One transgender man in a fighting unit can have a difference. 50/50 between Black and White doesn't. Not so long ago 1 Black in a unit did make a difference.

If Paul markham thinks there is a difference between fighting next to a gay or straight man it's because Paul would be preoccupied thinking about sucking the guys dick

If you are against gays and trams in the military it's cause your a closeted gay
Fact

Paul I know about 100 gay men that would beat the piss out of you in about 2 seconds so there is no difference

It means your a bigot and a closet gay

Matt 26z · 07-26-2017, 11:56 PM

The only reason trannys were allowed in the military was so they could study penis and vagina cosmetic operations on them. These advances could then be put towards soldiers who had their dicks blown off.

Matt 26z · 07-26-2017, 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndyA

If Paul markham thinks there is a difference between fighting next to a gay or straight man

Gay men have HIV at a rate that is astounding compared to straight men.

A group of soldiers gets severely injured and blood is flying everywhere. One has HIV. Now they all do.

kane · 07-27-2017, 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

My cousin is fighting in the Special Forces. He's anti gays, women, transgender in his unit. For exactly that reason.

So he is saying gay men, women, and transgender people are incapable of focusing and fighting when the pressure is on?

My guess is that he has served alongside and admired more than one gay man and didn't even know it.

MFCT · 07-27-2017, 01:42 AM

Can someone please explain to me what kind of caveman savagery we are devolving into? So thanks to Trump, the man on the right no longer has the freedom to stop wearing what he's wearing, and instead choose to wear the uniform that the woman on the left is wearing. What in the FUCK??

I mean, if this is what this country has come to, we might as well just put black people back in chains. Because essentially we already have. I'm in agony and anguish over this.

Google Expert · 07-27-2017, 02:07 AM

Liv Schrieber and son:

It's time to end this degeneracy.

Paul Markham · 07-27-2017, 03:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndyA

If Paul markham thinks there is a difference between fighting next to a gay or straight man it's because Paul would be preoccupied thinking about sucking the guys dick

If you are against gays and trams in the military it's cause your a closeted gay
Fact

Paul I know about 100 gay men that would beat the piss out of you in about 2 seconds so there is no difference

It means your a bigot and a closet gay

No, it's not. My feelings are about what serving soldiers on the front line want. Once they say it's OK. Then fine.

Paul Markham · 07-27-2017, 03:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z

Gay men have HIV at a rate that is astounding compared to straight men.

A group of soldiers gets severely injured and blood is flying everywhere. One has HIV. Now they all do.

Maybe he has. But the point you make is he didn't know about it.

Quote:

But having been in the Army and trained with men, can women do the job that is required? I certainly think so. Don?t get me wrong; I completely understand why men have always been put on the frontline. Biologically, something happens to men, call it testosterone or whatever, when they are put under threat. Within seconds a powerful burst of aggression kicks in and they become a pack of wolves.

I experienced this during training. I also realised that whilst women can get to this level of aggression, it doesn't come as quickly or as naturally as it does with men. And of course, seconds and minutes lost in the field can be life or death. Any delay is simply a risk you can?t take.

The last thing our nation needs right now is women coming home in body bags.

Rochard · 07-27-2017, 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

My reply was about Blacks in the Army. Not social change.

Blacks in the army were part of social change. As was women in the army.

Rochard · 07-27-2017, 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

Women are not as physical as men.

There is a US Seal who is transgendered.

pimpmaster9000 · 07-27-2017, 07:33 AM

it is not safe for men with tits to be in the army because US foreign policy is already insulting enough and now if the invaders are men with tits this will piss off everybody being invaded even more...it is hugely disrespectful...

it is not PC for them to be in the army either...human beings deserve a dignified death and it is not politically correct towards normal men who are heterosexual to be attacked and killed by guys with tits invader mercenaries...it is simply not right...

Google Expert · 07-27-2017, 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

There is a US Seal who is transgendered.

that seal is a MAN

he has a DICK

Helix · 07-27-2017, 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

There is a US Seal who is transgendered.

He transitioned after he retired from the military.

Paul Markham · 07-27-2017, 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

Blacks in the army were part of social change. As was women in the army.

My objection towards gays, women, transgender on the Frontline goes towards the other men's safety. Yours is about social change.

Can you see the difference?

Paul Markham · 07-27-2017, 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

There is a US Seal who is transgendered.

So he was in the Army, changed to a woman while in the Army and everything was fine!!!!

Oh no, he changed after he left the army.

This guy makes my point and Trump's for us. Kristin Beck on Trump transgender ban in military: 'Let's meet face to face' - Business Insider

EddyTheDog · 07-27-2017, 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

My objection towards gays, women, transgender on the Frontline goes towards the other men's safety. Yours is about social change.

Can you see the difference?

Then it's about education? - Blacks on the front-line where frowned upon - It happened anyway and now it's normal - In fact it's encouraged...

Social change will happen - It's happened all your LONG life

- Get used to it Paul.....

Rochard · 07-27-2017, 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

My objection towards gays, women, transgender on the Frontline goes towards the other men's safety. Yours is about social change.

Can you see the difference?

No, as a matter of fact I do not see the difference. A woman can pull a trigger just as easily as a man can on the battlefield.

I have lots of friends in the US military, and a lot of them are women. One of them was a medic, and she spent a lot of her time in combat in Afghanistan. She did her job and came back alive. She saved lives. You can't tell me she is not as qualified to serve as I am.

Bladewire · 07-27-2017, 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

My objection towards gays, women, transgender on the Frontline goes towards the other men's safety. Yours is about social change.

Can you see the difference?

You don't feel safe with a Gay man, even if he's white?

That's your own emotional problem Paul and has nothing to do with reality.

TheSquealer · 07-27-2017, 09:30 AM

Haha.. Trump is so good at pushing buttons, he has Liberals furiously defending the military and joining up to fight.

Bladewire · 07-27-2017, 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Google Expert

Liv Schrieber and son:

It's time to end this degeneracy.

How many kids do you have? Please tell me you haven't reproduced. I see you're pushing the anti Hollywood agenda and the anti Gay / transgender agenda. The only degeneracy are idiots like you trying to impose your uneducated bigoted beliefs on other people. If assholes like you can raise your kids with hate & judgement others can raise their girls that feel like boys, as boys & vice versa.

EddyTheDog · 07-27-2017, 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

Haha.. Trump is so good at pushing buttons, he has Liberals furiously defending the military and joining up to fight.

LOL - It's funny because it's true - I bet thousands of transsexuals have invaded the sign up booths today - Imagine the looks on their faces when they see a battalion of transsexuals heading towards them...

Bladewire · 07-27-2017, 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer

Haha.. Trump is so good at pushing buttons, he has Liberals furiously defending the military and joining up to fight.

I went to join the army when I was 18 and started the paperwork with the recruiter, then I was denied. I was really pissed but it was their rules. I didn't have a diploma and they said I had to graduate high school first. At that point I was already out of school for a year supporting myself. Never went back to reapply, never got my diploma. None of it had to do with me being Gay.

The armed forces is a patriot thing, not a liberal vs conservative thing. Thats a fucked up stereotype you've concocted there

Steve Rupe · 07-27-2017, 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

No, as a matter of fact I do not see the difference. A woman can pull a trigger just as easily as a man can on the battlefield.

I have lots of friends in the US military, and a lot of them are women. One of them was a medic, and she spent a lot of her time in combat in Afghanistan. She did her job and came back alive. She saved lives. You can't tell me she is not as qualified to serve as I am.

She may be as qualified to serve as you are but I doubt that you are qualified to serve. Unless she is a bull dyke and is full of testosterone she is not 100% capable of performing her role in the MOS as a medic. She is not capable of carrying or dragging a 200 lb man out of harms way in order to treat him.

The military allows women to serve in many MOS's that they are not 100% qualified to serve in. I have many friends that have served and are still serving and all have testified to this fact. Just as another example; women are allowed the MOS for driving a truck but they cannot perform 100% of all that is involved in that MOS, the average woman driver cannot change a tire on a duece and a half, she cannot lift five gallon Jerry cans of gas to put gas into the truck, she cannot load or off load much of what is carried on the truck.

A woman is allowed the MOS of being a Micro Wave Systems Operator and they cannot perform 100% of all that is involved in that MOS. They cannot lift the 5 gallon Jerry cans of gas to fill the Generators. The majority of them cannot use the heavy sledge hammers to pound the long heavy iron stakes in for the guide wires on the Micro Dishes.

Men in these MOS's have to be able to perform all of these feats in order to obtain the MOS. They brass turn their heads when it comes to women being able to meet the requirements of the MOS. There really are very few MOS's in the military that women can perform 100% of the requirements.

Men have to go out of their way to assist women in performing the duties required of the MOS that PC allows them to serve in. Men cannot act like men or talk like men when women are serving in MOS's that they are not actually qualified to server in.

One of my friends, an NCO, was an instructor for summer drills for West Point Cadets. Women are now allowed to serve at the Point. My friend was on the firing range as an instructor when the cadets were firing .50 Cal's MG's. A female cadet could not clear her MG when it jammed. She asked my friend to clear it for her. He told her no that he would not that she had been trained on that procedure and to clear it herself. He then went on to say something along the lines of, if you can't don't worry about it, you won't ever be required to use one in combat anyhow.

She reported him and he was reprimanded not for not helping her but for "Sexual Harassment" and this went into his jacket. In addition he was removed from being an instructor for the Cadets. He did not mind that so much but a permanent black mark on his record for "Sexual Harassment" pissed him off and when his enlistment was up after 12 years in the service he did not reenlist.

The powers that be should never have done away with the WAC's and over women's branches. The WAC's could all perform their MOS's 100%.

Steve Rupe · 07-27-2017, 11:05 AM

It now turns out that the Joint Chiefs as well as the head of the Joint Chiefs new nothing about the Donald's imposing a ban on Transgenders which means the Donald lied yet again when he tweeted that he had consulted with his Generals.

onwebcam · 07-27-2017, 11:09 AM

seXXXhub · 07-27-2017, 11:10 AM

i couldnt agree more with Trump

Bladewire · 07-27-2017, 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe

She may be as qualified to serve as you are but I doubt that you are qualified to serve. Unless she is a bull dyke and is full of testosterone she is not 100% capable of performing her role in the MOS as a medic. She is not capable of carrying or dragging a 200 lb man out of harms way in order to treat him.

The military allows women to serve in many MOS's that they are not 100% qualified to serve in. I have many friends that have served and are still serving and all have testified to this fact. Just as another example; women are allowed the MOS for driving a truck but they cannot perform 100% of all that is involved in that MOS, the average woman driver cannot change a tire on a duece and a half, she cannot lift five gallon Jerry cans of gas to put gas into the truck, she cannot load or off load much of what is carried on the truck.

A woman is allowed the MOS of being a Micro Wave Systems Operator and they cannot perform 100% of all that is involved in that MOS. They cannot lift the 5 gallon Jerry cans of gas to fill the Generators. The majority of them cannot use the heavy sledge hammers to pound the long heavy iron stakes in for the guide wires on the Micro Dishes.

Men in these MOS's have to be able to perform all of these feats in order to obtain the MOS. They brass turn their heads when it comes to women being able to meet the requirements of the MOS. There really are very few MOS's in the military that women can perform 100% of the requirements.

Men have to go out of their way to assist women in performing the duties required of the MOS that PC allows them to serve in. Men cannot act like men or talk like men when women are serving in MOS's that they are not actually qualified to server in.

One of my friends, an NCO, was an instructor for summer drills for West Point Cadets. Women are now allowed to serve at the Point. My friend was on the firing range as an instructor when the cadets were firing .50 Cal's MG's. A female cadet could not clear her MG when it jammed. She asked my friend to clear it for her. He told her no that he would not that she had been trained on that procedure and to clear it herself. He then went on to say something along the lines of, if you can't don't worry about it, you won't ever be required to use one in combat anyhow.

She reported him and he was reprimanded not for not helping her but for "Sexual Harassment" and this went into his jacket. In addition he was removed from being an instructor for the Cadets. He did not mind that so much but a permanent black mark on his record for "Sexual Harassment" pissed him off and when his enlistment was up after 12 years in the service he did not reenlist.

The powers that be should never have done away with the WAC's and over women's branches. The WAC's could all perform their MOS's 100%.

it's a conspiracy

EddyTheDog · 07-27-2017, 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

...

EddyTheDog · 07-27-2017, 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe

It now turns out that the Joint Chiefs as well as the head of the Joint Chiefs new nothing about the Donald's imposing a ban on Transgenders which means the Donald lied yet again when he tweeted that he had consulted with his Generals.

There is some massive backtracking going on - He got an idea in whats left of his brain and just said it - I do the same thing - Fortunately I'm not POTUS...

onwebcam · 07-27-2017, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Rupe

It now turns out that the Joint Chiefs as well as the head of the Joint Chiefs new nothing about the Donald's imposing a ban on Transgenders which means the Donald lied yet again when he tweeted that he had consulted with his Generals.

Lied or played fools? People actually think Trump himself is tweeting? Or that a tweet is an order?

onwebcam · 07-27-2017, 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

He sure loves pissing in snowflakes cereal.

I know it's a day late and a dollar short but would like to apologize for my comment before anyone gets offended. Some people may like piss in the cereal.

Bladewire · 07-27-2017, 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Lied or played fools? People actually think Trump himself is tweeting? Or that a tweet is an order?

I guess you didn't get the memmo that Trump's tweets are official white house statements and as such will be archive in the library of Congress.

Consider Trump's tweets to be 'official statements,' says Spicer - ABC News

Statements of Administration Policy |
Whitehouse

onwebcam · 07-27-2017, 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

I guess you didn't get the memmo that Trump's tweets are official white house statements and as such will be archive in the library of Congress.

Consider Trump's tweets to be 'official statements,' says Spicer - ABC News

Spicer? You mean the guy who was crying behind a bush/fired/leaker said that? No shit?

Bladewire · 07-27-2017, 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Spicer? You mean the guy who was crying behind a bush/fired/leaker said that? No shit?

Well I tried to educate you

You can lead a horse to water but can't make it drink

Statements of Administration Policy |
Whitehouse

onwebcam · 07-27-2017, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire

Well I tried to educate you

You can lead a horse to water but can't make it drink

Statements of Administration Policy |
Whitehouse

Oh please do, educate me on some twitter law.

07-26-2017, 06:18 PM	#101
The Porn Nerd Living The Dream Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Inside a Monitor Posts: 19,513	Great, there goes another dream of being called 'Major Porn'. __________________ My Affiliate Programs: Porn Nerd Cash \| Porn Showcase \| Aggressive Gold Over 90 paysites to promote! Now on Teams: peabodymedia

07-27-2017, 01:42 AM	#120
MFCT Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2015 Posts: 1,489	Can someone please explain to me what kind of caveman savagery we are devolving into? So thanks to Trump, the man on the right no longer has the freedom to stop wearing what he's wearing, and instead choose to wear the uniform that the woman on the left is wearing. What in the FUCK?? I mean, if this is what this country has come to, we might as well just put black people back in chains. Because essentially we already have. I'm in agony and anguish over this. __________________ Keeping you abreast of the teens that get undressed. Girls By Location - Couples By Location - Guys By Location - Trans By Location

07-27-2017, 07:33 AM	#126
pimpmaster9000 Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 26,732	it is not safe for men with tits to be in the army because US foreign policy is already insulting enough and now if the invaders are men with tits this will piss off everybody being invaded even more...it is hugely disrespectful... it is not PC for them to be in the army either...human beings deserve a dignified death and it is not politically correct towards normal men who are heterosexual to be attacked and killed by guys with tits invader mercenaries...it is simply not right... __________________ Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

07-27-2017, 11:09 AM	#140
onwebcam Fake Nick 1.0 Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Rent free, your head Posts: 27,653	__________________ PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF..... ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

07-27-2017, 11:10 AM	#141
seXXXhub Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 628	i couldnt agree more with Trump __________________

07-26-2017, 11:56 PM	#117
Matt 26z So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: ¤ª"˜¨๑۩۞۩๑¨˜"ª¤ Posts: 18,481	The only reason trannys were allowed in the military was so they could study penis and vagina cosmetic operations on them. These advances could then be put towards soldiers who had their dicks blown off.

07-27-2017, 02:07 AM	#121
Google Expert Webmaster Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 14,294	Liv Schrieber and son: It's time to end this degeneracy.

07-27-2017, 09:30 AM	#134
TheSquealer BANNED Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: In Your Head Posts: 25,093	Haha.. Trump is so good at pushing buttons, he has Liberals furiously defending the military and joining up to fight.

07-27-2017, 11:05 AM	#139
Steve Rupe Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2016 Posts: 3,048	It now turns out that the Joint Chiefs as well as the head of the Joint Chiefs new nothing about the Donald's imposing a ban on Transgenders which means the Donald lied yet again when he tweeted that he had consulted with his Generals.