![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Canada
Posts: 80
|
![]() The best way to promote cam girls and their related services is to review individual performers - you may agree or disagree with that statement, but hey, it works for me. But here's the thing - you can't use performer pictures in your reviews without their permission.
Here's a way around this problem. On most cam sites, performers have a profile page, which more often than not, features a gallery of the performer's photos. Cam sites should add a tab to each performers profile page called "Promotional Photos" - performers seeking reviews would be able to add photos to this page with the understanding that doing so provides permission for the photos to be used in reviews. Any webcam service that implements this idea will see a surge in traffic from sponsored reviews - the webmasters win, the performer wins and the webcam service wins. What are your thoughs on this idea? Please share.
__________________
Always looking for quality trades! www.coolchatfriends.com www.oursexyvideos.com www.webcams411.com www.sexblogtoplist.com |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Videochat Solutions
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 48,529
|
Interesting !!!
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Confirmed Fetishist
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fetishland
Posts: 11,521
|
actually a good idea
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Onboard an airplane around the globe
Posts: 3,733
|
And the day she wants to quit her photo will be spread over an endless amount of sites with no supervision, some sites may still be active others may be on auto pilot. Surely it is not for everyone.
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The truth is not affected by the beliefs, or doubts, of the majority. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: ¤ª"˜¨๑۩۞۩๑¨˜"ª¤
Posts: 18,481
|
Allow the publication of these photos only via hotlink. If the model quits, the images simply go 404. If the model deletes an image and replaces it with a new one, that new shot shows on your affiliate site instead.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 145
|
Yo this IS a good idea, and something I've been thinking about for a while now. Some of these individual performers are big enough that they command their own keywords, and the competition is currently not super fierce.
OP - you may want to check out MCProfits. I don't know if they work with many cam models, but the performers signed up with them upload promotional videos and photos, so you know anything on their MCProfits page you have permission to use!
__________________
I make adult review sites! ![]() https://www.adultcamreview.com https://www.gaycamreview.com https://www.pornexplosion.com As for politics, I think we must totally destroy all spice production on Arrakis. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Registered User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Great State of Colorado
Posts: 61
|
Quote:
I'm not quite sure if you're allowed to use anything on their page, but a requirement for being added to MCProfits is that models must have x-amount of FHGs or zip files, so plenty of promotional content for each performer. I was also going to suggest MCProfits as well. CamWithHer offers some promotional content and video embeds, iFriends / ClickCash provides some promo material for their featured models each month, but outside of that, not very many camming affiliate programs giving out promotional content. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Registered User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Canada
Posts: 80
|
Good point - maybe a condition would be that the photos can only be hot-linked and embedded, therefore whenever the performers stops camming, she can remove her profile page and the photos would automatically disappear or be replaced by a generic placeholder photo
__________________
Always looking for quality trades! www.coolchatfriends.com www.oursexyvideos.com www.webcams411.com www.sexblogtoplist.com |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 145
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
I make adult review sites! ![]() https://www.adultcamreview.com https://www.gaycamreview.com https://www.pornexplosion.com As for politics, I think we must totally destroy all spice production on Arrakis. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,313
|
or just do it the Instagram way.
https://help.instagram.com/581066165581870 "We do not claim ownership of your content, but you grant us a license to use it. Nothing is changing about your rights in your content. We do not claim ownership of your content that you post on or through the Service. Instead, when you share, post, or upload content that is covered by intellectual property rights (like photos or videos) on or in connection with our Service, you hereby grant to us a non-exclusive, royalty-free, transferable, sub-licensable, worldwide license to host, use, distribute, modify, run, copy, publicly perform or display, translate, and create derivative works of your content (consistent with your privacy and application settings). You can end this license anytime by deleting your content or account. However, content will continue to appear if you shared it with others and they have not deleted it. " |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
visit hardlinks.org
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Las Vegas , Nv >>> [email protected] or icq 94994627 anytime
Posts: 18,362
|
Good idea.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Registered User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Great State of Colorado
Posts: 61
|
It's a great program. Centro is really on their game. I'm not really pushing much on the customer-side of things, but just through some PR announcements about big names signing up to MC/FC, I've received commissions. More than I would have expected at that.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 10,524
|
Quote:
I am not an attorney, so please do not take the following as legal advice, but ... Legally, you can't copy a whole private show and post it, but why would you not be able to review the performer with a reasonable number of public pics? When a book reviewer reviews a book, they aren't supposed to upload a PDF of the whole thing, but they can absolutely quote small passages for the purpose of illustrating a review. It can't hurt to check with the performer as a courtesy, but I believe the law is on the side of journalists when it comes to reviews.
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Blue Blood's SpookyCash.com Babe photography portfolio |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Registered User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Great State of Colorado
Posts: 61
|
If you follow AmberCutie or StripperWeb, there's quite a few dialogues on this where models have stated that they'd have no problem giving out some promo content if affiliates do this, but "fuck the people that just scrape".
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: L.A.
Posts: 5,740
|
Have a strongly worded DMCA page without a lot of text so they actually read it. On there spell it out. We promote you. We are allowed to use your photos per the terms of service on your respective cam host. We are not a tube that steals your content. We send you paying surfers.
We've never had anybody ask to have their martials removed. Some have even offered to send us videos.
__________________
![]() ![]() * Handwritten * 180 C Class IPs * Permanent! * Many Niches! * Bulk Discounts! GFYPosts /at/ J2Media.net |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 26,732
|
most cam models, 90% of them, do not want their pics spread around the net...they do not see camming as their life goal but rather as temporary profit...
the webmaster of course has different ambitions... as for "Ratings" it is very misleading...ratings are only as good as the people doing the rating...."what you wont shit in the middle of the room for me? heres a negative rating"..."you dont stuff huge dildos up your ass? heres a negative rating"... all "Review" sites suffer from this....people are MUCH more likely to give a bad review than a good one...then the models have to beg others for good reviews...anybody who runs and online business that has a social media presence knows how fucked up reviews really are... |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |