Mueller caught deceptively editing content in report

[onwebcam]

"It's All A Fraud": Deceptive Edits Found In Mueller Report

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-...mueller-report

[bronco67]

"uncovered" by the famous internet sleuth @almostjingo.

It's a bunch of idiots trying to find some way to rationalize the behavior of scumbags. What is they've uncovered now? Is it some more shit that republican dumbasses think is something, but it turns out to be nothing? Like all the shit they get excited about?

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by bronco67

"uncovered" by the famous internet sleuth @almostjingo.

She's very good at what she does... Better than a team of $40 million lawyers. I think she's the one with a OSINT tool site

[directfiesta]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

She's very good at what she does... Better than a team of $40 million lawyers

was 25 million by the way .... 40 is Trump numbers ...

Me too I am good at what I do ...

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by directfiesta

was 25 million by the way .... 40 is Trump numbers ...

Me too I am good at what I do ...

Not all expenses are done and/or calculated. The $25 million is to September of LAST YEAR


The Mueller investigation could cost up to $35 million once all the expense reports are in
https://www.businessinsider.com/robe...million-2019-3


That was in March.. Looking like $40 is going to be the ballpark.. And considering Trump can see any of the books he wants.. He probably knows a bit more than we do.

[2MuchMark]

Ah yes, Zerohedge... I thought they imploded they couldn't prove the earth was a sphere?

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark

Ah yes, Zerohedge... I thought they imploded they couldn't prove the earth was a sphere?

Shoot the messengers, ignore the message.. It's the liberal way..

[Major (Tom)]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Shoot the messengers, ignore the message.. It's the liberal way..

Indeedy do

[bronco67]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

She's very good at what she does... Better than a team of $40 million lawyers. I think she's the one with a OSINT tool site

Who says she's good? Sean Hannity?

[bronco67]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Not all expenses are done and/or calculated. The $25 million is to September of LAST YEAR


The Mueller investigation could cost up to $35 million once all the expense reports are in
https://www.businessinsider.com/robe...million-2019-3


That was in March.. Looking like $40 is going to be the ballpark.. And considering Trump can see any of the books he wants.. He probably knows a bit more than we do.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/17/muel...rt-assets.html

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by bronco67

Who says she's good? Sean Hannity?

I do I watch her much more than I do Hannity.. In fact I've never watched Hannity outside of clips... I watch OSINT gurus like her... You should turn off Madcow and try it sometime.. There are many. And many break the news just like this..

[bronco67]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

I do I watch her much more than I do Hannity.. In fact I've never watched Hannity outside of clips... I watch OSINT gurus like her... You should turn off Madcow and try it sometime.. There are many. And many break the news just like this..

Oh...you watch her? That means she's top notch then.

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by bronco67

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/17/muel...rt-assets.html

Are you proud your party threw him under the bus to try and support your fake news narrative and then made him pay for the bus damage?

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by bronco67

Oh...you watch her? That means she's top notch then.

One of the best

[bronco67]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

One of the best

and you're not the best at detecting sarcasm.

If you like her then she's a joke.

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by bronco67

and you're not the best at detecting sarcasm.

Or perhaps I am

The joke is on you

[Diomed]

Originally Posted by bronco67

Who says she's good? Sean Hannity?

Always interesting watching you guys dismiss the 7% of news sources that challenge any liberal narrative in any way at all

Like watching you guys go along with the Kavanaugh shit.. it's embarrassing.

Like watching Trump empower Barr to investigate and seeing Mueller pop up on tv a week later.. Nothing to see here folks!

Many lulz.

[Slappin Fish]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Shoot the messengers, ignore the message.. It's the liberal way..

Ironic from the group of people who are spoonfed cutesy labels like MSM, RINO etc... so they never have to hear anything that doesn't suit their narrative

[bronco67]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Or perhaps I am

The joke is on you

I highly doubt that if the joke is coming from someone who couldn't outwit a glass of water.

[beerptrol]

More bullshit from the alt right. Bunch of dumb asses and biggest purveyors
of fake news

[onwebcam]

Originally Posted by beerptrol

More bullshit from the alt right. Bunch of dumb asses and biggest purveyors
of fake news

So you believe that it's ok for a prosecutor to present edited evidence to the jury?

Not just that, that it's ok for a prosecutor to present edited messages of the defense's lawyer?




My bet is this lawyer is already putting together a case of his own.. A government employee / PROSECUTOR just told the World he said one thing when he said another..

How do you indict a ham sandwich? Because Grand Juries don't have Rosie Memos.

[bronco67]

It's funny watching half of America parsing everything the investigators are doing, looking for one little error to nail them on, while ignoring the mountain of crimes Trump and his people have been committing.

It just came out yesterday that George Nader (also a convicted pedophile) was a conduit for the Russians in organizing access to Trump people during and after the campaign. Where's the outrage for that?

[Busty2]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

And considering Trump can see any of the books he wants.. He probably knows a bit more than we do.

I doubt it! The tard is unable to read anything longer than one sentance due to his intense ADHD

[MFCT]

From what I understand, Mueller altered a voicemail transcript of testimony by John Dow under oath.

Is it true that manufacturing evidence is a felony that carries a minimum of 15 years in prison?

Normally I'd be outraged at evidence being manufactured. Especially in such a high profile and important case as Trump colluding with Russia. I'd demand they throw the book at him for doing that!

However, since I agree with Mueller politically, I'm at a loss to understand what is supposed to be so wrong with manufacturing evidence.

[thommy]

Originally Posted by Diomed

Always interesting watching you guys dismiss the 7% of news sources that challenge any liberal narrative in any way at all

Like watching you guys go along with the Kavanaugh shit.. it's embarrassing.

Like watching Trump empower Barr to investigate and seeing Mueller pop up on tv a week later.. Nothing to see here folks!

Many lulz.

Overall, we rate Zero Hedge an extreme right biased conspiracy website.
Detailed Report
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: Bulgaria
World Press Freedom Rank: Bulgaria 45/180

History

Launched in 2009, Zero Hedge is a finance blog founded by Colin Lokey also known with the pseudonym “Tyler Durden,” Daniel Ivandjiiski, and Tim Backshall. According to a Bloomberg Interview the Zero Hedge founders/authors were anonymous until 2016. A Professional Service Subscription is required to read the rest of the interview from Bloomberg, however a New Yorker article also covered their history.

Zero Hedge wrote a rebuttal article regarding the Bloomberg interview that can be found here. A quote from the rebuttal reads: “Zero Hedge hired Colin when he approached us over a year ago begging for a job after he was fired with cause from Seeking Alpha, following a fight with a co-worker.”

Funded by / Ownership

The website is registered in Bulgaria under the name Georgi Georgiev, a business partner of Krassimir Ivandjiiski.

According to Rationalwiki the only writer “conclusively” identified is “Dan Ivandjiiski, who conducts public interviews on behalf of Zero Hedge.” The blog generates revenue from online advertising.

Analysis / Bias

In a quote from the above New Yorker article they summarize the political stance of the blog, which Lokey told Bloomberg is: “Russia=good. Obama=idiot. Bashar al-Assad=benevolent leader. John Kerry= dunce. Vladimir Putin=greatest leader in the history of statecraft.”

Zero Hedge’s content has been classified as “alt-right” and has been criticized for presenting conspiracy theories.

In review, Zero Hedge publishes pro-right wing/Trump articles such as Pat Buchanan: “Trump Calls Off Cold War II.” As well as fake news stories regarding liberals: Anti-Trump Protesters Bused Into Austin, Chicago.

Editorial content is written under the pseudonym Tyler Durden and usually focuses on conspiracies related to economic collapse. Zero Hedge sources to factually mixed think tanks such as the The Mises Institute, which promotes Austrian (Anarcho-Capitalism) economics.

A factual search reveals a terrible track record with IFCN fact checkers. There are too many failed checks to list here.

Overall, we rate Zero Hedge an extreme right biased conspiracy website. (8/18/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 7/17/2018)


Source: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/zero-hedge/

[beerptrol]

Originally Posted by bronco67

It's funny watching half of America parsing everything the investigators are doing, looking for one little error to nail them on, while ignoring the mountain of crimes Trump and his people have been committing.

It just came out yesterday that George Nader (also a convicted pedophile) was a conduit for the Russians in organizing access to Trump people during and after the campaign. Where's the outrage for that?

The alt right love their pedos

George Nader arrested on child pornography charges

[Bladewire]

Originally Posted by beerptrol

The alt right love their pedos

George Nader arrested on child pornography charges

True

Mexican user Escorpio here (Eric Chatham) defends these scum 24/7. Disgusting

[imabro]

Originally Posted by Busty2

I doubt it! The tard is unable to read anything longer than one sentance due to his intense ADHD

I bet he can spell sentence.

[2MuchMark]

Originally Posted by Diomed

Always interesting watching you guys dismiss the 7% of news sources that challenge any liberal narrative in any way at all
.

Sean Hannity has zero credibility, which is why he is constantly dismissed.

[PR_Glen]

Originally Posted by Diomed

Always interesting watching you guys dismiss the 7% of news sources that challenge any liberal narrative in any way at all

Like watching you guys go along with the Kavanaugh shit.. it's embarrassing.

Like watching Trump empower Barr to investigate and seeing Mueller pop up on tv a week later.. Nothing to see here folks!

Many lulz.

not as funny as you dismissing 93% of the other news organizations that say the opposite of all the cherry picked places you read.

You have to read most of it because most of that 7% aren't news organizations, they are blog sites funded by pundits with agendas. Other than fox, fox makes attempts at reporting news, they just omit the parts that makes them look stupid.

hate cnn, nbc, cbs, wp, all you want. They are still actual news organizations. And when shit gets scary and terrible you don't go to your random blog sites for updates. you go to one of those...

You don't have to be that intelligent to pick out the political slant in a news source. Why can't you guys do it?

[RedFred]

[Acepimp]

Originally Posted by thommy

Overall, we rate Zero Hedge an extreme right biased conspiracy website.

Source: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/zero-hedge/

Hi Thommy! Sorry but that's total bullshit!

MediaBiasFactCheck is a far-left biased site that is literally run by one of Hillary's buddies. The guy who runs it is president of a college in New York City where she likes to give speeches.

The MediaBiasFactCheck site is a joke- one look and most people can see how amateur it is.

You got duped again, buddy.

[crockett]

Originally Posted by onwebcam

Shoot the messengers, ignore the message.. It's the liberal way..

Originally Posted by DukeSkywalker

Indeedy do

Funny you attack the messenger all the time, but..but.. dats diffrant right?

Originally Posted by DukeSkywalker

Snopes is bullshit bro

Originally Posted by DukeSkywalker

Where does rachel maddow fit into this

Originally Posted by DukeSkywalker

Neither is huffpo or vox. It’s everywhere.

[MFCT]

As more information comes in about this alleged incident, it gets more interesting:

1) There was a phone call between Trump’s attorney John Dowd and Michael Flynn.

2) The transcript of this phone call apparently was sealed, and I suppose no one ever expected it to see the light of day

3) The transcript was, however, allowed to be accessed by Mueller during his investigation. And it was included in the Mueller report

4) The original transcript was released to the public by court order, apparently on Friday, May 31st, 2019

5) Comparing the original transcript to the one in the Mueller report, Mueller selectively edited the transcript by leaving out key information that supported Trump's innocence of obstruction.

6) "It is not the same transcript in the Mueller report. It was selectively edited to make the Trump team look worse and potentially guilty of obstruction."

Source, along with the differences that you can review for yourself:
https://www.independentsentinel.com/...em-look-worse/

7) I'm including this simply for background information, FYI, without accusing or alleging anyone is guilty of anything: manufacturing evidence in a federal investigation is the same as witness tampering... 15-20 years in federal prison

One must wonder what other information the Mueller report has been selectively edited to make Trump appear to have committed obstruction, while exculpatory evidence that put Trump in a good light was similarly omitted.

But again, even with all that said.... since I agree with Mueller politically, I don't see any indication of deception or wrong-doing on the part of Robert Mueller, whatsoever. This is a non-issue. I discourage anyone from discussing these new revelations, or even thinking about them.

By the same token, I hope Mueller will continue to shun all questions regarding the Mueller Report. I, for one, do not want him to have to suffer the indignity of having to explain why he would omit exculpatory evidence from his report. It is my opinion that it simply would be rude and in bad taste.

[bronco67]

Originally Posted by MFCT

As more information comes in about this alleged incident, it gets more interesting:

1) There was a phone call between Trump’s attorney John Dowd and Michael Flynn.

2) The transcript of this phone call apparently was sealed, and I suppose no one ever expected it to see the light of day

3) The transcript was, however, allowed to be accessed by Mueller during his investigation. And it was included in the Mueller report

4) The original transcript was released to the public by court order, apparently on Friday, May 31st, 2019

5) Comparing the original transcript to the one in the Mueller report, Mueller selectively edited the transcript by leaving out key information that supported Trump's innocence of obstruction.

6) "It is not the same transcript in the Mueller report. It was selectively edited to make the Trump team look worse and potentially guilty of obstruction."

Source, along with the differences that you can review for yourself:
https://www.independentsentinel.com/...em-look-worse/

7) I'm including this simply for background information, FYI, without accusing or alleging anyone is guilty of anything: manufacturing evidence in a federal investigation is the same as witness tampering... 15-20 years in federal prison

One must wonder what other information the Mueller report has been selectively edited to make Trump appear to have committed obstruction, while exculpatory evidence that put Trump in a good light was similarly omitted.

But again, even with all that said.... since I agree with Mueller politically, I don't see any indication of deception or wrong-doing on the part of Robert Mueller, whatsoever. This is a non-issue. I discourage anyone from discussing these new revelations, or even thinking about them.

By the same token, I hope Mueller will continue to shun all questions regarding the Mueller Report. I, for one, do not want him to have to suffer the indignity of having to explain why he would omit exculpatory evidence from his report. It is my opinion that it simply would be rude and in bad taste.

It's another case of carefully parsing statements to twist it into something it's not. They do this constantly. They just recently did this with the "Cannot clear the president criminally" statement. They look at it as "Trump is innocent". All of those fuckers are brainwashed and whacked in the fucking head.