Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar Mark Forums Read
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 08-31-2005, 03:12 PM   #1
jojojo
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,318
Simple 2257 question

Let's say I wanted to use a softcore pic of chick from a solo girl site on a domain as the ad and link that to the paysite.

if this is the only pic on the entire domain do I need to link to that paysite's 2257 link? or link somewhere or something?
__________________
Learn SEO - make $$ residually - icq me 333485092
jojojo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2005, 03:15 PM   #2
After Shock Media
It's coming look busy
 
After Shock Media's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn".
Posts: 35,299
Assuming they indeed placed sub section (e) back into the 2257/2256 rules as has been reported during the court hearings, then a soft core non explicit photo would not need 2257 documentation, which would mean no link would be required.
__________________

[email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]
After Shock Media is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2005, 03:19 PM   #3
jojojo
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,318
Quote:
Originally Posted by After Shock Media
Assuming they indeed placed sub section (e) back into the 2257/2256 rules as has been reported during the court hearings, then a soft core non explicit photo would not need 2257 documentation, which would mean no link would be required.
Thanks - thats good news

Here is another stupid noob 2257 question... what is the definition of softcore non explicit?

girl with/without panties bending over for the camera? does that fall in the definition?
__________________
Learn SEO - make $$ residually - icq me 333485092
jojojo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2005, 03:20 PM   #4
Michaelious
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Scotland
Posts: 6,720
this is all just getting too complicated lol
__________________
Michaelious is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2005, 03:24 PM   #5
After Shock Media
It's coming look busy
 
After Shock Media's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn".
Posts: 35,299
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojojo
Thanks - thats good news

Here is another stupid noob 2257 question... what is the definition of softcore non explicit?

girl with/without panties bending over for the camera? does that fall in the definition?
Again if they added sub section (e) back into 2256/2257. Then the same standards that used to exist for non explicit will remain the same.
__________________

[email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]
After Shock Media is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2005, 03:58 PM   #6
MrPinks
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: FL
Posts: 1,767
But what if the softcore pic is from a hardcore set?
MrPinks is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2005, 04:13 PM   #7
pornguy
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
pornguy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Homeless
Posts: 62,911
If the thumb links to hardcore, then you have to have it. thumb to softcore, you wont. BUT the big this is, what will they decide is or is not hard core.
__________________
PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic

AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!
pornguy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2005, 04:41 PM   #8
EZRhino
Confirmed User
 
EZRhino's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: couch
Posts: 6,258
Quote:
Originally Posted by After Shock Media
Assuming they indeed placed sub section (e) back into the 2257/2256 rules as has been reported during the court hearings, then a soft core non explicit photo would not need 2257 documentation, which would mean no link would be required.
Sounds about right
EZRhino is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2005, 04:44 PM   #9
After Shock Media
It's coming look busy
 
After Shock Media's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn".
Posts: 35,299
Quote:
Originally Posted by pornguy
If the thumb links to hardcore, then you have to have it. thumb to softcore, you wont. BUT the big this is, what will they decide is or is not hard core.
Again this would be covered in sub section (e) of the exemptions. It says in a pretty matter of fact way what is and is not covered.
__________________

[email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]
After Shock Media is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2005, 05:03 PM   #10
jojojo
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,318
so it definitely depends on what it links to?
__________________
Learn SEO - make $$ residually - icq me 333485092
jojojo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2005, 05:07 PM   #11
After Shock Media
It's coming look busy
 
After Shock Media's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn".
Posts: 35,299
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojojo
so it definitely depends on what it links to?
That is a very legal question.
Personally I think no it does not matter unless your linking to something on the same domain or same owners.

That would almost be the equivilant of amazon having 2257 on a softcore box cover picture that when you buy contains hardcore material.
__________________

[email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]
After Shock Media is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks
Thread Tools



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.